More

Hillary Clinton: Egypt Should Allow Protests

Hillary Clinton Egypt

First Posted: 01/26/11 03:27 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

(Reuters) - The United States bluntly urged Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on Wednesday to make political reforms in the face of protesters demanding his ouster, marking a pivot in its stance toward a key Arab ally.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivered the message at a news conference with the foreign minister of Jordan, another Arab country that watched the ouster of Tunisia's president in a popular revolt two weeks ago.

Police in Cairo fought with thousands of Egyptians who defied a government ban on Wednesday to protest against Mubarak's 30-year-old rule, firing tear gas at the crowds and dragging away demonstrators.

The revolt in Tunisia has prompted questions about the stability of other Arab governments and initially dragged down equity, bond and foreign exchange prices in parts of the region, notably Egypt.

Tunisia's veteran strongman Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali was swept from power on January 14 after weeks of protests.

Clinton minced no words, suggesting Egypt's government had to act now if it wanted to avert a similar outcome and urging it not to crack down on peaceful protests or disrupt the social networking sites that help organize and accelerate them.

"We believe strongly that the Egyptian government has an important opportunity at this moment in time to implement political, economic and social reforms to respond to the legitimate needs and interests of the Egyptian people," Clinton said in a statement with Jordan's Nasser Judeh at her side.

"We urge the Egyptian authorities not to prevent peaceful protests or block communications including on social media sites," Clinton told reporters in the most blunt comments to date by the United States urging Mubarak to undertake reforms.

GENUINE CHANGE

Robert Danin of the Council on Foreign Relations think tank said Clinton's remarks for the first time appeared to make clear what the United States wants to see in Egypt: genuine change that originates from the government rather than a dramatic overthrow as occurred in Tunisia.

As the first Arab state to make peace with Israel, Egypt has much greater strategic importance to the United States than Tunisia. Egypt has long received major U.S. aid and supported Washington's efforts to promote a wider Arab-Israeli peace.

"This is not a walking away from the alliance with Egypt in any way but, at the same time, putting the Egyptian government on notice that changes are going to have to come pretty quickly," Danin said.

"It is trying to lay out a way there can be managed change if the regime is responsive to the people," he said. "It (the Obama administration) doesn't want to see the means adopted in Tunisia -- which would necessitate the leadership to flee."

The White House took a similar stance, making clear that it was monitoring events closely and that it fully supported the Egyptian people's right to peacefully protest.

"We are supportive of the universal rights of assembly (and) speech. ... We would stress quite clearly for all involved that expressions should be free from violence," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters aboard Air Force One.

"This is an important time for the government to demonstrate its responsibilities to the people of Egypt in recognizing those universal rights," Gibbs said.

(Additional reporting by Ross Colvin and Andrew Quinn; Editing by Will Dunham)

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

(Reuters) - The United States bluntly urged Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on Wednesday to make political reforms in the face of protesters demanding his ouster, marking a pivot in its stance towar...
(Reuters) - The United States bluntly urged Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on Wednesday to make political reforms in the face of protesters demanding his ouster, marking a pivot in its stance towar...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:03 AM on 01/29/2011
I blame the Arab Golf countries for not opening their borders to their Arab brothers and sisters to work instead of importing people from Pakistan , Bangladesh, America, Europe, Australia, etc…The Arab gulf sheiks prefer to pour millions of dollars into gambling, hotels and palaces abroad, to show the world how wealthy they are.
They should rather invest in Arabia which is roughly the size of the United States of America and has the desert, the forests, the fertile lands, and the oil deposits. Essentially, Arabia is rich country but has been divided up into artificial countries. The only economic solution to this problem, especially for the younger generation, is that Arabia becomes a unified entity, with states similar to the US or Western Europe. It’s time for change, and this is the time for Arabia to make peace with Israel, creating a Palestinian state by exchanging the1967 land for peace. Otherwise the nuclear option will prevail, which will bring untold death and destruction.
03:07 PM on 01/28/2011
The title on the main page reads, "Hillary Clinton" Egypt Ssould Not Block 'Social Media Sites'." Someone might want to correct that...
10:40 PM on 01/26/2011
Hilary is always late for supper, in one hand she cries for freedom while in her hands provides the weapons of repression. The USA has been supporting totalitarian regimes for almost 100 years. Let us see,

Nicaragua, el Salvador, Argentina, Chile, Panama, Bolivia, Paraguay, Guatemala, Honduras, South Frica, Somalia, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, the PA authority, the Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, Pakistan, Liberia, Haiti, Iran (during the Sha regime), Tunisia, and many more......

