iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lawmaker Seeks To 'Modify' Child Labor Laws

Child Labor

First Posted: 02/16/11 11:21 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Welcome to our new blog, "The Watchdog," which will keep a close eye on regulatory agencies and how their actions impact the lives of everyday Americans. Though the rules and regulations they write -- from determining how much arsenic is allowable in your drinking water to whether your favorite TV show can drop the F-bomb in primetime -- affect all of us, their deliberations and the way that lobbyists influence their decisions receives very little coverage.

To make sense of these debates, follow the implementation of health care reform and financial reform and decipher the minutia of the Federal Register, "The Watchdog" is on the case. If you have any tips or suggestions, send them to marcus@huffingtonpost.com.

live blog

Oldest Newest

UPDATE: New House Oversight Committee chair Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) just issued his first subpoena for documents from Bank of America related to Countrywide's VIP program involving favorable mortgages for friends of former CEO Angelo Mozillo.

A spokesman for Bank of America emphasized that, "Upon acquiring Countrywide in July 2008, Bank of America immediately discontinued Countrywide's "VIP Loan Program." Bank of America has never had such a program." He added: "While we place the highest priority on keeping customer data confidential, we are obliged by Congress to respond to this subpoena."

Here is some of Issa's press release:

“Countrywide orchestrated a deliberate and calculated effort to use relationships with people in high places in order to manipulate public policy and further their bottom line to the detriment of the American taxpayers even at the expense of its own lending standards,” said Issa. “This subpoena will allow us to obtain the information needed to answer the outstanding public interest questions regarding the full size and scope of the VIP program. The American people have a right to know the totality of who participated in the Countrywide’s VIP program and what they did in return for access to it. Our role is to get all of the facts so that the American people can judge for themselves who should be held responsible and accountable.”

The subpoena compels Bank of America to produce the following by noon on March 7, 2011:

All documents, including emails, related to covered borrowers serviced by Countrywide Financial through the Branch 850 and/or VIP and/or Friends of Angelo program.

All documents, including e-mails, transmitted by Countrywide officials notifying a covered borrower of membership in the VIP and/or Friends of Angelo program.

All documents, including e-mails, transmitted between and among Countrywide officials discussing the purposes and goals of the VIP and/or Friends of Angelo program.

Documents sufficient to show the number of persons enrolled in the VIP and/or Friends of Angelo program for each of calendar years 1996-2008, and the city and state of residence of such persons who were covered borrowers.

The term "covered borrowers" means at the time of the loan the borrower, or their spouse, was:

A current or former officer or employee of a federal agency
A current or former Member, officer, or employee of the U.S. Congress
A current or former officer or employee of a government-sponsored enterprise
A current or former officer or employee of a state or local government

Share this:

In a move that is raising plenty of eyebrows, Missouri state Senator Jane Cunningham has proposed a bill that would "modify" child labor laws, eliminating the prohibition on employment of children under 14. The proposal has sparked an outcry in the state but Cunningham defends the bill, saying that it's important to cultivate a work ethic in young people and emphasizing that kids are still prohibited from working in dangerous professions.

"It's kind of a common sense thing," she tells The Huffington Post. "Right now, it's so over the top with regulations -- what businesses have to do, schools have to do. Parents should be in charge, deciding on the work ethic of their children."

Cunningham says that children are still protected by law from working in "dangerous jobs, like coal mines, with animals, with blades or involving dangerous stunts." She says that her bill simply loosens an overly broad prohibition on child labor and would allow kids to work at movie theaters, to babysit or to cut lawns, blaming the hysteria on union "misinformation" and politics.

Here is the language in her bill (SB22):

This act modifies the child labor laws. It eliminates the prohibition on employment of children under age fourteen. Restrictions on the number of hours and restrictions on when a child may work during the day are also removed. It also repeals the requirement that a child ages fourteen or fifteen obtain a work certificate or work permit in order to be employed. Children under sixteen will also be allowed to work in any capacity in a motel, resort or hotel where sleeping accommodations are furnished. It also removes the authority of the director of the Division of Labor Standards to inspect employers who employ children and to require them to keep certain records for children they employ. It also repeals the presumption that the presence of a child in a workplace is evidence of employment.

Even Jay Leno had some fun with the proposal, quipping last night:

"And in Missouri, Republican state Sen. Jane Cunningham has introduced a bill that would eliminate her state's child labor laws. Well, yeah, I mean, why should the 10-year-olds in China be getting all the good factory jobs?"

Share this:

Pharmalot reports:

The workings of the media may not always be clear, but one long-standing practice - especially among medical journals - is to apply an embargo on information before publication. Lately, however, this has become controversial as a growing number of journals and institutions are adding various requirements, notably barring journalists from seeking expert comment prior to the moment an embargo is lifted.

The issue has gained considerable traction thanks, in part, to coverage provided by a relatively new blog called Embargo Watch. And the discussion picked up steam recently when the FDA adopted the same approach as new policies for approving medical devices were announced. And so the Association of Health Care Journalists has written the agency for clarification.

