iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Data Shows Students At For-Profit Colleges Twice As Likely To Default On Loans

College Students

First Posted: 02/04/11 12:26 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

A quarter of all federal student loan borrowers at for-profit colleges defaulted on their loans within three years of beginning to repay them--more than twice the rate of their counterparts at non-profit institutions, according to new data released today by the Department of Education.

In addition, students taking out loans at for-profit schools were responsible for nearly half of all federal student loan defaults within the three-year timeframe, even though students enrolled at such institutions made up less than 15 percent of college students nationwide.

The findings released by the Department of Education come as the for-profit college sector faces heightened public scrutiny over questionable outcomes for students, many of whom leave the schools with debts they cannot repay. Average tuition at for-profit schools is nearly twice that of the in-state tuition at four-year public colleges, and more than five times the average tuition at community colleges, according to a Senate report released last year.

The data released today is essentially a snapshot in time: The Department of Education analyzed students whose loans began coming due between October 2007 and September 2008, and tracked those students through last September. Overall, nearly 14 percent of students analyzed at all colleges nationwide went into default within the three years.

But the numbers are particularly noteworthy for the for-profit sector, which at 25 percent had the highest default rate of any segment in higher education. Public non-profit schools had about 11 percent of borrowers defaulting in the three-year window, while students at private non-profit schools defaulted at a rate of less than eight percent.

Though there is flexibility in repayment plans, federal student loans are among the most difficult debts to discharge. In most cases, the debt persists even after someone declares bankruptcy.

Student loan default rates are a key factor in a college's eligibility for federal student aid dollars. In the case of for-profit colleges, access to higher education grants and loans is essential to the industry's survival. Many for-profit schools derive upwards of 80 percent of revenue from federal student aid.

The three-year rates released by the Department of Education today won't have a direct impact on student aid eligibility, but the same data in coming years will figure heavily into whether schools could face restricted access to higher education grants and loans.

Currently, schools are graded on a two-year timescale for student loan defaults. Schools that have more than 25 percent of borrowers going into default within two years could face sanctions and limitations to federal student aid dollars if the high default rates persisted for three consecutive years.

But Congress changed the rules in 2008, requiring an additional year of analysis to better gauge students' ability to repay their loans. There have been concerns in Congress and among student advocates that some for-profit schools actively managed their default rates by placing students into loan deferment plans or other agreements that prevented defaults until the two-year window had passed.

Comparing the two-year default data to the three-year default data sheds some light on how much one year can change the statistics. For the for-profit sector, the two-year student loan default rate was 11.6 percent, but by adding one more year of analysis, the default rate ballooned to 25 percent.

The shift in defaults from the two-year to the three-year window was much less drastic at non-profit colleges. Public non-profit schools increased from a six percent two-year default rate to a 10.8 percent three-year default rate; private non-profit schools went from a two-year rate of four percent to a three-year rate of 7.6 percent.

"You would expect the three-year default rates to be somewhat higher because students have a longer period of time in which to default," said a Department of Education official who discussed the default data with reporters before it was officially released. "But if the three-year rate seems disproportionately high compared to other sectors, then that may be a sign that institutions in that sector or a particular institution is managing its default rate aggressively."

Schools are still officially transitioning from the two-year window to the three-year window in measuring loan defaults. The first year in which a college could be sanctioned based on the three-year loan data is 2014. Schools must have more than 30 percent of students default on loans within the three-year timeframe, in three consecutive years, to be restricted from federal student aid.

The Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities, which represents the for-profit college sector, released a statement saying the group was "disappointed" to see the increases in default rates. But the group pointed to the high unemployment rate and the generally low-income demographics of its students as contributing factors to the higher default rates.

"Private sector college and university students are individuals working hard to build better lives, but are starting from the farthest back in the pack," the statement reads. "They are the most economically disadvantaged, and unfortunately this fact becomes most pronounced in difficult economic times."

Other higher education research groups said the data is an instructive lens for discerning student outcomes at different schools. Although the data does not yet officially impact federal student aid policy, the data still reflects real outcomes for students who were unable to manage their debts, said Pauline Abernathy, vice president of the Institute for College Access & Success, a California research group that seeks to make college more affordable.

