More

Reid, McConnell Reach Rules Reform Agreement

First Posted: 01/27/11 01:25 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Reid Mcconnell

WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have reached an agreement on a set of relatively small changes to the upper chamber's rules, including an informal pact to reduce the number of filibusters in exchange for allowing more amendments from the minority party.

Three aspects of the deal would be considered as standing orders and would thus require only 60 votes for passage, rather than the 67 generally needed for Senate rules changes. A Democratic Senate aide said that as part of the deal, both parties whipped members to make sure they had enough votes. The final agreement includes the final provisions, according to a document obtained by The Huffington Post:

· Eliminating secret holds, including the right of senators to pass their secret holds to another anonymous senator to keep a rolling secret hold.

· Eliminating senators' rights to force the reading of an amendment that has already been submitted for 72 hours and is publicly available.

· Legislation to exempt about 1/3 of all nominations from the Senate confirmation process, reducing the number of executive nominations subject to Senate delays, which will be scheduled at a future date under the terms of an agreement reached by Sens. Mitch McConnell and Lamar Alexander, Homeland Security and Government Affairs Chairman Joe Lieberman and HSGA ranking member Sen. Susan Collins, along with Sens. Reid and Chuck Schumer.

In addition, Reid and McConnell have entered a colloquy into the record establishing that Republicans would make an effort to filibuster less in exchange for Democrats reducing the use of the "filling the tree" parliamentary procedure to block them from offering amendments.

"It is a handshake agreement," the Democratic aide said. "At the end of the day, I anticipate that it will be violated. But as with anything else with politicians, they don't want to come off as hypocrites. And we can now point back to this agreement."

The overall package falls well short of what rules-reform advocates had sought. Reid's office has slated individual votes on separate measures for Thursday afternoon, but as they will be considered rule changes and require 67 votes for passage, they are virtually certain to fail. The list of amendments is below:

  • Iowa Democrat Tom Harkin's resolution amending the standing rules of the Senate to provide for cloture to be invoked with less than a three-fifths majority after additional debate;
  • New Mexico Democrat Tom Udall's amendment establishing that a senator publicly disclose a notice of intent to object to any measure or matter; and
  • Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley's amendment that would, an aide said, "require a certain number of senators to remain on the floor in order to filibuster."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have reached an agreement on a set of relatively small changes to the upper chamber's rules, includ...
WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have reached an agreement on a set of relatively small changes to the upper chamber's rules, includ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,473
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (45 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
elfish 06:21 AM on 01/28/2011
If you look at the origin of the word FILIBUSTER it sure fits what the Republicans did with it:
 
FILIBUSTER
 
1580s, flibutor "pirate," probably ultimately from Du.
vrijbuiter "freebooter," used of pirates in the West Indies
as Sp. filibustero and Fr. flibustier , either or  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreenhornet
civil rights lawyer
02:03 PM on 01/28/2011
Am I missing something? Why is this being labeled a "reform" agreement when it does nothing to reform the process that has led to legislative stalemate by virtue of the minority having a pretty much uiversalpower to veto what our majority represnetwives want to passé. Apparently, losing is winning in this bizzaro world of DC.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jasev01
11:36 AM on 01/28/2011
Way to drop the ball again democrats.  Did you offer a happy ending as well, Sen. Reid?  Mitch would like that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
11:29 AM on 01/28/2011
Good ol'boys network plain and simple. Hoist em all up on their suspenders and throw tomatoes at them. Seriously.
11:04 AM on 01/28/2011
Don't you get it? If the Filibuster is eliminated, HCR can be more easily repealed in 2012 (assuming a republican majority, then). NEITHER republicans, nor democrats want to give up any power, preferring instead to work both ends against the middle (US citizens). Sad, but true, everybody. We are well and truley skrooed.
10:30 AM on 01/28/2011
I think booth should retire! Old crooks. We need new ways of thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
10:17 AM on 01/28/2011
Fix the filibuster, already! I share Rachel Maddow's deep disappointment.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
10:14 AM on 01/28/2011
I see "Additional Amendments from the Minority" as a bad thing!

We need the line item veto, yesterday!
10:08 AM on 01/28/2011
"Handshake agreements" with Mr. Turtle: priceless!
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
09:54 AM on 01/28/2011
In the news today Democrats and Republicans reached an historic agreement entitled "The FU America Act of 2011".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:10 AM on 01/28/2011
Nothing to see here folks, move along. Reid and the dems cave AGAIN! There will be NO filibuster change other than make it easier for the minority to overrule the majority, again!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Anderson
You're going to burn up my bullshit detector.
08:49 AM on 01/28/2011
I say "Filibustering" is unconstitutional. I can't find it anywhere in the Constitution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdmccormick
I am tired of this BS
08:42 AM on 01/28/2011
One small step for the Senate

Negligible befit to the American People

Nice cave in Democrat's
08:14 AM on 01/28/2011
Until private money is eliminated from campaign finance nothing will change.
Everyone in Washington has been bought including the highest court in the land.
The peons at the bottom have very little hope.
07:29 AM on 01/28/2011
All that was need to pass the changes was 51, not 67 or 60 as the article implies. Facts please. Once again, the dem's capitulated to big money and the subsidiary of the big money, the republican party. Will it ever end? No, not without campaign finance reform. I contacted my senator to express my disgust at this, probably got a good laugh.
07:12 AM on 01/28/2011
Its an improvement but they should have eliminated the faux filibuster.

The holding up of executive branch appointments was damaging to the Treasury Department during the fiscal crisis and has been a big problem at Homeland Security.