More

Electronic Cigarettes Banned On U.S. Flights

Electronic Cigarette

MICHAEL FELBERBAUM   02/11/11 10:35 AM ET   AP

RICHMOND, Va. — The U.S. Department of Transportation says the use of smokeless electronic cigarettes on airplanes is prohibited and plans to issue an official ban this spring, according to a letter from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood obtained by The Associated Press.

In the letter to Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, LaHood said the department has been informing airlines and the public that it interprets smoking regulations to include e-cigarettes. Lautenberg, who wrote the 1987 law that banned smoking on airplanes, had asked transportation officials to clarify the rule.

E-cigarettes are plastic and metal devices that heat a liquid nicotine solution in a disposable cartridge, creating vapor that the "smoker" inhales. A tiny light on the tip even glows like a real cigarette. They have prompted debate over how risky they are and whether they're even legal.

Numerous videos on YouTube show passengers using the devices on airplanes. Lautenberg even said some passengers have interpreted flight attendant instructions to mean that the devices were only prohibited when other electronic devices were not allowed during takeoff and landing.

Many airlines already have begun informing passengers that the devices are not allowed on flights, but Lautenberg said there had been confusion over their use and wanted to make sure officials were solidly opposed to opening the door to e-smoking on planes. Some e-cigarette distributors have touted their convenience because they can be "smoked" anywhere traditional cigarettes are not allowed.

"We still don't know the health effects of e-cigarettes, and we don't want to turn airline passengers into laboratory mice," Lautenberg said in an e-mailed statement.

Jason Healy, president of e-cigarette maker Blu Cigs, called the move somewhat disappointing, but said it isn't the end of the world. Healy said he hopes that once more people understand e-cigarettes and more testing is done, that airlines could choose whether to allow them.

"I understand from an airline's point of view the hassles it could create," said Healy, whose company has partnered with a luxury charter jet company to provide free e-cigs on private flights. "It's not the actual product, it's the disruption and explaining to everyone else that it's not smoke."

Users and distributors say e-cigarettes address both the nicotine addiction and the behavioral aspects of smoking – the holding of the cigarette, the puffing, seeing the smoke come out and the hand motion – without the more than 4,000 chemicals found in cigarettes.

Nearly 46 million Americans smoke cigarettes. About 40 percent try to quit each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But unlike nicotine patches or gums, e-smokes have operated in a legal gray area.

First marketed overseas in 2002, e-cigarettes didn't become easily available in the U.S. until late 2006. Now, the industry has grown from the thousands of users in 2006 to several million worldwide, with tens of thousands new e-smokers every week.

The future of e-cigarettes is likely to be decided by the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA lost a court case last year after trying to treat e-cigarettes as drug-delivery devices, rather than tobacco products, because e-cigarettes heat nicotine extracted from tobacco.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,038
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
08:09 PM on 02/26/2011
That's ridiculous if you ask me, if you can smoke the electronic cigarette on a train then why not on a plane!?
__________________
Electronic Cigarette Review
photo
HerrMonk
Son of Apollo
12:46 PM on 02/15/2011
Water vapor kills folks!

Take this seriously: the government knows best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrandmaG
Tree hugging, veggie eating Democrat
11:41 AM on 02/15/2011
ALL of the ingresients in e-cigs have already been deemed safe by the FDA so leave it alone.
08:51 PM on 02/14/2011
Blitzkrieg! C'mon people. I bought an e-cig a week ago and haven't smoked a cigarette since. Two other of my co-workers also quit using them. I just hope all those people insisting on pristine air walk to work.
04:36 PM on 02/14/2011
This ban is really, really stupid and there is no valid reason for it.

I'm a non-smoker, but I researched these e-cigs and bought some for family and friends to keep them away from real cigs.

The output is simply a mild vapor like steam, and the nicotine is undetectable. It's just enough to give the smoker a fix, without hundreds of other harmful chemicals.

I'm sure a smoker could pretend to be sleeping under a blanket, hide the tip so the light isn't visible and take a puff and no one would ever know. They should also work just fine in the lavs and not set off the alarm, but can't say for sure.

