More

Geithner: GOP Spending Cuts Could Cost Jobs

Geithner

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/21/11 12:31 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner isn't happy with the latest round of Republican budget cut proposals.

Geithner, speaking at a press conference after a G20 meeting, said the House of Representatives' $60 billion package of spending cuts, passed on Saturday, would cost jobs.

"In our judgment, the continuing opposition...in the House would undermine and damage our capacity to create jobs and expand the economy," Geithner said during the press conference on Saturday, Reuters reported.

The U.S. has been pilloried around the world for huge budget deficits, which the Obama Administration responded to by promising to halve deficits by 2013. According to Reuters, Geithner told the G20 that the 2012 budget would meet that goal.

The budget also forecasted slower growth and higher unemployment for the next two years. In prior budgets, the administration had projected robust growth and a lower unemployment rate for 2011 and 2012.

In its latest spending plan, the White House revised GDP growth forecasts: from 3.8 percent in last year's budget, to 2.7 percent this year. Unemployment is expected to stay above 9 percent through 2011, and fall 8 percent through 2012.

The jobless rate is not expected to return to a "natural rate" of 5.3 percent until 2016, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In a recent paper, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco concluded that employment won't recover to pre-crisis levels instead falling to a new baseline rate of 6.7 percent.

The Republican spending measures passed on Saturday were proposed in opposition to White House budget plans released last week, spurring fears that there would be no compromise before temporary measures funding the government run out on March 4. Without a budget solution, the U.S. government could shut down.

Geithner said it would not come do that, adding he was "very confident Democrats and Republicans are going to be able to come together on a program to not just reduce spending but reduce our long-term deficits," the Wall Street Journal reported.

Last week, the White House presented a budget focused on reducing the deficit and spurring growth. President Barack Obama proposed a plan that cuts funding to a variety of programs that assist the working poor, and help the needy heat their homes.

In response, early on Saturday morning following an all-night session, the House of Representatives voted 235-189, to pass legislation that would slash $60 billion in government spending between now and the end of September, setting up a showdown. The President has vowed to veto the plans.

The measures, which were passed without a single Democratic vote, are aimed primarily at domestic social spending but also have policy goals -- going after the Environmental Protection Agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner isn't happy with the latest round of Republican budget cut proposals. Geithner, speaking at a press conference after a G20 meeting, said the House of Representat...
Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner isn't happy with the latest round of Republican budget cut proposals. Geithner, speaking at a press conference after a G20 meeting, said the House of Representat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:56 AM on 03/06/2011
If heads are to roll, let's start with Geithner. What happened to the stimulus money and where's the return on the TARP funds? Get rid of the baggage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
urweatherman
01:18 AM on 02/28/2011
What do you expect he would say? GOP ideas are great, lets go for it? Why am I not surprised by his ideological arguments.....sort of a rediculous pice to have here isn't it?
01:38 AM on 02/28/2011
Why not? He was a Republican in NY, and certainly helped all his old buddies suck a boatload of cash out of the treasury
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
netman714
More disgusted daily
12:59 PM on 02/22/2011
While there is no good reason for Geithner to be ina position of power after his role in the mortgage crisis, he does have this right.
It is unbelievable that supposedly educated people who are in a position of power in the federal government do not realize that the only way out of this mess is economic growth and jobs for the unemployed. Rather than trying to help create a workable solution the Repubs and Teabaggers think that simply cutting all funding will spur economic growth.
The most demoralizing part fo this story are the millions of americans who recently voted to give the Republicans another chance to drive the car, after the many catastrophes they have already created.
12:27 PM on 02/22/2011
You mean jobs we're currently borrowing to pay for? Things that make you go hmmm...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Gregory Bowers
08:05 AM on 02/22/2011
Wow, we just lost 3,000 comments. I had a couple of gems too :(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
netman714
More disgusted daily
01:00 PM on 02/22/2011
I think everyone of my posts are the most creative witty pieces of prose ever printed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
AND NO ONE IN JAIL YET, Why?
08:03 AM on 02/22/2011
Sure it's going to cost JOB'S! to bad none will be on Wall St. or Big Bank's!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:17 AM on 02/22/2011
"So be it" is the Republicans answer. GOP need more money for other countries so cough it up America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:40 AM on 02/22/2011
What he's saying isn;t true. We dramatically cut spending after WWII, and unemployment didn't suffer.
03:35 PM on 02/22/2011
But you need to lok at what we cut spending on and what else was going on. The GDP grew faster than the debt because we stopped having to fund the war effort and we opened up many new chanels for US exports overseas. On top of that, they INCREASED taxes and change the tax rules that more than quadrupled the number is people who had to pay taxes. The Victory Tax, an aditional, flat 5% tax, was levied on all annual net incomes of $624 or more.

