iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Anti-Abortion Georgia Lawmaker Proposes Law That Would Criminalize Miscarriages

First Posted: 02/23/11 05:22 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Georgia Abortion

Are lawmakers from the "women are chattel" set having some sort of nation-wide competition to see who can get the most sick-minded anti-abortion law enacted? Sure seems that way! Last week, a public outcry forced South Dakota lawmakers to shelve a bill that opened the possibility that abortion providers would be endangered by people who believed that killing them was a justifiable homicide. Today comes word that Georgia state Representative Bobby Franklin is shopping a bill that wouldn't just make abortion illegal in Georgia, it would criminalize miscarriages to boot.

Jen Phillips of Mother Jones -- which has of late been America's premier harbinger of this sort of cockamamie legislation -- has the details of a law that she terms "the apex...of woman-hating craziness":

I doubt that a bill that makes a legal medical procedure liable for the death penalty will pass.

Oh, wait, sorry! Did I forget to mention that the death penalty is involved here? My bad. That's precisely the sort of thing that you read about and do not want to believe it so fervently that, at first, your brain rejects it outright, as if it were some alien tissue grafted onto your medulla oblongata. Here's the relevant portion of the law itself:

'Prenatal murder' means the intentional removal of a fetus from a woman with an intention other than to produce a live birth or to remove a dead fetus; provided, however, that if a physician makes a medically justified effort to save the lives of both the mother and the fetus and the fetus does not survive, such action shall not be prenatal murder. Such term does not include a naturally occurring expulsion of a fetus known medically as a 'spontaneous abortion' and popularly as a 'miscarriage' so long as there is no human involvement whatsoever in the causation of such event.

(c) The act of prenatal murder is contrary to the health and well-being of the citizens of this state and to the state itself and is illegal in this state in all instances.

(d) Any person committing prenatal murder in this state shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be punished as provided in subsection (d) of Code Section 16-5-1.

And it's subsection (d) of Code Section 16-5-1 that explicitly puts the death penalty on the table. Here's the statute:

TITLE 16. CRIMES AND OFFENSES

CHAPTER 5. CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON

ARTICLE 1. HOMICIDE

O.C.G.A. § 16-5-1 (2006)

§ 16-5-1. Murder; felony murder


(a) A person commits the offense of murder when he unlawfully and with malice aforethought, either express or implied, causes the death of another human being.

(b) Express malice is that deliberate intention unlawfully to take the life of another human being which is manifested by external circumstances capable of proof. Malice shall be implied where no considerable provocation appears and where all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart.

(c) A person also commits the offense of murder when, in the commission of a felony, he causes the death of another human being irrespective of malice.

(d) A person convicted of the offense of murder shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life.

Okay, let's go back to Phillips:

The bill, however, shows an astonishing lack of concern for women's health and well-being. Under Rep. Franklin's bill, HB 1, women who miscarry could become felons if they cannot prove that there was "no human involvement whatsoever in the causation" of their miscarriage. There is no clarification of what "human involvement" means, and this is hugely problematic as medical doctors do not know exactly what causes miscarriages. Miscarriages are estimated to terminate up to a quarter of all pregnancies and the Mayo Clinic says that "the actual number is probably much higher because many miscarriages occur so early in pregnancy that a woman doesn't even know she's pregnant. Most miscarriages occur because the fetus isn't developing normally."

As Phillips points out, the law also basically radically redefines personhood back to the zygote stage. So remember, in America, the optimal way of exercising your legal rights as a "person," it is best that you go straight from the womb to being a multimillion dollar, rent-seeking corporation.

(Just to review, the way this game is played is that a legislator will conceive of an absolutely insane anti-woman law, stoke outrage, then make a big show of relenting on the crazy part of the law in order to get what they want -- making abortion illegal -- enacted. They will then aver that this is the result of "negotiations" in which "all sides" have been "heard out" resulting in a "compromise.")

