More

Unemployment Rate To Remain Above 9 Percent Through 2011, Will Remain Above 'Natural Rate' Until 2016: CBO

First Posted: 01/26/11 05:29 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Cbo Unemployment

The jobs crisis isn't going anywhere, according to the latest forecast from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which puts the national unemployment rate above 9 percent through 2011 and 8 percent through 2012.

Unemployment will fall to a more "natural rate" only in 2016, when CBO estimates it will reach 5.3 percent -- a projection roughly in line with private-sector figures.

"The recovery in employment has been slowed not only by the moderate growth in output in the past year and a half but also by structural changes in the labor market, such as a mismatch between the requirements of available jobs and the skills of job seekers, that have hindered the reemployment of workers who have lost their job," CBO's report says.

The degree to which the unemployment crisis is structural, as opposed to cyclical, is hotly debated by economists, with progressives like Paul Krugman arguing that structural unemployment is a fake problem "which mainly serves as an excuse for not pursuing real solutions." Many argue that the even drop in employment across industries shows that lack of overall demand is the problem, with stimulus spending the answer. Others have said pay disparities between workers with different levels of education show the problem is at least partly structural.

James Galbraith, an economist who teaches at the University of Texas, says CBO's structural unemployment claim is an after-the-fact rationalization for previous failed forecasts. (CBO's 2009 forecast predicted 8 percent unemployment in 2011 and 6.8 percent unemployment in 2012. Galbraith's been beating up on CBO since before then.)

"There never was any reason to believe that employment would bounce back, as CBO had previously forecast, in the wake of the financial meltdown, and no reason now to think that the problem lies with deficient skills for any class of workers," Galbraith told HuffPost. "[The CBO forecast] is a purely mechanical exercise idea based on the fact that in the past we've always rebounded to a natural unemployment rate of 5 percent. What that means is you never take into account that the system broke in any serious way."

The most unusual factor of the jobs crisis is how long some people are going without work. Long-term unemployment has surged since the unprecedented mortgage meltdown that clobbered housing prices and launched the Great Recession in December 2007. Some 6.4 million people -- 44.3 percent of the 14.5 million unemployed -- have been out of work for six months or longer, and 1.4 million have been out of work for two years or longer. This is the worst long-term unemployment situation in the United States since the Great Depression.

CBO's report says the long-term unemployed lose familiarity with developing technologies as their job-finding social networks deteriorate, but it hints at another reason those folks can't find jobs: Employers don't want them because nobody else does. The Congressional Research Service says the 1.4 million "very long-term unemployed" hail from all educational backgrounds.

"Workers who are unemployed for long periods may face even greater obstacles in finding a new job," the CBO report says. "Some employers may assume that long-term unemployment is a signal that a worker is not good at his or her job."

Indeed. Just check out this Craigslist ad for a restaurant manager in Salisbury, Md.: "Must be currently employed or recently unemployed."

As HuffPost has reported, this is a common requirement for many jobs, even if it sometimes goes unstated.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The jobs crisis isn't going anywhere, according to the latest forecast from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which puts the national unemployment rate above 9 percent through 2011 and 8 pe...
The jobs crisis isn't going anywhere, according to the latest forecast from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which puts the national unemployment rate above 9 percent through 2011 and 8 pe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,449
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
  1 of 11  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
JShankel 06:36 PM on 01/26/2011
2016?  That's being optimistic.

Ahem.  The jobs are not coming back.  Ever.  We spent the last 30 years moving our economy from 20% paperwork (finance and real estate) to 40%. 

Thing is, the market has figured out that we don't need 40% of the human population doing paperwork.  10% is just fine.  Machines are good at it.

