iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Cell Phone Towers To Be Replaced By Tiny Antennas

PETER SVENSSON   02/11/11 11:52 PM ET   AP

Cell Phone Tower

NEW YORK — As cell phones have spread, so have large cell towers – those unsightly stalks of steel topped by transmitters and other electronics that sprouted across the country over the last decade.

Now the wireless industry is planning a future without them, or at least without many more of them. Instead, it's looking at much smaller antennas, some tiny enough to hold in a hand. These could be placed on lampposts, utility poles and buildings – virtually anywhere with electrical and network connections.

If the technology overcomes some hurdles, it could upend the wireless industry and offer seamless service, with fewer dead spots and faster data speeds.

Some big names in the wireless world are set to demonstrate "small cell" technologies at the Mobile World Congress, the world's largest cell phone trade show, which starts Monday in Barcelona, Spain.

"We see more and more towers that become bigger and bigger, with more and bigger antennas that come to obstruct our view and clutter our landscape and are simply ugly," said Wim Sweldens, president of the wireless division of Alcatel-Lucent, the French-U.S. maker of telecommunications equipment.

"What we have realized is that we, as one of the major mobile equipment vendors, are partially if not mostly to blame for this."

Alcatel-Lucent will be at the show to demonstrate its "lightRadio cube," a cellular antenna about the size and shape of a Rubik's cube, vastly smaller than the ironing-board-sized antennas that now decorate cell towers. The cube was developed at the famous Bell Labs in New Jersey, birthplace of many other inventions when it was AT&T's research center.

In Alcatel-Lucent's vision, these little cubes could soon begin replacing conventional cell towers. Single cubes or clusters of them could be placed indoors or out and be easily hidden from view. All they need is electrical power and an optical fiber connecting them to the phone company's network.

The cube, Sweldens said, can make the notion of a conventional cell tower "go away." Alcatel-Lucent will start trials of the cube with carriers in September. The company hopes to make it commercially available next year.

For cell phone companies, the benefits of dividing their networks into smaller "cells," each one served by something like the cube antenna, go far beyond esthetics. Smaller cells mean vastly higher capacity for calls and data traffic.

Instead of having all phones within a mile or two connect to the same cell tower, the traffic could be divided between several smaller cells, so there's less competition for the cell tower's attention.

"If it is what they claim, lightRadio could be a highly disruptive force within the wireless industry," said Dan Hays, who focuses on telecommunications at consulting firm PRTM.

Rasmus Hellberg, director of technical marketing at wireless technology developer Qualcomm Inc., said smaller cells can boost a network's capacity tenfold, far more than can be achieved by other upgrades to wireless technology that are also in the works.

That's sure to draw the interest of phone companies. They've already been deploying older generations of small-cell technology in areas where a lot of people gather, like airports, train stations and sports stadiums, but these are expensive and complicated to install.

In New York City, AT&T Inc. has started creating a network of outdoor Wi-Fi hotspots, starting in Times Square and now spreading through the midtown tourist and shopping districts. Its network has been hammered by an onslaught of data-hungry iPhone users, and this is one way of moving that traffic off the cellular network.

Smaller cells could do the same job, but for all phones, not just Wi-Fi enabled ones like the iPhone. They could also carry calls as well as data.

San Diego-based Qualcomm will be at the Barcelona show with a live demonstration of how "heterogeneous networks" – ones that mix big and small cells, can work. A key issue is minimizing radio interference between the two types of cells. Another hurdle is connecting the smaller cells to the bigger network through optical fiber or other high-capacity connections.

"That's an impediment that we're seeing many operators struggling with right now as data volumes have increased," Hays said.

LM Ericsson AB, the Swedish company that's the largest maker of wireless network equipment in the world, is also introducing a more compact antenna at the show, one it calls "the first stepping stone towards a heterogeneous network."

Small cellular base stations have already penetrated hundreds of thousands of U.S. homes. Phone companies like AT&T, Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel Corp. have for several years been selling "femtocells," which are about the size of a Wi-Fi router and connect to the phone company's network through a home broadband connection.

The cells project radio signals that cover a room or two, providing five bars of coverage where there might otherwise be none.

British femtocell maker Ubiquisys Ltd. will be in Barcelona to demonstrate the smallest cell yet. It's the size of a thumb and plugs into a computer's USB drive. According to Ubiquisys, the idea is that overseas travellers will plug it into their Internet-connected laptops to make calls as if they were on their home network, but there are potential problems with interference if used that way.