Spending definitely need to be cut, but we will never be able to make any headway into the debt with cuts alone.

Tax rate (lowest rate:highest rate)
1942-1943-19% 88%
1944-1945 23% 94%
1946-1947 19% 86.45%
1948-1949 16.6% 82.13%
1950 17.4% 84.36%
1951 20.4% 91%
1952-1953 22.2% 92%
1954-1963 20% 91%
1964 16% 77%
1965-1967 14% 70%
1968 14% 75.25%
1969 14% 77%
1970 14% 71.75%
1971-1981 14% 70%
1982-1986 12% 50%
1987 11% 38.5%
1988-1990 15% 28%
1991-1992 15% 31%
1993-2000 15% 39.6%
2001 15% 39.1%
2002 10% 38.6%
2003-2009 10% 35%


The only way to reduce the deficit is to cut spending AND raise taxes. But unfortunately most Americans are much happier when someone else loses their job than when they might have to pay a few extra bucks in taxes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:45 PM on 02/22/2011
We have to get government spending as a % of GDP down to about 19% in order to balance the budget. You have data from the 1950's-today. All of the top marginal tax rates you've mentioned have been tried, and tax revenue as a % of GDP has always been right around 19%.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nick-gillespie/how-to-balance-the-budget_b_819629.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
10:31 PM on 02/21/2011
One of the few times Geithner is correct..taking money out of the economy during a deflationary recession will undoubtedly cost jobs. Not that the GOP cares...
luminavi
Love kicking over anthills on both left and right.
12:26 AM on 02/22/2011
How is he ever right? He and Bernanke have bet the farm blind on classic Keynesian economics which could not have accounted for the levels of globalization today. Thanks to U.S. QE, the world is getting rocked. With Libya going under and Saudi Arabia next, oil prices are destabilizing even further. Imagine the impact on GDP.
11:15 AM on 02/23/2011
Geitner is very likely correct more times than you will ever be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Andrews
How To Absolutely Secure Your Computer
10:11 PM on 02/21/2011
I am not going to argue that BUSH sucked but OBAMA is worse. Howard Dean where are you ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mstock57
Go commando
10:04 PM on 02/21/2011
The banana Republicans are counting on that Tim.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:45 PM on 02/21/2011
Wow, He got it right,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
worker beenumbed
09:14 PM on 02/21/2011
The SEC should be hiring.The SEC has ordered 1.03billion to be paid in penalties by securities violators in fiscal 2010.See "Select SEC and Market Data"Increase funding and protect the citizen.Securities violators were also ordered to 'disgorge' 1.8 billion in profits.
08:06 PM on 02/21/2011
What must be cut to zero without any question is the 'budget' of Geithner's own Treasury Department. These people plan in 2012 to take from the taxpayers 520 Billion (over half a trillion, 50B increase from 2011) dollars and give the money to themselves (the Geithner's own NY Fed bank/GS and others) as 'interest' payments.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
namewithheld
Sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guidelines.
06:57 PM on 02/21/2011
Ok, I hate the GOTP as much as anybody does, but Geithner has ZERO CREDIBILITY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Andrews
How To Absolutely Secure Your Computer
10:06 PM on 02/21/2011
@namewithheld Has he ever paid his taxes yet?