America does not know how tp compete, it corrupts and then grabs.
10:10 PM on 01/26/2011
How about telling this dictator Mubarak who has been president for 30 years that we will stop giving money and food to Egypt if he does not step down.
photo
Vlady
Better Late
11:51 PM on 01/26/2011
How about to make sure that after Mubarak 'Ahmadinejad' of Egypt will not grab the power?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctoress
08:04 AM on 01/27/2011
Oh, so the people there must select a leader that U.S. agrees with regardless of the votes of the citizens there? ahamdinejad is the best thing that happened to Iran. Live with it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
08:19 AM on 01/27/2011
'Ahmadinej ad' did not "grab the power". Iran is ruled by the clerics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Boehringer
Dona nobis pacem
10:06 PM on 01/26/2011
Other Arab leaders aren't sleeping well tonight. They're all afraid the fire will spread. I bet they've stepped up security and checked on their Swiss bank account balances just in case. Yes, they're coming for you, freedom is the inevitable direction of history. They're worried in Syria, Iran, Saudia Arabia and Kuwait, (which will also spike oil prices).
photo
Vlady
Better Late
11:55 PM on 01/26/2011
Right. Unfortunately, Iran's type of revolt will multiply in the ME
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hulagirrrl
01:59 AM on 01/27/2011
Yes, but hopefully the banks will be careful releasing the money, not like they did in Tunisia.
09:47 PM on 01/26/2011
Clinton is so utterly hypcritical on this - for 30 years US aid to Egypt has consisted of tons of goodies for Mubarak et al, plus billions of dollars, each and every year, for military equipment that has no use other than crushing internal revolt. It could not defend their country from a bus full of tourists.
09:49 PM on 01/26/2011
Your argument makes no sense.

Change for the better, at long last = hypocrisy?
09:53 PM on 01/26/2011
Let me make it plain. Clinton and the US are absolutely dead set AGAINST these demonstrations. She is lying as to the true US position.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tobias Riepe
02:49 PM on 01/27/2011
... says the woman who told the PA leaders that she expects to see the same faces around in the future, democracy be damned.
10:42 PM on 01/26/2011
Good point, money is used to buy governments.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miriamfl
09:39 PM on 01/26/2011
You know, we have already tipped the apple cart in the Middle East with our selfrighteous all knowing attitudes. Why can't we just stay out of it and not comment!!!!!! The social networks are not always good and not always used for good intentions. Who's to say that this wasn't started by some fringe group trying to topple this leadership for a worse one. Let's stay out of it for goodness sakes!!!!!! And yes Hillary sometimes shutting down the source of communication has to happen.
What if some fringe group here in the Great Old USA tries to exite the country with lies. What if some crazy tries to stir up a revolution through the so called SOCIAL NETWORK in this country????? Wouldn't you Hillary shut it down??? Heck yea!!!!!
09:45 PM on 01/26/2011
Calls for the US administration to be quiet while people fight for a greater democracy?

Would that you urged the US to live up to its own rhetoric instead of vociferously calling for a "no comment" attitude....
09:29 PM on 01/26/2011
Re: "We are supportive of the universal rights of assembly (and) speech. ... " -- this from the WH.

