More

Bernanke: Regulators Can Handle 'Too Big To Fail' Banks

Bernanke

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/18/11 01:57 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Fed chairman Ben Bernanke said on Thursday that regulators could now handle the collapse of a "too big to fail" bank. The next day, presenting a new research paper, Bernanke argued that foreign investors helped fuelled the financial crisis.

Speaking at a meeting of the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday, Bernanke said new regulations created under the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill passed last year, would take time to implement, but that regulation had improved. (Scroll down for video.)

"We've all learned lessons from the crisis," Bernanke told the committee, according to published testimony.

"What have you learned," asked Senator Richard Shelby (R- Ala.) ranking republican on the Senate Banking Committee.

"The importance of being very aggressive and not being willing to allow banks too much leeway particularly when they're inadequate in areas like risk management where it turned out to be such an important problem during the crisis," Bernanke responded.

"We've done a lot to strengthen out supervision on a day to day basis," Bernanke added.

Later on Thursday, speaking in Paris ahead of the G20 series of meetings between the finance ministers and central bankers of the world's 20 leading economies, Bernanke suggested foreign investors' desire for American securities exacerbated the financial crisis. (Scroll down for document.)

In the rush to buy American assets, Bernanke said in the Paris speech, foreign investors pushed banks to turn risky mortgages into bonds rated as safe, and ultimately helped cause the financial crisis between 2007 and 2009.

In the speech presenting a new research paper written with other Fed economists, Bernanke said:

"The preferences of foreign investors for highly rated U.S. assets, together with similar preferences by many domestic investors, had a number of implications, including for the relative yields on such assets. Importantly, though, the preference by so many investors for perceived safety created strong incentives for U.S. financial engineers to develop investment products that "transformed" risky loans into highly rated securities. Remarkably, even though a large share of new U.S. mortgages during the housing boom were of weak credit quality, financial engineering resulted in the overwhelming share of private-label mortgage-related securities being rated AAA. The underlying contradiction was, of course, ultimately exposed, at great cost to financial stability and the global economy."

The Federal Reserve chairman said that the housing bubble, and its attendant regulatory failures however, were all-American.

According to the Financial Times:

Bernanke has previously argued that a "global savings glut" led emerging markets to send large amounts of capital to the US in the 2000s, pushing down US interest rates. His new paper says that those emerging markets wanted safe assets - and US regulators failed to keep the financial system from creating them.

Speaking in Paris ahead of the G20 on Friday, Bernanke also said countries with large trade surpluses should let their currencies increase in value, instead of keeping their currencies artificially low, likely a veiled reference to China's policy of keeping the yuan low.

"The maintenance of undervalued currencies by some countries has contributed to a pattern of global spending that is unbalanced and unsustainable," Bernanke said, at the Paris event.

The G20 meeting is taking place in Paris this weekend. The last meeting, in Korea in November, happened just after the Fed announced it's $600 billion plan to help lift markets. The move, derided as "printing money" sparked criticism from foreign officials.


Global Imbalances: Links to Economic and Financial Stability, Remarks by Ben Bernanke Chairman Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at the Banque de France

The full text of Ben Bernanke's G20 speech on global imbalances is also available here.
A full video of the Senate Banking Committee meeting is online here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Fed chairman Ben Bernanke said on Thursday that regulators could now handle the collapse of a "too big to fail" bank. The next day, presenting a new research paper, Bernanke argued that foreign invest...
Fed chairman Ben Bernanke said on Thursday that regulators could now handle the collapse of a "too big to fail" bank. The next day, presenting a new research paper, Bernanke argued that foreign invest...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 196
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
05:01 PM on 03/05/2011
I love this Bernanke quote! It is so cool! It explains everything so well:

""The preferences of foreign investors for highly rated U.S. assets, together with similar preferences by many domestic investors, had a number of implications...Importantly... the preference by so many investors for perceived safety created strong incentives for U.S. financial engineers to develop investment products that "transformed" risky loans into highly rated securities."

There was so much demand for highly-rated, secure U.S. investment products that "U.S. financial engineers" were virtually compelled to "transform" risky loans into "highly rated securities"!

Isn't that fabulous? There were so many suckers, er, trusting investors, looking for secure investments that American swindlers, er, "financial engineers", were virtually forced, by "strong incentives", to gift-wrap sh*t in trusted American firm logo wrapping-paper and sell it as "highly rated securities".

The yokels, foreign and local, who trusted them, made them do it!

And,

"Remarkably, even though a large share of new U.S. mortgages during the housing boom were of weak credit quality, financial engineering resulted in the overwhelming share of private-label mortgage-related securities being rated AAA."

How amazing!

But more amazing:

"The underlying contradiction was, of course, ultimately exposed, at great cost to financial stability and the global economy."

Despite all effort the swindlers put into obfuscating and covering up.

And all the money they spent buying politicians, lobbyists and talking-heads,

The suckers somehow caught on...!!!
09:01 AM on 02/22/2011
Ya, we are ready this time, we are going to take off the "kid gloves" and put our feet down, and tell them we really mean it this time.

