More

SIGAR: U.S. Risks Wasting Billions In Afghan Security Aid Given 'Inadequate Planning'


First Posted: 01/27/11 11:00 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- The United States is at risk of wasting roughly $11.4 billion unless it comes up with a plan for constructing and maintaining nearly 900 Afghan National Security Forces facilities, according to a new report by a top federal watchdog. The news comes as U.S. President Barack Obama considers a military-backed proposal significantly boost the size of those forces.

The audit by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction concluded that the money is "at risk" because of "inadequate planning" and the lack of a "long-range construction plan" for the facilities. SIGAR began its investigation when the NATO mission in Afghanistan was unable to provide documents "describing the size, location or use of Afghan National Security Force facilities, such as Afghan National Army garrisons."

Since 2002, the international community has funded both the construction and ongoing maintenance of these facilities. According to the SIGAR report, "the government of Afghanistan does not have the financial or technical capacity to sustain ANSF facilities once they are completed."

The U.S. government has likewise outsourced part of that job, awarding a total of $800 million to in facilities-maintenance contracts to the ITT Corporation. As McClatchy notes, ITT received the contracts even though the "firm admitted in 2007 to sending classified materials to foreign nations, including China."

SIGAR's report recommends developing a "long-range planning document" for the ANSF facilities that reflects a possible increase in personnel -- to a projected 400,000 in 2013.

On Tuesday, Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.), fresh off a trip to Afghanistan, told reporters that Obama is considering a proposal to expand the Afghan National Police and Afghan National Army by a combined 78,000 on top of their standing targets, which have been a combined 305,000 soldiers and police officers by October. Afghan security forces grew by approximately 70,000 in 2010.

"I urged the president strongly and with very direct words that this needed to be done to enhance the possibilities of success of our mission and to speed up the reduction of our forces so that that important part of our mission, which is the buildup of Afghan forces to take responsibility for their own security, can be improved and enhanced," said Levin, recounting a recent conversation he had with Obama.

As The Washington Post reported last week, the plan has "raised concern among diplomats in Kabul about the quality of recruits and the sustainability of an increasingly costly security apparatus financed almost entirely by international donors."

And the Afghan reconstruction watchdog has had its own problems. On Jan. 10, SIGAR Arnold Fields announced that he would be stepping down from his position amid congressional dissatisfaction with his office's spending oversight. Congress did not create SIGAR until 2008 -- nearly seven years after the U.S.-backed forces toppled the Taliban and roughly five years after Congress established a similar watchdog agency to monitor the reconstruction in Iraq, which began operations shortly after U.S.-led coalition forces invaded the latter country.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON -- The United States is at risk of wasting roughly $11.4 billion unless it comes up with a plan for constructing and maintaining nearly 900 Afghan National Security Forces facilities, accor...
WASHINGTON -- The United States is at risk of wasting roughly $11.4 billion unless it comes up with a plan for constructing and maintaining nearly 900 Afghan National Security Forces facilities, accor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,298
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (55 total)
  1 of 11  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
TXfemmom 01:22 PM on 01/27/2011
I read an article about the recruits of the government, which all have to be approved by Karzai and are almost all Pashtun, and therefore unreliable, which reported that only 15% were literate.  Many couldn't even count well enough to meet their mission when things were taught in numbers instead of writing.  A good many were drug addicted. 
 
At a time when we need to squeeze every  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Rachel O
11:09 AM on 01/28/2011
It's already been wasted. Time to end this pipeline investment.
10:54 AM on 01/28/2011
That's billions the US doesn't have.

Billions that the US needs to borrow.
11:11 AM on 01/28/2011
And billions that the GOP thinks we should cut from priorities that enhance American lives.
09:58 AM on 01/28/2011
Just read in this morning's paper... 48 killed in Iraq while they were attending a funeral. Lovely isn't it?
It's the ONLY portion of Obama's SOU I couldn't agree with is when he was talking about Iraq and Afghan and Pakistan and the US progress over there (???????).
THERE HAS BEEN NO PROGRESS OVER THERE WHATSOEVER... WHO ARE WE TRYING TO KID?
The mission will NEVER be accomplished, no matter how long we OCCUPY THOSE COUNTRIES.
Bring our troops home and the trillions of dollars as well... we need them for our own country's RE-CONSTRUCTION.  
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:58 AM on 01/28/2011
There is no "risk" of wasting any (more) money in Afghanistan. There is only the certainty.
We have wasted money in the past, we waste money presently, and the future will see more money wasted until we leave. Oh, and there is the small matter of all the blood shed and lives wasted, all for the enrichment of war mongering business interests and power hungry politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wjhamilton29464
Attorney, progressive activist and writer
09:58 AM on 01/28/2011
People in Afghanistan were building walls and fortresses five thousand years before the United States was settled by Europeans and several thousand years before Native Americans were building their large structures. If they had the slightest motivation, they could certainly build their own military camps. They fought Alexander the Great.

We're trying to give these people something they may not want. Do we have any idea what sort of a country they do want? Do they know?
11:13 AM on 01/28/2011
My guess is that when they do decide they'll step and do something about it. We can't do it for them. Look at Tunisa, Egypt, and now Yemen. They have the capacity to fight their own battles.
09:25 AM on 01/28/2011
It's not waste if it lines somebody's pockets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kringle
Resurrection of the Gifting Spirit
09:12 AM on 01/28/2011
War should be a human taboo.

If war is a "Necessary Evil", remove ALL profit from it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
09:02 AM on 01/28/2011
Who will fund the Afghan army when we leave?  It will fall into disrepair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdmccormick
I am tired of this BS
08:45 AM on 01/28/2011
War is good……….for the top 1%, not so much for everyone else.
photo
espressobeans
. . . just saying it like it is.
08:36 AM on 01/28/2011
Shorter. The headline should read: "U.S. Wasting Billions in Afghanistan"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:22 AM on 01/28/2011
That's ok... I mean this is the way to make sure Social Security/Medicare/Medicaid get raided and destroyed. Right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:11 AM on 01/28/2011
I can't even post, it just makes me so mad!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raymond Hietapakka
07:48 AM on 01/28/2011
Easy to squander someone else's money on a bunch of ingrates.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
06:42 AM on 01/28/2011
We risk losing billions? And here I was convinced we already had. GET OUT NOW.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USCOASTGUARDVET
06:31 AM on 01/28/2011
Can we leave now?