So, the problem we face is that  Read More...
01:02 PM on 02/01/2011
James Galbraith predicted this economic cesspool at least 5 yrs. ago.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
04:14 PM on 01/31/2011
I sincerely hope 2011 isn't a 'lost year.'
12:23 PM on 01/29/2011
People should be aware that the new
Zeitgeist Moving Forward
video is on Youtube right now!!
peace
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Muzzle Me
Blogging: Graffiti with punctuation.
04:59 AM on 01/29/2011
Ok, I have a question for anyone that can help and would appreciate any input. Started work on Dec 20 (hurrah!), however here is my situation. When hired, I was told it was on a 26 week pay schedule for any given year. I was to get paid on January 28, but I won't get my check, physically in hand until February 4 and the check will be dated same even though the payroll period states on my check stub, January 17 through January 21. In essence, I will be receiving only one check per month. How will this effect my taxes if at all for 2011? Also, is this legal for my employer to do? Is the defining criteria that my employer has been consistent in issuing payroll this way? I live in Michigan. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkkFL
microbio refusé, je vous refusez
12:46 PM on 01/29/2011
Keep track of the hours you work and compare to hours paid. Are they using this structure to avoid paying overtime.
It's probably legal, seems like employers can do anything anymore!
You can contact your EEOC field office, without identifying yourself- they will be able to answer your questions.
But.. if your employer is engaged in deceptive practices you then face a difficult decision.
You may have to file a formal complaint which will cost you your job- no matter what the law says. And here in FL,(can't speak for other states) you will have a very difficult finding another job because of the complaint. (that little fact will suddenly turn up in your employment records..)
Check the EEOC website for references, but you will probably need to call.
Good luck!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
04:38 PM on 01/31/2011
Terrific news you found work. A yearly pay period of 26 paydays is actually pretty common. The first check will be the longest wait, after that you'll be paid (about) every two weeks. You just won't see that first two weeks-technically-until you leave the job; at that time they'll pay you current. It's all legal and stndard practice-at least in TX where I live. Few employers pay weekly. I know it seems kind of a rip that they're always two weeks behind, but they can do that. So, welcome back to the work world!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Muzzle Me
Blogging: Graffiti with punctuation.
06:09 PM on 01/31/2011
Thanx so much. I realize that the first two weeks are held back, but I may not have explained myself well the first time. Here is the gist:

Period: bi-weekly.
Beginning: 1/03
Ending: 1/14

Check date: 1/21 and when it is received. My boss processes payroll on the following Monday. In this case, on 1/17. Also, it's a work force all of three folks, me, co-worker and my boss. Also, my boss doesn't even process the three payrolll checks, but sends them out. In essence, I receive a check not bi-weekly but tri-weekly, if there is such a thing or once a month, technically.

I have since researched the law in Michigan and this is what I found out.

Michigan requires that the lag time between the end of the pay period and the payment of wages earned from 1 st-15th, pay by 1st of next month; 16th end of month, pay by 15 th of next month; 14 days after pay period for weekly or biweekly paydays to the employee. So, legally, my boss has up to 14 days after the pay period to issue me a check. The way the job market is, I wouldn't be surprised if more employers start doing this. I've worked for over 30 years and never have I waited 5 days plus after the payroll period.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
07:43 PM on 01/28/2011
This headline outlines the neoliberal, neocon agenda cooked up at Davos. Never mind riots in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen. As long as we the people in the U.S., France, Germany remain comatose, they're in charge.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
07:20 PM on 01/28/2011
Norman Goldman is reporting that Obama is reinstituting the NAFTA program allowing Mexican truckers to drive throughout the United States. Texas Republican Senator Cornyn is supporting the program. Mexico has no drug testing of drivers, no centralized record of drivers licenses or safety records.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkkFL
microbio refusé, je vous refusez
12:49 PM on 01/29/2011
yeah- but they work cheap!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
07:07 PM on 01/28/2011
The unemployment rate will be 5.3% in 2016? Why? Because so many of us unemployed will be dead by then?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Andrews
How To Absolutely Secure Your Computer
10:25 AM on 02/01/2011
@ritamary very true. Its called Depopulation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
11:01 AM on 01/28/2011
How long until we have a Cairo or Tunis event?
11:27 AM on 01/28/2011
Depends on when the cuts in SS, Medicare, and other social services start.
People are a lot less complacent when they are hungry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Andrews
How To Absolutely Secure Your Computer
10:27 AM on 02/01/2011
@spinotter11 very soon I am afraid as soon as all the FEMA camps are finished
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
02:05 AM on 01/28/2011
Forever is the word, unless our leaders understand that our form of capitalism is broken.
photo
joeisright
Semper Fi
10:12 AM on 01/28/2011
And you think the government is going to fix it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jude Brown
03:30 PM on 02/09/2011
Apparently, we can't expect you to fix anything, so yeah.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
10:20 PM on 01/27/2011
redrover6543   12 hours ago (9:34 AM)
15 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
So....... again I ask.

