More

General Petraeus Launching Probe On Reported Psy-Ops Manipulation Of Senators

Petraeus Psyops Probe

PAULINE JELINEK and LOLITA C. BALDOR   02/24/11 01:01 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan is ordering an investigation into charges that an army unit trained in psychological operations was improperly told to manipulate American senators to get more money and troops for the war.

A senator allegedly targeted said Thursday that he's confident there will be a review of the facts, but played down the idea that he was manipulated.

The staff of Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, head of the effort to train Afghan security forces, ordered the information operations unit to compile profiles, voting records and other information on visiting lawmakers to leverage in a campaign to get more assistance, said a story Thursday on Rolling Stone's website. It says the campaign also improperly targeted the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, and others.

Caldwell's office denied that the command used information operations cell to influence distinguished visitors. But a press statement from Kabul said that the commander of forces in Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus would order a probe "based on the information" in the article.

But the episode underscores how murky the dividing line can be between information operations and public affairs officers – one the Pentagon has wrestled with in recent years as it struggled to win the hearts and minds of populations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said Thursday that the probe will look at the actions taken by Caldwell and his staff and determine whether they were inappropriate or illegal.That distinction, he said, depends on the circumstances.

"It just depends on what it is they are doing. It's the actions not just the assignment," said Lapan. "It all depends on how the information is used. There is no blanket prohibition against having that information provided."

As an example, he said an information operations officer could be asked to look up someone's biography online. He added that Petraeus will announce who the investigating officer will be, but said it does not necessarily have to be someone of the same or higher rank than Caldwell.

The military cell devoted to what is known as "information operations" believed their mission on arriving in Afghanistan in November 2009 was to assess the effects of U.S. propaganda on the Taliban and local Afghan population, Rolling Stone said, quoting Lt. Col. Michael Holmes, whom it identified as the leader of the five-man team.

Holmes said they resisted the order to compile information on congressional delegations that were visiting there and think of what information "to plant inside their heads." He said they were subjected to retaliation for resisting.

"My job in psy-ops is to play with people's heads, to get the enemy to behave the way we want them to behave," Holmes is quoted as saying. "When you ask me to try to use these skills on senators and congressman, you're crossing a line."

Those singled out in the campaign included Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., Jack Reed, D-R.I., Al Franken, D-Minn., and Carl Levin, D-Mich. Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., of the House Appropriations Committee; the Czech ambassador to Afghanistan; the German interior minister, and a host of influential think-tank analysts, the story said, without identifying the international figures by name.

Levin pointed out Thursday that he has long been in favor of building up Afghan forces.

"For years, I have strongly and repeatedly advocated for building up Afghan military capability because I believe only the Afghans can truly secure their nation's future," Levin said in a statement. "I have never needed any convincing on this point. Quite the opposite, my efforts have been aimed at convincing others of the need for larger, more capable Afghan security forces, and that we and NATO should send more trainers to Afghanistan, rather than more combat troops."

___

Associated Press writer Deb Riechmann contributed to this report from Kabul.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 283
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
freethinkergirl 03:09 PM on 02/24/2011
Please throw Cheney in with the bunch to be investigated!!!!!......Do not forget W either....
 
1992

Halliburton's Brown & Root is paid $9 million by the Pentagon (under Cheney's direction as Secretary of Defense) to produce a classified report detailing how private companies could provide logistical support for American troops in potential war zones around the  Read More...
11:38 AM on 02/28/2011
Gen D H Petraeus and Lt. Gen Caldwell can say Mr. Einstein than ´we are more smat than you´ se can manipulate US Senator´s man. jaja
photo
Skyhawk
When I write one it'll appear here.
06:55 PM on 02/27/2011
McCain and Liberman? How hard can that be?
11:55 AM on 02/28/2011
Rolling Stones magazine!..................I always belived there*s a Rocks stars magazine!....samethings had been changed, now they do politics and critizise too!!!! realy awesome!..is ok I admit your * pocitic comments* about war, stragies and somethings like that..but with one condition....Take a pair of pants; yout teath bruhs, take a sevaral plains and go to Afghanistan exctly in Isaf-Nato in Kabul and enrroled like a soldier, before a cup of years ahead......maybe we can talk again! is too eassy put your nose in a Real National Hero like Gen. David H Petraeus from your desk without DO NOTHING!
02:11 PM on 02/25/2011
C'mon General, you can tell us this has been going on a long time but perfected in the first decade of the Century. C'mon.
01:53 PM on 02/25/2011
Let's see if we can guess how Gen. Petraeus will investigate himself and his subordinates.

