More

WikiLeaks: Libya Pressed Oil Firms To Reimburse Terror Costs

Wikileaks Libya

First Posted: 02/23/11 04:54 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - Libya's ruling family tried to coerce billions of dollars from Libyan and foreign oil companies, and its leader Muammar Gaddafi exhorted the United States to sow division in Saudi Arabia, leaked American diplomatic cables reveal.

One cable seen by Reuters, sent from the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, shows Gaddafi's government exerting heavy pressure on U.S. and other oil companies to reimburse Tripoli the $1.5 billion Libya had paid in 2008 into a fund to settle terrorism claims from the 1980s.

The amount was the initial payment in a planned $1.8 billion fund. The cable suggests Gaddafi intended foreign oil companies to provide full funding for the scheme, which at the time was a key factor in improving ties between Libya and the United States.

Even before Libya paid into the fund, Gaddafi, "who prides himself on being a shrewd bargainer, made it clear that he intended to extract contributions from foreign companies to cover the ... initial outlay," according to the April 2009 cable titled "GOL ratchets up pressure on oil companies to contribute to U.S.-Libya claims fund."

Senior Libyan officials met representatives of 15 oil producing and service companies -- including Marathon, ConocoPhillips, Occidental, ENI, Total , Wintershall, PetroCanada, Repsol and StatoilHydro -- to say they must contribute or Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC) would be compelled to "reconsider our relationship with you," the cable says.

Prime Minister-equivalent al-Baghdadi al-Mahmoudi is cited as telling oil firms that if they did not comply, there would be "serious consequences."

When Challenger Drilling's representative said it would have legal difficulties if it chose to contribute to the fund, the officials "were quick to offer possible mechanisms that would allow (the companies) to circumvent such problems," the cable said, citing a representative from Hess who later complained that "pressure had turned into coercion" at the meeting.

The instinct to ask oil companies for money was apparently not new. An earlier cable, sent in July 2008, relates how one of Gaddafi's sons, National Security Adviser Muatassim al-Gaddafi, was demanding "$1.2 billion in cash or oil shipments" from the NOC itself.

The reported attempts by Gaddafi's sons "to use the NOC as a personal bank" alongside doubts about prospects for meaningful reform, suggest "the regime remains unchanged with respect to the way it conducts key elements of its business," says the cable headlined "National Oil Corporation chairman Shukri Ghanem may seek to resign soon."

Muatassim may have intended to use some of the funds to establish a military or security unit akin to that of his younger brother, Khamis, and to pay for unspecified "security upgrades" he wanted to make in his capacity as National Security Adviser, the cable says.

Gaddafi had laughingly dismissed the claim, the cable says; but it cites a Libyan businessman outside the NOC as stating Gaddafi's children are "undisciplined thugs": "No one can cross or refuse such people ... without suffering consequences, particularly when the matter is to do with money."

"TOO MUCH FREEDOM"

The cables, obtained by WikiLeaks and seen by Reuters, also offer insight into Gaddafi's views on regional neighbor Saudi Arabia.

One cable recounts how, in 2006, Gaddafi had urged the United States to call for "self determination" for tribal groups of Saudi Arabia, "who would presumably choose a government other than the present monarchy."

Gaddafi's comments came on a visit by the late Democrat Congressman Tom Lantos, then a member of the U.S. House Foreign Relations Committee, and were made in Gaddafi's desert encampment on the outskirts of Sirte, according to the cable from August 2006 headlined "Congressman Lantos stresses bilateral achievements and regional challenges with Libyan officials."

In an hour-long meeting, Gaddafi mainly expounded on the rise of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia, "which has become one of his standard topics," said the cable; he also lobbied for support for a plan to create "Isratine" -- a secular Jewish-Palestinian state -- as the best solution for lasting peace in the Middle East.

The cable separately recounts how a speech on political and economic reform by another of Gaddafi's sons, Seif Al-Islam Gaddafi, had earned a rebuke from Egypt's leader Hosni Mubarak.

Lantos had congratulated Seif on his speech, it says. "Seif immediately noted that President Mubarak of Egypt called his father, the leader, to express his displeasure with the speech, saying it called for 'too much change and too much freedom' and warning that the country should be more conservative in its approach to change."