"The schools aren't being penalized, but the students still are, and so are taxpayers," Abernathy said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
A quarter of all federal student loan borrowers at for-profit colleges defaulted on their loans within three years of beginning to repay them--more than twice the rate of their counterparts at non-pro...
A quarter of all federal student loan borrowers at for-profit colleges defaulted on their loans within three years of beginning to repay them--more than twice the rate of their counterparts at non-pro...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 515
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
11:34 PM on 02/08/2011
In my post below, I should have made it clear that the PPIC study mentioned was looking at graduation rates from the California Community College system. 75% don't.
06:16 PM on 02/08/2011
Kurfco,

You make some important points. Big picture here, there are clearly "good" for-profit schools and "bad" ones, and the same goes for public and non-profit schools. What is missing in the American education system is good data on outcomes for helping consumers make the right decision. This is clearly a case where consumer protection - at all levels of education - needs to be strengthened. The same goes for health-care. Why can't I lookup what doctors in my area charge and their success rates? Markets need good consumer information to function properly.

To your point, what about K-12 schools which gobble up $150,000 to $250,000 PER STUDENT and are neither graduating kids (half in CA) nor teaching them to read, write, or compute? The social costs of spending this kind of money for piss-poor outcomes, and absolutely no recourse for our most vulnerable students has been for generations, absolutely devastating for families and on the economy.

Telling schools WHAT or HOW to manage is not the answer, but holding them accountable for results most definitely is. With good consumer protections in place, a robust free-enterprise (for- and non-profit) public education sector would do what school "reform" has proven absolutely unable to do for the past 50 years: give our kids a world-class education, without spending even a nickel more money.
05:12 PM on 02/08/2011
Don't take this as a defense of the For-Profit educators, it's not. However, the information presented in this article is highly misleading. The full data set, as I recall seeing it elsewhere, shows that students in the Community Colleges default at rates almost as high as in the For-Profit sector. The reason for this should be obvious. It is very difficult to take a student who was poorly prepared in high school and get them through a real college, no matter who pays for it and where the "education" takes place.

The real scam is that we blindly throw good taxpayer money at trying to remediate a terrible K-12 system via massive -- no entrance requirements -- higher education anyplace.

The Public Policy Institute of California conducted a study, later corroborated by one of the Cal State schools of Education, that looked at students who enrolled intending to graduate or transfer at the end of two years. Both studies showed that 75% failed to do either in six years. These studies were conducted before the current budget mess made it harder for students to get the classes they needed.

You can help some students get a higher education with funding from the taxpayer, but doing so on a large scale is impossible and is just saddling millions of kids with hopeless amounts of debt for absolutely nothing.
06:21 PM on 02/07/2011
All these fake for-profit colleges have .edu web addresses, so they must be real, right?
03:58 PM on 02/07/2011
See the free market is succeeding..... at fleecing people.... Their degrees need to include a plane ticket to where ever we sent the jobs. It's only fair we pay for the ticket too, after all we shipped the jobs and technology for free... And we can't figure out why we are in decline? Evidently the education system has failed since we can't answer the question. The Chinese laugh at us and rightly so...
11:00 AM on 02/07/2011
They default b/c they can't get good jobs. They can't get good jobs b/c their education is terrible. Their education is terrible b/c it's selective. Yet more proof that sometimes in life you have to settle for being a dud.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
01:35 PM on 02/07/2011
Yes, and most of these "students" are duds. They weren't college material to begin with. Then the for-profit places told them everything they wanted to hear.... "you'll get a big student loan, and much of it you can spend as you like.... you can go to college in your pajamas on your laptop...."

All stuff slackers like this generation love to hear.

So they were stupid and they fell for it. The really bad news is the taxpayers are going to have to pay the bill for them.
04:02 PM on 02/07/2011
The fact is you don't know anything about these students. I bet these slackers work harder than you do. Hard work no longer guarantees success in America. Luck and connections do. You are indeed a puppet...
05:20 PM on 02/08/2011
Neither the Community Colleges, nor the For Profits, are succeeding in turning poorly prepared high schoolers into real college graduates, with real job prospects. Why in the world would we expect them to? In the real world, you can't get Olympic Gold Medals on eBay. You must have talent and work hard. You're not likely to get a real college degree from any instititution that has no entrance requirements.

The terrible tragedy is that we are saddling an entire generation with the worst kind of debt imaginable, in a terrible economy, in a much changed world, in pursuit of something they are unlikely to achieve.