A Colonel (lower ranked that the perp) will be put in charge, question people until a sacrificial lamb can be identified ... then an announcement will be made by a "chest-full-of-medals" that "there's nothing to see here, move along."

I always remember my time in the National Guard during Berkely's riots. I'd constantly ask, "if a protester won't move, what do I do? Stick him with the bayonet?" In every case I got the same answer, "You'll know what to do when the time comes." Translation: "Do something that gets ME in trouble and I'll hang you out to dry, otherwise, no one will ever hear about it." Same situation here.
01:16 PM on 02/25/2011
I've the only comment pending a post. It asks a great question and points out a great point or consideration and HP will not post it because it brings the attention to the misuse of our great military by the people on Capitol Hill. Thanks HP. I think I'll cancel my account and find another liberal site to voice my opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
01:14 PM on 02/25/2011
In the immortal words of Captain Renault: "I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!"
12:55 PM on 02/25/2011
STOP PEOPLE!!!!!!!! We should refocus and ask what would motivate our military to consider such an operation. The military's has done EVERYTHING our Gov't has ordered. I've served 22 years and glad I retired in time not to be used as a global pond to fight our gov't's wars. They are tired, stressed, dead, injured, using the same inadequate equipment.
Our military will NEVER say no to our Gov't BUT there's a line somewhere. These young men and women are bouncing between two campaigns are are watching our gov't on Capital Hill conduct themselves like grade school kids. So screw all the other questions. Maybe our commanders are looking out for their own cuz that's what we do. If only congressional would look out for their own constituents. Enough is Enough.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
namewithheld
Sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guidelines.
12:39 PM on 02/25/2011
Will this be published by Whitewash Press, like the 9/11 Report and the Financial Meltdown Report? I may want to invest before it comes out.
11:29 AM on 02/25/2011
The military is rather like a small nation within our nation.
For example DADT is repealed, discrimination is illegal,and yet the military has been allowed to continue to implement, and repeal enforcing DADT. Gays must still be in the closet in the military.
Torture and kidnapping are illegal in our nation, but not in the military.
Rape is illegal in our nation but not so much in the military.
Going into someone eles's country and murdering, robbing, torturing, and raping civilians would still be illegal under our law,but not in the military.

As such, why should we be surprised when the military treats Americans the same way they treat our enemies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ladywolf55
Independent Secular Progressive
01:34 PM on 02/27/2011
And the military is doing it ALL IN OUR NAME.
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
10:35 AM on 02/25/2011
Military lobbyists verses civilian lobbyists. Politicians are easily fooled.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
09:53 AM on 02/25/2011
How do you hypnotize a politician? Wave a $10,000 check in front of them for 3 seconds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
My comments are funnier than yours.
09:34 AM on 02/25/2011
I do not understand why this is so significant. PSYOP's mission (that they are pretty damn good at) is persuasion, so OF COURSE they would be the natural choice for this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
01:17 PM on 02/25/2011
It is significant because THE LAW says that PSYOPS is NOT to be used on U.S. Citizens. Unless you feel that Congressmen and Senators are not U.S. Citizens. Now, in some case you might be able to make a case that they aren't human but they are Citizens.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:20 AM on 02/25/2011
Of course we can be sure that the military investigating itself in a matter such as this will give us a legitimate outcome - NOT!
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
09:54 AM on 02/25/2011
Agreed.
09:18 AM on 02/25/2011
The Fox guarding the chicken coop again.
photo
Buckeye54
...the One your mom warned you about!
08:45 AM on 02/25/2011
An investigation is called for. Who will lead the investigation? The Senate? The Department of Justice?

Such an investigation must be conducted, and individuals need to punished as appropriate.

This whole story just reinforces my gut feeling that there is nothing honorable to win in Afghanistan; that every dollar spent there is one that was not spent here on OUR citizens; and that every fallen service member means devastated and heartbroken families and friends.

Since no one—no one— can tell me what our goals (precisely stated in concrete terms) in Afghanistan are—then I can conclude that the only thing left for us to do is bring our troops home now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:21 AM on 02/25/2011
Last word on the investigation - it will be led by a three-star general. Gives you a feeling of confidence, doesn't it? (sarcasm)
photo
Buckeye54
...the One your mom warned you about!
09:41 AM on 02/25/2011
Yeah—the military investigating itself for misconduct always fills me with confidence. Anyone remember Abu Gharoub or the Pat Tillman investigation.

If anyone goes to Leavenworth it will be a lowly sergeant or corporal who was ordered to do something illegal and had no viable options for evading the illegal order.