iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Votes To Kill F-35 Second Engine Program


First Posted: 02/16/11 03:48 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Amanda Terkel contributed reporting.

WASHINGTON -- More than half of the House Republicans voted on Wednesday to earmark $450 million in funds for a duplicative fighter-jet engines that the Department of Defense has repeatedly said it does not need. But a bipartisan coalition, including just over half of GOP freshmen, voted against the F-35 engines, approving an amendment to strip an expenditure long bemoaned as pure pork, but defended by members of Congress from the states who would benefit from the project.

Support for or opposition to the project had more to do with region than party. Members from Ohio and Indiana, where General Electric Co. and Rolls-Royce would build the fighter engines, unanimously backed the extra engine. House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio is an outspoken supporter of the jet engine, but didn't cast a vote, observing the speaker's tradition of abstaining. The opposition from inside his party to a pet-project of Boehner's is a rebuke to the speaker.

Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.), who introduced the amendment, told The Huffington Post that he was heartened that members took the chance to live up to their campaign promises.

"What it comes down to is what was the November election about?" he said after the vote. "What were you sent here to do? And that was to cut spending. I have $450 million we can cut today. The speculation that over the next 50 years, two engines might drive down costs, is just that -- it's speculative."

Ryan Alexander, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, praised the vote, saying it was important "to demonstrate that nothing should be off limits when it comes to cutting wasteful spending."

The Pentagon largely escaped the deep spending cuts proposed in the House GOP's continuing resolution, which set out to trim more than $60 billion from current spending levels. But Department of Defense Secretary Robert Gates urged Congress to add an amendment to the budget bill to cut funding for the program, calling it unnecessary and wasteful.

After the vote, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell tweeted that Gates was "gratified that the House has recognized merits of DoD's position in opposing the extra engine."

Lobbyists from both sides tried to win over freshmen Republicans, many of whom were torn between dueling priorities: fiscal responsibility and support for military funding. Rolls-Royce and General Electric representatives descended on Capitol Hill in the days before the vote to lobby against the amendment, which they said would allow for a monopoly on fighter engines by Pratt & Whitney, the current manufacturer.

This story was updated with additional information.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Amanda Terkel contributed reporting. WASHINGTON -- More than half of the House Republicans voted on Wednesday to earmark $450 million in funds for a duplicative fighter-jet engines that the Departmen...
Amanda Terkel contributed reporting. WASHINGTON -- More than half of the House Republicans voted on Wednesday to earmark $450 million in funds for a duplicative fighter-jet engines that the Departmen...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,965
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (158 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:07 PM on 02/18/2011
Mr Boehner seems to have chosen Joe Biden, rather than Nancy Pelosi, as his role model. Boehner aims to be affable, popular, emotionally expressive, and capable of laughing at himself.

But Boehner hasn't quite got it right. He comes across as obsequious, easily bought and sold, emotionally unstable, and ridiculous.
03:14 PM on 02/18/2011
It's really nice that everyone speaks up on FB, a good place to bitch and moan. We need to get really loud some how. We know that the Republicans in the house are going to hurt many people and kill many babies and old people. They are going to create a whole new generation of homeless people as well as sick and defenseless. They are doing everything to everything they can to take our vote away and everything they can to take more money from the poor and middle class and deliver it to the rich and ultra rich. I just saw the President speak at Intel. Wow, we actually have a president with brains. What a difference form GWB. We need to support Our very good President Obama if we want to survive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joyfree
Jaded by life, but ever hopeful...
02:17 AM on 02/19/2011
You deserve a fan---
11:04 AM on 02/18/2011
Always money for fighter jets, weapons and war. BUT not for the poor!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
10:06 PM on 02/17/2011
Justify the war for the first time, DRAFT THE REPUBLICANS, including Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Winebuger. Put them on night watch on the front line without support

Tongue in Cheek, I don't think like them, but just wonder what it was like to thing like them ONCE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
09:11 PM on 02/17/2011
First Question: Do we need it?
Military says nope. Budget says nope. Final answer: Nope.

Didn't even make it to the second question.

Low Hanging Fruit.
08:51 PM on 02/17/2011
It is a little bit refreshing to see members of the GOP not voting in total lockstep as if they were the Supreme Congress of the Soviet Union or something. Aside from the obvious fact that this 2nd engine idea is a total waste of money and F-35's aren't good at stopping people from strapping bombs to themselves and committing acts of terrorism. If we can't afford high speed trains, we certainly can't afford to spend a trillion dollars a year on the Pentagon.
08:27 PM on 02/17/2011
The pentagon and DOP are just as inefficient as ever. It reminds me of the Pentagon Papers and the development of the Bradly Fighting Vehicle. It seems like the Pentagon is really the place to significantly reduce spending, not by cutting funding but be having some sort of efficiency, any efficiency at all would do fine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Oates
Country Loving Democrat
07:11 PM on 02/17/2011
We didn't see Nancy losing any glitter shops or man sized high heel stores in her district when she was speaker...
John is just not man enough to fill her skirt!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StevieRae
Neutralize "being primaried" by voting
06:55 PM on 02/17/2011
Those Republicans in Ohio and Indiana who voted for the additional f35 engines because they would be built in their districts merely shows how clever military contractors were in spreading the production of their products/weapons into every major House district.

We're good at pitchin forks at the issues in the abstract, but, when it get a little to close to "home", then it gets personal and we're defensive. How will we ever reduce military spending given these conditions????

What am I missing?
05:39 PM on 02/17/2011
As I've said before there's always the China option: repatriates dollars, keeps jobs, perpetuates the arms race.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elbrando
The dream shall never die - Ted Kennedy
05:36 PM on 02/17/2011
A $400 million cut in military spending. about time.
04:24 PM on 02/17/2011
I bet liberals are happy with tea partiers now...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LittleOldLadyWho
Lifelong Liberal Democrat
05:23 PM on 02/17/2011
Always have been!!  This means that the GOP will have to go to work!  Besides, they (GOP) worked SOOO, so hard to pump them up.  As goes cause and affect  . . . "you reap what you sow!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Oates
Country Loving Democrat
07:03 PM on 02/17/2011
Yeah! How's that whole 'hopey' 'changey' thing workn for ya?
They gave birth and are now being eating alive by their ungratefull children.....
photo
alberto93
A humanist, rationalist.
04:16 PM on 02/17/2011
Since GOP have a clear majority in the House, then Boehner is leader of NOTHING. Now smile Mr. Speaker!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
03:40 PM on 02/17/2011
Baw.lboy, wipe those tears “off the table”.