iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Judd Gregg: 'I Don't Think We Can Afford Afghanistan Much Longer' (VIDEO)


First Posted: 03/07/11 01:12 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- A former Republican senator who was once a cabinet choice for President Barack Obama is calling for a quicker withdrawal from Afghanistan, saying the country cannot continue to shoulder the economic and human burden.

"I don't think we can afford Afghanistan much longer," said former New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg, who retired in January, during an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday. "The simple fact is that it's costing us. Good people are losing their lives there, and we're losing huge amount of resources there ... So I think we should have a timeframe for getting out of Afghanistan, and it should be shorter rather than longer."

When asked by panelist Willie Geist if he wished Obama would "set clear guidelines as to when this is going to end and what we're doing there" and whether he "finds some political courage among some of [his] former colleagues to start moving in that direction," Gregg replied, "I think we have to."

WATCH:

Gregg originally supported the invasion of Afghanistan, and as recently as March 2009 -- shortly after he withdrew his name from consideration for Commerce Secretary -- said he backed Obama on foreign policy. "I'm perfectly happy to be supportive of the president when he's on the right track on places like Afghanistan and Iraq," said Gregg, who later became one of the administration's sharpest critics on government spending.

His comments on Monday come as Defense Secretary Robert Gates visits Afghanistan to meet with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Gates said Monday that both the U.S. and Afghan governments agree U.S. forces should remain in Afghanistan even after 2014, which Obama has targeted as the end of combat operations.

"Obviously it would be a small fraction of the presence that we have today, but I think we're willing to do that," Gates said. "My sense is, they are interested in having us do that."

During the MSNBC interview, Gregg said that the focus should be on Pakistan -- and perhaps even India -- rather than Afghanistan, a sentiment shared by some current lawmakers. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who recently returned from a trip to the region and sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters last month that the administration needed to focus more attention on Pakistan. "[O]ur biggest problem in Afghanistan is Pakistan," he said. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.), who was on the trip with Coons, has also expressed concerns about the cost: "When you look at all the financial challenges we have as a nation, are we really moving down the right path? How much more sacrifice from the United States will be needed?"

Gregg did not identify which of his former colleagues, if any, are shifting away from the Republican party line on Afghanistan. While a small group of GOP House members are working to explore alternatives, they have not yet been able to make significant inroads in getting other lawmakers to speak out publicly. In January, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said that "virtually" all GOP senators "support what the president's doing" on the war.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A former Republican senator who was once a cabinet choice for President Barack Obama is calling for a quicker withdrawal from Afghanistan, saying the country cannot continue to shoulder ...
WASHINGTON -- A former Republican senator who was once a cabinet choice for President Barack Obama is calling for a quicker withdrawal from Afghanistan, saying the country cannot continue to shoulder ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 518
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
photo
HufferDave87
Give me the facts, then I'll decide...
01:42 PM on 03/11/2011
Why can't we take some of those old retired widowers who watch the Texas/Mexico border online and put them on shifts patrolling in Afghanistan? Cheaper...no morale issues since they want to do it...they'll probably supply their own weapons...
photo
ewldest
I don't care "whose" war it is - end it now
12:36 AM on 03/09/2011
Thse colonial wars are bankrupting us, the return on our investment is not worth the price.
"Support the wars - destroy America" - anyone really want to rally 'round that Democan Republicrat battle cry?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctor4kids
Incite civility and reason
08:02 PM on 03/08/2011
As a pediatrician it pains me to see Congress and the president suggesting budget cuts--Headstart, the WIC program, programs to help poor people heat their homes while the elephant in the room--the war in Afghanistan-- is totally ignored.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdecisneros
my micro bio is empty because I went to the micro
06:26 PM on 03/08/2011
So it took them over ten years to figure out this was a bad idea. Do you think it will take then almost ten years to figure out the Health care reform was a good idea?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InfinteShibumi
Just breathe...
03:43 PM on 03/08/2011
I think we should all just let Judd retire into the sunset.
12:35 PM on 03/08/2011
I still don't understand why we haven't burned down all the poppy fields......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctor4kids
Incite civility and reason
08:04 PM on 03/08/2011
Proud to be your first fan. And the money for the poppy fields funds Al Quada and the Taliban and contributes to the misery of many here in the US.
12:15 PM on 03/10/2011
I agree 100%, so many questions that are unanswered.
12:33 PM on 03/08/2011
Maybe we can't afford the War, but we should as hell paid for those bailout packages that seemed to do nothing at all. Where are all the comments and articles on that?
09:24 PM on 03/07/2011
So, now a Repub wants to cut and run?
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
09:05 PM on 03/07/2011
you're gone and you were nothing but an @hole when you were there. NOBODY CARES WHAT YOU THINK. all i can see is your sm!rky face when you were regurtating repu6e talking points when on tv. cr@wl back under your rock
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
09:17 PM on 03/07/2011
"regurtatin­g" should read "regurgitating"
"
blogisti
Censor Approved Knowledge Only
08:21 PM on 03/07/2011
America never could afford the wars. They have not been paid for at all. Each day at war America goes deeper in debt. Imagine a Republican tiring of war? Can't afford war, says a Republican? It sounds like he is no longer a prisoner of the Military Industrial/Security Complex. Could he actually be a free Republican? That would be a first in my life time. Amazing.
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
09:07 PM on 03/07/2011
he's trying to redeem the unredeemable. "f" him
08:15 PM on 03/07/2011
This is what happens when you have a standing Army.
08:09 PM on 03/07/2011
So what else is new. End of combat operations in Afghanistan meant the same as in Iraq. There always was going to be a residual US presence after 2014, One problem as in Iraq is that this will also mean fewer US deaths (there have only been a handful in Iraq over the past year) and that will take it off the news wires even if we are still wasting scads of money there.
07:56 PM on 03/07/2011
It is funny that we are thinking of withdrawing from Afghanistan due to cost issues rather than human lives. I bet you, innocent humans were not on the big agenda back then; "How much is it going to cost us? Millions? Do we have it? Sure, attack 'em!"
photo
moby49
I will act as if what I do makes a difference.
07:54 PM on 03/07/2011
Cant afford it much longer?? We couldn't afford it all!! Once we broke the Taliban we should have left. Not our job to build a new nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blogger x
Both parties sold us out a long time ago.
07:53 PM on 03/07/2011
America can't afford the war in Afghanistan much longer, especially not while funding the Taliban.
http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/insidestory/2010/06/2010622133429161976.html