Seif claimed not to know what his father's reply to Mubarak was, the cable says, commenting that since the speech was broadcast widely on state-run media, it must have had the tacit blessing of the leader.

The cable also points to a bizarre sense of humor within Libya about the politics of dictatorship in the region. On the Lantos visit, it says, the delegation was shown an in-flight movie -- an Egyptian film called "The Leader" -- which makes fun of Middle Eastern dictatorships:

"Security personnel and a local translator confirmed that many of the jokes in the movie ... could be aimed at Gaddafi or Mubarak, including a scene showing disregard for members of the cabinet," the cable says.

It goes on to comment that "it is unclear if this was to show that the leader does in fact have a sense of humor about his monopoly on political power, or that a certain degree of toleration exists in Libya, or that the Libyans love a movie that pokes fun at Egyptian politics -- if in fact the Libyans intended any message at all."

(Editing by Simon Robinson)

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON (Reuters) - Libya's ruling family tried to coerce billions of dollars from Libyan and foreign oil companies, and its leader Muammar Gaddafi exhorted the United States to sow division in Saudi ...
LONDON (Reuters) - Libya's ruling family tried to coerce billions of dollars from Libyan and foreign oil companies, and its leader Muammar Gaddafi exhorted the United States to sow division in Saudi ...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:28 PM on 02/27/2011
Thanks for this great article. Where would we be without Wikileaks? If the US State Department cables hadn't been leaked with all this news about Gadhafi, would there have been such a big uprising? The conditions were there for an uprising, years of poverty and political abuse, but this news lit the fuse.

I think this kind of truthful reporting is the most important thing to create a better world. There was a great CNN video piece about this which I posted and blogged about on my blog at:
http://www.revolutionofconsciousness.com/2011/02/wikileaks-libya-and-role-of.html
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:11 PM on 02/27/2011
Come on, conservatives, you hate democracy and the Republic and want the multinational to rule. WHY?
10:41 PM on 02/24/2011
Where did Gaddafi get that face? I think I've seen it on SNL. It is scary. If Libya and other Arab countries realize that they can be a gold mine for tourism if they can make the switch to a democracy. Libya would do well to take down his pictures though. He makes the Aflac goat look good. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 359 fans were the hardest
02:22 PM on 02/24/2011
sucking chest wound, as in, why doesn't he have one???
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
paxatman
Do no harm, Help others.
02:13 PM on 02/24/2011
So many more reasons to nationalize oil companies. They support more terror than the Gaddafis of the world. They have become terrorist brokers.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American in Exile
10:28 AM on 02/24/2011
Did anyone ever really believe that Libya was going to voluntarily pay that money anyway? If so, I have a few things I'd like you to invest in.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:55 AM on 02/24/2011
Who kept Qaddafi in power?

He's sending the bill to the right people.
06:21 AM on 02/24/2011
I'm curious, is there a Mrs. Qaddafi?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 AM on 02/24/2011
She must be blind?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bergen2
04:11 PM on 02/24/2011
Yes, I think so, and she is his second wife.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
02:52 AM on 02/24/2011
Oil for blood. This needs a lot of fixing.
01:53 AM on 02/24/2011
Not clear whether the oil companies actually paid the vigorish on this one. Anybody know about that?
01:43 AM on 02/24/2011
So of course, the oil companies paid into a fund that was supposed to be paid by Libya to the victims. Oil barons, Tony Blair, governments, all helped Libya out including the government of the totally insignificant victims.
The only way to fight the global corporatocracy is now an armed struggle, as the power is much, much to imbalanced in this world to fantasize that the little people can work things out peacefully with the powerful greedy.
11:51 PM on 02/23/2011
unbelievable, the average folk is losing their homes while corporations are out there looking for 'profit' and never giving back to their country. they all have enough resources to make all the countries in the world wealthy and all its citizens. this corporate greed is the culprit of all these wars and dictatorships.
01:47 AM on 02/24/2011
Mohamed, fanned. But really, it's so NOT unbelievable, believe me. There is now such huge force arrayed against people fighting together, after watching what's gone on in the past month, you can bet the governments around the world are being beseiged by the corporations demanding they make the world "secure" for their businesses by changing laws that say you can't have your own army fighting against your people. This was already attempted under GWBush, when they tried to get rid of the "posse comitatus" rule because they suddenly realized there was going to be a huge depression.