According to Rupert Baines, marketing head of Picochip Ltd., a more realistic application for a tiny plug-in cell is to make it work with cable boxes or Internet routers, to convert them into femtocells.

A key part of the "small cell" idea is to take femtocells outside the home, into larger buildings and even outdoors.

Picochip, a British company that's the dominant maker of chips for femtocells, will be in Barcelona to talk about its chips for "public-access" femtocells, designed to serve up to 64 phone calls at a time, with a range of more than a mile. They could be used not just to ease wireless congestion in urban areas, but to fill in dead spots on the map, Baines said.

For instance, a single femtocell could provide wireless service to a remote village, as long as there's some way to connect it to the wider network, perhaps via satellite.

Analyst Francis Sideco of research firm iSuppli pointed out a surprising consumer benefit of smaller cells: better battery life in phones.

When a lot of phones talk to the same tower, they all have to "shout" to make themselves heard, using more energy. With a smaller cell, phones can lower their "voices," much like group of people moving from a noisy ballroom to a smaller, quieter room.

"Ultimately, what you end up with is a cleaner signal, with less power," Sideco said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

NEW YORK — As cell phones have spread, so have large cell towers – those unsightly stalks of steel topped by transmitters and other electronics that sprouted across the country over the last decad...
NEW YORK — As cell phones have spread, so have large cell towers – those unsightly stalks of steel topped by transmitters and other electronics that sprouted across the country over the last decad...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
11:53 PM on 02/14/2011
This is a hugly erroneous article and should be classified as urban myth. I'm a land use and environmental lawyer and do site acquisition consulting work for various wireless telecommunications providers. For years we've heard about "micro" sites, with equipment the size of a brief case and antennas that would be attached to telephone poles or street lights. While this technology exists and more is on the way, it is not what is being deployed.

All the advertisements touting "4G" (for 4th generation wireless technology) are deceptive. The leading 4G technology "LTE" replaces the existing system but it is not backward compatible with existing phones. What this means is that the existing technology cell towers will remain in place until the old technology is phased out or everyone gets 4G phones. There will be redundant networks using different generations of technology via more antennas on existing towers if they will hold them or on even more new towers.

In most markets in the country 4G networks have not yet been deployed.The specs are for 12 new 6' antennas per site plus 6 boxes mounted on a colar around the monopole with fiberoptic from the equipment and coax to the antennas. Billion$ are in the pipeline each with each cell company racing to deliver 4G service, but not with micro sites.

The bottom line is the public still faces a choice of having better wireless technology or getting rid of unsightly towers. Not a pretty picture, maybe, but it's real.
02:59 AM on 02/14/2011
So, is that going to improve voice quality?
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
02:49 AM on 02/14/2011
A related story:

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-02/disconnected
03:33 PM on 02/13/2011
"what effect does the 24 hour bombardmen­t of ever more powerful digital signals have on the human body?"

You will get brain parasites. Watch out.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
11:14 AM on 02/14/2011
maybe that is the reason behind the large fox news audience?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wespenn56
Progressives = progress.
07:22 AM on 02/15/2011
You are soooo fanned and faved!
11:54 AM on 02/13/2011
I wonder if it will improve ATT&T's service.

Can you hear me now?
11:03 AM on 02/13/2011
To be honest, In rarely notice cell towers. I live in a more urban area, but overall never really notice them. Not sure if they just fit in better with the urban landscape, or like telephon poles they are rarely noticed anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Phitzwell
12:21 PM on 02/13/2011
Most are hidden either in a fake tree or behind fiberglass. You would be shocked how many are around you though that you just cant see.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
02:52 AM on 02/14/2011
Depends on your are many places don't bother to hide them at all.

