iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

1.4 Million Have Been Out Of Work For 99 Weeks Or Longer: Congressional Research Service

Unmeployment

First Posted: 01/24/11 03:43 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

There are 1.4 million "very long-term unemployed" who have been out of work for 99 weeks or longer, according to a new report from the Congressional Research Service.

Ninety-nine weeks is a milestone for the jobless because that's the limit for unemployment benefits (though 99 weeks are not available in all states). Beyond that point, the jobless aren't eligible for much help besides food stamps and charity. The job market for anyone out of work that long is downright hostile.

The 1.4-million figure, calculated using the latest data available as of October, is much smaller than some home-cooked estimates circulated online by advocates for additional weeks of benefits for these "99ers." Some of those estimates are as high as 7 million.

A spokesman for Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) told HuffPost on Monday that the Lee intends to reintroduce legislation to provide additional weeks of benefits, but more help for the jobless seems unlikely to pass a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

The long-term unemployed, as opposed to very long-term unemployed, are people who've been out of work for six months. As of December, 6.4 million people, or 44.3 percent of the 14.5 million total jobless, have been out of work for six months or longer.

The CRS report shows that very long-term unemployment is more likely to afflict older workers than younger ones. Of jobless workers older than 45, 10.7 percent have been unemployed for 99 weeks, compared to 6 percent of workers younger than 35. And 44.4 percent of the very long-term unemployed are older than 45.

Once long-term unemployment sets in, even a college degree is often of little help. Even though the national jobless rate for college graduates is just 4.8 percent, CRS says "unemployed workers at all educational levels were equally likely to have been looking for work for more than 99 weeks."

The report warns that the ranks of the very long-term unemployed could grow.

"Many workers who were laid off during the recession and are still unemployed have not, as of October 2010, been unemployed for more than 99 weeks," the report says. "If a large number of these workers remain unemployed, the number of very long-term unemployed could increase. Finally, during an economic recovery workers who have been unemployed the longest are often the last to be hired."

As HuffPost has reported, job ads on Craigslist and other sites routinely insist that applicants must be currently employed, and older job applicants say age discrimination is rampant.

Click HERE to download a PDF of the report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
There are 1.4 million "very long-term unemployed" who have been out of work for 99 weeks or longer, according to a new report from the Congressional Research Service. Ninety-nine weeks is a mileston...
There are 1.4 million "very long-term unemployed" who have been out of work for 99 weeks or longer, according to a new report from the Congressional Research Service. Ninety-nine weeks is a mileston...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 878
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelGuy
Swiis Canton, Dutch Republic, advocate
09:55 PM on 02/07/2011
Liberal Democrats insist upon too much taxation, rules and regulations upon American businesses. Restrictions, regulations and taxation imposes a burden upon manufacturesers and producers. If these become too cumbersome, it is in the necessary for self-survival that a business will emigrate to a country in wich the busines climate is more friendly to productive producers of goods and services. Companies and their employees mustoffer quality goods and services at competitive prices to insure profits for themselves, their owners and shareholders.
The second deleterious and detrimental group that is causing the destruction of our industry andeconomy are the free trade conservative Republicans. . When wages, taxes and services are less costly and a foreign business is not fettered and restricted by such agencies as the EPA, then it folows that the product or service marketed will be significantly lower in cost than an equivalent American product. Our Republicans lie when they feed us the propaganda American workers can compete against any other group of workers, when they know ful well the disparity of wages and conditions. Competion is only valid when the rules and conditions are similar for all competitors. .
Our Founding fathers fostered centuries of prosperity for this situation by adopting wise, Hamltonian tariffs to foster and protect American workers. Foreign investors and manufacturers found it more profitable to move their factories to America in order to sell to the American citizens than to pay the tariffs imosed upon imported goods.
04:40 PM on 02/01/2011
I'm not sure how they came up with this calculation; however, part-timers (less than two to three hours per day if you are fortunate) cannot survive on these hours except it is better than nothing; although, I'm not sure if that is considered underemployed or is working two hours per day considered employed? Also, there are people who have been unemployed for much, much longer than two years so who knows if they were counted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsrl317
Persuade me or prove me wrong, and I will change
08:17 PM on 01/27/2011
Wow. Today I got my LAST unemployment check. As of tomorrow I'm a 99er. also got automated rejection notices from a couple of companies who wanted the same requirements outlined in my impressive 25 year resume.

