More

'Junk' Insurer Owned By Goldman Sachs Gets First Exemption From Health Care Provision


First Posted: 03/10/11 11:50 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Welcome to our new blog, "The Watchdog," which will keep a close eye on regulatory agencies and how their actions impact the lives of everyday Americans. Though the rules and regulations they write -- from determining how much arsenic is allowable in your drinking water to whether your favorite TV show can drop the F-bomb in primetime -- affect all of us, their deliberations and the way that lobbyists influence their decisions receives very little coverage.

To make sense of these debates, follow the implementation of health care reform and financial reform and decipher the minutia of the Federal Register, "The Watchdog" is on the case. If you have any tips or suggestions, send them to marcus@huffingtonpost.com.

live blog

Oldest Newest

A notorious company that has been temporarily banned from selling insurance in at least one state and faces allegations of peddling "junk insurance" elsewhere is getting the first waiver from the 2010 health care overhaul's requirement that insurers spend at least 80 percent of premiums on care, according to federal regulators.

Maine is the first state to get the temporary waiver -- New Hampshire, Nevada and Kentucky have applications pending -- allowing the three insurance companies in the state to keep their existing 65 percent medical loss ratio, successfully persuading the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that higher costs would drive insurers out of the market.

As The Watchdog reported in January, Maine's insurance commissioner sought the exemption on behalf of HealthMarkets Inc., which is largely owned by funds run by Goldman Sachs and Blackstone -- the insurer's subsidiary, Mega Life and Health Insurance, controls about 37 percent of the market for individual insurance in the state.

HealthMarkets and its subsidiaries have a troubled history and have long been dogged by accusations that their coverage is inadequate. The insurer has been banned for at least five years from selling insurance in Massachusetts after a probe by the state's attorney general, who accused the firm of waging a "campaign of deception and unfair practices," finding that the insurer's coverage didn't cover such basics as doctors' office visits, prescription drugs, chemotherapy and even some lab tests and X-rays.

Last October, the city of Los Angeles sued HealthMarkets and its Mega Life unit for allegedly selling “junk insurance” that left customers “without coverage when they needed it most,” according to court documents. In response to the complaint, which is still pending, the company issued a statement: "No company in the service business is without issues involving customer satisfaction, and HealthMarkets is no exception. We encourage our customers to contact us directly with their questions and concerns so we can resolve issues." It has also set up a page on its website to address allegations.

Since 2002, the company has been fined by at least seven states and faced lawsuits from dozens of policyholders. A three-year probe of the insurer by 29 states, including Maine, found multiple problems involving consumer disclosure, oversight and training of agents, claims handling and complaint handling practices, resulting in a $20 million settlement in 2008.

Share this:

- The most unexpected anti-regulation zealots: yoga teachers in Texas, who are planning a mass rally on the lawn of the state capitol next week.

- Lax IRS rules help groups shield names of their campaign donors

- SEC chief Mary Schapiro makes plea for more funds

- IRS steps up its regulation of tax-return preparer industry

Share this:

At yesterday's House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gases, both sides came away with their views intact.

Not for a lack of effort by Democratic Rep. Jay Inslee, who came armed with a 2-foot-high stack of studies and reports to demonstrate the scientific consensus around global warming.

After stating that Republican lawmakers skeptical of climate change were suffering from an "allergy to science and scientists," he quipped:

“If Copernicus, Galileo, Newton and Einstein were testifying today, the Republicans would not accept their views until all the Arctic ice has melted and hell has frozen over, whichever comes first.”

Share this:

- The Obama administration has filed more cases against whistleblowers than all presidents in the last 40 years.

- There are three SEC oversight hearings scheduled for tomorrow, including "Who's Watching Wall Street's Watchdog?"

- “Food Sovereignty” law passed in small Maine town to allow sale of locally produced food without interference of regulators.

- Key quote from new HBO documentary on the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire that killed 146 workers almost 100 years ago:

“People forget the Triangle fire at their peril…If people want to know what deregulated industry would look like, look at the bodies on the sidewalk outside the Triangle building,” says Leigh Benin, a professor of labor history at Adelphi University whose cousin, 19-year-old Rosie Oringer, jumped from the building.

>

Share this:

Two years after the SEC was pilloried for missing Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme despite plenty of warnings, the agency's embattled commissioner Mary Schapiro is under fire for hiring as the S.E.C.’s general counsel someone with a Madoff financial interest.

The key graf from the story by the NYT's dynamic duo of Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story:

Perhaps the most significant Madoff matter involving Mr. Becker is a proposed reversal of the agency’s recommendation on how to compensate victims of the scheme, according to two people briefed on the S.E.C.’s discussions who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to discuss the matter. While the agency had agreed on a deal that would return to investors only the money they had put into their Madoff accounts, Mr. Becker argued that the commission should change its stance to allow victims to keep some of the gains their investments had generated, since the investment would have grown somewhat over time even in a low-interest account. The Becker family would benefit from this approach.

