More

U.S. Unveils $53 Billion High-Speed Rail Plan

Us High Speed Rail Plan

JULIE PACE   02/ 8/11 04:39 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is calling for a six-year, $53 billion spending plan for high-speed rail, as he seeks to use infrastructure spending to jump-start job creation.

An initial $8 billion in spending will be part of the budget plan Obama is set to release Monday. If Congress approves the plan, the money would go toward developing or improving trains that travel up to 250 mph, and connecting existing rail lines to new projects. The White House wouldn't say where the money for the rest of the program would come from, though it's likely Obama would seek funding in future budgets or transportation bills.

Obama's push for high-speed rail spending is part of his broad goal of creating jobs in the short-term and increasing American competitiveness for the future through new funding for infrastructure, education and innovation. During last month's State of the Union address, Obama said he wanted to give 80 percent of Americans access to high-speed rail within 25 years.

At the same time he's calling for new spending on sectors like high-speed rail in the upcoming budget, Obama also has pledged to cut overall spending as he seeks to bring down the nation's mounting deficit. The White House has said environmental programs for the Great Lakes, and block grants for community service and community development are among the programs that will face cuts.

But it's unlikely the cuts Obama proposes in the budget will be enough to appease the GOP. Republicans now controlling the House have promised to slash domestic agencies' budgets by nearly 20 percent for the coming year.

The White House has said cuts must be cautious, arguing that drastic reductions in spending could cause the still-fragile economic recovery to stall. Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday the administration wouldn't compromise when it comes to spending on the infrastructure, education and innovation programs Obama is touting.

"We cannot compromise. The rest of the world is not compromising," Biden said in Philadelphia at an event announcing the high-speed rail initiative.

Obama's call for increased spending on high-speed rail projects is nothing new. He's long seen the sector as an area of opportunity for creating jobs and improving the nation's transportation system. His administration awarded $10 billion in federal grants for high-speed rail projects last year, including $2.3 billion for California to begin work on an 800-mile-long, high-speed rail line tying Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay area to Los Angeles and San Diego; and $1.25 billion to Florida to build a rail line connecting Tampa on the West Coast with Orlando in the middle of the state, eventually going south to Miami.

Obama also laid out a plan last summer to invest $50 billion in high-speed rail, as well as highways, bridges, transit and airports, adding it to the first year of a six-year transportation bill. Congress didn't act on the proposal before adjourning last year, but Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said he's confident lawmakers will take up the measure again and deliver a bill to Obama by August.

Thus far, Obama's plans to increase spending on high-speed rail have received a chilly a reception from Republicans. House Transportation Committee Chairman John Mica, R-Fla., urged the administration Tuesday to focus its spending on the crowded Northeast rail corridor, and not "squander limited taxpayer dollars on marginal projects."

Virginia Rep. Eric Cantor, the second-ranking House Republican, urged the administration to involve the business community in its high-speed rail plans.

"I'm not in favor of additional monies that we don't have, to be spent on those projects, and would certainly look for ways to leverage the private sector to get it involved," Cantor said.

The White House said the six-year rail plan would include strong "Buy America" requirements that attract private sector investment in developing and operating passenger lines, and would ultimately create tens of thousands of jobs in the U.S.

___

Associated Press Writers Joan Lowy and Alan Fram contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is calling for a six-year, $53 billion spending plan for high-speed rail, as he seeks to use infrastructure spending to jump-start job creation. An initial $...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is calling for a six-year, $53 billion spending plan for high-speed rail, as he seeks to use infrastructure spending to jump-start job creation. An initial $...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 732
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
09:47 AM on 02/14/2011
The Republican plan is unacceptable. It would, as Paul Krugman has said, eat the future. We must invest in infrastructure, education and export promotion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:59 PM on 02/12/2011
Only makes sense between two high population areas and there is demand.
Where is the business plan that clearly proves demand? There is not one.

Another example of Obamanomics. It feels good, right, so do it. We can always prin t money and tax people more.
07:49 PM on 02/11/2011
One word: Amtrak. It has never made a profit.
09:49 AM on 02/14/2011
It would if it was as convenient as air travel. I'd take a train anyway over a plank. Airports are no longer any fun.
photo
BlackBuddha
I didn't mean to, I meant to
05:45 PM on 02/11/2011
Is that a Bullet Train in your pants, or are you just happy to see me?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HonkyTonkMan
04:00 PM on 02/11/2011
Let's do this already. Are there not loads of places that seem too close to get to by plane, but you don't feel like driving? That applies to anyone in the eastern half of the country. Planes? Cool. Highways? Awesome. Trains? Why not?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HonkyTonkMan
04:02 PM on 02/11/2011
Plus, the business sector can build these.... hopefully they'll have less to do when defense is made sensible. I suppose trains are easier than enormous aircraft carriers that we don't need.
02:46 PM on 02/11/2011
How convenient... Who is the leading manufacturer of diesel-electric locomotives? GE. Who is the new Chairman of Obama's outside economic advisers? The guy who runs GE, Jeffrey Immelt.

No conflict of interest here - nor coincidence - I'm sure...
08:51 AM on 02/11/2011
Pipe dream. They've made the announcement now you'll never hear about it again. The places where rail is feasible already have it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drmhp
12:41 AM on 02/11/2011
There is no money. Most Chinese cannot afford their bullet trains the same will be here.
06:09 AM on 02/11/2011
Why are the stations and trains always packed when I take their trains?
HeII, I even had to stand the full 3 hours and 600 miles from Wuhan to Guanzhou lately.

I hope they build more high-speed rail to meet the demand. Fortunately they are. The entire HSR network will reach 13,000 km (8,100 mi) by 2012 and 25,000 km (16,000 mi) by 2015. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_China
photo
BlackBuddha
I didn't mean to, I meant to
06:57 PM on 02/10/2011
But will we limit the number of bullet trains per track?
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
05:38 PM on 02/11/2011
We need common sense trains, nothing that's to fast, big, or looks scary.
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
04:33 PM on 02/10/2011
This is not going to happen!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wernerholm
bio doesnt ever meet guidelines
02:45 PM on 02/10/2011
yeah right... our "rail" "service" for passengers is the laughing stock of the world! Even North Koreans come here and look down their noses at AMTRAK
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spqesq
02:40 PM on 02/10/2011
Better late than never. All aboard!
12:20 PM on 02/10/2011
I'm fine with this plan. If you build it people will come. Also these are good paying union jobs.
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
05:39 PM on 02/11/2011
I say let the union wither away.
07:23 AM on 02/10/2011
"In the 2008 elections voters in the state approved a ten billion dollar bond to fund constructi­on of an initial line running between Los Angeles and San Francisco. The full network is planned to also include San Diego and Sacramento­. The system will run as fast as 220 mph using steel wheel on steel rail technology­."

Yes, but probably Made in China:
""We look to China to build our high speed rail, to be part of the bidding process that we are going to go through," Schwarzenegger told a gather of U.S. businesses in Shanghai.

"Many countries will be bidding to build our high-speed rail, (and we plan) also to look for financing from China," he said." http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/13/us-china-california-rail-idUSTRE68C0TY20100913

10 billion $ is not nearly enough to develop a modern high speed train.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]