iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Junior Dems Push To Shake Up Senate Committee Assignments

First Posted: 01/28/11 05:43 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Senate Dems Committees

WASHINGTON -- Junior Senate Democrats have waged a behind-the-scenes campaign since the November election to try to shake up the committee-selection process and snag unusually-plum assignments, three Democratic senators told HuffPost.

The aim of the reformers was to win access to what are known as the "Super-A" committees dominated by senior members of the party. In some cases, they did: Several senior Democrats stepped down from major committees to accommodate the junior members, and Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) shuffled others around to open up seats.

Super-A committees are highly prized: With jurisdiction over major industries that have business before Congress, they lend ease to reelection fundraising. Senate Democrats consider the top five committees to be Appropriations, Finance, Foreign Relations, Armed Services and Commerce. (Republican rules only consider the first four to be premium panels.)

Under Democratic caucus rules, a senator is only permitted to sit on one Super-A committee so that the spoils can be spread around. Senate rules also limit the overall size of committees, but both parties routinely break both rules, offering themselves waivers. The Appropriations Committee, for instance, is limited to 28 members by Senate Rule 25, but 30 members -- nearly a third of the entire chamber -- sit on the panel.

The junior-member effort was led by Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), who was elected in 2002. "Part of this [effort] was to make this Senate run more efficiently and maybe get us to be on fewer committees so we could focus more on fewer committees," Pryor told HuffPost, adding that he himself is on six committees and is spread too thin.

"But another part was that we wanted to make sure that our younger, newer members had a chance to plug in and be active and be involved, and, I'd say, live up to their potential," said Pryor, who sits on both Commerce and Appropriations. "So, it was something that was a good exercise, and certainly, I think, we made some progress on all fronts."

Pryor made a closed-door presentation to the caucus, he said, laying out the fact that many members were on more than one committee and that many committees had more than the maximum number of people allowable. One difficulty, he said, is that a solution to one of those problems only exacerbates the other. Reducing the size of the panels makes it harder for newer members to gain entry.

"I think there's a commitment, at least on the Democratic side -- I can't speak for Republicans -- but on the Democratic side, that we need to dial it down and go back the other direction. And you can't do it overnight, because there are lots of reasons," Pryor said.

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) is the most flagrant offender of the Super-A rule. The chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees trade issues that effect multinational corporations, he also sits on two other major panels -- Finance and Commerce. Seventeen other Democrats sit on two Super-A committees, including Mark Begich (Alaska), Tom Udall (N.M.) and Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), Democrats elected in 2008.

Shaheen joined Armed Services and Foreign Relations on Thursday; Udall joined Foreign Relations. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat appointed to replace Hillary Clinton and reelected in 2010, gave up her seat on Foreign Relations to take one on Armed Services. She was a leader in the fight to repeal the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Bill Nelson (Fla.) and Jeff Bingaman (N.M.) agreed to step down from Armed Services to help open up spots. Three other seats opened up on Foreign Relations with the departures of Chris Dodd (Conn.), Russ Feingold (Wis.) and Ted Kaufman (Del.).

Maryland's Ben Cardin won a seat on the Finance Committee, adding that to his spot on Foreign Relations. Arkansas Democrat Blanche Lincoln's loss freed up that spot. Majority Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.) is technically the Senate's number-two Democrat, but is losing a battle with Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) for the position of top deputy to Harry Reid. He gained a seat on the Foreign Relations Committee and already held a key financial-services subcommittee chairmanship on the appropriations panel.

Freshman Chris Coons (Del.) won a seat on the Foreign Relations Committee and Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) and Joe Manchin (W.V.) picked up seats on the Armed Services Committee.

In leaving the chamber, Kaufman said that one of the most pressing problems facing the Senate's ability to operate was the sheer size of the committees. The panels are too big to function smoothly, he said, and members are on too many to become expert on any one.

Pryor agreed. "It's hard to operate efficiently when you have committees that big," he said.

Brad Shannon contributed reporting

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 391
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jakesmom
Everybody counts or nobody counts.
01:51 PM on 01/30/2011
She looked cockeyed because she is cockeyed; the way she thinks is just so off kilter, I can't even stomach her or Palin.
photo
SeaShell226
"Severely" Loyal & Liberal American Democrat
01:06 PM on 01/30/2011
Who could blame todd if he did?
.
pure INSANI-TEA party !
IreneNH
Please feel free to disagree
09:13 AM on 01/30/2011
"...they lend ease to reelection fundraising."

One way to get the Senate to follow its own rules is to make it illegal to receive funds from the industries which are impacted by their committees.
photo
lcr999
scientist
12:43 AM on 01/30/2011
As a country, we should have the wisest/smartest people in the house and senate. Only a fool would look at our congress and say that is true. Wise and smart are not even anywhere on the list of actual qualifications needed to get elected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CubanVoice
Hope common sense goes viral.
10:18 AM on 01/30/2011
Thats the truth. Those with connections and the funds that come along with them get elected. Knowledge, ethics and the American people be damned.
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can again!
12:15 AM on 01/30/2011
Another clear sign, that Congress has sold out to wealth and power.
Whats worse? Congress, selling out America?
Or they way they blatantly steal our money and homes, to do it?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodog
Honk if you believe in a public editor.
11:57 PM on 01/29/2011
"The aim of the reformers was to win access to what are known as the 'Super-A' committees dominated by senior members.... The junior-member effort was led by Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), who was elected in 2002."