And if they do it again, then they are really gonna get it! Just wait until your father gets home!!
10:01 PM on 02/21/2011
I feel that Mr Bernanke is deluding himself. Bankers, fraudsters and white collar criminals are the most imaginative and innovative crooks in humanity, while Mr. Bernanke, and government agencies anywhere in the world cannot by definition be imaginative or innovative. Mr. Bernanke's claim to fame is a unique level of knowledge and skills learned from "the last depression". Governments will always be up to 100 years behind the best criminal minds due to the "groupthink" they all must adhere to. Mr. Bernanke is no exception.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2garen
09:03 PM on 02/21/2011
Of course they can handle the "too big to fail" they slipped a Micky into the legislation that allows the Fed to not have to ask to bail them out again. They can just rip off the money and stick the taxpayer with the bill.
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
06:58 PM on 02/21/2011
Will this be as good as the first time, when you and other top government officials allowed the economy to collapse.

Now you have the magic formula?
03:40 PM on 02/21/2011
His handling it just right. His staff of advisers take turns between wotking for the Fed and the too big to fail banks.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
11:35 AM on 02/21/2011
"Fondle" might be a more accurate description.

You don't "handle" someone you're in bed with.
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
06:58 PM on 02/21/2011
I like that!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:17 AM on 02/21/2011
none of the problems that caused the first crash corrected
crash number two a certainty
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
06:59 PM on 02/21/2011
I will not be surprised!
10:09 PM on 02/20/2011
Instead of helping the big companies financially with taxpayers' dollars the government should seize all their assets and send the CEO's behind bars for securities frauds. Wait a minute- quite a few in DC are in with these CEO's.
09:41 PM on 02/20/2011
The govt collects around 2.4 trillion in tax dollars per year. These big banks have more than a trillion in deposits- some 2 trillion. If one of these banks collapses...or just 2....we cannot afford to bail these whales out. The major banks need to be wound down. Lets stop the nonsense. We cannot afford to keep these banks alive. They are weapons of financial destruction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
08:52 PM on 02/20/2011
Bernanke will handle the problem by quantitative easing part 2 or throw the Banksters a bone
Obama and Geithner's Insidious Plan to Hand the Entire Housing Industry Over to the Banks
Obama should be punishing the banks that sabotaged the American dream of home ownership -- instead he's giving them the whole enchilada.

A most dastardly deed occurred last Friday when the Obama administration issued a 29-page policy statement totally abandoning the federal government’s time-honored role in helping Americans achieve the goal of homeownership. Instead of punishing the banks that sabotaged the American ideal of a nation of stakeholders by “securitizing” our homesteads into poker chips to be gambled away in the Wall Street casino, Barack Obama now proposes to turn over the entire mortgage industry to those same banks.

The proposal, originated by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, involves nothing less than a total “winding down” of the 80-year-old federal housing program, setting instead a new goal of a two-tiered America in which the masses are content to be mere renters of the American Dream. Such a deal for a country where, as the report concedes, “Half of all renters spend more than a third of their income on housing, and a quarter spend more than half.”

http://www.alternet.org/economy/149960/obama_and_geithner%27s_insidious_plan_to_hand_the_entire_housing_industry_over_to_the_banks/
08:28 PM on 02/20/2011
Bernanke's statement, "...so many investors for perceived safe...[investments] created strong incentives for U.S. financial engineers to develop investment products that "transformed" risky loans into highly rated securities." does summarize the practices of the United States' financial instrument manufacturers and sellers when they made and sold the products that caused investment instrument buyers world-wide to stop buying, or trusting, American financial instruments, which created the financial crisis.

But his attempt to assign blame for the manufacturers' criminal activities to be 'financial engineering', saying, "...though a large share...were of weak credit quality, financial engineering resulted in the overwhelming share of private-label mortgage-related securities being rated AAA.", is attempt to pass off industry and regulator corruption and conspiracy on the “financial engineers”.

American Financial Instrument Manufacturers deliberately conspired and racketeered with corrupt regulators and bought politicians and and perq-chummed officials in both public and private sectors to “engineer" changes of laws and regulations to eliminate and nullify them.

They "bought" false “AAA" ratings for their shoddily-made financial instruments and took advantage of their victims honorings of traditional business ethics and trusts of them, to sell their deliberately made swindle-purposed products.

If the financial industry had been any other industry and had made "engineered to fail" products and sold them "because there were buyers who wanted the product”, the industry would have been investigated and sued. Especially if it had racketeered to dismantle and corrupt existing regulation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheMilesHome
In the Conservatory, with a Pipe Wrench.
08:18 PM on 02/20/2011
I can help -

Throw Jamie Dimon and a few others in a couple of state facilities for a year or two. You'll see how quick it would stop.
photo
IllTakeTheRedEye
Do you know what a nonemployer business is?
08:58 PM on 02/20/2011
Covertly uncover all of their assets, like Jamie Dimon, and then seize all of those assets after a fraud conviction and you would really get them. Cannot serve as a director or corporate officer of a company again after being convicted of fraud while you were one.
 
Effect, is like the Trading Places movie with Dan Akroyd and Eddie Murphy, they would be completely broke and cannot get a job. Kinda like what they did to all of us.
bichn
There ain't no rest for the wicked.
07:30 PM on 02/20/2011
You could have handled them this time around but you bailed them out instead and aided them in getting even bigger. You have no credibility left.