iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama To Restart Guantanamo Bay Trials After Two-Year Ban

Obama Guantanamo

LOLITA C. BALDOR and ERICA WERNER   03/ 7/11 07:50 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama reversed course Monday and ordered a resumption of military trials for terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, making his once ironclad promise to close the isolated prison look even more distant.

Guantanamo has been a major political and national security headache for the president since he took office promising to close the prison within a year, a deadline that came and went without him ever setting a new one.

Obama made the change with clear reluctance, bowing to the reality that Congress' vehement opposition to trying detainees on U.S. soil leaves them nowhere else to go. The president emphasized his preference for trials in federal civilian courts, and his administration blamed congressional meddling for closing off that avenue.

"I strongly believe that the American system of justice is a key part of our arsenal in the war against al-Qaida and its affiliates, and we will continue to draw on all aspects of our justice system – including (federal) courts – to ensure that our security and our values are strengthened," Obama said in a statement.

"Going forward, all branches of government have a responsibility to come together to forge a strong and durable approach to defend our nation and the values that define who we are as a nation."

The first Guantanamo trial likely to proceed under Obama's new order would involve Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the alleged mastermind of the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole. Al-Nashiri, a Saudi of Yemeni descent, has been imprisoned at Guantanamo since 2006.

Defense officials have said that of around 170 detainees at Guantanamo, about 80 are expected to face trial by military commission.

On Monday, the White House reiterated that the administration remains committed to eventually closing Guantanamo – which is on a U.S. Navy base – and that Monday's actions were in pursuit of that goal. But the outcome Obama wants seemed even more distant.

Critics of the military commission system, which was established specifically to deal with the detainees at Guantanamo, contend that suspects are not given some of the most basic protections afforded people prosecuted in American courts and that serves as a recruitment tool for terrorists.

Obama's administration has enacted some changes to the military commission system while aiming to close down Guantanamo.

More than two dozen detainees have been charged there, but the charges against a number of them were dismissed in the wake of Obama's order in January 2009 to halt the commission process.

So far six detainees have been convicted and sentenced, including Ali Hamza al-Bahlul, Osama bin Laden's media specialist who told jurors he had volunteered to be the 20th Sept. 11 hijacker. He is serving a life sentence at Guantanamo.

Meanwhile, the first Guantanamo detainee tried in civilian court – in New York – was convicted in November on just one of more than 280 charges that he took part in the al-Qaida bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa. That case ignited strident opposition to any further such trials.

Another case is that of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the professed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, who had been slotted for trial in New York before Obama bowed to political resistance and blocked the Justice Department's plans. With the military tribunals set to restart, it's likely Mohammed will be put back in that system to face trial alongside other admitted 9/11 conspirators.

Under Obama's direction Monday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates issued an order rescinding his January 2009 ban against bringing new cases against the terror suspects at the Cuba prison. Gates said the U.S. must maintain the option of prosecuting alleged terrorists in U.S. federal courts, but in his order Monday he also said the review of each detainee's status had been completed and the commission process had been reformed to address legal challenges.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif., said he was pleased with Obama's decision to restart the military commissions. But he said the administration must work with Congress to create a trial system that will stand up to judicial review.

Monday's announcement also included a process for periodically reviewing the status of detainees held at the prison. That's an effort to resolve one of the central dilemmas at Guantanamo Bay: what to do when the government thinks a prisoner is too dangerous to be released but either can't prove it in court or doesn't want to reveal national security secrets by trying to prosecute him? The answer, the White House said, is that the U.S. will hold those men indefinitely, without charges, but will review their cases periodically. However, if a review determines that someone should be released, there's no requirement that he actually be freed.

That decision on such a process had been expected for some time and was roundly criticized by rights groups. Tom Parker, a policy director at Amnesty International, condemned Obama's new order as reinstating a much discredited commission system that will rely on periodic reviews similar to what was done during the Bush administration.

The reviews, he said, "fall short of offering detainees an opportunity to mount a robust defense and to challenge the government's position regarding their detention."

Gates' order also does little to resolve the dilemma posed by many Yemeni prisoners who, for years, have been cleared for release. Their country is a hotbed of terrorism, and the U.S. does not trust the government to monitor former detainees. The order allows the U.S. to hold those men indefinitely, until the security situation in Yemen improves or the U.S. can find somewhere else to move them.

The administration also announced support for additional international agreements on humane treatment of detainees. The White House said that would underscore to the world its commitment to fair treatment and would help guard against the mistreatment of U.S. military personnel should they be captured.

Congress hardened its objections to trying detainees on U.S. soil by including language in legislation signed by Obama in January that would block the Defense Department from spending money to transfer Guantanamo prisoners to the U.S. for trial. The legislation also set up new rules for moving detainees elsewhere, and as a result Gates has told lawmakers that it has become very difficult for the government to release detainees to other countries because he now has to certify they will pose no danger. Officials have said that about one-quarter of those released so far have returned to battle.

