More

Rep. Sharon Cissna, Angry Over TSA Patdown, Arrives By Boat In Alaska

Sharon Cissna Tsa

First Posted: 02/24/11 05:34 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Becky Bohrer, Associated Press

AUKE BAY, Alaska — An Alaska state lawmaker vowed Thursday to fight for the rights of travelers who have been subjected to what she considers intrusive airport searches by federal airport screeners.

A jubilant Rep. Sharon Cissna arrived by ferry in Auke Bay, just outside Juneau, after a four-day ordeal that began with her refusal to submit to a full-body pat-down at a Seattle airport ordered by Transportation Security Administration agents.

Cissna said travelers are "accidentally being abused by government," and it's an issue that must be dealt with.

Cissna, D-Anchorage, is a cancer survivor who has had a mastectomy. She underwent the full-body scan at the Seattle airport but was singled out for a further pat-down search, her second within three months.

Having vowed to never endure the pat-down procedure again, she decided to take a rental car and small airplane from Seattle to Prince Rupert, B.C., and from there, a two-day ferry ride to Juneau.

Her case is from far isolated and has turned the petite 68-year-old into an unlikely hero, applauded on Facebook and the state House floor for her stand.

"I feel really proud of Sharon," House Democratic leader Beth Kerttula said. "I think she stood up for thousands of Americans who are saying, why, when a woman has had a mastectomy, does she have to go through this?"

Since new screening measures took effect last year, the American Civil Liberties Union has reported receiving more than 1,000 complaints from travelers – including breast cancer survivors – who said they endured intrusive pat-downs. Among other things, the travelers claim TSA agents patted their genitals and ran fingers through their hair or along their bras or waistbands.

At least one federal lawsuit has been filed over the pat-downs. The plaintiffs in the case, pending in Washington, D.C., include a breast cancer survivor from California and a Kentucky man that the lawsuit says was presumably singled out for a pat-down due to an enlarged testicle.

"In terms of privacy issues, this is an outpouring the likes of which we rarely see, and it transcends all walks of life and political views because it is so personal," said Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst and privacy expert for the ACLU. "It is a personal encounter between government and individuals that traumatizes many people."

He said the issue underscores the need to invest more in law enforcement and intelligence efforts to pursue potential threats, and shows TSA must invest in different, less-invasive technologies.

TSA spokesman Dwayne Baird did not speak specifically to Cissna's case. But he said the agency takes passenger privacy seriously and builds privacy protections into its security methods. Baird said pat-downs, along with other screening techniques, are meant "to improve our ability to detect explosives hidden on a person and keep the traveling public safe."

He said that full-body scanners – the likes of which Cissna went through at a Seattle airport on Sunday – are meant to show anomalies. The scanners became prominent after a man was accused of trying of blow up a plane using explosives hidden in his underwear in late 2009.

If an anomaly is detected, Baird said, "we have to resolve the issue." A pat-down is one way of doing that.

The agency, on its website, says travelers won't be asked to remove prosthetic devices but "Security Officers will need to see and touch" them as part of the screening process.

The TSA insists it tries to make the process as comfortable as possible, allowing for passengers singled out for pat-downs to be screened privately and to have a travel companion with them. It has made cards available as a way for travelers to more discreetly inform TSA agents of any medical conditions or disabilities they have. But the cards don't exempt screening.

In response to Cissna's case, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has asked TSA Administrator John Pistole to clarify the agency's screening policy for passengers with special medical needs.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