But they are everywhere.
12:28 PM on 02/13/2011
Yeah, but in the long run, it'd be nice to have all that stuff be less obtrusive. Location and route-based marketing should already have made roadside billboards obsolete.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:23 AM on 02/13/2011
Why not eliminate cell phones and get civilization back on track!
10:18 AM on 02/13/2011
what effect does the 24 hour bombardment of ever more powerful digital signals have on the human body?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Phitzwell
12:23 PM on 02/13/2011
The radiation levels the antennas put out are just a tad above background and are generally 50 foot up in the air. Next time you stand in front of a microwave oven you are receiving a higher dose than a year of cell transmission
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
02:53 AM on 02/14/2011
Interesting made up levels. Very doubtful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
veteran1964
10:01 AM on 02/13/2011
With all the billions of dollars being spent on cell towers, production and instalization of all of these cubes and the manpower, why don't they just link us ALL up to the satellites and provide us with a phone that works with them. It would be simpler to have satellite communications than with all of these poles, wires, etc. I would be willing to pay a bit extra to have this than what we have today. Satellite phones are already here. Drop the prices way down and millions will subscribe and then there will be no DEAD spots.
12:27 AM on 02/14/2011
Satellites costs hundreds of millions of dollars, and there aren't enough of them for everyone to use them the way you describe.
If cost is no object, like if you are CIA or your big employer is paying for it, then satellite is a great way to go.
But for most of us, it just won't be affordable, so the above news is potentially great news.
11:57 PM on 02/14/2011
Satellite phones only work outdoors with line of sight to a satellite, like GPS. Communications satellites only have so much capacity at that. This is a widely held belief, but not realistic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Frank
My last name is FRANK so thats what I am..
08:46 AM on 02/13/2011
now all the huge cell towers that are everywhere looking ugly will become obsolete and no doubt when the companies that own them go out of business and cannot sell them many will be left where they are simply because its too expensive to take them down...the skyline will look even uglier than it does today with all the lame looking telephone poles everywhere...
12:30 AM on 02/14/2011
A bigger concern might be what to do about any future abandoned towers which could pose a big safety risk as they deteriorate.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
02:57 AM on 02/14/2011
You live in a strange place. Around here they'd be removed quickly.
12:09 AM on 02/15/2011
Most cell tower landlords, or local zoning authorities, require a bond to be posted to pay the cost of removing the towers if obsolete.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quotidien
08:45 AM on 02/13/2011
What's the stock symbol for Alcatel-Lucent?
photo
born 2b different
research b4 u post
09:59 AM on 02/13/2011
if you had typed that into google you would already have the answer.
01:09 PM on 02/13/2011
ALU.

born 2b different, you logged in for the sole purpose of proving how superior you are? You couldn't have bothered to be helpful? Jerk behavior, dude.
12:31 AM on 02/14/2011
I think it was more along the lines of teach a person to fish as opposed to feeding them a fish.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DharmaRecruit
4 8 15 16 23 42
08:28 AM on 02/13/2011
Now if we can just get rid of archaic telephone poles and wires. Seriously, how many towns look wretched simply because wires are draped across sun-bleached wooden poles and cluttering up the views? It's time to step into the 21st century.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:22 AM on 02/13/2011
Agrees. But, the cost of doing so is expensive and requires far more planning if not the possibility of loosing wooded areas to accomodate the inground service.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
drsolo
Progressive Wisconsin
09:57 AM on 02/13/2011
They may be called "telephone" poles but they carry electrical lines so getting rid of them will require burying the lines along with cable and dsl services. The upside of this tiny units will be much easier to pinpoint the location of anyone using their cell phones!!!!
06:19 AM on 02/13/2011
Antennae
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxjr
02:28 AM on 02/13/2011
Yeee haww. This should save me a few bucks a month, my sister lives in an area that is between too large towers, one is in New Brunswick the other Nova Scotia. So every time I make a call while visiting her I get dinged for roaming charges. Small source towers would end that glitch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mara Para
01:40 AM on 02/13/2011
I live in central Wisconsin. Vast glaciers covered Wisconsin eons ago. As these glaciers moved, they sculpted the land beneath. For countless millennia, the Mississippi River cleaved deeply through the land along our western edge, creating magnificent bluffs and hundreds of little mountains. Bald eagles fly above these bluffs, perching on the highest tree brances and swooping down to catch fish in the mighty river below.

Two Great Lakes lie along our nothern and eastern boundaries. Hundreds of lakes and rivers puddle and flow throughout the state. In fact, the Wisconsin River flows between ancient bluffs not far from my home. Bald eagles live there, too. It is beautiful.

Except for those @*#! cell towers everywhere. Honestly, I can hardly wait for them to be replaced. In my lifetime, I hope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Phitzwell
12:26 PM on 02/13/2011
Get your state and local governments to demand the towers be hidden. The hidden trees for instance look so real that I have known people who have leaned against one and asked where the tower was.