More

Craig Damrauer: New Math Equations Parse Relationships, Divorce

Huffington Post     First Posted: 02/09/11 04:27 AM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

We're intrigued by Craig Damrauer's New Math project. Since 2002, the New York-based artist has been contributing to his series, which he describes as "an attempt to quantify the world using words and basic math." Today, the series consists of over 250 pieces that parse seemingly random aspects of the world, from the monarchy to modern art, placebos to unicycles, greed to the Gulf oil spill, and much more.

While some equations are tongue-in-cheek and others have a more serious tone, all strip down the objects, ideas, and people that surround us to their basic elements in a way that's strangely satisfying to behold, and it has found fans in its various incarnations, from book to prints, to T-shirts, to a limited-edition set of cards edited by Ed Ruscha.

Many of Damrauer's pieces--and all 23 of the images here--deal with human relationships, even though he acknowledges the difficulty of the subject matter: "Whenever we're talking about interactions involving humans, divorce especially, things get rather complex. Far more complex than my math will take me. And so what I end up doing is adding more and more equations, hoping that in doing so they'll eventually add up."

Damrauer created a special series of new prints just in time for Valentine's Day, The New Math of Relationships, for the Website 20x200. Damrauer describes the series: "This tapestry of equations could stretch forever, or at least as far as human interaction stretches. And that's, I suppose, what makes relationships so difficult, so rewarding, so brilliant and impossible."

This Slide
Confusing
I agree!

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top 5 Slides
loading...
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DIVORCE

We're intrigued by Craig Damrauer's New Math project. Since 2002, the New York-based artist has been contributing to his series, which he describes as "an attempt to quantify the world using words and...
We're intrigued by Craig Damrauer's New Math project. Since 2002, the New York-based artist has been contributing to his series, which he describes as "an attempt to quantify the world using words and...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:30 PM on 02/09/2011
I think one of them is wrong. It should be:

DISAPPOINTMENT = EXPECTATION > REALITY
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Stewart
04:20 PM on 02/09/2011
Funny thing about divorce that has always confused me:  When people get married they swear a solemn oath to stay with the spouse "until death do them part."  In most marriage ceremonies they raise the ante by swearing to God himself -- which, presumably, they deeply believe in and is the most profound thing in their life.  Then, in many cases, they get divorced.  

I've always wondered: were they just kidding about the oath?  Did they have their fingers crossed?  Did they lie to God, or break their promise to God?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlefairy
One little fairy against the world
06:23 PM on 02/09/2011
Or did they think the vow only counted as long as they were "feelin' it"? So much for understanding the concept, huh? On the other hand, thank God for grace--and forgiveness.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mirabai305
Tea and Cake or Death?
02:00 AM on 02/10/2011
It's a common mistake people make about unconditional love. The truth is that Someone will love you unconditionally as long as you meet their conditions. When you don't the love is no longer there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
12:37 PM on 02/09/2011
He got the disappointment one exactly backwards.

Expectation should be the denominator, and reality the numerator.

When expectation is greater than reality, the result is less than 1. That's disappointment.

Example: My expectation of my spouse was an 8. He/she turned out to be a 4. So I got 50% of what I hoped for from the marriage. That sucks, and I'm very disappointed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlefairy
One little fairy against the world
02:30 PM on 02/09/2011
Try reading it as "over" instead of divided by, and see how you feel about the way they're written. BTW, what would your spouse use as the equation (assuming, yuh know, that the example is not entirely theoretical). ;^)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlefairy
One little fairy against the world
11:57 AM on 02/09/2011
Fantastic!