iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Indiana Bill Would Force Doctors To Tell Women That Having An Abortion May Lead To Breast Cancer

Abortion

First Posted: 03/09/11 04:03 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Hundreds of protesters rallied at the Indiana statehouse on Tuesday in opposition to restrictive abortion measures that would, among other things, require doctors to tell pregnant women about a controversial theory that says having an abortion could lead to an increased risk of breast cancer.

House Bill 1210, introduced by Indiana state Rep. Eric Turner (R), would make abortions illegal after 20 weeks. The Senate has already passed a similar bill, but it is awaiting action in the House.

The bill would also require physicians to inform a pregnant woman seeking an abortion that the fetus could feel pain and require patients to view an ultrasound. A patient could get out of doing so only if she stated her refusal in writing.

Turner was not available for comment on Wednesday, but he recently said, "The vast majority of both the Senate and House are pro-life legislators, and I think we truly represent Hoosier constituents."

But one of the most controversial portions of the bill is the part that would require doctors to inform women about the risks of abortion, including "the possibility of increased risk of breast cancer following an induced abortion and the natural protective effect of a completed pregnancy in avoiding breast cancer."

Indiana wouldn't be the first state to promote this theory. According to the Guttmacher Institute, five states -- Alaska, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia -- currently include mentions of a link between abortion and breast cancer in written counseling materials.

In 1999, Nevada Republican Sharron Angle -- who was then in the state Assembly and recently lost the U.S. Senate race against Harry Reid -- proposed a similar measure requiring doctors to make the abortion-breast cancer link.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) and other major health organizations, however, have rejected this theory. In February 2003, the U.S. National Cancer Institute brought together "more than 100 of the world's leading experts who study pregnancy and breast cancer risk." They found that neither induced nor spontaneous abortions lead to an increase in breast cancer risk. In fact, the risk is actually increased for a short period after a woman carries a pregnancy to full term (i.e., gives birth to a child). According to ACS, these findings were considered "well established," which is the highest level for scientific evidence.

In June 2009, the highly respected American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice wrote, "Early studies of the relationship between prior induced abortion and breast cancer risk were methodologically flawed. More rigorous recent studies demonstrate no causal relationship between induced abortion and a subsequent increase in breast cancer risk."

"I think that the pregnant lady needs to have every bit of information that she can," Turner said in defense of the strict counseling requirements in his bill. "I think it's important that she see an ultrasound image of her child before she elects to have an abortion. She can see that it's a living being."

While some backers of the anti-abortion legislation turned out on Tuesday in Indianapolis, the Indianapolis Star reported that they were greatly outnumbered by opponents.

For Planned Parenthood of Indiana (PPIN), which organized the rally, the fight is personal. House Bill 1205 would prohibit the state from "entering contracts with or making grants to any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions are performed." While many pieces of legislation in Indiana don't take effect until July 1, after the close of the legislative session, this bill has an emergency provision -- meaning it would take effect immediately upon passage.

Planned Parenthood has 28 locations around the state. According to PPIN President Betty Cockrum, they serve 9,300 patients on Medicaid for a wide range of services including administering pap tests and STD treatment, providing birth control and giving annual exams. At PPIN's other eight funded health centers, they serve 12,500 Medicaid patients. So if House Bill 1205 passes, PPIN estimates that approximately 21,800 Hoosiers would be affected.

Indiana is also central in the national debate on abortion rights. On the federal level, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) is leading a similar campaign against the national family planning organization.

"We're working as hard as we can to have the right conversations with legislators and leadership," said Cockrum in an interview on Wednesday with The Huffington Post, adding that on the national level, one of their primary targets is Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.). "I have to believe that Sen. Lugar is going to understand that taking family planning dollars away from existing health care providers to pay for birth control and pap tests isn't good public health policy." Indiana Right to Life, which supports Pence's bill, also considers him a key vote. It recently sent an e-mail message to its supporters encouraging them to contact Lugar.

Indiana Right to Life has hailed 13 measures introduced into the state legislature this session, calling it the "largest array of pro-life legislation in recent history." The group's website states, "The flood of legislation is a direct result of the dramatic change in leadership at the Statehouse following the November elections."

For now, these bills are all stalled. Indiana's House Democrats left the state on Feb. 22 in order to prevent their Republican colleagues from reaching the quorum needed to push through anti-union legislation.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Hundreds of protesters rallied at the Indiana statehouse on Tuesday in opposition to restrictive abortion measures that would, among other things, require doctors to tell pregnant women ...
WASHINGTON -- Hundreds of protesters rallied at the Indiana statehouse on Tuesday in opposition to restrictive abortion measures that would, among other things, require doctors to tell pregnant women ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,428
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (73 total)
04:26 PM on 03/25/2011
What in the heck is going on in indiana???




