iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Libya's Billions Invested In U.S. Private Equity, Big Banks

Libya

First Posted: 03/01/11 05:38 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

NEW YORK -- U.S. President Barack Obama's executive order freezing $30 billion in assets of Muammar Gaddafi, his family and the Libyan government could impact several U.S. banks and private equity firms, including Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and the Carlyle Group. The Obama administration described it as the largest seizure of foreign funds in U.S. history.

The oil-rich country's sovereign wealth fund, the Libyan Investment Authority, controls at least $70 billion in fixed assets and reserves. It has invested the bulk of its money in European banks and businesses, including Dutch-Belgian bank Fortis, Italian bank Unicredit, the Pearson publishing empire, Italian defense firm Finmeccanica SpA, an oil-production sharing agreement with BP and even a slice of the Italian soccer team Juventus.

In the wake of the Bush administration's lifting of sanctions against Libya in 2004, following Gaddafi's agreement to give up weapons of mass destruction, American businesses and private equity firms also came flocking to the North African country to court government and LIA officials. As The Huffington Post reported last week, a broad coalition of U.S. oil companies, defense manufacturers and businesses lobbied the U.S. government to repair relations with the longtime international pariah and to take advantage of business opportunities in the country.

The secretive Libyan Investment Authority has reportedly invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Goldman Sachs Asset Management funds, including a loan fund designed to invest in new hedge funds set up by the Kuwait Investment Authority. Goldman Sachs already has a relationship with Libya -- in 2008, Goldman was the first U.S. bank to get a contract with the country following the removal of sanctions, when it was hired by Libya's central bank to provide information on its behalf to credit rating agencies. A spokesperson for Goldman Sachs did not return calls seeking comment.

The Libyan government, including LIA, has also banked with Citigroup, according to several sources familiar with the matter. A spokesperson for Citigroup declined to comment on the bank's interactions with the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, which is in charge of carrying out Obama's order regarding Libyan assets.

JPMorgan Chase reportedly handles much of the LIA's cash and some of the Libyan central bank's reserves. The summer after then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visited Gaddafi in 2008, LIA gave "mandates to some of the international banks, including JPMorgan to manage their funds in the interbank money markets, according to Vanity Fair.

The LIA fund's general consultant has been Mercer Investment Consulting, a unit of Marsh & McClennan, the global risk consulting and advisory firm. A spokesperson for Marsh declined comment. The fund set up a $2 billion investment fund with the Qatar Investment Authority to invest in Libya, Qatar and Western markets, which could complicate the effort to freeze the LIA's assets.

Two years ago, the Carlyle Group's co-founder and managing director, David Rubenstein, and Blackstone chief executive Steven Schwarzman traveled to the Libyan capital of Tripoli to help celebrate the wedding of Mustafa Zarti, the deputy director of the LIA, in a massive tent set up on the outskirts of the city, reported the Financial Times. And when Gaddafi's son and longtime likely successor, Saif al-Islam, visited New York in November 2008, Schwarzman hosted a lunch for him at the Blackstone CEO's Park Avenue apartment. The younger Gaddafi was also honored on that trip by Carlyle's retired chairman, former defense secretary Frank Carlucci, who hosted a dinner for him in a private room at the City Club.

Thanks to the efforts of Rubenstein, who first traveled to Libya in 2006, the Carlyle Group received funds from the LIA. A spokesman for Carlyle declined comment. A spokesman for Blackstone told The Huffington Post, "We have no investments in Libya. They have no investments with us."

In addition, several U.S. banks each manage up to $500 million of the secretive fund's assets, according to a 2010 diplomatic cable obtained by WikiLeaks that reveals details of a January meeting between the LIA's Mohamed Layas and the U.S. ambassador in Tripoli at LIA's office overlooking the Mediterranean.

"We have $32 billion in liquidity, mostly in bank deposits that will give us good long-term returns," Layas told the ambassador, according to the cable. "He explained that several American banks are each managing $300-500 million of LIA's funds ... He noted that LIA's primary investments are in London, in banking and residential and commercial real estate."

LIA has placed several hundred million dollars of assets with FM Capital Partners, a London-based firm set up in 2009 by former Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan asset manager Frederic Marino, according to an FM Capital statement and British news reports.

The LIA has historically shunned investing in the United States due to concerns that politics overly complicate U.S. market movements. "The only market which is unfortunately not a pleasant market is the United States. It's a very active market, but it is full of politics and unpleasant actions. In Europe, politics is not very much interfering in trade," Libya's former prime minister Shokri Ghanem told Bloomberg TV in 2008.

But the LIA's Layas was upbeat about the prospects for U.S. deals during a recent visit to Washington, where he met with U.S. company representatives and the Export-Import Bank. "Some of the advantages that Layas saw the U.S. having over European competitors for contracts in Libya are the weakness of the dollar compared to the euro, as well as U.S. access to more advanced technology," according to the WikiLeaks cable, which also revealed Layas' claims that the LIA had turned down investment opportunities in schemes run by jailed financiers Allen Stanford and Bernie Madoff.

The LIA is unusually secretive compared to other sovereign wealth funds, analysts say, and it is difficult to sketch a more complete list of U.S. companies that have received the fund's assets. Several months ago, during the bankruptcy proceedings of Boston Generating LLC, it was revealed in court documents that the power conglomerate had contacted the LIA about selling the fund some of its assets. And another of Gaddafi's sons, Al-Saadi, invested $100 million in a movie production fund, Natural Selection, that is producing "The Ice Man: Confessions of a Mafia Contract Killer," starring Mickey Rourke, Bloomberg News reports.