Mark Pryor? Reformer?

He joined Blanch Lincoln, voting No for Cloture on DADT.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/senate-vote-repeal-ban-gays-military/story?id=11685658

How quickly we forget. 

Voted No on The Healthcare Reconciliation Act

Voted Yes on a Statement of Opposition to EPA Greenhouse Gas Rule

Voted No on Requiring Afghanistan Troop Redeployment Plan and Timetable

Voted Yes last January on Ben S. Bernanke, Federal Reserve Chairman

Voted Yes 9 on Authorizing Concealed Firearms Across State Lines

Voted Yes on Allowing Loaded Guns in National Parks

Voted Yes on Firearms Manufacturers Protection Bill
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinarm
call me a proud FemaNazi according to Rush.
09:38 AM on 01/30/2011
Listen I live in Arkansas and I what I can tell you once and for all is that Pryor is no Democrat, it may have a D next to his name but it should have an R.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MmeFlutterbye
Mmeflutterbye
10:03 PM on 01/29/2011
Simple solution. Get our your pocket calculators and figure out how many committees of limited size each Senator could be on.

There, now that wasn't hard was it? But wait!.... Will that jeopardize certain lobbyist/senator relationships? Not to worry. There are loopholes to dive through, I'm sure.
09:45 PM on 01/29/2011
Just more Conservatives wanting power, doesn't matter that their Democrats, they are just a bunch of DINO's
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
05:45 PM on 01/29/2011
Bribery on display, and proud of it....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
juzcuz
05:19 PM on 01/29/2011
Good to see Senator Chris Coons getting involved.. I believe he's going to make a dandy senator and will fight for liberal & progressive causes when appropriate. I really got to like him when he was running against C.Ding-a-ling... their debates were amazing. Coons out-knowledged and out-talked her to the hilt! I predict he'll go far in congress, after getting through the rookie stage and getting his bearings more. Go Coons, we're counting on you!
05:28 PM on 01/29/2011
Coons and friends to the rescue!
07:36 PM on 01/29/2011
She cleaned-his-clock in the debates.
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
08:03 PM on 01/29/2011
lol
08:41 PM on 01/29/2011
You are joking, right? What you meant to say was that, if you looked at her from the side, you could see straight through to the other side because there was nothing in between.
05:18 PM on 01/29/2011
“Super-A committees are highly prized: With jurisdiction over major industries that have business before Congress, they lend ease to reelection fundraising.”
There you have it.
USA politics blatantly in the open, bad grammar included, for all to see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
05:07 PM on 01/29/2011
"Super-A committees are highly prized: With jurisdiction over major industries that have business before Congress, they lend ease to reelection fundraising."

No one is suprised that Congress is on the take, but we live in an age where they no longer feel the need to cover that up. So why not take the next step? Every elected representative should wear the logo of his/her biggest supporter, i.e. sponsor. Maybe even a Nascar-style outfit emblazoned with all sponsors' logos.

The same approach could apply to committees. Goodbye Senate Appropriations committee, hello Blue Cross/Blue Shield Senate Appropriations Committee or The Koch Brothers' Senate Appropriations Committee. Since the biggest corporate donors change, put changing banners over committee meetings with the name of the corporation with the most skin in the Senate game at that time. This will help predict exactly what the committee recommendations will be, and will spare us having to look things up on various watchdog sites.

And why not apply the name of the corporations who benefit most to actual Congressional legislation? The Wellpoint Repealing the Job Killing Health Care Act, for example.

We could also rename military campaigns. Wouldn't "Operation Haliburton Profits" more sharply focus the mind on actual objectives than "Operation Iraqi Freedom?"

Congress doesn't mind being "out" about ties to corporate interests, nor does it expect these ties to upset the electorate, so I'd say it's time to "tell."

I feel sure these measures would create jobs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William K
this too shall pass
05:25 PM on 01/29/2011
Privatizing government - another American innovation. Can't wait for the Ministries of Peace, Plenty, Love, and (especially) Truth. Just remember, "Thoughtcrime does not entail death. Thoughtcrime IS death".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
05:33 PM on 01/29/2011
That would be the NewsCorp Ministry of Truth. . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sf omega man
Taming elephants since 1996
04:41 PM on 01/29/2011
Well taking John Kerry off all his committees would greatly speed efficiency.
04:40 PM on 01/29/2011
The Galactic Senate in Star Wars is less rigged and corrupt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drillsgtmark
I don't know but I've been told...
04:33 PM on 01/29/2011
Shakeup is good especially if you get too comfortable. However, this Super A committee does not feel right. I would propose instead of seniority, I would say look at someone who has wrote bills that have become laws, even if he/she does not have the seniority. There is still politicking with this committee too.
photo
Georgia1992
Proud Liberal Democrat
06:00 PM on 01/29/2011
"Shakeup is good especially if you get too comfortabl­e."

Amen!