iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Don't Believe Goldman Sachs, The U.S. Economy Has Endured 3 'Lost Decades'

First Posted: 02/02/11 02:23 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Goldman Lost Decade

Step back from the ledge, America. Scotch the gloomy talk of a Japan-style Lost Decade in which we sink into decline and marinate morosely there for years. We're back, baby! So says a cheery depiction of these times from the wizards at Goldman Sachs (a firm that, come to think of it, played a starring role in trashing our economic security).

The report from Goldman's Investment Strategy Group, and served up here as evidence of happy times by the credulous folks at Politico's Morning Money, dismisses suggestions that the American economy might yet confront substantial problems. "The U.S. Will Not Face a 'Lost Decade,'" declares a subheading in the report, which later calls the odds of that prospect "very remote indeed." Instead, "America's structural resilience, fortitude and ingenuity will carry the economy and financial markets in 2011 -- and beyond."

Lest this hyperventilating prose fail to provoke the intended response, that last clause sits beneath a picture of George Washington crossing the Delaware. (Hats off to the creative geniuses inside Goldman's public relations machine, who apparently aim to redefine doubts about the economy -- and Goldman's lucrative cheerleading -- as downright un-American.)

But one problem with all this soothing talk: As millions of ordinary people can readily attest, we are already deep into a Lost Decade and then some. Rescuing ourselves from this era of diminished expectations is going to require far more than disseminating rosy projections about this year's stock market while touting the innate power of American business. It demands a serious-minded plan to get people back to work so we can wean ourselves off the investment fantasies propagated by Goldman and its Wall Street cohorts.

A brief consideration of reality comes in handy here. The U.S. economy slipped officially into recession in December 2007 and remained there until June of 2009, not for nothing earning the moniker "the Great Recession." During those 19 brutal months, the economy lost a net 7.3 million jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the year and a half since, the economy has gained back a grand total of 72,000 jobs -- not even half what most economists say we need in a single month just to absorb new entrants to the labor force.

And that concentrated period of pain landed on top of a so-called economic expansion that was as weak as any on record. In 2000, at the tail end of the last so-called boom, the median American family claimed annual earnings of about $61,000, according to federal data. By late 2007, as the Great Recession began, that same median family had seen its earnings dip to $60,500.

Never before in the half-century during which the government has tracked such figures had the data offered up such clear evidence of declining fortunes: An expansion had run its course with the typical American family rolling backward.

Add this up: Seven years of times so lean that lowered incomes became the American norm, followed by a year and a half of terrifying decline -- with millions of foreclosures and trillions of dollars in lost wealth -- followed by a similar interim of tepid economic growth leaving the unemployment rate above 9 percent. That's a Lost Decade right there.

Set aside the fluctuations that have made the economy manic in recent time -- a technology bubble propelled by Wall Street financiers and Silicon Valley venture capitalists; the real estate bubble, pumped up by banks that turned mortgages into casino chips -- and focus instead on what matters most to ordinary people: What do we bring home from work? In that context, "Lost Decade" seems like a mild description of the American experience. The data offers up the Lost Three Decades.

At the end of 2010, the average weekly earnings for American rank-and-file workers sat at roughly the same level as at the end of 1979 in inflation-adjusted terms. (Have a look at the raw Labor Department data here.) A lot of caveats go into absorbing that number. Large numbers of women and immigrants entered the labor force in those years, which has tended to pull down average wages. But a central truth cannot be dismissed: More than a quarter-century has gone past -- a sweep of history that has seen the personal computing revolution, two wars in the Persian Gulf, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War, the integration of China into the global economy -- and yet the average American worker has gotten nowhere. This while the costs of health care, education and housing have skyrocketed.

You won't encounter any of this sort of analysis in Goldman's delightful report, which is aimed not at people who work for a living, but people who are inclined to conflate the stock market and the real economy. And the stock market, according to Goldman, is poised for a boffo 2011.

Who can argue with that? Savvy U.S. corporations are making enormous sums of money by boosting their sales abroad and keeping a lid on their costs -- which is to say, by not hiring people. Companies like General Electric, whose chief executive Jeffrey Immelt was just named to head a task force that is supposed to encourage job growth, have netted record profits by selling product overseas and laying off workers at home.