www.matterofopinion.com
12:29 PM on 03/22/2011
As a conservative I'm sure it is obvious that there isn't much about HP that I agree with. However, what makes me ill is when the nutty far right to lifers sneak onto a bill garbage and lies. I know folks on the left do as well and you guys need to step up to the plate and call them out as well. All of us have to force Washington to be more honest and stop sneaking stuff into bills. Don't you think that would go a long way to getting us to trust them again? I do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Parfitt
Two democrats walk into a bar. Three walk out.
04:52 PM on 03/18/2011
I understand why cons want to expand the restrictions on abortions, but they're going about it all wrong. Making abortion available to any woman who wants them is a right that we need to respect in this country. I don't think it's the place of a man to decide whether or not someone gets an abortion, and so they shouldn't be passing laws about it either.
09:49 PM on 03/16/2011
Abortions have absolutely nothing to do with breast cancer! It has more to do with the daily consumption of dairy products in every form, but western medicine cannot understand the cause of the gene mutation, and because they believe that women are making too much estrogen rather then consuming it, so they blame it on the human body. There is more breast cancer in countries that ingest dairy products than any other nation. Please people don't talk about things you don't understand. The study was probably back by some dairy company.
11:30 AM on 03/16/2011
They want to do away with Medicare, health care for the poor, abortions- yet not one Republican or anti-abortionist has come up with a plan for population overgrowth when all these pregnant women have children. I believe homelessness and child abuse will skyrocket, & the need for government assistance will triple if not quadruple to feed new mouths filling up space quickly at state orphanages. I'd bet the GOP wouldn't want to fund them, either- so where will all these children go? Will Palin propose the idea of giving every single child born unwanted a warm bed for 18 years and then help with grants for college? Of course not. That'd be ridiculous. So what's the plan? There isn't one. They want to force THEIR beliefs. I believe that is unconstitutional. No one should be able to physically force their personal views of reproduction management into our individual lives. With each passing day I hear more & more ridiculous crap from these politicians. Perhaps they are aiming for shock value in order to stir the masses or bide their time, but it poisons the well- & taking away these kind of rights and spreading LIES in order to SCARE the public- shouldn't that be illegal? Like screaming "Fire!" in a crowded theater? These BULLY politicians should be held accountable for such manipulative practices.
photo
JoliAvocat
Barack Obama in 2012
04:15 AM on 03/16/2011
We need legislation to warn all those Republican men about drugs for their impotentcy.

Fair is fair.
photo
JoliAvocat
Barack Obama in 2012
04:14 AM on 03/16/2011
What about the warnings on Cialis and Viagra? Don't we need a bill to warn all those men about it?

Fair is fair, fellas. Republican males need to know....
photo
JoliAvocat
Barack Obama in 2012
04:07 AM on 03/16/2011
I'm going to write Barbara Boxer and ask her to propose legislation to have any prescribing physician of Cialis, Viagra or similar meds inform his/her patients it could result in a heart attack, stroke or whatever other issues are listed on the container they come in.

You know, to "inform" them what "could" happen. That's fair. You could die for that erection you covet so much. That's more than fair.
photo
JoliAvocat
Barack Obama in 2012
04:04 AM on 03/16/2011
Anything the Republican men can do to chip away at a woman's right to choose. Get over it fellas. You have the wrong equipment to be dictating what I do with mine. Live your life the way you wish but let me live my life according to what I WANT and not what YOU want.

Mind your own business.
avg american
It's about jobs, jobs, jobs...
07:43 PM on 03/14/2011
Indiana's unemployment is at 9.5%.

http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=usunemployment&met=unemployment_rate&idim=state:ST180000&dl=en&hl=en&q=indiana%27s+unemployment+rate


Why aren't they focused on jobs?
Where are the jobs?
photo
JoliAvocat
Barack Obama in 2012
04:09 AM on 03/16/2011
No kidding. These men are far too focused on what is between our legs and not enough on this economy that Bush and Cheney destroyed.
12:35 PM on 03/22/2011
And Clinton did nothing to hurt the economy or 9/11? I agree with you re: abortion and I think that when someone add's a lie to a bill (like abortions cause cancer) that should be an impeachable offense or at least brought before the ethics panel. But your generalizations about ALL republicans is ridiculous. I am one, I am pro-abortion, pro environment, pro gay marriage but anti-handouts and big government. I don't think my tax dollars should pay for abortions but I would fight to protect choice. The government has to stop baby sitting folks and folks need to take care of themselves. Probably one of the best solutions to all the baloney in DC is to only elect women. At least that would keep the scandal rate low.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
05:25 PM on 03/14/2011
What else are they lying about?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Maranda MassieGuthrie
my bio is empty!
08:35 PM on 03/13/2011
" I have something to say " it is no body's right to tell someone what they can do w/ their bodies, says the republicans about national health care, but when it comes to being pro choice all the sudden it is?..Why are crotchety old man trying to tell woman not only for abortions, but for miscarriages what they can do w/ their bodies?..The fact of the matter is a dose of prevention goes a long why so taking away planned parent hood and funding is counterproductive!! Last, let me just ask what kind of life is a child who is born that can not be afforded and now a society who says they don't want help it, going to have. Any one who knows anything about child abuse knows forcing a woman to have a baby, when it is not wanted can lead to horrible consequences! Unfortunately the truth is not all people decide they are in love w/ their child when it is born.. The fact is i think abortion is a woman's right, it should not be used as a form of birth control, but in the end it is the woman's choice and god who decides the out come and judgment, not any preacher or man, or woman, and definitely not any tea baggers right! Do we really want to go back to the days of woman being killed in nasty rooms, getting illegal abortions?
01:02 PM on 03/13/2011
Abortion has many more health hazards then just cancer....All the health risks should be disclosed.
10:32 AM on 03/13/2011
Really what is the worse of the 2 evils-the chance of breast cancer or raising a child you do not want or need.
Meanwhile people are forced to ingest chemicals in their atmosphere and food that could be eliminated but this would take profit from the chemical lobbies.
photo
JoliAvocat
Barack Obama in 2012
04:11 AM on 03/16/2011
GREAT point and well said. You notice all these 50+ year old Republican males don't care about the dasturdly side effects of Cialis or Viagra. And they are substantial risks.

Selfish tiny thinkers who wish to impose their religious beliefs on us. No dice, fellas. We are on to you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissAstrid
My thoughts spilled out of my fingertips
05:05 PM on 03/12/2011
Is it just me or does it seem like a lot of these anti-abortion extremists believe that a woman wakes up one morning 2 weeks before she's due and decides, "Hey, this pregnancy thing is pretty stressful on my body. I'm going to go get an abortion. And not just any abortion! I want to make sure my baby is alive when it comes out just so we can have the pleasure of killing it."