It's a tough lesson for kids but if they haven't gotten a good education in K-12, they never will, and every employer will be able to discern that in a resume and cover letter or personal meeting. Isn't that right, Ed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heroine addict
habitual goddess worship
09:25 PM on 02/06/2011
Hear that?

It's the world's smallest violin playing just for the greedy/power hungry universities.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
01:36 PM on 02/07/2011
You must have attended one of these places - they've been paid - the taxpayers will now pay for all those iPods, laptops, and drinking parties the Generation Slacker ran up on their guaranteed student loans.
heckmepitus
Truth, justice and the American way
01:29 PM on 02/06/2011
Profit, that is the evil here. These are for profit colleges and Liberals are against profits.
photo
dawgspiel
Never, never, never give up.
05:41 PM on 02/06/2011
No. Liberals are fine with profits, but not every human activity should be for financial gain. Education is one of these activities. Education is an investment in the future human capital of this nation. Our success or failure as a country depends on our people, not on physical resources.

Burdening our young with crushing debt to obtain the education necessary to compete and succeed individually and as a country as a whole is wasteful and counterproductive. 

We invest in kids via education to develop the next Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, the engineers and scientists we need, to invest the doctors and nurses with the knowledge required to take care of us when we're ill,  to achieve breakthroughs that make our economy more competitive and our people more prosperous. 

In education, as is clearly indicated here, profit does not work. Education should be for cost, not profit, and should be available for all. Investing in our young is a worthwhile cost and a huge benefit to the country. That's the promise of America and a promise we must keep to ourselves for our individual and cooperative good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ceefee
Author, Poet, Writer
07:31 PM on 02/06/2011
"with the knowledge required..." Aye, there's the rub.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:01 AM on 02/07/2011
Funny I thought conservatives were against taxes being wasted but I guess not. My taxes should not go to schools that can't prepare their students for jobs that will pay back the loans. If the schools can't prepare the students to make enough money to pay back the loans then the schools should receive less money from my my taxes.
12:50 AM on 02/06/2011
has anyone bothered (after 470 comments) to point out that a large portion of students at for profit schools are individuals who would not get a college education without the existence of for profit schools?? why should the school be punished for the misdeeds of it's former students?
04:37 PM on 02/06/2011
They should be punished because for-profit schools blatantly exploit non-traditional students. With tuition that costs nearly 2x's that of a state university, or 6x's that of a community college, students who happen to graduate are left with 50k+ loans and no real education. As a student myself, there are several online distance education programs available through state universities (UCLA, CSU, Penn State, SUNY, just to name a few). Even though the degree is online, the degree came from a reputable school, which is what employers want.
http://www.coloradostateglobalcampus.com/?gclid=CNOSwKy99KYCFQNrKgodVhXFCw
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ceefee
Author, Poet, Writer
07:33 PM on 02/06/2011
"no real education...." There you go. Money does not equal education. Or even literacy, for that matter.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:05 AM on 02/07/2011
Define "college education". Yes - some of them graduate with a piece of paper. But they also leave $50 - $60 K in debt; many of them are poorly trained or not at all trained for the career they chose; and many employers will clearly state - just check Monster.com if you don't believe me - that they will not interview applicants from many of these for-profit schools. My company takes resumes from schools like these and tosses them in the garbage. So yes - they do get a piece of paper - but that piece of paper isn't just worthless, it's worthless with a $60K debt attached to it.
06:08 PM on 02/05/2011
If your kid is interested in science, watch Richard Muller's great physics lectures at UC Berkeley on your computer with you kid. Then talk about what you learned with your kid(s) afterward.

Some of the best education is now available for free on the web.

I read all of Darwin's major works on Google in about two months a few years ago. Wow, wow, wow. What a revelation. My education didn't include biology and I was blown away. Highly recommended and free.

Now if Google or the Getty Museum - or Cambrige University - would only add his drawings. This whole silly argument about evolution vs creationism would be blown out of the water.

If you are lazy, just read the Voyage of the Beagle with your kids. I guarantee you that few elementary education teachers have read this book which is a great book to read when you are any age.

