More

Deutsche Boerse Group To Merge With NYSE, Create World's Largest Exchange

First Posted: 02/10/11 08:43 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Wall Street

Deutsche Boerse and NYSE Euronext's plan to create the world's largest exchange has sent competitors around the world scurrying to find partners, accelerating an industry shake-up.

Traditional exchanges are under intense cost pressure from upstart electronic rivals such as Bats Europe and Chi-X Europe which were set up by some of the world's largest investment banks to loosen the big bourses' grip on share trading.

"The smaller players have really changed the face of these larger players around the world, and so they're forced to merge," said William Karsh, former chief operating officer at Direct Edge, one of two privately-run U.S. electronic trading operators that have challenged the NYSE and Nasdaq OMX Group in recent years.

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd said on Thursday it would look for deals with other players after Deutsche Boerse and NYSE's announcement that they were in advanced talks to form a marketplace that would have annual trading volume exceeding $20 trillion.

The world's biggest exchange operator by market value said: "Due to changes in the financial market landscape, HKEx will consider international opportunities for alliances, partnerships and other relationships that present strategically compelling benefits consistent with its focus on markets in China."

Wednesday's news of a bid by London Stock Exchange for Canada's TMX, followed by the Deutsche Boerse talks with NYSE, revived a wave of international mergers last seen in 2006 and 2007, and shifted the process of exchange consolidation up several gears.

"The race is on to create regional trading gateways to serve international institutional investors, and the drivers are accelerating," Axel Pierron, an analyst at Celent, said.

The proposed mergers fueled a rally in shares of listed exchanges globally. Australia's ASX, which is trying to overcome domestic opposition to a $7.9 billion takeover bid from the Singapore Exchange, rose 4.7 percent.

Aggressive, upstart trading venues have eaten deeply into the market shares of these traditional exchanges, forcing the Big Board, the LSE and others to invest heavily in trading technology and to look to higher-margin areas to grow.

SINGAPORE SLING

SGX's bid for ASX faces major political and regulatory hurdles in Australia, but while many investors said the latest deals appeared to strengthen the case for the tie-up, others said the LSE could now be seen as an alternative partner.

"LSE is clearly making a play on the mining-resources side of things and Asia is in general very resource-hungry, so if Australia wasn't potentially tied up with SGX, which isn't a done deal yet, that would be one option," said Niki Beattie, managing director of consultancy Market Structure Partners.

Both the Australian and London stock exchanges have traditionally attracted a significant number of resource companies to list, including heavyweights such as BHP Billiton.

The LSE's proposed purchase of the Toronto stock market operator would make it the world's fourth largest and a top center for growth sectors of mining and energy, with $4.1 trillion of stock changing hands each year.

"Having seen so many mergers in the global market recently, Australia may better accept the prospect of being part of a larger group and it's paved the way for Australians to accept the reality of today's world," said Magdalene Choong, an analyst at Phillip Securities who has a "buy" rating on SGX.

In contrast, HKEx shares fell by the most in about three months on worries mergers would intensify competition. The Hong Kong exchange has so far avoided any moves to merge because of its strong pipeline of China-backed IPOs.

Other exchanges in Asia have been reluctant to seek tie ups due to tight ownership and political obstacles.

(Additional reporting by Mike Smith, Saeed Azhar, Kevin Lim and Rachel Armstrong in SINGAPORE, Sonali Paul in MELBOURNE; Writing by Alexander Smith; Editing by Sophie Walker)

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 686
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary St Lawrence
11th Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Get Away With It
10:40 AM on 02/13/2011
German takeover of NY Stock Exchange: Where’s Col. Hogan when we need him?
http://garystlawrence.wordpress.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
Ron Paul -More Liberty, Less Government, No Fed
01:10 PM on 02/12/2011
"Deutsche Boerse and NYSE's announcement that they were in advanced talks to form a marketplace that would have annual trading volume exceeding $20 trillion."

To put this in perspective, tell me again - what is our national debt and our GDP?

Maybe the trading volume is over-inflated by all those clever derivatives you have been hearing so much about.
12:28 AM on 02/12/2011
what the ...F... is going on here ?.....Our stock exchange is being sold off ?
11:27 AM on 02/12/2011
And...how much media attention do you see on this topic...shhhh...no one is supposed to know...

Our media is becoming more "closed" and "controlled" by the minute...
11:35 AM on 02/12/2011
there was something on Drudge last nite...said Mayor Bloomberg loves this idea......something about this really smells.....

And you are right...the media is all but ignoring this.....odd.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYC80
I am an independent
01:03 PM on 02/11/2011
The island of Manhattan will be next for sale, oh wait China can claim it since we own them much money
11:29 AM on 02/12/2011
So have we been borrowing the $1.5 billion we've been giving to Egypt for the past couple of decades from China??

The more our govt's activities are exposed, the harder it is to believe how little we know...if we knew, many of the activities would be stopped...
07:41 PM on 02/10/2011
Very little MSM coverage of this important topic...what are the real reasons for the merger, what will it mean to the NYSE...is this just the next step in the deterioration of the dollar? The biggest loser is bound to be the middle class that will be asked or forced to pick up losses by someone somewhere...the winners will, of course, be the financiers...

Egypt's protests and problems are important issues, but don't warrant 24/7 almost exclusive coverage as a way to hide other important issues...