Are you suggesting that 50% of the people in this country can't pay anything at all?
Favorite (0) Flag as Abusive
------------------------------

You seem awfully upset about the bottom half of the country's working people not paying into income taxes.That figure (a Heritage foundation talking point for several years) distorts a large number of variables.

And while conservatives are up in arms to tax busboys and retail clerks, many corporations escape paying federal taxes altogether. GE hasn't paid any income taxes in years. Ford's tax rate was 2.3%. this is all according to those crazy Socialist writers over at Forbes.

I know people who aren't paying any net income taxes. many of them have jobs that don't pay very much, offer no benefits, and barely cover the rent. None of those things apply to Ford or GE or Citigroup.

http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/01/ge-exxon-walmart-business-washington-corporate-taxes.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
07:10 PM on 01/28/2011
Exxon has not paid any taxes and actually got tax credits in addition to record profits. Anyone surprised here?
photo
democrats for life
republicans need not apply
01:14 PM on 01/27/2011
since the corporations want their manufacturing jobs overseas, with cheap labor for higher profits, the goverments should put a special tax on them to pay for unemployment. the 99ers need help now, get it done
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
01:42 PM on 01/27/2011
Yes, you're talking about a "wage recapture" tax. And it's not a socialist idea either. Martin Ford talks about it in "The Lights in the Tunnel." It's a good read.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:50 AM on 01/27/2011
Stagflation?
photo
earto44
Defender of planet Erf.
10:58 AM on 01/27/2011
It's time to reduce military spending and start a MAJOR war on job creation.
If I were king, I would start the new Workers Program. WPA 2011 Style. Give decent paying jobs to the worst hit areas. Look at it in this way. What if you paid a person $650 a week for a WPA job. That person , in theory is collecting $450 a week with an unemployment check. So, this is really only costing $200 more. You add a job, and remove someone from unemployment. We could clean up, paint, build, make things safer, create new cars, the jobs that could be started right now, today could be in the millions. This worked back in the 30's when we were in the same situation, and it could work today.

The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was a relief measure established in 1935 by executive order as the Works Progress Administration, and was redesigned in 1939 when it was transferred to the Federal Works Agency. Headed by Harry L. Hopkins and supplied with an initial congressional appropriation of $4,880,000,000, it offered work to the unemployed on an unprecedented scale by spending money on a wide variety of programs, including highways and building construction, slum clearance, reforestation, and rural rehabilitation.
photo
Hank Rearden
Get out of the cart and help pull
12:46 PM on 01/27/2011
Today people would rather stay on the dole rather than work for 33% more.

You should read B. Virdot and his Secret Gifts. It is an amazing compilation of letters written in the Depression to a newspaper ad that promised small gifts of charity to Depression-Era Ohioans.

The letters were full of stories of people REFUSING gov assistance, and promising to repay the charity. People refusing the charity and just wanting to work. The moral differences of the times is absolutely striking.

Please don't quick response me by saying "people are willing to work" I understand that. People desire very much to have their good paying job back. Just don't blow smoke about people today willing to jump on a broom for wee bit more than they can collect from un-employment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
01:46 PM on 01/27/2011
Resist falling into that easy trap. In fact, there has been no big moral change among humans in thousands of years. Yet for thousands of years, people have talked about what a better quality of people there used to be. It's just a perception. If it were true, we were either saints a thousand years ago, or we're true monsters today.
02:42 PM on 01/27/2011
So much of what the WPA projects still exist to this day. Some poster repeat the incorrect meme that "no nation ever spent themselves into prosperity." The don't realize that the U.S. did in the 30's and 40's. During WWII when manufacturers were mobilized for the war effort, those newly employed bought products and services and paid taxes. Revenues increased and the post WWII period was a time of growth. Taxes were high on those at the top, unions were strong and banks were regulated and businesses thrived.
photo
Hank Rearden
Get out of the cart and help pull
11:36 AM on 01/28/2011
What happened after WWII was other than the US the world's industrial base was decimated and we successfully used our leverage to further our economy. Our leverage has long since been deleveraged.
10:50 AM on 01/27/2011
This has been coming a long time, in my home town the mills have been modernizing, everytime they automate a line, they lay off 12-14 people. Up to 2008-09, this wasn't a problem since most of the people laid off found work in the residential housing sector, my neighbor laid off from the mill, went to work for a fencing contractor. Now the fencing contractor is out of business. We have industries that are screaming for labor, agricultural for the most part so much so that we are bringing in illegal immigrants. We need to do 3 things, make health care a right, stabilize retirement, change peoples attitudes about work so native born americans will take these jobs they aren't going to pay well but they are better than nothing and with the current technological revolution we all might become redundant
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samtee
Shankapotomus.
10:54 AM on 01/27/2011
People don't see how modernization is killing jobs.
But we will have to repeal Obamacare.