The White House said Monday that it would continue to work to overturn those congressional prohibitions.

___(equals)

Associated Press writers Ben Feller and Matt Apuzzo contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama reversed course Monday and ordered a resumption of military trials for terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, making his once ironclad promise to close the ...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama reversed course Monday and ordered a resumption of military trials for terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, making his once ironclad promise to close the ...
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,827
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (56 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
01:00 PM on 03/28/2011
The new word for "I promise now and later I will do the opposite" is:... "Obamanizing"!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
12:56 PM on 03/28/2011
I really think deep inside President Obama is a Republican in the closet. Let's face it. He is acting more and more Republican each day. Of course all this after the midterm elections. So, "Change" was always subjected to polls results. Way to go Mr. President. You have become the biggest disappointment after G W Bush. I am not a Republican. I do not vote Republican. But you never razzled dazzled me Mr. President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshy X
observer in Weimar Amerika
03:21 AM on 03/10/2011
Obama has finally seen the light and seen reality and is keeping the necessary Gitmo terrorist prison going... the prison there is far safer, cleaner, nicer than the mainland penitentiaries.... short of shooting the terrorists on site, sending them to a clean, efficient, well regulated prison is beyond humane... good food and Korans
11:46 PM on 03/08/2011
UPDATE II: Ben Wizner of the ACLU's National Security Project is the lead lawyer in the Jeppesen case, which resulted in the recent rejection by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals of the Bush/Obama state secrets argument, and also co-wrote (along with the ACLU's Jameel Jaffer) a superb article in Salon in December making the case against preventive detention. I spoke with him this morning for roughly 20 minutes regarding the detention policies proposed by Obama in yesterday's speech. It can be heard by clicking PLAY on the recorder below. A transcript will be posted shortly.

LISTEN TO THE INERVIEW HERE BELOW..
11:29 PM on 03/08/2011
Facts and myths about Obama's preventive detention proposal......IN SALON
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/05/22/preventive_detention
11:15 PM on 03/08/2011
The New Yorker's Amy Davidson compares Obama's detention proposal to the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II (as did Professor Amann, quoted above). Hilzoy, of The Washington Monthly, writes: "If we don't have enough evidence to charge someone with a crime, we don't have enough evidence to hold them. Period" and "the power to detain people without filing criminal charges against them is a dictatorial power." Salon's Joan Walsh quotes the Center for Constitutional Rights' Vincent Warren as saying: "They’re creating, essentially, an American Gulag." The Philadelphia Inquirer's Will Bunch says of Obama's proposal: "What he's proposing is against one of this country's core principles" and "this is why people need to keep the pressure on Obama -- even those inclined to view his presidency
11:13 PM on 03/08/2011
(4) Do other countries have indefinite preventive detention?

Obama yesterday suggested that other countries have turned to "preventive detention" and that his proposal therefore isn't radical ("other countries have grappled with this question; now, so must we"). Is that true?

In June of last year, there was a tumultuous political debate in Britain that sheds ample light on this question. In the era of IRA bombings, British Parliament passed a law allowing the Government to preventively detain terrorist suspects for 14 days and then either have to charge them or release them. In 2006, Tony Blair citing the London subway attacks and the need to "intervene early before a terrorist cell has the opportunity to achieve its goals" wanted to increase the preventive detention period to 90 days, but MPs from his own party and across the political spectrum overwhelmingly opposed this, and ultimately increased it to 28 days

It is hard to justify: pre-charge detention in Canada is 24 hours; South Africa, Germany, New Zealand and America 48 hours; Russia 5 days; and Turkey 7½ days.

By rather stark and extreme contrast, Obama is seeking preventive detention powers that are indefinite. Meaning without any end, potentially permanent. There's no time limit on the "preventive detention." Compare that power to the proposal that caused such a political storm in Britain and what these other governments are empowered to do. The suggestion that indefinite preventive detention without charges is some sort of common or traditional scheme is clearly false.
11:08 PM on 03/08/2011
FROM SALON GLENN GREENWALD
Facts and myths about Obama's preventive detention proposal READ IT HERE... http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/05/22/preventive_detention

(1) What does "preventive detention" allow?

It's important to be clear about what "preventive detention" authorizes. It does not merely allow the U.S. Government to imprison people alleged to have committed Terrorist acts yet who are unable to be convicted in a civilian court proceeding. That class is merely a subset, perhaps a small subset, of who the Government can detain. Far more significant, "preventive detention" allows indefinite imprisonment not based on proven crimes or past violations of law, but of those deemed generally "dangerous" by the Government for various reasons (such as, as Obama put it yesterday, they "expressed their allegiance to Osama bin Laden" or "otherwise made it clear that they want to kill Americans"). That's what "preventive" means: imprisoning people because the Government claims they are likely to engage in violent acts in the future because they are alleged to be "combatants."
11:05 PM on 03/08/2011
Is it "due process" when the Government can guarantee it always wins?