Are there any investigative reporters out there??
06:55 AM on 02/11/2011
"investigat­ive reporters"

Do they have any?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montn2
05:25 PM on 02/10/2011
O Boy.....cannot wait to hear bachmann scream that the Germans are taking over our economy!
06:52 AM on 02/11/2011
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.):

"After the $700 billion bailout, the trillion-dollar stimulus, and the massive budget bill with over 9,000 earmarks that the President signed, many of you implored Washington to please stop.

But, instead of stopping, we saw an unprecedented explosion of governance at President Obama's direction; unlike anything we have seen in the history of our country.

For two years President Obama made promises... He claimed that he would find solutions to fix our economy and help create jobs.

But now, as a new highlight, he donated NYSE to some German communistic N@zis!"

Accurate?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montn2
10:48 AM on 02/11/2011
NYSE is not government owned. Monies from the bail out are being re-paid with profits; the auto companies are making profits; earmarks are up to Congress and he has agreed to sign the bill eliminating them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjtaylor22
05:14 PM on 02/10/2011
OK, OK OOOKAY..THE REAL NAZI'S ARE BUYING THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE...and no one is batting a dam eyelash............
05:28 PM on 02/10/2011
Did you live in a bunker for the last 65 years?
02:20 AM on 02/11/2011
So much for critical thinking. Guess you were one child that was definitely left behind.
05:12 PM on 02/10/2011
Everything in America is for sale. What a shame. Soon, no industry will be 100 % American.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjtaylor22
04:59 PM on 02/10/2011
NY is to synonmous with America..they need to change their name to the Leech group, because now they will be mor eof a pariah than they have ove the last decade...no stake in the USA, except what they can extract in profits.............
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:25 PM on 02/10/2011
I hope it works out better than the Daimler Chrysler marriage.
03:50 PM on 02/10/2011
This is just in reaction to what the canadians did on the 9th

http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2011/02/09/tmx-lse-merger.html
02:40 PM on 02/10/2011
The Germans are actually more serious about financial reform. They have done more to address preventing another banking crises caused by over-leveraged/risky investing polices by banks.

The NYSE has become the embodiment of Shylock and cannot be trusted in a fiduciary role.
04:09 PM on 02/10/2011
But in all honesty as a German I have to admit that we didn't even nearly push so far or so hard as we were promised. Roughly quoting Chancellor Merkel: "For the future, no financial market, no financial institution or player and no financial product will be left unregulated".
The second thing is, it's only fair to recognise that as much as our economy depends on exports, the UK's and US economies depend on services, mainly banking.

Having said that, if my observation and analysis is correct, I do think that Europe as a whole will impose stricter rules. For three reasons: first, contrary to the US, especially continental Europe/ "Old Europe" tends to call for more/ strong government intervention and regulation when facing a serious problem. The political center here shifts to the political left while in the US it shifts to the political right. Secondly - and I'd say that your former POTUS was a strong catalyst in that direction - the way US corporations do "international business", the perceived hegemonial attitude in US politics towards us and the US position regarding global warming put - to say the least - any approval for US leadership in doubt. Maybe it's as simple as this: The way US politics acted it actually did - contrary to US intend - galvanize Europe. Whatever -it has yet to be defined - we Europeans are, we certainly are (and want to be) different from the US. "USofEu" is actually a term perceived
photo
blindhammer
The future is not what it used to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
02:12 PM on 02/10/2011
NYSE is just a market place where the shares of companies are bought and sold, most of the trading is done electronically so it really doesn't matter where the actual location of the exchange is..........
 
No this is not the start of a One World Currency, not its not the 4th Reich, or any other conspiracy theory the wingnutsWant to tell you it is.....
 
Its just big business trying to crush small business, but merging and becoming larger.......... that's all folks
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
belladio
Not in the mood to suffer fools
02:53 PM on 02/10/2011
I'm a fan of yours but I disagree and think this could lead to a global currency in time. Changes like that, if done intelligently, are done in incremental steps rather than all at once. It's pretty obvious that the multinationals that have enormous power over our legislation/government officials have a global mindset. That isn't going away anytime soon, if ever. The next logical steps for these interest groups are coordinated regulatory laws between trading partners (www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/04/joint-statement-president-obama-and-prime-minister-harper-canada-regul-0) to ease global trade restrictions and eventually a standard currency.

Think about even 15-20 years ago - would you have imagined our current globalization/corporatism then? I couldn't have. We're marching along in small steps that may escape notice, but the destination seems pretty clear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
03:16 PM on 02/10/2011
Oil is the one world currency as it stands right now, Oil replaced gold about 100 years ago, although as Oil is actively worked on to be replaced by something else, gold will probably re-enter the market place as the commodity that goods and services are collaterialy traded behind.
 
That being said, it could take 50 to 100 years for that to happen.
 
Don't be so quick to dismiss the benefits of 1 global trading currency, it would make it very difficult to pay someone 12 cents an hour to make an 800 dollar Ipad, when that 12 cents has to be paid in a Global currency as opposed to a Chinese Yuan........
04:29 PM on 02/10/2011
I share your doubts, but mainly because of a different reason. I favour Realpolitics or pragmatism. So, I prefer smaller units because they can be dealt with politically (legislation and jurisdiction) much more easily. I have no problems with the trade in goods: they are physical. I also have no problem with services, as long as jurisdiction is clear.
We just learned that it's a bad idea if a nation's "Main street" cannot match its "Wall Street" obligations. Certainly, 80M Germans cannot match obligations in which 320M US citizens are involved.
01:56 PM on 02/10/2011
I assume this merger, or takeover, or whatever it is, was a big part of the conversations the super rich who run our world had in Davos.