Non-smokers need to be a little more flexible and tolerant. You can't smell or detect an e-cig. Honestly, I am more offended and sick from sitting next to someone who is eating onions, but I don't insist that they be banned for my own convenience!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
03:25 PM on 02/14/2011
While I think this may be a viable alternative and I personally can't stand inhaling someone elses fumes there are still too many unknowns for this product. Google search e-cigs for second hand vapor and you get a bunch of articles that discuss proximity exposure and other chemicals involved. They may be better but the facts are not all in yet.
Here's one I found:
http://pagingdrgupta.blogs.cnn.com/2010/06/03/my-boss-smokes-e-cigarettes-in-the-office-is-this-safe/
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
03:30 PM on 02/14/2011
BTW I do hope they turn out to be a good product. I'm not against people using nicotine for pleasure any more than I'm against alchohol or pot. I just don't want to have to share in it due to being seated next to them.
04:40 PM on 02/14/2011
Just get over it.

I hate sitting next to people eating onions a lot more than I do someone puffing on an e-cig. If they really, really bother you, I think you are just being intolerant and need to relax a bit.

I also don't want to sit by people with loud, smelly kids, but I don't call for them to be banned.

I'm a non-smoker and I try and let people be.
11:56 AM on 02/14/2011
Now we don't have to sit beside a nicotine free-basing drug abuser jonesing for their quick fix. Praise the lord and FAA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrandmaG
Tree hugging, veggie eating Democrat
10:57 AM on 02/15/2011
What the H are you talking about? I hope you dont even consider having a drink or drinking coffee on a flight. They're DRUGS!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Nelson Montana
Artist, Author, Composer
05:36 AM on 02/13/2011
I think the reason is, it'll be hard to keep track of who is using this or a real cigarette.

And as an aside -- why do all these smoke alternatives contain nicotine? Isn't that the bad part? I'd think many smokers enjoy the activity and don't necessarily crave nicotine.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kat Ingalls
Don't believe everything you read
12:44 PM on 02/13/2011
E cigs emit water vapor not smoke. E cigs don't have a strong odor - you can definitely tell the difference between the two. Nicotine is the addicting factor here, that is why alternatives contain nicotine. The good news is that second hand smoke is no longer a factor that will impact others. Water vapor cannot hurt you any more than the steam from coffee or tea.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Nelson Montana
Artist, Author, Composer
01:09 PM on 02/13/2011
I get all that, it's just that with 20-30 people smoking E cigs I'd think it'd spur someone to light a real one and think they can get away with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe3245
How can we have lost control we never had?
02:39 PM on 02/14/2011
Most crave nicotine and enjoy smoking. But nicotine is just the addictive and enjoyable part, its not the deadly part.
trish333
Tea will be served in 2012. Lemon or sugar?
04:18 AM on 02/13/2011
If these guys are so hot to ban everything, they should really be more useful and ban the guy in the next seat that hasn't bathed for a month.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:36 PM on 02/12/2011
Well, based on their definition, Nicarette Gum is also a "tobacco" product, since it also contains nicotine. What a load. Show me who gets damaged is someone smokes an "e-cigarette". Nobody. There is NO second hand smoke. There is NO reason why people shouldn't be allowed to smoke these on an airplane or anywhere else. So what if some passengers think the person is smoking a real cigarette. They aren't, so who freaking cares.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
09:02 PM on 02/13/2011
Who cares? The other passengers (as you say)...also known as customers. Since we're not talking about a constitutional right, they're allowed to tell the airline their preference, and the airline is allowed to respond or ignore. It's the same with just about any other business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrandmaG
Tree hugging, veggie eating Democrat
11:00 AM on 02/15/2011
I no longer wish to sit next to others who are partking in the drug use of alcohol or caffiene. Should they be banned?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Slate
12:33 PM on 02/15/2011
Agreed, the airlines should have the right to cater to their customers preferences, but we're not talking about that here, we're talking about the FAA banning them. This has nothing to do with a freely operating airline responding to their customers' preferences - and everything to do with government dictating what's allowed in the marketplace.
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
04:32 PM on 02/12/2011
Outlawing a device that dispenses a compressed liquid for non-medical reasons seems consistent with other security regulations.