I'm going to have a brew or two, and just let it soak in. Can't provide for my family. Gotta find any level of work now. Anything will do. Even restaurants aren't hiring.

Oh well. So, this is what it feels like. I can only imagine if I were not as strong as I am. But today is day one. strong today, a wimpering cry-baby in 24 hours as it goes dark. Terrible.

I hope all teh other 99ers find some work. I'm praying for us all! Never give up, never relent. Damn, this beer tastes very good. The last one I'll be able to afford for some time.

Let's see: Food stamps, and see if I can get public assistance. The house is about to be gone, maybe file for bankruptcy. Seeing a lawyer next week. at least I am assured, the state of our union is strong.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:38 PM on 01/25/2011
U.S. workers are going to learn the Iron Law of Wages first-hand...

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/11/24-2
Firms See Long-Sought Goal in Sight: Major Pay Cuts | CommonDreams.org

"...These firms are systematically implementing a major strategy to permanently drive down wages far below anything considered "middle class." The key tool for corporations: forcing acceptance of permanent two-tier wage structures and the insertion of nonunion casual workers into union plants to drive down union pay to levels unimaginable a couple years back. Big business is essentially trying to take back the hard-won gains of working people won over generations.

[snip]

Expect the downward wage spiral to continue under relentless pressure from corporations who see an endless surplus army of labor with 9.6% unemployment and benefits running out for two million in December.

For example, "Toyota 's goal has become $12.64 an hour, the median wage for comparable manufacturing in Kentucky, where it has its largest plant, or $10.79 in Alabama, where it is building a new plant," reports UC-Berkeley Prof. Harley Shaiken, a long-time scholar on labor issues and the auto industry..."

Iron Law of Wages:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/iron+law+of+wages
Iron law of wages | Define Iron law of wages at Dictionary.com

"the doctrine or theory that wages tend toward a level sufficient only to maintain a subsistence standard of living. "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VashS5
06:09 PM on 01/25/2011
Yet companies are increasing their payments and penalties. I guess when your lemon is out of juice you just have to keep squeezing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:01 PM on 01/25/2011
This is an article from the Economic Policy Institute dated August 26, 2010...

http://www.epi.org/economic_snapshots/entry/jobs_..._but_low_pay/
Jobs ... but low pay

"While a lack of jobs is arguably the biggest problem facing the labor market, another major concern is the quality of the jobs that are being created. The Figure presents the five fastest growing occupations between 2006 and 2009 and shows that all but one of them pays below the median wage in May 2009 of $15.95 an hour. The two fastest-growing occupations, home health care and food preparation and serving, pay closer to the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour than the median wage. A food preparation worker’s typical wage of $8.28 an hour would earn an annual salary of $16,560, based on a typical 2,000-hour work year: That salary is just below the 2009 poverty threshold for a family of three. Warehouse stock clerks, another fast-growing occupation, would earn slightly more than $20,000 per year..."

You'll have to cut and paste the link

Otherwise you'll get this article:

"Social Security replacing smaller portions of workers’ income"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KWiedemer
Denver Unemployment Examiner
04:01 PM on 01/25/2011
So, the December BLS report tells us that there are 11.5 million workers who are:

a) working part time, but would prefer to be working full time -- or,

b) discouraged from looking for work (because there are no jobs) or are temporarily 'out of the job market' because they are attending (temporary, short term?) training/school or for other reasons such as family.

Based on this data, here's the question: How many of these 8.9 million part-time workers were working full time when they were laid off at some point in 2007 or 2008 -- but have not had a full-time job for more than 52, 78 and 99 weeks -- but want a full-time job? I'm willing to bet that nobody knows the answer to that question, but if the data were available, and these workers were included in the number of people out of (full-time) work for more than 99 weeks, I'm quite certain the number would increase sharply. In other words, there are millions of people who, for periods longer than 52, 78 or 99 weeks, have been unable to find a full-time, permanent job -- or gave up looking entirely.

