More

Unemployment Rate Falls In February, U.S. Adds 192K Jobs

Unemployment Rate

First Posted: 03/04/11 08:52 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

After a winter of weak improvement in the labor market, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has finally reported a promising sign of growth in the American economy.

In February, 192,000 jobs were added to the U.S. economy. While this headline number is encouraging, February's job growth was not, economists point out, good enough to make a significant dent in the unemployment rate, which remained relatively unchanged, falling to 8.9 percent from 9 percent.

"I'm hoping that this is the beginning of something better," said Georgetown professor of public policy Harry Holzer. "All of last year we averaged at 100,000 a month, and that's not enough. that's not enough to even keep up with population growth. The question now is are we returning to something more sustained -- job growth at the level that could really start to improve things."

Job gains occurred in manufacturing, construction, professional and business services, health care, and transportation and warehousing, while employment in state and local government edged down. One bright spot in the bureau's report was that the areas of job growth are slightly more wide spread than in recent months. In the past year, job growth has focussed primarily in low wage industries.

"I think its a great number for the economy and a great number for the american worker," said Wells Fargo economist John Silvia. "For the private sector -- we haven't seen a number like this since 2006."

The last several months of job growth have been achingly slow. Despite numerous indicators of economic recovery -- manufacturing expanding for the nineteenth straight month, gross domestic product on the rise, and growing corporate profits -- the unemployment rate didn't drop below a grim 9 percent.

In fact, this winter's most significant drop in the unemployment rate came, not from jobs added to a difficult labor market, but from discouraged workers giving up the hunt.

Despite the number of jobs added in February, the labor force participation rate -- that is, the number of working age Americans employed or looking for work -- remains incredibly low at 64.2 percent. The last time the participation rate dropped below this benchmark was in March 1984.

(Click here for our full report on workers leaving the labor force.)

Last month, even as the unemployment rate dropped from 9.4 to 9 percent, only 36,000 new jobs were added. Some of this was due to miserable January weather, and economists caution that its important to look at the average over several months, particularly when weather is a factor.

"I never put too much emphasis on any one month," Holzer said. "But overall the trend looks to me like modest improvement. If you can stay at close to 200,000 jobs a month, or even improve that number, then you'd start to see more sustained progress in the unemployment rate."

Still, economists say that it would take on average at least 250,000 added month over month, year after year, to bring the unemployment rate down to re-recession levels.

"There's no question that we're adding jobs," Holzer said. "The question is how long this will be sustained, and will it be enough to bring the unemployment rate down, and how quickly."

To get a sense of the scope of the hole the American economy is in, take a look at the below chart from the Federal Reserve of Minneapolis, which compares how bad the Great Recession was and how the recovery compares to previous cycles.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
After a winter of weak improvement in the labor market, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has finally reported a promising sign of growth in the American economy. In February, 192,000 jobs were added to...
After a winter of weak improvement in the labor market, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has finally reported a promising sign of growth in the American economy. In February, 192,000 jobs were added to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,764
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (90 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forty8r
Gerrman Freethinker
05:54 PM on 03/25/2011
Same old story good high paying jobs lost/crapy low paying jobs created. Its been going on this way for the past 30 years.
04:48 AM on 03/12/2011
The economy needs to have jobs growing at this rate for awhile for a recovery to be certain. However the more looming problem is the long term effect unemployment on the level of children in poverty.

http://theintrinsicvalue.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:15 PM on 03/07/2011
Yes, significant numbers of people have given up.
11:43 AM on 03/07/2011
Jobs with significantly lower wages will come back. Free trade with communist China requires that your wages keep going down even as prices rise. There is a very simple reason the rich are getting richer. They write the trade deals and you don't. They get quick overwhelming bailouts and you don't. They run DC and you don't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
11:14 AM on 03/07/2011
Meanwhile, a new study by the National Employment Law Project shows that most of these newly created jobs pay significantly lower wages than the jobs eliminated after the Wall Street financial crash.

"Would you like to supersize your happy meal sir?" (Newly employed) thanks Obama.
photo
Barbara DeZan
Knowledge is Power
11:45 AM on 03/24/2011
Need you be reminded that this is NOT Obama's mess? This was a Bush and Co thing..from start to finish.

Thanks to Obama, the complete destruction of our economy was avoided.

As for Wall Street and the "financial" business.....that was also a Bush thing...as was TARP....which he signed in October of '08....

As for the quality of your job: when one is unemployed and has responsibility for himself and perhaps a family..any job is a good one.

Too many of us "oldsters" worked 2 and sometimes 3 jobs for years to keep family, home and hearth together.

Too many of you folks are crybabies.....
04:16 PM on 03/06/2011
Where has it fallen? Not where I live, we have an 11.1% unemployment rate.
And another town by me has a 16.1%. It has taken some people I know almost a year to find a job.
Me I now am unemployed, and wonder where the heck I can even look, we have zero industry,
In my town or in the USA. Ya, Nuses can find jobs anyplace but forget the rest of us.
03:50 PM on 03/06/2011
What kind of a free market is this? Companies wine not enough people will accept their low wage jobs?
If I go to purchase something at a store and I think it is too much-will they lower the price just for me.
No, actually they would rather throw it away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Battista II
12:57 PM on 03/06/2011
Boy, inflation is going to set this economy straight for sure. Youch. Value halved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mike dougles
09:44 AM on 03/06/2011
This is a nice list but it means nothing without a cost of living index in each state to go with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:58 AM on 03/06/2011
An 2004 op-ed by Sen Schumer and Paul Craig Roberts...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/06/opinion/second-thoughts-on-free-trade.html
Second Thoughts on Free Trade - New York Times

"...Yet in that essay of 70 years ago, Keynes himself was beginning to question some of the assumption­s supporting free trade. The question today is whether the case for free trade made two centuries ago is undermined by the changes now evident in the modern global economy.