This formula pretty much describes how the economy has grown robustly for most of the last three decades, while opportunities for working people have withered. Its perpetuation fairly ensures no need to worry about a Lost Decade if you are an executive at a multinational corporation, a shareholder seeking hefty dividends, or a Wall Street chieftain counting on a bonus.

But the words at the top of Goldman's report -- "Stay the Course" -- amount to a threat for the rest of the nation. The course is untenable. For most people, it leads to credit card debt, ulcer medication and, perhaps, bankruptcy.

Japan imploded and then stagnated at the messy end of the real-estate speculation that filled out the 1980s by dithering about the needed fix. Tokyo tried modest stimulus spending packages, then austerity, then public works spending and then export-led growth -- always too late, always inadequately and usually amid political discord over how to proceed.

Here in the United States, the most striking similarity with Japan's years of decline is the way in which political dysfunction continues to be a powerful barrier to needed action, rendering impossible the muscular investments required to pull us out of the ditch -- investments in renewable energy, education and infrastructure.

Goldman's dismissal of Lost Decade fears is brazenly self-serving. When people are afraid, they tend not to hand their money to Wall Street gamblers to manage. Worse, its words heap fresh disinformation and a false dose of reassurance into a conversation that ought to be centered on an honest reckoning about where we are and how to claw our way back.

We are very much lost, and have been for decades. And we will remain so for as long as influential people pay attention to the cynical assurances of Goldman, which has mastered the art of digging us deeper into a hole, all the while selling us the shovels.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Step back from the ledge, America. Scotch the gloomy talk of a Japan-style Lost Decade in which we sink into decline and marinate morosely there for years. We're back, baby! So says a cheery depiction...
Step back from the ledge, America. Scotch the gloomy talk of a Japan-style Lost Decade in which we sink into decline and marinate morosely there for years. We're back, baby! So says a cheery depiction...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,035
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Caperton Miller
09:43 PM on 02/14/2011
Read Matt Taibbi's "Griftopia". Goldman isn't "part" of the problem, they ARE the problem. Ken Lay Oil bubble? Manipulated by Goldman. Late 90's tech bubble? Hyped up by Goldman. Commodities bubble? Goldman. Housing bubble? (Do I have to go on.) Blankfein & Co. make Madoff look like the minor leagues. (Which is where the Mets'll end up if Wilpon can't afford to pay his players, but I digress.)

Follow the money people. It's....all....Goldman. Period.
08:04 PM on 02/04/2011
talkmedown,
Sorry, just got back here.

Read the KOS on Corporate, but Public Unions & Interests (grants, tax-ex., etc.) are just as self-promoting.

Fear a daunting task ahead.
10:12 AM on 02/04/2011
Creepy guys like this one are causing alot of trouble in our world.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
05:56 AM on 02/04/2011
goldmansachs is simply a big piece ot the problem in this country - could it just go away?
09:47 PM on 02/03/2011
A picture right out of Der Sturmer. Picture of the century so far..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelGMan
Liberal, liberal, liberal;-)
09:38 AM on 02/04/2011
Who dat?
09:33 PM on 02/03/2011
I often wonder if wall street is not hedging bets on unemployment. When it is reported it is always higher or lower than anticipated.
Who anticipates? The same people who bet on the mortgage instruments?
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
08:07 PM on 02/03/2011
I am a nobody.....but from 2002 to 2007 I kept pointing out that home prices could NOT keep rising because wages had been flat, "They can't ALL be drug dealers"...something was very wrong and there HAD to be a crash. If a nobody like me without knowledge of the whole MBS, CDO, CDS or CDOsquared scam could see trouble, WHY didn't those in a position to DO something about it?
The middle class is sinking. Get ready...set your clocks, because when the middle class of a country is destroyed, violent revolution out of their despair won't be far behind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Thinkster Paulson
A concerned American moderate
09:13 PM on 02/03/2011
I shared your concern for the period you mention, and guess what -- so did all of the guilty parties. Greenspan, Rubin and Summers all saw the writing on the wall, but they decided to ignore the facts in order to feed Wall Street profits. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Moodys -- they were all complicit in the crash but did nothing to stop it because they were benefiting from the plunder.

You're right, they essentially robbed the American middle class for around 30% of their collective wealth, and instead of addressing the crime, the federal government used tax payer money to save the thieves from ruin and fund their recovery to record profits. Still now, the government asks the American middle class to sacrifice more while the exploiters continue to stuff their bank accounts.