RELATED:
Ga. Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages [Mother Jones]

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Are lawmakers from the "women are chattel" set having some sort of nation-wide competition to see who can get the most sick-minded anti-abortion law enacted? Sure seems that way! Last week, a public...
Are lawmakers from the "women are chattel" set having some sort of nation-wide competition to see who can get the most sick-minded anti-abortion law enacted? Sure seems that way! Last week, a public...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,314
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
12:00 PM on 03/12/2011
I'm outraged at the Huffington Post and would gladly accept that you discontinue my account after this comment. You people spread "FEAR TACTIC" propoganda and spin words to suit your own purposes. The proposed law does not indicate a woman would have to prove their was "no human involvement" in order to avoid prosecution - because if I'm not mistaken we still live in the United States and that means that one is innocent until PROVEN guilty. The burden of proof would be on the state to prove that the death of the child was caused by anything other than a natural or spontaneouse abortion or miscarriage.

Oh, wait! I forgot. Libs don't believe in the laws of this country and think the Gov't and UNIONS should have more control. I disagree wholeheartedly with the sentiments of this post and the conclusions of the sited source. I also, being a woman, see abortion laws as legalized genocide, and find it abhorrent that life is so devalued that not only are we promoting the taking of human life at the pre-birth stage, but at any stage - including the elderly who may soon be on the hit list with Obamacare.

As a woman, I don't believe you can legislate morality - but I don't think you should make the taking of human life at any stage legal. EVER.
11:24 AM on 03/28/2011
The ones that do not believe in the laws of this country are the republicans; for one, they deny the separation of church and state.

Fear tactic? Just read the opinion column in the Atlanta-Journal Constitution about the same bill,

http://www.ajc.com/opinion/neal-boortz-these-guys-853460.html

I wonder how someone can value the life of an embryo too much to later disentangle completely from it once it is born... and I am leaving aside the death penalty for which THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION: it is premeditated murder
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CJWebber
I think we all love teachers.
01:21 PM on 03/09/2011
Since the fetus is considered a person, then why not charge the fetus with murder should it kill the woman?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowery2008
12:44 PM on 03/10/2011
Put the new born in baby prison if the mother dies at birth. Sounds fair. LOL
09:20 AM on 03/09/2011
the law doesn't criminalize miscarriages unless the miscarriage is deliberately caused. and the burden of proof would still be on the state. i hope the law passes so it can be taken up by the courts and the supreme court can eventually overturn roe v. wade.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowery2008
12:48 PM on 03/10/2011
You can go and have a child if you like but I think women everywhere deserve the right to choice to do so, and what about incest and rape. Women are not baby machines. We are not incubators for your of spring. Get it though your think head our body out choice.
04:13 PM on 03/10/2011
Lowery...you make a good point. But it is completely ruined by the fact that you didn't take one second to read over your post to correct the silly typos!
09:13 PM on 03/07/2011
If it's targeting abortion like so many have said then it should only discuss abortion and nothing to do with misscarriage. my sister in the last 2 years has had 4 of them and is pregnant now. we hope that her body will allow her to keep it. This republican needs to get a clue, womens bodies (and god) say if we can have kids or not. if it was up to the women than they would keep the baby. if i lived in georgia i would probably find his address and write him a letter calling him every name in the book. Who the heck voted for him to become a representative. as a mother and a woman i find his bill idiotic and offensive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Overboe
08:27 AM on 03/07/2011
Well it looks like the men are taking back power from women, now we will see if the women are determined enough to halt this bill.
Women are you going to let men push you around? Are you going to let this pig of a man try and send your rights and freedoms back to the 18th century?
Maybe the women in Georgia are meek, weak and bow down to the dominant superior man. Maybe women in Georgia want to be controlled and forced to do as the dominant superior man insists.
If that is the case and women allow them selves to be forced by men to follow and do as they are told then beware, not only will things get worse but women will suffer ever more!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:23 PM on 03/05/2011
This bill and this legislator has absolutely no support by other legislators in the state. A University of Georgia professor of political science said the best way to ensure a bill does not get passed is to have this guy involved with it. He's always introducing totally insane bills on all sorts of topics that never go anywhere. He's acting alone, and it's a publicity stunt. This article is what he wants--he thinks if he can get his views out there, they will catch on. But everyone thinks he's nuts. This bill will never even reach the floor for debate. So, this article is more than a bit misleading.
11:58 AM on 03/05/2011
It saddens me that he is classifying a miscarriage the same as an abortion. Anyone who has lost a baby the desperately wanted would understand how hurtful these thing are... If a Dr. can't tell you why it happened and says "sometimes these things just happen and we don't know why" how in the world can you be expected to PROVE you didn't cause it. Weather you are pro or against abortion this is absolute nonsense... Last time I checked abortion is legal. If you want to fight that fine but don't group women who have lost a baby that wasn't by CHOICE into the same issue. It is hurtful. It wasn't our CHOICE to loose a baby!
07:08 AM on 03/05/2011
Yikes! Considering that between 1/4 and 1/3 of all pregnancies end in a miscarriage, we may have a jammed up legal system....
05:57 PM on 03/04/2011
If the GOP continues to defund organizations like Planned Parenthood which offers pre-natal care and that leads to miscarriages, can we prosecute them for causing loss of life? If they pass this law, then think some smart lawyer should start a class action suit against every law maker whose defunding of pre-natal care or medical aid to low income mothers has led to the death of a child and charge them with homicide. Lets turn their obscene laws against them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Terri Statham
04:09 PM on 03/03/2011
My mother had a miscarriage in GA before I was born. She and my father wanted the baby badly. This happened during the 50's. If such a law had been in place at the time, she might have had to PROVE no human involvement occurred. I have heard a couple of people say that this does not include miscarriage, YES IT DOES - if some crazy prosecutor decides to try and prove there was some kind of human involvement. This law is insane.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:00 PM on 03/03/2011
criminalize lawyers and put them to death legally. Death sentence to Lawmakers with no brains. Outlaw stupidity from the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:03 PM on 03/03/2011
As concerns my comment below: forgot to mention that I WAS JOKING. I'm totally non-violent (which probably means I'm gay to half the GOP).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:22 PM on 03/03/2011
...except my satirical comment was banned so the above comment doesn't make any sense.

