More

Mozilla CEO On The Best Way To Protect Our Privacy Online

First Posted: 03/11/11 08:29 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Firefox

Amidst new concerns over the safety of personal data on the web, Mozilla CEO Gary Kovacs argued that technological tools, rather than government regulation, should be used to better safeguard users’ privacy online.

"I never rely on the government to lead something, it just takes too long," he said in an interview with The Huffington Post. "Capitalism works."

Yet privacy experts counter that regulators must intervene to ensure consumers’ interests are taken into account together with companies’ priorities.

“The FTC and a bunch of other folks asked industry to self-regulate over the last several years and it’s actually gotten exponentially worse,” said Mary Hodder, chairman of the Personal Data Ecosystem Consortium. “I don’t think companies can control themselves and do the right thing in the face of getting all this user data.”

Mozilla is one of several companies taking note of renewed government efforts to tackle online privacy: In a report released late last year, the FTC chastised companies for their failure to more quickly address privacy issues--warning "this could be the last clear chance to show that self-regulation can...protect consumers' privacy"--and endorsed a "do not track" system that would allow users to disable targeted advertising.

Mozilla, along with companies like Microsoft and Google, responded by providing a "do not track" tool that lets people opt out of online behavioral tracking.

The organization is also working on a feature that helps users identify who's tracking them: as they browse the web, individuals will be able to monitor, in real-time, any companies watching their activity, with the option to block them.

"Our position isn't that any of this behavior should not exist," Jay Sullivan, Mozilla's vice president of products, said in reference to targeted advertising. "It's that the user should understand what's happening and be in control of it."

Kovacs noted that online privacy has taken on new urgency as more aspects of our identities--from our movie preferences to our relationships to our purchases--migrate to the web. Companies have played fast-and-loose with such consumer data, fueling privacy concerns.

"What we used to do on the web is search for information. We don't do that exclusively anymore," Kovacs explained. "The problem is there have been some pretty egregious instances of privacy breaches that have caused lot of folks to lift their heads...People are stepping up and saying, 'What's happening to my identity up there?' It's probably long overdue."

Just as our behavior on the Internet has changed drastically, the web itself has also been reshaped by the rise of apps running on separate operating systems, such as Apple's iOS, Google's Android, Microsoft's Windows Mobile, and others.

"The Internet is being fractured," said Kovacs.

Kovacs warned the shift creates new challenges for developers, who must build apps for the disparate ecosystems, while consumers may also be losing out.

"Users don't get the power of millions of web developers," he explained. "Now they have to choose: do I live in an Apple world or in a Google world?"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Amidst new concerns over the safety of personal data on the web, Mozilla CEO Gary Kovacs argued that technological tools, rather than government regulation, should be used to better safeguard users’...
Amidst new concerns over the safety of personal data on the web, Mozilla CEO Gary Kovacs argued that technological tools, rather than government regulation, should be used to better safeguard users’...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 69
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
11:41 AM on 03/14/2011
1) Have a properly configured computer(s) and network.
2) Use Linux or BSD, not Windows or Mac OS X
3) Do not use social networking sites.
4) Disable geo-caching on your mobile devices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donethridge
09:15 AM on 03/14/2011
We just recently went through a period of economic devastation because of no regulation. Now Mr. Kovacs thinks the same should apply to our privacy. I disagree with him. While the regulations may not happen right away, we need them to punish those who steal our data and identities. How does it benefit anyone to have less?
04:23 AM on 03/14/2011
Time will clear everything.
--------------------------------------
WinPST Share Outlook
photo
Bushwhacked
REGISTER! VOTE! OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!
04:03 AM on 03/14/2011
Companies can not be trusted. Period. Look at the financial industry - greed and deregulation allowed the collapse to happen. BP - eh, yah we can contain it. NOT. Facebook made it's creator(s) uber-rich - and not just by selling ads; by selling information. YOUR information and information about your behavior. Duh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LAustin
Ret. Professional 65+, recent widow
10:42 PM on 03/13/2011
Whatever.
05:43 PM on 03/13/2011
It's up to each individual to protect themselves and their private data as best they can.

We really are on our own as far as removing tracking cookies and other stalker-ware from our browsers.

1. Do not give FB your phone number and home address. Why would you need to share that information? Friends already know how to contact you.

2. Manually delete cookies from your browser. Deleting Flash cookies requires an additional manual step. You have to delete all the files in the #SharedObjects directory *and* from the macromedia.com/support/flashplayer/sys directory. Those are the insidious files that really share and track your browsing history. You have to delete them manually. You have to delete them regularly.

3. While Google has invested a lot of time to make things "simpler" for users to connect, correspond and store documents, they've created a gold mine of data which is theirs to sell to whomever they choose. Not worth it folks.