Share this:

- This afternoon, a House Judiciary subcommittee will hear testimony on the REINS Act, introduced by sponsored by Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Jim DeMint (R-S.C), which requires congressional approval for major regulations.

- NIH rules miss subtleties of corporate influence on medical research, reports Project on Government Oversight's Paul D. Thacker.

- Republicans seek to slow new Commodity Futures Trading Commission rules on derivatives, wielding agency budget cuts as a threat.

- Classic intro of an op-ed in today's Wichita Eagle about a hometown lawmaker's bid to scuttle a Consumer Product Safety Commission database: "One would think it hard to find a politician who opposes reducing preventable dangers to children. Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Wichita, has stepped up to this challenge."

Share this:

Troubled automaker Toyota, which has seen its sterling reputation take a hit in the wake of the recall of more than 14 million cars since 2009 largely due to problems with unintended acceleration, has a new problem on its hands.

The company is recalling 22,000 vehicles -- includign the Sequoia, FJ Cruiser, Land Cruiser, Tacoma and Tundra models for the years 2008 through 2011 -- due to concern about the reliability of tire-pressure alerts, in which drivers may not be aware that a tire is going flat.

Chrysler and Honda also announced recalls of Jeep Wranglers and Civic hybrids, respectively.

Share this:

Must-read in the LA Times today about the sheer scope of the House GOP's budget bill, which targets environmental regulation so widely "it appears to be as much an ideological gambit as a budgetary one."

More:

From fish protections in California to water pollution limits in Florida and regulation of greenhouse gas emissions nationwide, environmental programs were targets of the Republican budget resolution, which appears to have been as much about setting a political agenda as about deficit reduction...

The continuing resolution adopted by the House two weeks ago swings a much bigger ax than similar proposals that helped stall a spending measure, resulting in a government shutdown in 1995. "I've never seen anything remotely like this. The sheer scope of it is overwhelming," said Sean Hecht, executive director of the UCLA Environmental Law Center...

The proposal slices the Environmental Protection Agency budget by 30% — the largest cut to any agency. It bars the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions and from implementing new water pollution limits in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and in Florida.

Share this:

- The SEC is severely understaffed (by about 400 employees), which does not bode well for its enhanced role under Dodd-Frank, according to a new report.

- Four deaths spur suspension of Pfizer, Sanofi vaccines in Japan.

- Lax regulation of property tax exemptions for benevolent institutions, churches and nonprofit hospitals is costly, reports the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.

- A new blog worth checking out is Exemption Watch: How FOIA Works.

Share this:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Welcome to our new blog, "The Watchdog," which will keep a close eye on regulatory agencies and how their actions impact the lives of everyday Americans. Though the rules and regulations they write --...
Welcome to our new blog, "The Watchdog," which will keep a close eye on regulatory agencies and how their actions impact the lives of everyday Americans. Though the rules and regulations they write --...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 217
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 PM on 03/16/2011
The Supremes ruled corporations are" individuals" and these 2% will dictate the rules of the road
for the Corporate States of America. Wake up people; you are the 98%. Majority rules.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:50 PM on 03/11/2011
Looks like the health care reform is losing its teeth. With all the waivers and exemptions, will there be anything left of it?
05:15 PM on 03/11/2011
HealthMarkets is the purveyor of junk health insurance that has left a trail of human suffering for over 25 years. If you read HHS's decision to give Maine an exemption for the company, you'll see that it's full of contradictory assumptions about the extent of coverage for Mega's "Signature Benefit Plan." At one point HHS says that the plan has a "maximum out-of-pocket" of "$2,000 to $20,000." At another point it says the maximum out-of-pocket is simply "$2,000." At a third point it says, "$2,000 to $10,000." Correct answer: None of the above! There IS no maximum out-of-pocket for a HealthMarkets plan -- certainly not the Signature Benefit Plan. It's a shame that the regulators don't even understand the policy. How do they expect consumers to understand it?
01:03 PM on 03/11/2011
Obama and his administration is so blatantly corrupt ---clearly, first and foremost Obama serves is Govt Sachs lord ----they have a blank check from the govt funds and they write the laws...must be nice to own an entire country...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:40 PM on 03/11/2011
"Ha Ha Ha LOL, HA HA HA LOL, HA HA HA LOL, ....."
- Excerpt from the US Banker Playbook. .
11:49 AM on 03/11/2011
I'm a graphic designer and photographer. If I treated my clients the way health insurers treat theirs, I'd be out of business. Abusing the people who've granted me the privilege of being in business just wouldn't be smart.

Since I'm self-employed, I've tried to find affordable individual health insurance. It's not easy.

For several years, I've been covered, if you want to call it that, by a HealthMarkets policy sold via an organization called the National Association for the Self Employed (NASE).

