iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House GOP Readies Severe New Restrictions On EPA

House Republicans Epa Restrictions Bill

DAVID ESPO   02/ 1/11 09:32 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — In a sharp challenge to the Obama administration, House Republicans intend to unveil legislation Wednesday to ban the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act and expect to advance the bill quickly, officials disclosed Tuesday night.

The officials said the bill would nullify all of the steps the EPA has taken to date on the issue, including a threshold finding that greenhouse gases constitute a danger to the public health and welfare.

In addition, it seeks to strip the agency of its authority to use the law in any future attempts to crack down on the emissions from factories, utilities and other stationary sources.

Many scientists say that carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping pollution contribute to global warming, and attempts at regulating them is a major priority for President Barack Obama as well as environmentalists. Critics argue the evidence is thin and that new rules will drive up the cost of business and cause the loss of jobs.

The officials who described the GOP plans did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to pre-empt the release of a draft measure prepared by the Energy and Commerce Committee, chaired by Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan.

The legislation marks yet another arena in which newly empowered House Republicans are moving quickly to challenge the administration.

Sworn into office less than a month ago, the House has already voted to repeal last year's health care law and is advancing toward a series of expected confrontations with Obama over Republican demands for deep spending cuts. In addition, Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, recently announced support for legislation to restrict abortions.

A vote on the greenhouse gases bill would occur first in the Energy and Commerce Committee, and is expected later this winter. The measure would then go to the House floor, where Republicans express confidence they have a strong enough majority to overcome objections by Democrats, many of whom are expected to oppose it on environmental grounds.

Republicans are attempting similar restrictions in the Senate, where the Democrats are in a majority and the political situation is more complicated. Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming has introduced a more sweeping measure than the one House Republicans are drafting. At the same time, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., has proposed a two-year moratorium on EPA attempts to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, a plan that already has attracted a handful of Democratic supporters.

The Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, but it wasn't until the Obama administration took office that the effort began.

Initially, the administration's principal focus in the area was on passage of legislation to impose restrictions, but that attempt failed when the Senate balked at a bill Democrats pushed through the House in 2009.

Since the Republican election gains of last fall, Obama has made several moves to accommodate the concerns of business, including an executive order to weed out proposed new regulations that would hurt job growth. Despite the order, there has been no indication to date that the White House intends to stop plans to regulate greenhouse gases through the Clean Air Act.

In a statement posted on its website late last year, the EPA announced it is moving unilaterally to clamp down on power plant and oil refinery greenhouse emissions, announcing plans for developing new standards over the next year.

EPA administrator Lisa Jackson said the aim was to better cope with pollution contributing to climate change.

"We are following through on our commitment to proceed in a measured and careful way to reduce GHG pollution that threatens the health and welfare of Americans," Jackson said in a statement. She said emissions from power plants and oil refineries constitute about 40 percent of the greenhouse gas pollution in this country.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — In a sharp challenge to the Obama administration, House Republicans intend to unveil legislation Wednesday to ban the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gase...
WASHINGTON — In a sharp challenge to the Obama administration, House Republicans intend to unveil legislation Wednesday to ban the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gase...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,509
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (90 total)
photo
SocialistBoy
No pix no reply
10:59 PM on 02/05/2011
What EPA restrictions?? The big corporations run 'herd' on the EPA!!
Here, drink your water!!
http://www.care2.com/causes/environment/blog/whats-with-all-this-fracking/

Watch the movie!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lornejl 2
My micro always seems to be one letter too lon
06:50 PM on 02/04/2011
im posting from my kindle. just testing
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:21 AM on 02/04/2011
The BBC website is reporting that the Amazon river basin has, in 2005 and 2010, had what was previously thought to be a "once in a hundred year" drought, with some tributaries drying up.

Scientists are saying that it is too soon to say that the lack of rain in tropical South America is part of a trend, and it is too soon to say that it is due to global warming, but they are saying that if these droughts continue to happen, then the Amazon rain forest could become a net emitter of CO2 rather than a net absorber.

Meanwhile, the GOP continues to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
12:18 AM on 02/05/2011
Did the BBC also note the two episodes of very heavy rains that also have come to Brazil in the last few years? Or is it politically incorrect to note that there have been heavy rain events in Brazil, as well as periods of draught?
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
07:15 AM on 02/08/2011
"Did the BBC also note the two episodes of very heavy rains that also have come to Brazil in the last few years?"