“The restriction imposed on the medical-device announcement rewrote a longstanding compact between reporters and various public and scientific organizations. It also hampered or delayed reporters’ ability to fully inform the public about what the FDA is doing with taxpayers’ money. The early reports on the medical device approval process were brief and uninformative as a result,” wrote Charles Ornstein and Felice Freyer of the AHCJ (full disclosure: we are a long-standing member).

Share this:

President Obama’s proposed 2012 budget includes a small ($24 million) increase for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which includes a $6 million increase for the agency’s 21 whistleblower programs.

OSHA’s Whistleblower Protection Program aims to protect private sector workers from retaliation for reporting wrongdoing.

In addition, the $384 million budget request for the Mine Safety and Health Administration represents a nearly $27 million increase over the FY 2010 enacted level of $357 million.

Share this:

Since 1990, the Government Accountability Office has compiled a list of federal programs and operations that it says are high-risk due to their greater vulnerability to fraud, waste and mismanagement. Of the 50 areas it designated that year, one-third have been removed due to progress they've made to address the GAO's recommendations.

This year, GAO is adding one program to the list -- Interior's Management of Federal Oil and Gas Resources. Per its new report:

Interior does not have reasonable assurance that it is collecting its share of billions of dollars of revenue from oil and gas produced on federal lands and it continues to experience problems in hiring, training, and retaining sufficient staff to provide oversight and management of oil and gas operations on federal lands and waters. Further, Interior recently began restructuring its oil and gas program, which is inherently challenging, and there are many open questions about whether Interior has the capacity to undertake this reorganization while carrying out its range of responsibilities, especially in a constrained resource environment.

Many of the problems at DOI were first brought to attention by the Project on Government Oversight, which has thoroughly probed the agency's mismanagement of oil and gas resources.

The new chair of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who won kudos for his early warnings of trouble at DOI's former Minerals Management Service, will be holding a press conference this afternoon to discuss the report's findings. As to the GAO's criticism of the Interior Department, Issa stated:

“In 2006, the Department of the Interior’s own Inspector General Earl Devaney told the Oversight Committee that ‘short of a crime, anything goes at the highest levels of the Department of the Interior.’ It’s better late than never, but it shouldn’t have taken the worst ecological disaster in history for GAO to place this program onto the high risk list.”

Share this:

- Study: New credit card rules helped consumers without raising rates

- Watch live the House Commerce subcommittee debate net neutrality and regulation of the Internet

- Top regulator: Swaps trading venues, a centerpiece of legislation overhauling derivatives, may need to be phased in later than planned because many will miss an October 15 deadline for meeting self-policing requirements.

- One of the best ledes for a story about developments in the regulation of complex derivatives: "A top U.S. financial regulator rejected fears that new derivatives rules will hurt businesses trying to hedge their costs, saying the price of a six-pack of beer won't skyrocket because of the reforms."

Share this:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Welcome to our new blog, "The Watchdog," which will keep a close eye on regulatory agencies and how their actions impact the lives of everyday Americans. Though the rules and regulations they write --...
Welcome to our new blog, "The Watchdog," which will keep a close eye on regulatory agencies and how their actions impact the lives of everyday Americans. Though the rules and regulations they write --...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,024
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
04:54 PM on 02/18/2011
Those of you who are mentally stuck in a Fifties' frame of reference need to look around. The days when a young man could show pluck by sweeping floors are gone. You can't start in the mail room and wind up as a VP anymore. Those days are over.

Of the successful people we all know today, who among them swept floors for a living? Bill Gates? Larry Ellison? Mark Zuckerberg? No, none of them. None of them became successful by enduring child labor.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
03:41 PM on 02/18/2011
Work ethic. Right. The only children who would be affected would be from low-income families, and the need to be inculcated early not to have any expectations from life. Just work for The Man. No need to do homework because your lot in life is manual labor, and you won't need calculus for that.

Actually, I thought other union-earned worker rights would be assailed before child labor. That they started with this is a bad, bad indicator for all American workers -- even the ones who think they're somehow different or exempt.
02:34 PM on 02/18/2011
It would be more beneficial to encourage an education ethic on 14 year olds. They have the first 16 to 22 years of their lives to devote to learning. Don't distract them with earning an income too early. They have the rest of their lives to do that. Maybe she's just trying to get them used to low wages at an early age.
03:36 PM on 02/18/2011
She doesn't want the kids to have time to devote to learning. That's the point of what she's trying to do.

The corporatists won't even stop at exploiting children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeTroll
Prove your own claims. I'm not your intern.
01:43 PM on 02/18/2011
So the unskilled unemployed can stop blaming illegal aliens for "taking their jobs" and start blaming their own kids?
jokerdanny
my other bio is a macro
01:38 PM on 02/18/2011
oh those compassionate conservatives...dontcha just lovem
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ricardo01
The poodle chews it.
12:51 PM on 02/18/2011
Cunningham is right. When the GOP gets done with this nation, babysitting, washing cars, and mowing lawns are going to be the best jobs we have. Might as well train the workforce now.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
Christian, liberal lawyer
11:43 AM on 02/18/2011
Why send hazardous, menial good jobs to China when cheap child labor can be found right here in the good ol' U.S. of A.?
 