Denver Unemloyment Examiner

http://www.examiner.com/unemployment-in-denver/congressional-report-provides-insight-into-the-long-term-unemployed-99ers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snarkyone
03:55 PM on 01/25/2011
We to get a million angry and unemployed men in the streets of Pennyslvania Ave protesting. Stop being victims of corporate greed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snarkyone
03:55 PM on 01/25/2011
Typo: Insert "need" after We.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JanPoore
05:02 PM on 01/25/2011
WHat about unemployed women?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snarkyone
05:10 PM on 01/25/2011
Of course, the women should be there as well.
02:55 PM on 01/25/2011
1.4 million. That would make a pretty good army.
photo
democrats for life
republicans need not apply
05:49 PM on 01/25/2011
don't buy that 1.4 million for a second, numbers are closer to 4 million
11:50 PM on 01/25/2011
Good.
02:54 PM on 01/25/2011
I heard Obama is reducing the child tax credit to $500 next year, thats BULL
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JanPoore
05:04 PM on 01/25/2011
Befiore saying "I heard Obama is........." why don't you do some research? This is how rumors of him not being born here got started.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
07:52 PM on 01/25/2011
I never understood why people who chose to have kids need to have an extra entitlement?
09:29 AM on 02/02/2011
I've never understood why corporations who choose to be a business feel entitled to tax favors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurn
All dogs go to heaven
02:31 PM on 01/25/2011
Since the Republicans forced the issue on the $25.00 a week stimulus and did away with it,they also eliminated the $2400.00 exemption that was part of it.So,in effect,my taxes went up.So to them,it's wonderful for the rich to have millions cut from their taxes,but for people on UI,let's have them pay more.So,thanks repubs!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:08 PM on 01/25/2011
.ok,this is for the lower 99% of americans.do you know of anybody,or are you out of work?everybody,ok.has your home drastically dropped in value over the last 5 years?everybody,ok.did the government bail you out before the big banks,who made risky loans they would not have made 30 yrs ago,?no?ok...hmmm.does anybody believe that the government that the government and the media are owned by corporations?everybody,ok.does anyone believe that this 2 party system works for them?nobody,ok.did anyone get the CHANGE they were looking for in obama?nobody,ok.so,what to do now?there is over 2 million of us and a few thousand of them,how can they own us like this?WE NEED CHANGE...any ideas?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
03:23 PM on 01/25/2011
That is an excellent rap. Spruce it up a little and it could be a document like the Declaration of Independence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:30 PM on 01/25/2011
Thanks spin,i need a few posts under my belt as this is day 1 for me at huffington post.I'll work on it.
04:15 PM on 01/25/2011
How about putting spaces in your post so I can understand it for starters....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:32 PM on 01/25/2011
sorry longnamewithnospacesinitaskingfivequestions. This is my first day here.I am working on it.Don't i get a few posts as a learning curve?geeeez
photo
democrats for life
republicans need not apply
01:24 PM on 01/25/2011
it's time to take this country back, vote out the party of no in 2012, every single one of them, they are trying to pull our country down the 3rd world
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:14 PM on 01/25/2011
dem,we need more then 2 parties.obama's reading ronny reagans book,that can't be good.he's hire corporate leaders,you know the ones that sent away so many americans job,to see what they can do to get this economy goin again.how ya think that's going to work for us?we have to change this government,IT DOESN'T WORK FOR US!!!,it works for big business!!!people need to wake up!! 2 party systems gotta go!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
06:36 PM on 01/30/2011
May I translate the above into legible prose:

Democrats, we need more than two parties. Ob­ama's reading Ronny Reagan's book; that can't be good. He's hiring corporate leaders - yo­u know, the ones that sent away so many American jobs, to see what they can do to get this economy going again. How do you think that's going to work for us? We have to change this government­ - IT DOESN'T WORK FOR US!!!, it works for big business!!­! People need to wake up!! The two party system's got to go!!!

Why use cellphone abbreviations on the Huffington Post? Don't be lazy - use proper English.
01:17 PM on 01/25/2011
thanks OBAMA - that laser like focus sure did work!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
03:24 PM on 01/25/2011
Boehner and McConnell has a laser-like focus on taking your money, if you prefer them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheMilesHome
In the Conservatory, with a Pipe Wrench.
04:39 PM on 01/25/2011
So you really don't think the GOP was involved in any of the heartaches huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamenta
There are other human values besides greed
01:14 PM on 01/25/2011
This is the little dirty secret that our politicians in Washington and Obama won't really talk about.