Darwin had a healthy, first hand respect for the divine and it shines through in all his work. Highly recommended and free!
photo
democrats for life
republicans need not apply
06:00 PM on 02/05/2011
so if they default on the loans, then the taxpayer has to pick up the tab. why should you and i pay for someone else's education?
12:51 AM on 02/06/2011
we already do! if you pay taxes in my state, California, you're paying for the education of anyone at an elementary, middle, or high school, as well as paying the majority of what's given to community college students & CSU/UC students.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:06 AM on 02/06/2011
Are you bragging or complaining?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:07 AM on 02/07/2011
The difference is that the for-profit schools have CEOs, investors, and boards who make millions of dollars from the tuition. Some of these schools have 100% tuition funded by government guaranteed student loans. But when the student graduates from one of these for-profit schools and can't get a job, who has to pay back the student loan? Not the for-profit investors or CEOs who took the money in the first place. They got theirs. No - the defaulted loans get stuck back on the taxpayer which is you and me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
04:50 PM on 02/05/2011
By the way, Goldman Sachs is a major shareholder in ITT Tech Institute.
06:07 PM on 02/06/2011
Should we short the stock or buy long term?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
04:34 PM on 02/05/2011
Watching TV and the web, and knowing the jobs market out there, I have to question the value of a lot of the training programs for-profits offer. I think a bit of research will show that local community colleges offer better courses for less money.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
01:40 PM on 02/07/2011
Yes, but you have to show up and perform, or they bounce you out. :) Generation Slack doesn't like that.
01:30 PM on 02/05/2011
This is why students should avoid student loans. They are designed to put students in debt, so that for profit colleges can get money. I had 2 jobs to pay my way through college without a loan.
LibChicAZ
I am the People, the Mob
07:40 PM on 02/07/2011
How long ago was that? Tuition is at an all time high.
02:02 PM on 02/08/2011
That was about 9 years ago. I also went to UNM which has one of the lowest tuitions in the country, but student loans just aren't worth it. There was a documentary on 60 minutes and it talked about how far people are into debt with student loans alone. It was scary.
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
07:00 AM on 02/05/2011
There is such a disconnect in the value of a education,what it costs and what you will get out of it. I have an MBA have a great job and had $0 student loans (Air Force,Yale New Haven Hospital paid for it all) and I took advantage of the opportunities afforded. But I see the different mentality of the kids. Very entitled (some) and coddled (most). I have really good friend whose daughter was offered a full scholarship to a good school but turned it down to go to a "school" the child wanted to go to and the parents now have big time debt associated with that "juvenile decision". Listen I am all for choice. But in that case a full ride for free...come on! I have kids and I am already preparing them for the fact that they will have to pay for at least half of their education. At a minimum. Or there are avenues like the military (Air Force only sorry) that they can look at. Other than that I am not going to spend my "golden years"( if there is such a thing) paying back my kids debts!!!!NOT!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lalita Amos
My hovercraft is full of eels
07:30 PM on 02/05/2011
You do realized that what you got was a "full free ride" as well...and with the taxpayers providing virtually all of the revenue for the Air Force, these taxpayers were paying--at least in part--for your education. Oh, and the patients at the hospital absorbed the cost of your education through even slight increases in costs for services. Now, I'm not mad at you for taking advantage of what was made available to you, but in that regard, you aren't that much different from the seeming-freeloaders you describe.
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
10:21 AM on 02/06/2011
Thanks for the reply and i respect your opinion. I would not call serving in a war zone and risking my life a free ride nor taking advantage of opportunities for an education from my employer. I call it an "incentive to work and serve" and I took advantage of such. "Freeloader" is such a strong word and the American Taxpayer and my employer got something in exchange for a highly trained asset (me) and dont forget I was doing a job. I have seen such a disdain for people like me who took advantage of opportunities and your post is no different. instead of you saying smart move or way to keep your self out of the entrapment of debt you come at me with the "freeloader" label. America is on a downward trend. And people like yourself who try to come up with reasons to mock,minimize and jest at people like me are the reason. I smell jealousy or maybe something did not go right for you but thats your axe to grind. The military has forever been a place for poor folks to travel,get educated and further their lives. I bet if you check your own tree of relatives there is one who took the same route as I did. "Freeloader" ....get real.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
01:41 PM on 02/07/2011
An earned ride I'd call it. The poster followed the rules - I'd be it wasn't as fun as "college in your PJ's"