I urge all to reaquaint themselves with the "free speech zone" constructed for the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston where then Senator-elect Barack Obama was to give the keynote speech...

http://reference.findtarget.com/search/Free%20speech%20zone/

If regular American citizens took to the streets of DC a la Tunisia & Egypt, they would be locked up by the Department of Homeland "Security".
09:28 PM on 01/26/2011
Where are the war crazies who wanted to support the protests in iran but not the protests in Egypt ?
Iran atleast have more frequent regime changes.
09:52 PM on 01/26/2011
They were supported by the US neo-con, Israel right-or-wrong echo chamber.

That policy/media hydra is very nervous about what is happening on "the Arab street."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CrazyThisIs
An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind
09:57 PM on 01/26/2011
Great assessment. No joke, the reporters on this, via cable news, are silent on this story all together.
photo
Vlady
Better Late
09:56 PM on 01/26/2011
Not all ' regime changes' are equal. The change that is coming in Egypt will be the second Iran
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragucci
Caustic1
09:20 PM on 01/26/2011
Maybe the people are better off without him,if he's a dictator then bounce his assand we slide in and help develope a government the people want and have needed for a long time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RogerHWerner
09:13 PM on 01/26/2011
Clinton's remarks sound like posturing: In the event that Mubarak falls, the US doesn't want to deal with repeat of the 1979 Iranian situation. If we examine US policy towards Palestine, the US supported free elections but when those elections brought a radical Islamic government to power, one that opposed US Middle Eastern policies, the US rejected that government. What Clinton, and by extension the administration, hasn't addressed is how the US would deal with an Egyptian government led by radical Islamists. Egypt, unlike Palestine, would be impossible to isolate. Further, in that Egypt shares a long border with Israel and actively works to subvert Hamas' military activities, the rise of an radical Islamic government in Egypt could prove explosive. I realize that Clinton's demands to Mubarak are aimed at avoiding what could amount to catastrophe but I have to wonder if American objections are too little and too late. I hope not.
09:48 PM on 01/26/2011
Why the jump from protests to change to government controlled by radical Islamists?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Janssen
do not go quietly into that good night.
09:11 PM on 01/26/2011
Too little, too late Hillary. Mubarak is a repressive dictator. He better start packing his bags.Tunisia has opened up a can of worms and where it stops.................who knows!
07:44 PM on 01/26/2011
The dictator is safe in Egypt. You can tell that by the very small number of protesters¬. Consider for example that Um-kalthoum funeral was attended by 8 millions of Egyptians while protesting the dictator of Egypt was attended by the few (in the order of tens of thousands). Invite Egyptians for a dance and more than the number of protesters will show up. Unfortunat¬ely the number of brave people in Egypt is small.
You have more people tweeting and twating than protesting¬. What is the current population in Egypt and what is the percentage that showed up?
I'm not only criticizin¬g Egypt alone. The same apply to Jordan, Syria etc. People are cowed and dictators are brutal.
My fear is for the brave few who risked so much for their country.
The cold fact though is that the dictator is safe for now
07:43 PM on 01/26/2011
The dictator is safe in Egypt. You can tell that by the very small number of protesters¬. Consider for example that Um-kalthoum funeral was attended by 8 millions of Egyptians while protesting the dictator of Egypt was attended by the few (in the order of tens of thousands). Invite Egyptians for a dance and more than the number of protesters will show up. Unfortunat¬ely the number of brave people in Egypt is small.
You have more people tweeting and twating than protesting¬. What the current population in Egypt and what the percentage that showed up?
I'm not only criticizing Egypt alone. The same apply to Jordan, Syria etc. People are cowed and dictators are brutal.
My fear is for the brave few who risked so much for their country.
The cold fact though is that the dictator is safe for now and Ms Clinton has to deal with this cold fact.
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
06:51 PM on 01/26/2011
You missed the boat Ms. Clinton. Should Mubarak really allow protests he would be toast. He will join the late Shah of Iran and you may not like the alternative to his rule in Egypt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RRK70
08:36 PM on 01/26/2011
more "blowback" from a tepid and amoral foreign policy.  "democracy" breaking out in the Middle East would probably destroy American interests there as we seem to so often side with dictators and royal families rather than secular and democratic leaders.