iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Oil Spill Update: Scientist Finds Gulf Bottom Still Oily, Dead

Gulf Oil Spill Update

SETH BORENSTEIN   02/19/11 08:53 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Oil from the BP spill remains stuck on the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, according to a top scientist's video and slides that she says demonstrate the oil isn't degrading as hoped and has decimated life on parts of the sea floor.

That report is at odds with a recent report by the BP spill compensation czar that said nearly all will be well by 2012.

At a science conference in Washington Saturday, marine scientist Samantha Joye of the University of Georgia aired early results of her December submarine dives around the BP spill site. She went to places she had visited in the summer and expected the oil and residue from oil-munching microbes would be gone by then. It wasn't.

"There's some sort of a bottleneck we have yet to identify for why this stuff doesn't seem to be degrading," Joye told the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual conference in Washington. Her research and those of her colleagues contrasts with other studies that show a more optimistic outlook about the health of the gulf, saying microbes did great work munching the oil.

"Magic microbes consumed maybe 10 percent of the total discharge, the rest of it we don't know," Joye said, later adding: "there's a lot of it out there."

The head of the agency in charge of the health of the Gulf said Saturday that she thought that "most of the oil is gone." And a Department of Energy scientist, doing research with a grant from BP from before the spill, said his examination of oil plumes in the water column show that microbes have done a "fairly fast" job of eating the oil. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab scientist Terry Hazen said his research differs from Joye's because they looked at different places at different times.

Joye's research was more widespread, but has been slower in being published in scientific literature.

In five different expeditions, the last one in December, Joye and colleagues took 250 cores of the sea floor and travelled across 2,600 square miles. Some of the locations she had been studying before the oil spill on April 20 and said there was a noticeable change. Much of the oil she found on the sea floor – and in the water column – was chemically fingerprinted, proving it comes from the BP spill. Joye is still waiting for results to show other oil samples she tested are from BP's Macondo well.

She also showed pictures of oil-choked bottom-dwelling creatures. They included dead crabs and brittle stars – starfish like critters that are normally bright orange and tightly wrapped around coral. These brittle stars were pale, loose and dead. She also saw tube worms so full of oil they suffocated.

"This is Macondo oil on the bottom," Joye said as she showed slides. "This is dead organisms because of oil being deposited on their heads."

Joye said her research shows that the burning of oil left soot on the sea floor, which still had petroleum products. And even more troublesome was the tremendous amount of methane from the BP well that mixed into the Gulf and was mostly ignored by other researchers.

Joye and three colleagues last week published a study in Nature Geoscience that said the amount of gas injected into the Gulf was the equivalent of between 1.5 and 3 million barrels of oil.

"The gas is an important part of understanding what happened," said Ian MacDonald of Florida State University.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration chief Jane Lubchenco told reporters Saturday that "it's not a contradiction to say that although most of the oil is gone, there still remains oil out there."

Earlier this month, Kenneth Feinberg, the government's oil compensation fund czar, said based on research he commissioned he figured the Gulf of Mexico would almost fully recover by 2012 – something Joye and Lubchenco said isn't right.

"I've been to the bottom. I've seen what it looks like with my own eyes. It's not going to be fine by 2012," Joye told The Associated Press. "You see what the bottom looks like, you have a different opinion."

NOAA chief Lubchenco said "even though the oil degraded relatively rapidly and is now mostly but not all gone, damage done to a variety of species may not become obvious for years to come."

Lubchenco Saturday also announced the start of a Gulf restoration planning process to get the Gulf back to the condition it was on Apr. 19, the day before the spill. That program would eventually be paid for BP and other parties deemed responsible for the spill. This would be separate from an already begun restoration program that would improve all aspects of the Gulf, not just the oil spill, but has not been funded by the government yet, she said.

The new program, which is part of the Natural Resources Damage Assessment program, is part of the oil spill litigation – or out-of-court settlement – in which the polluters pay for overall damage to the ecosystem and efforts to return it to normal. This is different than paying compensation to people and businesses directly damaged by the spill.

The process will begin with public meetings all over the region.

___

Online:

Joye's website: http://www.marsci.uga.edu/directory/mjoye.htm

NOAA's restoration site: http://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Oil from the BP spill remains stuck on the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, according to a top scientist's video and slides that she says demonstrate the oil isn't degrading as hoped and h...
WASHINGTON — Oil from the BP spill remains stuck on the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, according to a top scientist's video and slides that she says demonstrate the oil isn't degrading as hoped and h...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 383
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
freedom1947
San Juan River Fishin'
10:25 AM on 03/31/2011
Is BP going to push its way back into our gulf area now that Libya has shut down temporarily? Is Texas Georgie Boy going to lobby for his oily friends? Do we need to destroy the oceans enviroment any more than it is? What about it Mr. Republican hero of merica!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lloyd Cata
08:47 PM on 03/19/2011
Feinberg is a glorified claims adjuster, not a environmental expert. Just because "BP is his employer" does not authorize him to make statements as to the health of the environment....unless that would reduce the amount of the damages, which appears to be the basis for Mr. Feinnerg's expert analysis.
06:10 PM on 02/25/2011
It's most likely BP fault. They started this oil drill & they better clean the rest of the oil up in the Gulf. Animals are so cute & some dolphins have died from the oil in the Gulf. BP better clean it up. Don't even support Shell or BP anymore...they are mean to our oceans. They better help now.
07:08 PM on 02/23/2011
how is this program any different from the other programs that have been initiated?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mtview
05:42 PM on 02/22/2011
Did the dispersant taint the oil so that even the microbes don't want it?
03:31 PM on 02/22/2011
Why has it taken so long for this new restoration plan to be enacted? And when is BP going to start being held more financially responsible for this plan?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:19 PM on 02/21/2011
BP told Obama what to do and he did it! I'm very disappointed Obama. This was a moment to shine and he didn't.