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=221537
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
01:20 PM on 01/27/2011
So says Limbaugh or the folks at FOX & CNBC, huh? When are blockheads going to learn that they get nothing but lies from the folks on these media sources? Would you, along with republicans rather be turned down again because of pre-existing conditions? The right answer is to improve on the bill we have, but of course that is not what you're hearing from certain sources. Maybe you will contact you sources and tell them the answer is taking away the Politician's free medical care that they get from Doctors inhouse. We pay for their health care, yet they want to keep it away from others?
02:09 PM on 01/27/2011
"Obamacare won't be repealed. The insurance companies got what they wanted 30 million new customers and NO competition from a "public option" thanks to the clueless protests from the teabaggers. 30 million new customers and NO competition, with a sweet deal like that why would they want it repealed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
11:17 AM on 01/27/2011
What you say about long-term residents of your area not being willing to take agricultural jobs certainly reinforces the meme whereby we need illegal immigrants because we AMERICANS are too good to soil our lily-white hands with backbreaking labor. And it's true. We are a nation of lazy clods, by and large. Automation and machines have spoiled us - and if there is a post peak oil world, there will be plenty of fresh calluses. It's like the UAE or Saudi Arabia where a whole underclass was imported and maltreated to do our dirty work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
11:42 AM on 01/27/2011
Americans need living wage jobs -- not slave-wage jobs. That's the problem.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
01:25 PM on 01/27/2011
So you're calling the unemployed lazy? Where have we heard that before? Oh, yes. We must have heard smaterings of Republican water cooler talk. Do you think it is ambition when Republicans do nothing but block recovery, so not doing their jobs? Dumbing Down of America. That is what we're seeing among ditto heads who listen to only "Hate Jocks" and think they're getting news.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
10:25 AM on 01/27/2011
I believe the CBO analysis of extended unemployment is probably correct, but I can't for the life of me figure out what is ever going to bring it down to a less painful level, since conservatives refuse to let us fund infrastructure improvements. I hope everybody realizes that the only reason this didn't happen earlier was because of the deliberately whipped up housing mania. It was a nasty way to do it, considering that it caused the economy to implode. Any other bright ideas?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
10:41 AM on 01/27/2011
Grants for small business owners across all sectors who would like to expand and hire. The majority of hiring still originates in this segment. If larger business interests do not want to contribute to a solution, we should focus on those that deserve our support more.

Infrastructure improvements, while needed, would not impact a wide enough segment quickly enough and would feel more wasteful to taxpayers. When small business thrives, it's a powerful statement of overall health of a nation. Small business has been ignored for far too long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OhioIsHome
11:29 AM on 01/27/2011
Have you driven lately on our crumbling infrastructure? I just had to replace a windshield thanks to a piece of the loose "crumbling" flying up and slamming down on my windshield!

Infrastructure "investment" not only creates jobs, but also enables folks to travel on our roads and highways. Then they need to purchase gas and eat. Which in turn allows more people to remain employed.
And yes, the local glass "small business" company got the business, but I'd much rather have safe roads. Some roads are extremely dangerous. And where I live, the bridges haven't even been INSPECTED in 10 years!
05:32 PM on 01/27/2011
i had the same view as yours until i saw a small business owner being interviewed who said that the government giving him money won't result in hiring if people are not buying his product. the market is consumer driven.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samtee
Shankapotomus.
10:48 AM on 01/27/2011
Fund it with what Obama has us broke.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
01:29 PM on 01/27/2011
What is that you just said? say it in English, but not with Limbaugh language, and maybe it might make sense. Won't count on it though if you think Limbaugh & Beck know the difference between real news and tall tales.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
09:52 AM on 01/28/2011
The wars made us 'broke', Bush's poor business policies made us 'broke'. We seem to have enough to fund endless, pointless war though, right?