If you really think about the argument Obama made yesterday -- when he described the five categories of detainees and the procedures to which each will be subjected -- it becomes manifest just how profound a violation of Western conceptions of justice this is. What Obama is saying is this: we'll give real trials only to those detainees we know in advance we will convict. For those we don't think we can convict in a real court, we'll get convictions in the military commissions I'm creating. For those we can't convict even in my military commissions, we'll just imprison them anyway with no charges ("preventively detain" them).

Giving trials to people only when you know for sure, in advance, that you'll get convictions is not due process. Those are called "show trials." In a healthy system of justice, the Government gives everyone it wants to imprison a trial and then imprisons only those whom it can convict. The process is constant (trials), and the outcome varies (convictions or acquittals).

Obama is saying the opposite: in his scheme, it is the outcome that is constant (everyone ends up imprisoned), while the process varies and is determined by the Government (trials for some; military commissions for others; indefinite detention for the rest). The Government picks and chooses which process you get in order to ensure that it always wins. A more warped "system of justice" is hard to imagin
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:16 PM on 03/08/2011
I just heard that Obama issued an executive order declaring that detainee can be detained in GitMo indefinitely even after an acquittal in court. Is this true? If it is it is very disturbing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:52 PM on 03/08/2011
I think that President Obama should return the Nobel Peace Prize with the notation that "as President of the United States of America, he feels obligated to do many things that go against the spirit of the Peace prize."

Perhaps later, when he is retired and building homes for poor people, or he actually accomplishes something benefiting world Peace then they can give him a deserved prize.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cathyjs
05:20 PM on 03/08/2011
Why are so many of you fighting this? President Bush tried to get countries to accept GITMO prisoners before he left office but only succeeded in transfering a few, some of who were later caught killing innocent people. These are not nice men. Do you really want them walking around free? Civil rights are all well and good but these terrorists could care less about the morals we as Americans possess and we have to stop equating them with the way we think or do things.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:12 AM on 03/09/2011
"Civil rights are all well and good but . . . "

What country do you live in?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cathyjs
08:34 AM on 03/09/2011
Are you going to try to tell me that these terrorists gave a hoot about the civil rights of the people they murdered?
09:18 PM on 03/09/2011
The real question is what country are the people in Gitmo from?
You're expecting us to give them more rights then they were given in their own country when they avoid wearing uniforms so that they can ambush other soldiers. That's why they don't get civil rights and why they're treated as enemy combatants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
02:18 PM on 03/08/2011
And what's going on in the other "black rendition" camps? Gitmo is just one of what? Thirty, spread around the benighted globe? I think I can infer what is going on in the other camps. Torture. Limitless detention without trial.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:46 PM on 03/08/2011
Where are those other camps? I've never heard of any others before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
06:05 PM on 03/08/2011
Reportedly in Eastern and Central Europe, in South Asia, and elsewhere.
12:22 PM on 03/08/2011
"and his administration blamed congressional meddling for closing off that avenue"
"your side" controlled all 3 houses for the first 2 years of Obowbow's reign & he couldn't get it done?. lol. same with his lobbyist pledge aye? same with curtailing the rising cost of health care aye? same with his promise of no new taxes aye? One house down, 2 to go. God Bless this great nation & free & fair elections!! see you in 2012! =)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:47 PM on 03/08/2011
It was still GWB controlling the strings for the first 2 years of the Obamas term.
09:20 PM on 03/09/2011
What in the world are you talking about?
Are you literally blaming this decision on Bush? And if so, explain why?

Obama was all against this before he was elected. Then he said it will take a while.
Oooops. Uh, that was wrong too?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:05 PM on 03/08/2011
Obama is "reluctant" to restart this failed and unlawful process.

He is "reluctant" to do anything where his image is on the line- which is of course everywhere.

See Jane Mayer's article from a few years ago:

"it is proving virtually impossible for Holder to make mid-course legal corrections without sparking political fights over the Bush legacy. Many of Obama’s political advisers see such battles as exactly the kind of “wedge” issues that alienate the independent voters they need. So far, polls show that the President has repaired the Democrats’ image problem on national-security issues; his approval rating on handling terrorism is about fifty per cent, and was unhurt by the Christmas Day fracas. The one national-security policy on which recent public-opinion polls register extreme disapproval is the decision to handle terror suspects as civilian criminals."
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/02/15/100215fa_fact_mayer
Obama refuses to make difficult decisions, blames others for making his job impossible It is a recurring pattern of a passive-aggressive politician who continues wars just so his flank is covered, and compromises every principle for his re-election prospects. Expect people to die in needless wars, the poor to suffer because of his vanity healthco sellout, the government to become more corrupt because he will not fight back against its contamination, and all because he is afraid of his own shadow.
09:21 PM on 03/09/2011
"Obama refuses to make difficult decisions, blames others for making his job impossible "

Yep.
Its almost as if he feels that the only thing keeping him from being terrific, is, you know, the rest of the world.
If Obama were on Celebrity Apprentice, he wouldn't make it past the first round. He'd be David Casidy'd.