The EPA states that BP used a Nalco dispersant called Corexit 9500. The MSDS on that material is more than enough to raise an alarm about its use. Rep. Edward Markey (D) of Massachuse­tts raised the alarm and got the EPA to put a use "scale back" order. This order was essentiall­y useless because the Coast Guard under Thad Allen gave BP 74 exemptions in 48 days. This was a major political fight in OBAMA's schoolyard­. He was supposed to protect us. He didn't. He caved to the political and financial power of BP. Straight up cowered. If this dude is a stooge then he needs to be held accountabl­e. As do every single weak ass politician without the back bone to fight for the American people. Especially Obama. I voted for him. He seemed like he would fight for us. But every day he looks just as bought and sold as every other politician in D.C. It's time American hit the reset button, just like Egypt and Jordan!

BTW look at Corexit 9500. The main ingredient appears to be Mineral Spirits. Put a single drop of mineral spirits in a puddle and watch it cover the whole surface. Then imagine 1.8 to 42 Million gallons of Corexit in the Gulf. The oil is now under the surface where the fish are.”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valeskas
catlover/book lover democrat
02:10 PM on 02/21/2011
Why would it only take such a short time to be gone, when the Exxon Valdez area still has problems. BP and its hangman need to pay thru their nose for many more years to come. BP should only drill in England, if it goes bad their, who cares. Did people realy believe their lies, thats why the South likes its people dumb, so there politicians get kickbacks from their lobbyist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
judderwocky
my micro bio has a micro ego
01:37 PM on 02/21/2011
So the guy Obama appointed is being instructed to say that everything will be well by the time he is up for re-election. What nonsense.
photo
thromulese
i have a scream
12:14 PM on 02/21/2011
“The head of the agency in charge of the health of the Gulf said Saturday that she thought that "most of the oil is gone."

Yes. She looked at the gulf from her porch and saw no oil…so…there is no oil. That’s science when it is bought and paid for by the polluters.

“And a Department of Energy scientist, doing research with a grant from BP from before the spill, said his examination of oil plumes in the water column show that microbes have done a "fairly fast" job of eating the oil.”

It is just too obvious that the problem here is the research is being done with a GRANT FROM BP. I’m surprised they are not saying the spill was “good” for the Gulf.

“Lawrence Berkeley National Lab scientist Terry Hazen said his research differs from Joye's because they looked at different places at different times.”

Yes, one was looking in Ohio and the other was looking in the Gulf.

BP poisoned the Gulf for decades to come. No slanted, bought and paid for science, and no right wing politician can cover up that fact. I for one will never again eat ANYTHING pulled out of the polluted gulf again.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
10:30 AM on 02/21/2011
The Gulf of Mexico is Dying - by Dr. Tom Termotto
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/203777

'Nuff said ☮
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
09:51 AM on 02/21/2011
Any money that Feinberg doesn't disperse from the compensation fund goes right back to BP.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thetruth92802
08:53 AM on 02/21/2011
Obama fault
photo
Lorindol
I shall consider it . . .
11:57 AM on 02/21/2011
No Obama fault. Bush fault. Deregulation bad. Ungawa!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
12:13 PM on 02/21/2011
F & F ~ Right on, Lorindol ☮ 

Ch  en  ey's  push of deregulators led to BP disaster
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyPHG07Ii0
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
12:19 PM on 02/21/2011
I forgot, Obama has no power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:17 AM on 02/21/2011
The government has been lying about the amount of oil and toxic chemicals in the Gulf waters since the beginning, and they continue to lie. This is not surprising.

Just don't eat the seafood. Give it up for a few years, or maybe forever. Luckily we don't need seafood to live on. It's obvious there are toxins in the environment down there and the evidence continues to mount.

Humans continue to poison the environment and eventually, it will not be able to support us anymore because we're killing it. It's that simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
09:52 AM on 02/21/2011
Yes but this is in the water cycle in the gulf and is bringing the toxins of crude and corexit inland with the rain and windblown surf during storms. This stuff is found in fish ponds and swimming pools miles from the coast. And people are still getting ill and being hospitalized.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:25 PM on 02/21/2011
BP was instructed by the EPA to look for a safer replacement than Corexit. One of the main ingredients is mineral spirits, which appears to be the carrier for the surfactant. Mineral spirits has many, many, many suitable replacements that are biodegradable and safer for aquatic life. The fact that none of these were used is just disgusting. The only reason they didn't try is because BP is a petrochemical company. Mineral spirits is a petrochemical.

Putting these dirt bags in charge of the clean up was a huge mistake.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
06:33 AM on 02/21/2011
You pump billions of gallons of oil into an area and it seems generally obvious it doesn't go away. I am not suprised. We have so much to lose here.