Two recent examples illustrate this concern. Over the next three years, a major New York securities firm plans to replace its team of 800 American software engineers, who each earns about $150,000 per year, with an equally competent team in India earning an average of only $20,000. Second, within five years the number of radiologis­ts in this country is expected to decline significan­tly because M.R.I. data can be sent over the Internet to Asian radiologis­ts capable of diagnosing the problem at a small fraction of the cost.

[snip]

We are concerned that the United States may be entering a new economic era in which American workers will face direct global competitio­n at almost every job level -- from the machinist to the software engineer to the Wall Street analyst. Any worker whose job does not require daily face-to-fa­ce interactio­n is now in jeopardy of being replaced by a lower-paid­, equally skilled worker thousands of miles away..."

We are so there.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
10:44 PM on 03/05/2011
The US Economy needs 130,000 jobs per month just to match the new people entering the jobs market for the first time For the last 3 months that's 390,000 jobs.
In the last 3 months we have created Dec: 113000 jobs unemployment went down .4%;
Jan 36,000 unemployment went down .4%
Feb: 292,000 unemployment down .1%
Total jobs last 3 months= 341,000
So in the last 3 months unemployment has gone down .9% while being short 49,000 of the jobs needed just to keep pace with new workers, let alone bring jobs to the millions of unemployed.

These figures plainly do not make any sense.
Clearly the administration is cooking the books.
photo
Razpooten
Nil homini certum est
12:19 AM on 03/06/2011
Exactly, and what about the attrition rate? Baby boomers and their daddies are retiring and dying off - who is replacing those jobs and how are they counted?
photo
redsquirell
red squire LL
12:59 AM on 03/06/2011
The real question would be; Why does the press continue to go along with everything the Government says today without calling them out? Could Watergate have been exposed today? I wonder how they can even call this a report on unemployment. Must be using some legal definition that means nothing to anyone but them. When will the press do it's job and quit cowing to the rich status quo long enough to help educate the people about how we are manipulated and lied to? It's all about the money for the government and the press; if there is any difference now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Redwood Eagle
Treehugging, Hippy, Druid Grandfather
07:29 PM on 03/05/2011
Billions of jobs have been lost to companies outsourcing work to other countries. It's time to heavily tax companies based here who have less than 75% of their workers here. It's time to ban products made by American companies in foreign lands. They don't want to make it here? Fine! They don't get to sell it here either.
photo
Razpooten
Nil homini certum est
12:21 AM on 03/06/2011
Fine, so you are ready to pay $5,000 for a $500 TV - because US workers will demand higher wages, bennies, etc.
photo
democrats for life
republicans need not apply
05:05 AM on 03/06/2011
your not too bright are you
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:18 PM on 03/07/2011
Agreed. We need factories of slave labor here so you can buy a US made TV on the cheap.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
moose and squirrel
Very soon we would both be completely twisted...
04:18 PM on 03/05/2011
though i'm skeptical of the figures, i am convinced the employment climate is finally improving.  here in las vegas, the worst hit city with the highest UE rate in the nation, there is alot of chatter going on.  firms are starting to gear up for an explosion of work anticipated over the spring and summer.  i have been out of work for over a year, and last week was the first time i got some serious feedback on returning to work;  i have a few meetings next week with a few people about particulars.   though we have a long way to situation normal,  i encourage everyone seeking work to retrace their steps right now if you havent been looking for a while.  opportunities may have sprung up where you last looked.
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
07:45 PM on 03/05/2011
Ah - but will Boris and Natasha allow this to happen? It could bode well for Obama and lead to his re-election - tune in next week for another exciting episode when Poindexter goes into the time machine and exclaims "run Bulwinkle - Palin's got her sights on you......."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
02:20 PM on 03/07/2011
It is getting better, but I doubt the recovery will 'ever' re-absorb the millions thrown out of a job over the past 3 years.The hope is these people will eventually fade away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
02:49 PM on 03/05/2011
The analysis of the unemployment figures is absurd., Reps are patting themselves on the back claiming it was tax cuts, Obama is patting himself on the back for his brilliant stimulus.

The fact is TARP saved the financial sector, but mostly both parties who fostered and condoned banks rape and pillage, ALLOWED banks to create a massive ponzi scheme and then basically granted them immunity from their crimes, Main Street and the housing market will suffer along for the next decade. The employment figures reflect a small blip, due to the past 18 months mega corps were in limbo, now that they thev confirmed Obama is clearly in their pocket, they relaxed a little. Obama nor Reps have any long term substainable plan for the economy.

Small business and housing are screwed for the forseeable future, yet neither was part of the economic agenda. Protecting big banks and Mega-corps was always the priority.
photo
Razpooten
Nil homini certum est
12:24 AM on 03/06/2011
You look at the world through a tunnel vision; the current economic trend started about three decades ago. It will take nearly that long to fix it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
08:54 AM on 03/06/2011
You are making my point I have numerous posts making exactly that statement, it took decades of corrupt incompetant politicians to look the other way as banks tightened their grip on the American economy.

Nothing Obama has done will lead us on the path to prosperity. Nor do the Reps have any idea, we are set up for bubble burst bubble, for the forseeable future. As no one has taken control of the financial sector, banks are still firmly in control , have never been more to big to fail. Tunnel vision? hardly, I see the big picture for what it is Politicians have failed as stewards of the economy. and have no desire to fix it.