After I purchased the policy, I learned that this company has been sued by several state attorneys general. There have also been class action suits. Do a search on "NASE class action" and you'll find plenty of information.

I've tried to get on the Arizona state plan for small business people, but guess what? Our legislature passed a law that excludes sole proprietors from this plan. Thanks a lot, legislature.

So, I continue with HealthMarkets. Let me tell you, if and when the public option goes into effect, I will cheerfully cancel that HealthMarkets policy.

All I can say is, I hope I live long enough to do so. I'm 53 years old and already avoid/delay regular checkups and tests because I fear that, if something is found, the cost of treatment will bankrupt me to the point where I will lose my house.

So, that's where things stand for me. Too bad that such things are allowed to happen in the richest country on earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
11:20 AM on 03/11/2011
First, before the anti-Obamabotbots jump all over me as usual, let me agree that the health insurance market is robbing us blind with obscene rate increases.  Until the health care loss-ratio rule actually goes into effect, we are all being gouged because the states and not the federal government are still charged with the authority to regulate insurance pricing.  And the states are doing nothing in the face of two years of rate increases doubling the cost of many policies over that short time.  This should be a crime.
 
The types of health insurance policies that qualify for the exemption are so-called "mini-med" policies which offer coverage at half the price or less, but with annual caps on coverage that would put policyholders (and health care providers) at financial risk in the event of a health-care catastrophe pushing annual care costs above $100,000. 
 
For mini-med policies, the insurers collect far less premium to begin with, so their overhead costs will naturally be a higher percentage of income, and it was "justifiable" to exempt them from the 80% rule which mini-med plans could not afford.  The exemption is not open ended; it modifies the 80% rule to a percentage justified in the application materials, in this case 65%. 
 
I have no problem with this part of the 80% rules and the exemption process.  But in the bigger picture, with premiums on standard insurance plans doubling, the market is driving more and more individuals into the riskier and limited coverage mini-med plans, and most of those individuals are going to be in the 50 to 65 age range, especially those who lost their jobs, are too old to get re-hired, and are too young to qualify for Medicare.
 
This is a sloppy, sloppy transition from state regulation to federal.  But when the 80% rule is applied to full-coverage plans, they will become more affordable and fewer people will select the mini-med limited-coverage plans.  By that time, I'll be eligible for Medicare.  In the meantime, I'm being hammered with another 45% premium increase next month while my state insurance commissioner snoozes.
 
 
10:17 AM on 03/11/2011
Pigs at the trough, snort and cough, babies and biggies , all of them piggies.

And Goldpimp Sucks is the nastiest swine around.
10:12 AM on 03/11/2011
Big Insurance Crooks - Cut their pay, send them home.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DoUGetItYet
Objectivity has no Ideology
09:36 AM on 03/11/2011
195 comments!

Real hard to reach the thousands of comments when the Obama Zealots can't argue the obvious coruption that would lead this administartion to allow this to happen.

DoUGetItYet people. THE WHOLE DA.M.N SYSTEM IS CORRUPT! From top to bottom from right to left.
10:14 AM on 03/11/2011
You're right. However, the Republican crooks are far worse. Their policies are mostly what caused our meltdown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
11:27 AM on 03/11/2011
Everyone of us is a corruptible human being.  There will always be criminals amongst us.  Don't hold your breath waiting for that to change.
 
But there are also unintended consequences that come with every piece of social-change legislation requiring amendments (unemployment insurance, social security, Medicare, Medicaid-- all had to be amended from their original forms which were flawed.
 
Unfortunately, we now have a political environment in our federal government that is unlikely to fix anything for the next two years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trespanieli
09:05 AM on 03/11/2011
The evidence continues to pile up. Washington politicians are the best that money can buy.
photo
Brown Buddha
harvest is plentiful but the laborers are few
08:35 AM on 03/11/2011
Nut Sachs
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
matthewhgrant
07:45 AM on 03/11/2011
let goldman bail them out. not the government. and if they fail, hold goldman to task. then i woke up and realized it was all a dream.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugene Skidmore
the real deal
07:41 AM on 03/11/2011
if its "junk insurance" let them fail. these are the "republican policies" that would be "sold" across state lines to "lower" healh insurance costs "for america". of courase the problem is the policies only enrich the corperation, do not provide even the resemblance to healthcare, and thier business should be treated as the criminal enterprise it is. another example of "free market" solutions from the right, which they would NEVER have to purchase themselves.
07:28 AM on 03/11/2011
Just more evidence in a depressingly long list of evidence of our "government" being bought.

By the way, these types of insurance companies are the ones that Wendell Potter (insurance industry whistle blower) warned against. These are the ones that would offer the lowest price if the Republican talking point of selling across state lines becomes law. With high deductables, high co-pays, limits to amounts paid for various illnesses, various exclusions, etc. - essentially worthless policies and a big waste of money.