4. Capitalism seems to work really well when it's based on selling and trading what you don't own, and which in the scheme of things costs you nothing, and is constantly replenished by unsuspecting consumers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donethridge
09:36 AM on 03/14/2011
Very good suggestions. Regulations are needed!!! Without them how will the evil doers be punished? Why would we want less? These folks want you to believe the government has no role in this issue. How can this attitude be of benefit to anyone other than those who are tracking you? We just saw the results of this attitude in the economy.

Check out:
http://www.qfxsoftware.com/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/betterprivacy/
http://www.mywot.com/

These are Firefox add ons. If you use all three they will help keep you safe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoMoFearNoMoHate
09:14 AM on 03/22/2011
How do I know that these third-party add-ons are not just getting in on the ploy? Stealing information for THEMselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hillaryj
05:29 PM on 03/13/2011
Which do you prefer? Foxfire or IE8?
photo
Leper
Giving the finger to intolerance
01:09 AM on 03/14/2011
Opera
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donethridge
09:37 AM on 03/14/2011
Chrome and Firefox.
09:44 PM on 03/12/2011
Actually, it's an interesting point, because didn't the government lead this? Didn't Bush spy on millions of Americans? And our newest president has not stopped that program, right? So it's probably still going on?

Maybe if government tries to stop businesses from doing this, they will call the government out for doing the same thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libertyreturns
Comin' Atcha Live!
07:04 PM on 03/12/2011
"The organization is also working on a feature that helps users identify who's tracking them: as they browse the web, individuals will be able to monitor, in real-time, any companies watching their activity, with the option to block them."

That will be a welcomed feature!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
"Without a struggle, there can be no progress. "
09:49 PM on 03/12/2011
The add-on Ghostery will show you the trackers and allow you to block them.

NoScript will show you the scripts running on a page and allow you to block them.

photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
07:47 AM on 03/13/2011
Both are a pain in the ass. They basically make web pages nonfunctional, until you authorize all the scripts.  It just shows how difficult protecting yourself from the man has become.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:46 AM on 03/14/2011
Already have the capability......I use it.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:01 PM on 03/12/2011
that is the most hilarious thing that i ever heard, internet and privacy, b/s, happy save browsing!
09:40 PM on 03/12/2011
I've heard that mozilla does offer the most safe, open source privacy options (my understanding is open source means that anybody can monitor and improve and assess the code to keep a check on what's up)
01:40 PM on 03/13/2011
Well, that is certainly true, but howz that Mozilla protect us but the websites don't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
11:39 AM on 03/12/2011
Great to see HP featuring some open source people for a change - now if they really want to set the tech section on fire - they should do a gimp versus photoshop thread.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WilliamWalton
Life's Path:Balt.>York>Chapel Hill>Atl.>Wilmington
08:40 PM on 03/13/2011
HA!!!! I love my GIMP!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:36 AM on 03/12/2011
To my way of thinking, the problem does not consist of "secure-enough transmission of data from point to point" (which SSL and HTTPS and so-on handle very well), but with the persistent information and the proliferation of it.

For example:

(a) "Gabbing" on-line to your "friends," telling them "everything about you" from moment to moment, while giving no thought whatsoever to the fact that you are simultaneously telling a corporation the same thing... and for all time.

(b) Does anyone else see serious security consequences with "Google Docs?" Who said that I wanted Google, Inc. to "conveniently" make and store a copy of every attachment that I ever had to anything? What LAWS are in place that will give me any recourse ... any recourse whatsoever ... if "the Big Benevolent Company" does anything that I do not 100% agree with?

(c) Sending un-encrypted emails with (therefore...) effortlessly-viewable AND effortlessly-keepable contents and attachments.

Sure, companies don't want regulations, and I agree that we do not want to rush out and impose too many of them too fast, but every sharp sword has two edges and this has always been the case. We also need a sheath to put that sharp sword into.

To me, the question is not that we do, in fact, need "regulation," but rather, just what those regulations need to be. Designing good laws, like writing good books, is not an easy task.
04:44 AM on 03/12/2011
Capitalism works alright, accumulating wealth to a few,destroying the environment and species...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dino213aa
02:43 AM on 03/12/2011
Shouldn't they be thinking about the best way to make their browser faster?
04:18 PM on 03/12/2011
They have, try out the new Firefox 4 release candidate. Final version should be coming out in a few weeks.
06:50 PM on 03/13/2011
Firefox 4 is already pretty damn fast..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dino213aa
01:47 PM on 03/15/2011
Not based on my experience. I've downloaded it.. it's maybe a little snappier than the last version, but still not as fast as Google Chrome.

Honestly the way to get Firefox to move fastest is to disable as many add-ons as possible. It doesn't handle add-ons well. It does seem awfully bloated though. Chrome uses about 70mb of ram and Firefox generally uses 260mb on my machine.