It is criminal, and as you've suggested, it will lead to violent calamity if left to continue.
06:25 PM on 02/05/2011
It will lead to violent calamity? Really? The middle class' wealth has been plundered, jobs have moved overseas, unchecked illigeal immigration continues, bankruptcies and foreclosures have affected millions, our country is bankrupt and borrowing from China to fund two unnecessary wars, our public educational system suffers from yearly cuts and increasing drop out rates, corporations are creating jobs overseas to save on labor costs, health insurance is becoming a "rich man's entitlement," and you think a "violent calamity" is due? The middle class has watched our "representatives" being paid ("campaign contributions") to support big business and Wall Street. If taxpayer bailouts given to those who crashed this economy didn't cause a stir, then I don't know what will. Americans should have been out by the millions throughout the country reclaiming their country back. Instead, we sit on our duffs writing our complaints in comment fields. We've lost our pride, our honor, and ourselves, because we've allowed the elite to destroy us. Yeah, a "violent calamity" is forthcoming. I highly doubt that. We're apathetic cowards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nuyorican21
Law Clerk
11:06 PM on 02/03/2011
It was incredibly clear. Its depressing to think about it.
exmate
Life is about playing a poor hand well.
05:13 PM on 02/03/2011
Unfortunat­ely the people charged with fixing our economy with the consequent improvemen­t in employment only understand the employment on Wall Street.

If there had been less employment on Wall Street, these past few decades, our economy would be doing better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
04:07 PM on 02/03/2011
Sacks of Gold is pushing paper. That's what the best and brightest in this country do. Like a bank robber once said "Cause that's where the money is." It is far easier to create a credit default swap than to engineer a trans-contental hi speed railway system. We don't build things anymore. Until we start building things again, things ain't gonna get better for most of us. Our bridges and roads are built and powered by imported oil. A hi speed train can move at ton of goods 400 miles on 1 gal of diesel. We should be connecting Chicago to Reno with a train that can move at near jet speeds. There ain't much between those two cities. Asia and Europe are way ahead of us in high speed rail. England used rail power to conquer the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:14 PM on 02/03/2011
Every time I see that picture of Lloyd Blankfien: The arrogant countenance, the self-absorbent smirk, the obvious contempt for the under-class and his knowledge that there's not a thing we common folk can do to remove his hand from our pockets....It makes me wanna spit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:13 PM on 02/03/2011
This guy looks like a church mouse that just took a dump on the Sacramental Offering.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
01:04 PM on 02/03/2011
true that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:41 PM on 02/03/2011
From the article--

""A brief consideration of reality comes in handy here. The U.S. economy slipped officially into recession in December 2007 and remained there until June of 2009, not for nothing earning the moniker "the Great Recession." During those 19 brutal months, the economy lost a net 7.3 million jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the year and a half since, the economy has gained back a grand total of 72,000 jobs -- not even half what most economists say we need in a single month just to absorb new entrants to the labor force.""

You call this a "recovery" President Obama? Wall Street is healed, but the rest of America is on its de.ath bed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
12:36 PM on 02/03/2011
RE: The data offers up the Lost Three Decades.

At the end of 2010, the average weekly earnings for American rank-and-file workers sat at roughly the same level as at the end of 1979 in inflation-adjusted terms.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Don't I know it. I entered the work force in the late 1970s.
Taxes for those rank-and-file workers have gone UP, if not through actual tax rates then by the loss of deductions such as the deduction for credit card interest and the deduction for commuting, while for the upper most earners, who could care less about deductions, tax rates have gone DOWN. Yet the rank-and-file continue to give tax breaks to the wealthy. It crazy backwards, it really is.
11:41 AM on 02/03/2011
Good thing Peter's a semi-journalist not an economist. You'd be hard pressed to find a serious one that will tell you wages can rise beyond the rate of inflation and productivity for any length of time. I have the same issue with this article as I do with generally all Huffpost writing, the author has a story and works in some facts to back it up. Never mind that all these "facts" don't really say what he believes they do, thankfully the average Huffpost reader understands less about finance/economics than they do about making thoughtful arguments.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:32 PM on 02/03/2011
Wow. Care to refute a few of his points, or are you content just to spew?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
12:37 PM on 02/03/2011
Productivity is UP, it's way up but the workers have not seen any gains. That's the problem.