iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Afghan Civilian Deaths Hit Record Levels In 2010


First Posted: 02/01/11 10:40 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- At least 2,421 civilians were killed in Afghanistan last year, a record high since the U.S. invasion in 2001, according to a new report.

The report, released Tuesday by the Kabul-based Afghan Rights Monitor, said more than 3,270 civilians were also injured in conflict-related security incidents. That works out to roughly six to seven noncombatants killed and eight to nine wounded in the war each day.

The report blamed armed opposition groups (AOGs) for 63 percent of the civilian deaths and U.S.-NATO coalition forces for 21 percent of them. It criticized "AOGs for their deliberate killing and harassing of civilian communities and the US-NATO for their labeling of almost every war casualty as being 'suspected insurgent.'"

Improvised explosive devices continued to be the most lethal weapons in Afghanistan last year, killing more than 690 civilians and wounding more than 1,800 others. Two hundred thirty-seven civilians lost their lives in suicide attacks.

U.S. and other foreign deaths also hit their highest levels last year since the start of the war. A total of 499 U.S. troops and 212 other coalition members lost their lives in fighting in Afghanistan in 2010.

A sobering report from the Government Accountability Office released last week also showed that despite an increase in the size of the Afghan National Army (ANA), levels of violence are on a steady upward trajectory.

President Barack Obama has said the United States will begin to withdraw troops in July with the goal of fully transferring responsibility to the Afghan security forces by 2014. The GAO found that, while the international community has made "important progress in accelerating ANA growth," as of September not a single ANA unit was considered as capable of carrying out its mission independent of coalition assistance. Two-thirds were assessed as "effective with limited coalition support."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON -- At least 2,421 civilians were killed in Afghanistan last year, a record high since the U.S. invasion in 2001, according to a new report. The report, released Tuesday by the Kabul-based ...
WASHINGTON -- At least 2,421 civilians were killed in Afghanistan last year, a record high since the U.S. invasion in 2001, according to a new report. The report, released Tuesday by the Kabul-based ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 96
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
04:42 PM on 02/01/2011
As a 2 tour veteran of Afghanistan and another 2 years in additional countries in the region I would like to share my FIRST HAND experience with some of the posters on here. First off, believe it or not, I think it is great that there are people opposed to this war. I think America would be a very sad place if freedom of thought and speech did not exist. So I am not trying to argue whether the war is good or bad. Your opinion is your right. I also have nothing but respect for the people of Afghanistan and Muslims in general. I make a clear distinction between the Taliban and the Greater Islamic World. They are not the same.
What I do want everyone to understand is that even though unfortunate accidents have occurred where the U.S. has caused civilian casualties, it is not our intent. When it does happen, it weighs very heavily on those U.S. soldiers involved. As opposed to Taliban militants who more often than not, attack Afghan civilians when no coalition soldier is even present to create fear and intimidation. I personally witnessed this almost as a daily occurrence in my 2 years in country.
War is a miserable thing, it always has been, it always will be. Please take the time to learn first hand and not just regurgitate rhetoric. Ignorance is the worst enemy of all.
photo
wilsonveteran
Free America End Big Government
03:25 PM on 02/01/2011
I see most here did not read the story which states that 63% of these casualties are caused by the insurgents and that these same insurgents are targeting their own people. Only 21% killed by nato and u.s. forces. But to be a good progressive you have to believe as Obama does that our soldiers are just out there air raiding families and homes. The headline and writer would also like you to believe that.
03:14 PM on 02/01/2011
Many of these people may not have been directly members of the Taliban or Al Quieda but they certainly were witholding information and harboring members of these organizations.. To assume they were completely innocent is ridiculous and clearly an attempt of the anti war leftists to drum up some feaux moralilty to justify their reasons to give up the fight..
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
02:45 PM on 02/01/2011
Population of Af is just under 30 million,US 307 million. 2421 Af civilians died, 15,241 US were murdered.

The Afghan civilian death rate is about 35% higher than the murder rate in the US.
The US handgun death rate (about half suicides) is higher than the Afghan death rate.

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
02:34 PM on 02/01/2011
What happened to all the anti-war protests?

Is it only when a GOP president is in office that we protest against wars?

Where is Cindy Sheehan ?