If smokers want their in-flight nicotine fix that badly, they could use nicotine patches or gum. They have such legal methods for drug delivery to support their addiction.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:38 PM on 02/12/2011
We can also choose not to fly on your Nazi airplanes.
10:17 AM on 02/13/2011
smoking is uncool and a deal breaker
11:52 AM on 02/14/2011
Did you compare regulating the use of devices that create the illusion of smoke while flying on an airplane to pulling people out of their homes and shooting them in the streets in front of their children, and then shooting their children?

I'm glad someone made the connection, I totally agree. Not being able to create the illusion of smoke on a plane is like being shot in the head because of your heritage in every important facet.
02:06 AM on 02/13/2011
The liquid is not compressed. The products emits only a harmless, odorless vapor which quickly dissipates. The product affects no one but the user him/herself, just like the patch or the gum.

The amount of liquid in a single e-cigarette cartridge is tiny - just a few mililiters at most.

I cannot see one single reason why an electronic cigarette is a security risk, a health hazard to others, or even a health hazard to oneself. The product delivers only nicotine, which is about as dangerous as caffeine. It's the other 4000 chemicals in tobacco cigarettes that prevent a serious health to both the user and others.
12:44 PM on 02/12/2011
I'm hoping they outlaw all vapors released from people on flights.............. this is so stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrandmaG
Tree hugging, veggie eating Democrat
11:02 AM on 02/15/2011
Yeah, that steam from that coffee really bothers me a lot.
10:17 AM on 02/12/2011
There is absolutely no reason to prohibit the use of e-cigarettes in public spaces other than the fact that their use "appears to be smoking" and causes confusion among non-smokers. The product produces no second hand smoke, only a vapor made up mostly of water, propylene glycol (which is classified as "Generally recognized as safe" by the FDA and can be found in many household products such as shampoos, etc & nicotine. If the user" inhales the vapor only trace amounts of nicotine can be detected in the exhaled vapor. One would think that they would be encouraging the use of e-cigs instead of prohibiting their use since they are 95% safer than traditional tobacco cigarettes. Some e-cig makers even sell cartridges with zero nicotine. They are 100% safe for the user and anyone around them. But the anti-smoking zealots will hear nothing of this until they wipe out all smoking or anything that resembles it. I have been using e-cigs for 2 weeks now and have quit smoking tobacco cigarettes entirely.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:40 PM on 02/12/2011
The anti-smoking zealots will always hate you even if you stop smoking everything completely. They won't be happy until everyone is an anti-smoking zealot like them. I have met these people and they are crazy. They won't compromise about anything. They're about as useless as your average republican.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrandmaG
Tree hugging, veggie eating Democrat
11:04 AM on 02/15/2011
I don't like enhaling all that caffiene form that steaming coffee. Not to mention that tobacco companies and the pharma companies who make patches and gum really like the e-cig ban.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bunny Tickle Britches
♥ Cupcakes For Everyone! ♥
09:26 AM on 02/12/2011
Will they also ban people who have decided to douse themselves with an entire bottle of Old Spice?
pogo
My micro-bio is empty.
11:20 AM on 02/12/2011
Hey, I only do that when I go to WalMart. For special occasions I dab a little vanilla extract behind my ears. Drives the ladies wild.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
11:36 AM on 02/12/2011
Lolo that was you! I was standing behind in line at wally world the other day ?

:) Lololo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crom14
05:03 PM on 02/12/2011
Foe sure! That just happened to us on a flight!!!!!!!
09:26 AM on 02/12/2011
I wish this law passes
God help us if they come up with a somilar device for Crack smokers
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
11:31 AM on 02/12/2011
why? are ya worried it will cut into you profits !
03:01 PM on 02/12/2011
If cocaine were legal, like it used to be, it would be inexpensive and crack wouldn't exist. Crack was invented to stretch a small amout of cocaine into more "product".The result of the crack epidemic can be seen in many inner-city neighborhoods. Turf wars, drug deals gone awry and ending in shootings and drive-by shootings. Whenever they say on the evening news about an inner-city shooting and they say "No motive or suspect yet", you can bet it has to do with the street drug trade that wouldn't exist if drugs were legalized.