Needless to say it had involved: Moving next door to the person(s) pushing this bill; a machine gun; trespassing; lame excuse that some Republicans would buy, not: "Heck! I thought it was some n****r tryin' ta WMD my *** with their devil breath!"
(joke/satire)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:36 PM on 03/03/2011
My satirical comment was banned (cf. above comment), twas a little too much for some, I'm sure if it had been similar from the other sides' point of view it would have upset me too. On the other hand, a sixth of the comments on Huff-post are incredibly obnoxious without even much attempt at obvious humor /satire...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:12 PM on 03/03/2011
Make that a tenth of the comments on Huff-post.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:48 PM on 03/01/2011
The headline is a little misleading. It's not miscarriages, it's abortion.

Wish his mother had aborted him...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 PM on 03/03/2011
"Spontaneous abortion"=miscarriage. (not trying to be smart, not)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:38 PM on 03/04/2011
I'm sure you're not. And neither am I when I say that to women - those are two very, VERY different things.
06:42 PM on 03/11/2011
trying??? your not
04:50 PM on 02/28/2011
Anyone know who we can contact to help fight this law?
11:58 AM on 03/01/2011
Micheal you can contact that D@MN fool Bobby Franklin directly at bobbyfranklin@house.ga.gov! Be4 sure to reference Hb1. As a woman who has lived my entire life in Georgia, I am about to hit him with all the guns in my arsenal . Happily not all of us who live in the south are ignorant bible thumpers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:09 PM on 03/03/2011
Martians?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CJWebber
I think we all love teachers.
11:10 AM on 02/28/2011
It wouldn't be a surprise if this bill passed. After all, it passed in Utah last year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:13 PM on 03/03/2011
As far as I know the bill was withdrawn:
www.huffingtonpost.com/searchS/?q=utah+miscarriage+legislation