I want us completely out of Afghani and Iraq NOW.
02:22 PM on 02/01/2011
Obama 2012 Yeah this is what the libs love. They want to be in control of the slaughter.
photo
ewldest
I don't care "whose" war it is - end it now
02:12 PM on 02/01/2011
In a culture structured by clans and tribes, each civilian death represents 10 or 20 Afghanistanis who will blame the US for their relative's death. Multiply that by ten years. That's, what, some 400000 Afghans harboring a grudge against the US? Then there are the Afghans not immediately effected by a relative's death, who nonetheless hear about these deaths and hold the US accountable, and who are gradfually awakening to the fact that the US is not there for them, but to further US economic interests in the region. Not joining the Taliban, but ripening for the inevitable peoples' insurgency against US colonial presence.
Iraq had political and religious institutions that the US could manipulate to develop some semblance of an independent state; not Afghanistan. We will be stuck there a long time, and we will be pushed out through some sort of general uprising or popular resistance movement. We will leave the way all colonial occupiers leave, in disgrace, and the Afghans will not be the better for our having been there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
02:09 PM on 02/01/2011
Big numbers since prez Obie took over.
02:02 PM on 02/01/2011
The Bottom Line--Tax Protest!

"Left"? "Right"? As long as "Americans"..are Financing these Atrocities..they'll..Continue!

Period!

I wish we could see the real..Uncensored.."Consensus" on this issue!

I wonder "How Many" Posts have been.."Disappeared" from this "Discussion"!

Sadly..for the "Left"..the Hypocrisy of Both Increasing..rabid.."Narrative Control"..and the now..truly..stunning..hypocrisy of "As Yet Unmentioned Tax Protest"..is the "Real Reality" behind any..and ALL.."Comment" regarding the "Wars".

And..sadly..every other "State" Issue.

From Mass Surveillance to "HCR"..the "Left" has lost All "Cohesion".

We've the "Real Left"..Progressives who are almost "Libertarians"!

Then..the "Cubicle Left"..the "Steve Jobs Fans" who actually.."Appreciate Steve Deciding Which Apps Are Acceptable..For Everyone Else At The Source"(The Ultimate Corporate Nanny State-ism).

The Cubicle Left is Increasingly "Okay" with Levels of Hypocrisy..formerly the sole domain of the "Right".

The Cubicle Left "Defends".."Policies"..and Offers "Solutions"..that are..Totally..INDEFENSIBLE! Like the "Rights" Stances on "Reproduction and Marriage".

That is to say..the "Left"..has begun to "Take the Lead" in:

"Defending The Indefensible"!

Turning away from.."Reality"..Supporting "Policies" and "Legislation"..thats not only..Impossibly Ineffective but even..Utterly Destructive to their own Stated "Goals".

(Privatization Of Cannabis is a Great Example. An Impossibility in reality--Psychoactive 2nd hand smoke + Insurance Companies? Wake up--BUT..also Absolutely Destroying the Rural Liberal Economic base of Cottage Industry..Tactically..Suicidal!)

The "Left"..cannot "Decry" what they're Making Possible!

Not In..Reality!
02:02 PM on 02/01/2011
Where is the outrage and protests? Everytime a story like this came out during the Bush administration would create a wave of anger. Now? Not so much. Please be consistant and persistant. If you want the WAR to END then DEMAND IT! Yesterday, today and unfortunately tomorrow!
02:34 PM on 02/01/2011
True. This is really discrediting a lot of the progressive anti-warriors. Too bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jasel
Nurse
01:50 PM on 02/01/2011
Amazing. I've seen more outraged directed at Michael Vick in the sports section. Nice to know where our priorities lie.
01:48 PM on 02/01/2011
Is that the stock chart of Halliburton?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julie Zhou
01:42 PM on 02/01/2011
My heart cries for the Afghan people...
01:37 PM on 02/01/2011
Welcome to Obamaland supporter of peace, freedom and democracy for corporations, not people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:42 PM on 02/01/2011
Bush/Cheney got us in ... to find WMDs ... or "spread democracy"?

And it is the ENTIRE Republican Party who protect PROFITEERS over PEOPLE!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinyrainbows
01:50 PM on 02/01/2011
Ahem...stay on topic. This article is about Afghanistan.

Move along.

Next.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
02:10 PM on 02/01/2011
It's Bush's fault.
There you go again.
LOL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:33 PM on 02/01/2011
Perhaps I'm missing something, but exactly what does this have to do with the spectacular profits earned by our military contractors and weapon manufacturers?