About $300 million of the LIA's investments were handled by the now-defunct financial-services firm Lehman Brothers, but the LIA's Layas claimed that the fund had "a legal disagreement with Lehman Brothers due to a major investment that was 'mismanaged.'"

And though the fund prefers to invest in commercial property and real estate in London, it has not done the same in the United States, according to Geoff D. Porter, a political risk and security consultant specializing in North Africa and the Sahara. "In general, U.S. investors are wary of the Libyans and Libya is wary of the U.S. -- they don't want their assets attached just like Americans are wary of political risk in Libya," Porter said. "Most firms, such as Blackstone, are well aware of the reputational risks and are wary of the LIA."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 167
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dhampton100
58 years old Christian American -US Army Veteran.
11:56 PM on 03/02/2011
it's a good thing Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't rich because some of these same people would haave been visiting him and defending him just for the opportunity to do "business" with him. As long as you have "MONEY" these people don't care what you are guilty of doing.
10:43 PM on 03/02/2011
Oh dear, then Libya's pocket book is in trouble! No wonder Hillary is so suddenly concerned about the poor Libyans. Em. Em Em.... Their country is falling apart and the US no longer has any use for Gadhafi and to add heartache ti misery, Libya's money is invested in the US! I think the dark days are not over for Libya with that kind of financial reality. Sadam's oil, Mubarak's golden years, Libya's $....... I am beginning to experience gross concern levels.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kye154
07:18 PM on 03/02/2011
Ha!!! " Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and the Carlyle Group" handling Gaddafi's finances. Don't they have any shame? Shows you what extent the corruption within our own banking system, and on Wall Street, to keep a dictator propped up for over 40 years.
10:51 PM on 03/02/2011
Kye154, America cannot get enough money ...... the more money regardless of how it is gotten, the better. Hey it gets sexier the higher the amount that can be taken without any blow back. The banks are just tools that shape the vessel that stores the stolen money. Let you or me try it though, we would be toast! The US government? Not so much.
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
03:40 PM on 03/02/2011
The usual blood sucking greedy,treasonous industries of money represent well in this article. God I hate the financial industry in this country. Especially Goldman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thenewlibertarian
Author of The Naked Truth About Drugs
03:36 PM on 03/02/2011
Come on, people. It's been nearly 40 years since "follow the money" entered our lexicon...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
02:08 PM on 03/02/2011
And how about Kim ill Soong, that sick sick sick N. Korean despot?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
01:56 PM on 03/02/2011
Greed is everywhere!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
01:55 PM on 03/02/2011
When Americans mispronounce foreign names as often happens, I usually get a bit annoyed at not respecting foreign languages and names but I really think it's brilliant when Ghadaffi is pronounced ( Guh daffy), so perfect!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
02:27 PM on 03/07/2011
Mo Ghadaffi's so daffy, the man's
Lost his grip with his goofs and his bans
On his nation's poor folks.
He's the butt of some jokes
And now seeing a change to mad plans.

Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi (b. 1942) isn't the only long-time dictator who seems to have lost his marbles as his power becomes so entrenched with time. The midEast rebellions of 2011 and in Libya have underlined his unstableness and makes clear the necessity for his overthrow by the courageous Libyan rebels.

The mispronunciation of his name by many media presenters also underscores his Gha-daffy-ness, brilliant IMO!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
01:52 PM on 03/02/2011
The Nigerian scam emails are going to change over to Libyan scams very soon.
01:19 PM on 03/02/2011
What was Libya's evidence presented to get an exemption from anti-money laundering provisions?
01:02 PM on 03/02/2011
.
whenever the stink of a dirty dollar shows up in the world,
guess who shows up first in line to launder it??
.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
01:38 PM on 03/02/2011
U.S. banks. Don't you feel proud?
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
03:41 PM on 03/02/2011
Goldman Sucks?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mephillipsr
Veteran, Independent, Opinionated, Retired
12:44 PM on 03/02/2011
You have just got to love all those politicans who have worked so hard to make it easy for the entire world to make money off America. What a bunch of chumps. LMAO
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gayle Boesky
Conventional wisdom is neither
12:28 PM on 03/02/2011
I have no relationship with these banks, but blaming them for taking Libyan money is a bit unfair. Not only did the government lift the prohibitions, it, no doubt, encouraged the banks' actions. The Libyan money doesn't just sit in these banks, it's used to lend to and invest in American companies, U.S. government bonds, etc. The government changed the policy because it helped our economy. My guess is that the Treasury and State Departments didn't want to see that money go to another country. This isn't a Republican/Democratic issue, it's a pragmatists versus moralists. The issue to be debated is whether the government's policy should have been changed not what the banks did in response to the change.
01:58 PM on 03/02/2011
Sorry, the Banks run our country, so your point doesn't make sense!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
12:06 PM on 03/02/2011
This is why conservatives LOVE dictators and drug dealers.
11:55 AM on 03/02/2011
NOW our lack of response in Libya makes total sense.

No wonder we're not doing a thing to assist the revolt against this Tyrant - we have the Wall Street money boys and a secretive Hedge Fund to protect.