Why pay to educate a child through a high school diploma, if he can learn all the skills necessary to be a successful janitor or poolboy by the age of 15?  That's right, kids, get a headstart in the workforce by skipping all those unnecessary science and math classes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
10:43 AM on 02/18/2011
Jay Leno said it all!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdcrump
Conservatism: The struggle to justify selfishness
10:42 AM on 02/18/2011
From the bill:
This act modifies the child labor laws. It eliminates the prohibition on employment of children under age fourteen. Restrictions on the number of hours and restrictions on when a child may work during the day are also removed. It also repeals the requirement that a child ages fourteen or fifteen obtain a work certificate or work permit in order to be employed. Children under sixteen will also be allowed to work in any capacity in a motel, resort or hotel where sleeping accommodations are furnished."

Guess that guarantees the votes of the Grand Old Pedophiles.
10:27 AM on 02/18/2011
Jane is too old to have children who would be affected by modifying child labor laws. But perhaps she could offer up her grandchildren. With no skin in the game, Jane is just another empty-headed politician.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
01:11 AM on 02/18/2011
My father was one of 15 children.
Fifteen.
When the Great Depression hit, his mother removed ALL the kids from school.
Their "job" was to find fuel, food, anything to keep the family going.
(They weren't enforcing child labor laws then, I am guessing.)

But this is clear...if we lower the age of employment, more kids will drop out, work low wage jobs, and never have any future beyond pay check to pay check.

I have to wonder at anyone who see's this as "an American dream".

My father and his siblings never GOT an education...they all died without even a high school diploma. But in their day, a worker could afford a family. Now? Minimum wage won't do much to support a family of four...wake up people...if you take it all quietly, rest assured, you will witness the next "gilded age" for the very few.

So much for the "service economy"....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeTroll
Prove your own claims. I'm not your intern.
01:41 PM on 02/18/2011
It was much the same with my dad growing up in Chicago's Little Italy in Capone's day. He was educated via the G.I.Bill after WWII. Mom was pulled out to work her family's farm in those days. She finally got her GED in the 70s a few weeks before my oldest brother graduated.

I have to doubt there would be the same type of GI bill for these kids to look forward to regardless of how many wars we let them participate in...
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
12:14 AM on 02/18/2011
we had an older guy that worked with us that drove the schoolbus at 14........now, that is a 21 year old job or more.....we baby our kids and dont teach them necessary skills and then wonder why america is going backwards...
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dancingstu
Christian, liberal lawyer
11:39 AM on 02/18/2011
Why is operating heavy, potentially lethally dangerous machinery a priority for kids 14 and under?  After eliminating the requirements that employers of schoolchildren be inspected, how dangerous do you think their workplaces should be so we don't baby them anymore?
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
03:21 PM on 02/18/2011
i dont think 14 and under should drive a bus...i am just pointing out in the us they did....i think a 13-14 year old should be able to drive a riding lawnmower....even for a business to earn extra money if that is his/her priority in life. i also think if a 12 year old walks into joes grocery and can sweep the floor down the block from his house and joe is willing to hire him at min wage....the two should be allowed to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julepandme
01:46 PM on 02/18/2011
ah yes, putting children to work - that's not going backwards AT ALL
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
03:19 PM on 02/18/2011
i am sure you will have hard working children...will you allow them to at least rake the leaves...
photo
Neets101
politely asking for mod squad approval
08:11 PM on 02/17/2011
Ya, sure those of you who worked as youngsters and suffered not were the reason those protections were enacted in the first place.

There was never any abuse of child labor? The regulations were put in place because the government was bored that day?

Get real.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
A truly free society is inevitable!
06:26 PM on 02/17/2011
Anyone who thinks the government should point guns at people to force them to keep their kids from working have real problems. I was forced to hide my employment when I was a teen risking prosecution of my employer and my parents. My kids had to do the same. When a kid wants to work and learn a trade or just work for pocket money then what business is that of the government? If you are the type of person that calls the cops when you see the neighbors kid mowing lawns then seek help. Child actors are exempt btw. There is no one crying about the 6 yo actor who puts in 12 hours. Stop supporting the guns of the government.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
12:09 AM on 02/18/2011
it is ridiculous.....and we wonder why they dont learn a decent work ethic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdcrump
Conservatism: The struggle to justify selfishness
11:30 AM on 02/18/2011
Six yo and under are restricted to 3 hours. That's why they like to hire twins or triplets for those roles. 'Point guns at people to keep kids from working'? You like to make stuff up, don't you? Grow up, kid.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDog79
05:26 PM on 02/17/2011
About the child labor laws - with all the unemployed people in the US do we really need child labor? and does the proposed law have minimum wage for children or are they paid in candy - because I think offering children candy to do work may be crossing a line somewhere.
Lastly, in Ohio, children can babysit and mow lawns without changes to child labor laws. what could she be thinking?