Becky Bohrer, Associated Press AUKE BAY, Alaska — An Alaska state lawmaker vowed Thursday to fight for the rights of travelers who have been subjected to what she considers intrusive airport se...
Becky Bohrer, Associated Press AUKE BAY, Alaska — An Alaska state lawmaker vowed Thursday to fight for the rights of travelers who have been subjected to what she considers intrusive airport se...
Filed by Kate Auletta  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 171
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
02:03 PM on 03/19/2011
Some people think this massive security push by tsa & dhs is in preparation for war. If that is the case,in say 2012/2013 it will not matter how much the public protests.
FWIW I also think this is to have security in place when WAR begins.
I detest tsa!
06:42 PM on 02/27/2011
ASTOUNDING AMAZING the number of people stampeding to get in line to FORFEIT their rights as human beings with control over their persons.
Flying is not an option it is a RIGHT for all taxpaying citizens not on a no-fly list. The public subsidies for airports and air traffic control justify this.
05:36 PM on 02/27/2011
Everyone is so flustered about terrorist on planes....I read in our paper last night that a non U.S. student was just arrested as a terrorists. So I'm thinking maybe we shouldn't let students come here from countries that produce these hate mongers. How many times has that happened???? yeah....several times. go figure.
11:41 AM on 02/27/2011
I found an article of note on this subject:
http://reason.com/archives/2006/08/11/dont-be-terrorized
03:28 PM on 02/26/2011
I just read online that DHS plans to roll out DNA portable scanners that can give results of a saliva test within an hour. I have some real privacy and liberty concerns with this. What is done in the name of security today may be abused by others as the technology becomes commercially available.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Ludin
Child advocate
12:16 PM on 02/26/2011
You know, I have two obvious and protruding implants. I never once have felt invaded. I have been patted down like this for years because I am not permitted to go through metal detectors, and now I just opt out of the scanners -- for because when I take my belt off, my pants fall down to my ankles [they make you hold your hands up]. If a dude wants to check out my waistband, feel my one nut, or whatever -- go at it! Its not about the absurdity of the technology, it is about changing it up often enough so that the bad guys can't plan something with certainty.
photo
bart4u
Concerned Citizen
03:34 AM on 02/26/2011
I was searched because I had staples on my intestines from resection operations and I was asked to see my scar. The agent keep feeling my stomach and scar. I hate flying.
03:03 PM on 02/25/2011
Why do we feel our lives are more precious than our freedom to move about? Maybe the TSA needs to try and find a way to scan God and pat him down. Maybe he has some bad weather planned for the flight. The problem with terrorism is in the mind- you can't get inside someone's mind to see if they are a threat. 9-11 was executed with Bxx Cutters- have you seen a box cutter?? Its not an impressive weapon by any means. I bet a properly motivated terrorist could make a seat belt into a weapon. Come on people!!!! Get pissed over this......its absurd!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogg-the-bear
Stunning millions with bolts of lightning...
02:26 PM on 02/25/2011
Being poor ain't good for much.... but, man, I am SO glad I cannot afford a plane ticket these days.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LINY01
Kind Thoughts lead to Kind Words
01:28 PM on 02/25/2011
Have you seen this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR0G7t609Zc&feature=player_embedded

TSA Harasses 9 Year Old Boy AFTER Train Ride
This search happened AFTER a train ride. Are American citizens now being searched before they can leave train stations? Why are children being targeted as possible terrorists when they get off of trains?

As Reported By Witness:

The only bad thing on our trip was [the] TSA at the Savannah train station. There were about 14 agents pulling people inside the building and coralling everyone in a roped area after you got off the train.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patchdee
12:36 PM on 02/25/2011
I saw a clip where a baby had to have his shoes removed....... just in case he had a cute little baby bomb in his sneakers! Crazy!
01:35 PM on 02/25/2011
I understand you point, but if a terrorist knew we never checked babies, they would use babies. Children were used in Vietnam to attack soldiers with grenades.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogg-the-bear
Stunning millions with bolts of lightning...
02:27 PM on 02/25/2011
And you have statistics and cases to prove that this is occurring in modern airports?
11:45 AM on 02/25/2011
The credulous and reliably incurious AP reporter fails to ask, what, exactly, was the "aonomaly" in this case? The answer would have made a better story, because women with mastectomies who use prosthetic bras are being singled out for manhandling at TSA now.
09:18 AM on 02/25/2011
She can walk as far as I'm concerned. I have a defibulator and am patted down every time I fly. I'm certain the TSA likes the procedure no more than I do but they've been nothing but professional. I think they are helping protect us and they have my support. See who screams the loudest and what happens to the economy if one more goof ball slips a weapon on board an airline and there are casualities. Wouldn't be pretty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogg-the-bear
Stunning millions with bolts of lightning...
02:30 PM on 02/25/2011
That sounds like a good rationale for removing citizen's rights to privacy. It doesn't affect your dignity so the rest of us should suck it up. Brilliant.
03:22 PM on 02/25/2011
Flying is not a right. NC2 has a point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen G Ford
Not sure WHAT this is for
05:26 AM on 02/25/2011
I really enjoy this MORONIC debate...

Now... for those of you screaming "INVASION OF PRIVACY"...

If these "INVASIONS" are stopped... you will be the NEXT ONES whining about TSA's "INABILITY" to keep us all SAFE!
But go ahead... DENY IT!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
signgrrl
typeface geek
09:26 AM on 02/25/2011
funny, EL AL does just fine without it. safest airline for decades (1970 - present)
03:24 PM on 02/25/2011
El Al also flies with uniformed, heavily armed agents. Could you imagine Air Marshals being so conspicuous? "His gun is scaring my baby". And security in Israel's airports does in fact and without concern profile. If you're Arab-looking, you're getting stopped, questioned, and possibly (probably) searched. Or you don't get on the plane.
11:21 AM on 02/25/2011
I bet you'll enjoy the full cavity searches that enablers like you will bring on next.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjkool
01:11 AM on 02/25/2011
There are some lucky TSA screeners somewhere.