How does that help your argument?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
01:42 AM on 02/04/2011
The only response to this is veto. You cannot let this ignorant rabble, endanger the American people and the world in this way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scott456
11:48 PM on 02/03/2011
*yawn* Wake me up when the GOP produces a bill that the President will actually sign.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
07:18 AM on 02/08/2011
"*yawn* Wake me up when the GOP produces a bill that the President will actually sign."

I bet the president would sign a bill that created jobs, but that doesn't appear to be on the Republican radar. Instead they are devoting themselves to destroying the middle classes' government jobs.
09:37 PM on 02/03/2011
If we could just silence $arah Failin for 1 month, that would decrease methane gas by 50 tons.
09:35 PM on 02/03/2011
Fred Upton makes no qualms about being bought and paid for by big energy. Oh yeah, and do some lip service to the citizens that elected him on the side.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monk Monkey
Watching probability clouds precipitate
05:03 PM on 02/03/2011
Horrifying. These people will be considered the most criminal of all in the decades to come. It requires just a morsel of observatory power to see we have entered into a scenario of ecosystem mayhem - anyone notice what has happened to Australia over the last several months, for example? The fallout of Peak Oil can't come soon enough - economic collapse and the end of fiat currency, paradigm shift, local resilience and governance.
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
07:26 PM on 02/03/2011
You deserve a fan. Let me be your first (unless someone beats me to it - slow computer, slower typist).
04:50 PM on 02/03/2011
So clean air is a bad thing, in a time when Allergies and asthma continue to raise. Thank you for putting money before Health. much less the environment
02:25 PM on 02/03/2011
This is so unpatriotic. It will do 1,000 times more damage to our people than terrorism ever could.
Our elected representatives should protect American families over the interests of corporations.
This is the greatest attack on the health and well being of our nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anelder
01:09 PM on 02/03/2011
Note how this has nothing to do with Jobs, Jobs, Jobs.

In fact it would result in less jobs.

Once more the republican party lives up to it's reputation. All talk and no action.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Eggplant
Convince me otherwise
12:47 PM on 02/03/2011
Republicans plan for the future… No healthcare for millions.
Then, further pollute the planet, its water and its air until everyone is sick.
Whether you believe in climate change or not, polluting our earth must stop.
If Republicans cannot see that pollution is bad for every living thing on earth
they really are st_oo_pid.
Money, Corporate profits & Party ideology over Country, People and Planet.
Great plan for the future generations they pretend to care so much about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doodlebug2
12:11 PM on 02/03/2011
doesn't Germany have a well thought out and prosperous economy and enviro laws?
so does not the argumant that enviro laws squash business not work?
Also, say we through out all enviro laws, they still are going to pay some guy a dollar a day in china, right/ that job is not coming here.
You want no enviro laws , go to venezuela and look at lake maracaibo.
Seems to me, we can't make laws to stringent to stangle all business but we can't have do what you want pollution, think early part of this decade and cuyahoga river burning and ash covered Pittsburg.
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
07:13 PM on 02/03/2011
Republican arguments:
Germany is in Europe, so must be socialist - end of story.
Dollar a day - if the unemployed weren't so lazy they would take that job.
Rivers burning - finally a way to melt all this snow we've been getting.

Fanned.
12:04 PM on 02/03/2011
Hey, Obama relaxes the rules for GE (who also ships jobs overseas) - what's the difference.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anelder
01:15 PM on 02/03/2011
All of that shipping you hear about with GE took place back in 08. Now you know things change and to keep on referring to the past as if it was the now is misleading.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:23 AM on 02/04/2011
The Right would have nothing to say at all if they could only rely on the truth.
photo
Phxflyer
I think, therefore I am not republican
10:55 AM on 02/03/2011
Another waste of time.

Where are the jobs republicans?
12:05 PM on 02/03/2011
Ask immelt - in the case of GE, they have shipped 20,000 jobs overseas in the last two years. And he is the jobs czar. LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doodlebug2
12:12 PM on 02/03/2011
govt doesn't create jobs, remember.
photo
BigRex
We need to talk about your TPS reports.
01:01 PM on 02/03/2011
free-market baby...want a job you either need to check your citizenship at the door or work the same hours as your foreign competitor for the same pay.

Ofcourse, the Bush tax cut extension also included tax breaks for job creation overseas...that was a bone thrown to the GOP for their support.