iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gov. Walker Informed That Bill Targeting Unions May Cost State $46 Million In Federal Funds

Scott Walker

First Posted: 02/22/11 11:23 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

***UPDATED BELOW***

WASHINGTON -- Budget referees and transportation officials in Wisconsin have informed Gov. Scott Walker (R) that if he were to pass his controversial anti-union legislation into law, he could be forfeiting tens of millions of dollars in federal funds for transportation.

Under an obscure provision of federal labor law, states risk losing federal funds should they eliminate "collective bargaining rights" that existed at the time when federal assistance was first granted. The provision, known as "protective arrangements" or "Section 13C arrangements," is meant as a means of cushioning union (and even some non-union) members who, while working on local projects, are affected by federal grants.

It also could potentially hamstring governors like Walker who want dramatic changes to labor laws in their states. Wisconsin received $74 million in federal transit funds this fiscal year. Of that, $46.6 million would be put at risk should the collective-bargaining bill come to pass -- in the process creating an even more difficult fiscal situation than the one that, ostensibly, compelled Walker to push the legislation in the first place.

The governor is certainly aware of this. While the potential loss of funds may have escaped the attention of many observers, sources familiar with the state's transportation policy tell The Huffington Post that Walker's office has been informed of the relevant legal language. Moreover, in an a nearly unnoticed report filed by the state's Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the non-partisan budget scorekeeper, the stakes are laid fairly bare.

"According to information from the U.S. Department of Labor, the proposed changes in collective bargaining rights included under SS SB 11 could impact the ability of unionized transit systems in the state to receive existing federal transit aid, unless actions are taken to protect the collective bargaining rights of their employees," the memo reads. "If the federal Department of Labor makes the determination that the changes under SS SB 11 affect the continuation of collective bargaining rights, and protections of transit employee's wages, working conditions, pension benefits, seniority, vacation, sick and personal leave, travel passes, and other conditions of employment, the Federal Transit Authority could not provide federal transit funding under there provisions." (See the full document below.)

A call to Walker's press shop was not immediately returned. A local report said that the governor's office felt SB11 would meet all the requirements necessary to continue receiving federal aid, though their reasoning isn't entirely clear. The state could conceivably void the projects that were dependent on the federal money. It could also try to privatize those projects.

Another option would be to petition the Department of Labor to grant a pass for the changes in collective-bargaining laws in state; that, however, would be dependent on a Democratic administration being willing to, more or less, turn a blind eye on the measure aimed at unions. The Department of Labor cannot force states to adopt collective bargaining agreements for transit workers by withholding federal funds for transit projects. But it can exert its influence on those states that seek to eliminate them.

As the Legislative Fiscal Bureau notes: "at the time of application for federal funding, each applicant has to certify that the 13 (c) collective bargaining provisions have been met. [The Federal Transit Authority] than provides certifications to the U.S. Department of Labor for their review and for public comment."

Officials from the Department of Transportation, which oversees the FTA, refused to comment for this article. Officials at the Department of Labor did not immediately return a request for comment.

***UPDATE 2/23***

Faced with the prospects of forfeiting $46.6 million in federal transit funds, Democrats in the Wisconsin House of Representatives have crafted an amendment to Gov. Scott Walker's anti-public union bill that would protect collective bargaining rights strictly for transit workers.

The amendment, authored by Reps. Tamara Grigsby (D-Milwaukee) and Penny Bernard Schaber (D-Appleton), would add transit employees to the list of "public safety employees" that are exempted from some of the harsher measures under Walker's bill.

While protecting the rights of only a small sliver of the union members -- Grigsby's office said she "would much rather maintain employee rights for all" -- the amendment could, nevertheless, be worth tens of millions of dollars for the state. As the Huffington Post reported on Tuesday night, Wisconsin stands to lose nearly all federal transit funds if it were to wipe out the collective bargaining rights of transit workers.


"We are here to do the right thing," said Grigsby in a statement announcing her amendment. "CEO Walker's bill is an attack on Wisconsin's working families and a poorly thought-out one at that. Currently, this bill will cost the state almost $47 million in federal transit aid, something I hope is an unintended consequence of this legislation. What we're proposing today is a way to preserve our vital transit systems."


WISCmemo

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
***UPDATED BELOW*** WASHINGTON -- Budget referees and transportation officials in Wisconsin have informed Gov. Scott Walker (R) that if he were to pass his controversial anti-union legislation into l...
***UPDATED BELOW*** WASHINGTON -- Budget referees and transportation officials in Wisconsin have informed Gov. Scott Walker (R) that if he were to pass his controversial anti-union legislation into l...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,541
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
10:06 PM on 03/03/2011
So when are you fools from the Peoples Republic of Madison going to Ohio. They just passed a lot tougher law in Ohio reducing collective bargaining than Walker wants for Wisconsin. What a bunch of fools. If collective bargaining for wages and benefits is so great for State governments then why doesn't President Obama give it to Federal workers? Federal workers are forbidden to collectively bargain for wages or benefits; instead, raises are determined annually through legislation. President Obama just froze the pay of Federal workers for two years, no bargaining there. Where is the outrage, Union people? I belong to a State Union and let me tell you something; collective bargaining has been corrupted. When the State Unions give politicians money they dam sure expect something for it and the tax payers get screwed because of it.
Once you college boys and girls grow up and actually work for a living you will understand. Better yet try going into business for yourself and give your employees collective bargaining rights, let a third party come in and decide what pay and benefits you will pay those employees, then lecture us all on how great it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
05:14 AM on 03/01/2011
Walker is one public employee who truly deserves a pink slip.
02:08 AM on 02/26/2011
CHECKMATE, Walker!
04:24 PM on 02/26/2011
You have just cost the us auto workers my business as well as any other union product for ever again this is the perfect example why we con't have unions in government black mail is only getting the real tax payer more frustated. I encourage any taxpayer who does not like to be black mailed with our own money to not buy union as the private unions have made it clear they are quite willing to say screw the tax payer pass the word.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sanity Rules
Liberal and anti-conservative
02:32 PM on 03/23/2011
Sorta like how big business screws the taxpayers daily...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreatdaveo
Mr. Puppers says:
11:27 PM on 02/25/2011
"A call to Walker's press shop was not immediately returned."

You should have said you were one of the Koch Brothers. I hear those calls go straight to the governor himself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jemdad99
Husband, dad, coach, career guy
10:56 PM on 02/25/2011
I understand that Gov Walker is consulting with David Koch as we read this article.
10:37 PM on 02/25/2011
plus loss of fed education aid when the state cuts it's own state aid to schools....fed $ go down too
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thecornerangel
09:43 PM on 02/25/2011
Maybe Koch will make up the difference. Walker will probably privatize highways too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim1657
06:18 PM on 02/25/2011
Thinking that Wisconsin public employees should all become independent contractors and incorporate. That way they can ask for all the great tax breaks that are given to corporations (they would pay less taxes- wouldn't that be great for the State of Wisconsin).

To make the Governor happy, they should abolish the union and form a Professional association of independent contractors performing public services. They could Call it the Chamber of small independent contractors an be treated with the same awe and respect as the Chamber of Commerce. Then maybe the Governor would talk to them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyche
04:12 PM on 02/25/2011
Apparently, this regulation has been targetted for reform, as it's a major cause of delay of millions of dollars of transit funds every year, adds millions of dollars of cost to these programs -- and no value.

http://jamsidedown.com/2011/01/obama-looking-for-dumb-federal-programs-kill-13c.html
03:03 PM on 02/25/2011
he could 'privitize' transit-let me guess, run by the Koch brothers? Gov. Wlaker, I see a felony in your future.
02:31 PM on 02/25/2011
What tax cut? No one got a tax cut. The House and Senate voted to allow the tax rates to remain where they have been for years. That is NOT a tax cut.
11:33 AM on 02/25/2011
Thank you Governor Walker for doing your part to help reduce the insane spending going on in Washington DC. The $46 million in savings, while small, is a step in the right direction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tincada
12:58 PM on 02/25/2011
Agree, WI doesn't need the money. Send it to FL.
03:05 PM on 02/25/2011
Wisconsin, please do what my great state of S.C. did=secede. Take no federal funds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreatdaveo
Mr. Puppers says:
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sanity Rules
Liberal and anti-conservative
02:34 PM on 03/23/2011
Your 'great' state of South Carolina got WHIPPED after seceding. South Carolina is a LOSER state....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelO
Occupy America
08:13 AM on 02/25/2011
That little weasel needs to be recalled.
08:05 AM on 02/25/2011
Cancel the check today. The GOPers obsession with destroying the middle class is repugnant to all decent Americans. The working class and the middle class always have been the backbone of this nation, not the mega wealthy. The middle class and working class are responsible for our nation's growth into the greatest nation on earth. These attacks on teachers and nurses, hotel and restaurant employees, bus drivers, trash collectors, fire and police, are reprehensible. Most of these members of Congress come from working and middle class backgrounds and to see them attack the very foundation of this nation is appalling.
04:34 PM on 02/26/2011
Let me tell you that a lousy 7% of the work force is not the back-bone and as far as the public emplyee unions your sucking the life out of America every one knows that as long as you have collective bargaining any tax increase to the union will be given back by the very next demacrat you elect so if your reimbused for your taxes on the next collective bargaining agreement your just a parasite you know a leach.
07:21 AM on 02/25/2011
Well, I bet he is saving more by cutting the workers' wages, oh wait, less wages, less taxes, more debit...Opps