iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Unions Frame Collective Bargaining As Civil Rights Issue

Union Civil Rights

SAM HANANEL   03/11/11 11:27 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Labor unions at the heart of a burning national disagreement over the cost of public employees want to frame the debate as a civil rights issue, an effort that may draw more sympathy to public workers being blamed for busting state budgets with generous pensions.

As part of that strategy, unions are planning rallies across the country on April 4 – the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination. Union officials want the observances in dozens of cities to remind Americans that King was supporting striking sanitation workers in Memphis, Tenn., the night he was shot.

By portraying collective bargaining as a human rights issue, union officials hope the rallies can help fuel a backlash against Republicans in Wisconsin and other states trying to curb collective bargaining rights for public employees.

"This is a fight for workers, this is a fight for the middle class, this is a fight to try to stave off the shift in power and wealth that is starting to become gross," said Harold Schaitberger, president of the International Association of Fire Fighters.

The planned rallies on the 43rd anniversary of King's death are part of a coordinated strategy by labor leaders to ride the momentum of pro-union demonstrations and national polls showing most Americans support collective bargaining rights as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and other GOP leaders in states fight to reduce or strip those benefits.

Walker has argued that collective bargaining is a budget issue. On Friday, he signed into law a bill the strips nearly all collective bargaining benefits from most public workers, arguing the move will give local governments flexibility in making budget cuts needed to close the state's $3.6 billion deficit.

"That's something people forget about Dr. King," said Liz Shuler, secretary-treasurer of the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor federation. "We all know about his work in the civil rights movement, but he was also a workers' rights advocate."

It's also another signal that labor leaders are trying to broaden the coalition of groups speaking out against efforts to limit collective bargaining rights for public employee unions. Unions are coordinating the rallies with the NAACP, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and other civil rights, religious and progressive groups.

"Dr. King lost his life struggling to help sanitation workers – public sector employees – achieve their goals for a dignified existence as workers," said Wade Henderson, president of the Leadership Conference. "We think that's an extraordinary backdrop in which to frame the debate over what's taking place in the country today."

When King traveled to Memphis in 1968, he was lending support to more than 1,100 black sanitation workers who were on strike seeking better working conditions, higher wages and benefits, and union recognition.

Daniel Walkowitz, a labor historian at New York University, said the gesture was typical of King's later years, in which the targets of his activism were less often the legal barriers to civil rights for blacks. More often, King was focused on lack of employment and educational opportunities for African-Americans.

"Tying the rallies to King is an interesting strategy because it does draw upon King's understanding that the problems of labor were problems of civil rights," Walkowitz said.

Walker argues that the sweeping step against collective bargaining is necessary to balance the budget not only over the next two years but into the future. He said he wouldn't compromise on the issue or on anything that saves the state money.

But union leaders see it as a fight for middle class rights. Wisconsin unions had agreed to cuts in pension and health benefits as long as they could keep collective bargaining rights. Labor leaders say Walker's refusal to compromise shows he wants to leave unions toothless and cripple their political clout.

While unions are on the verge of losing power in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states, union leaders believe they are winning the war of public opinion and pulling in broader support.

"The movement is bigger than just the labor movement," United Steelworkers President Leo Gerard said. "What we're seeing is an awakening about the importance of collective bargaining."

Labor leaders already have pledged to pour more than $30 million into a push to stop legislation in dozens of states that seeks to limit bargaining rights of public worker unions or otherwise curb union power. Union officials are also helping mobilize demonstrations in state capitols and spending money on recall campaigns against GOP officials who support efforts to curb union rights.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Labor unions at the heart of a burning national disagreement over the cost of public employees want to frame the debate as a civil rights issue, an effort that may draw more sympath...
WASHINGTON — Labor unions at the heart of a burning national disagreement over the cost of public employees want to frame the debate as a civil rights issue, an effort that may draw more sympath...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 392
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
Lisapearlblack
Soldier for Justice
01:08 PM on 04/01/2011
My case which involves govt fraud,racial discrimation,legal malpractice,medical malpractice,bogus contracts that came down from the"Bush Administration"in which we were issued"United States Contracting Officer" and yet on paper were"Medical supply technicians?" needs to be told. My case started in 2005 and dust collected on it until the good ole boys said that I was AWOL,when actually I had gotten sick from the retaliation of coming forth with the truth 2 the public. My case is a combination of WATERGATE,MLK,and BROWN VS BOARD OF EDUCATION. I have had 2 attorneys who happen to be african anerican who have ran from the case. The MSPB heard my proof that I was adversly "removed" & ruled in favor of the Dept of Veterans Affairs. I am the "whistlblower that came forth" and told the just that the Murfreesboro TN V.A medical supply side was not being properly overlooked."The little secret?" is NAVREF a lobbyist group(research) that works "side by side" with the V.A.I was locked from a door(Osha violation),taken out of O.R supply(I was the only person that had formal experience,hmmmm),Katrina victims supplies were locked in the V.A parking lot garage so that they were never able to recieve that aid. Racist remraks on more than 1 occasion.Vets got HIV,HEP B&C from unsterile medical equiptment and when I speak in court all I hear is denied,denied,denied! Not a "soul" has come to my aid.Transparecy with this case? "I don't think so". Not so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlacknProud310
Go Elizabeth Warren, Make Em Pay!
05:28 AM on 03/22/2011
This maybe perhaps a little off-topic but I have never ever had a time when a brown face was the top of a union ladder of leadership but maybe I'm not looking in the right place. They all are white ran. Not sure if this is coincidence but Hmmmmm.
10:10 AM on 03/14/2011
I would concede that the right of assembly makes unionizing a right and therefore collective bargaining. However, if you have a right to assemble you also have a right to NOT assemble meaning that you have a right to not be forced into a union you do not wish to join as condition of employment. If this is a rights issue the 28 states that are not right to work states should be forced change their laws. There is nothing that threatens the very existence of unions more than giving the workers the right to opt out, so I think it is unwise for them to frame the issue this way.
06:40 PM on 03/11/2011
If collective bargaining is a civil right, then how come all workers do not have that right?

How come federal employees do not have that 'civil right'?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Face It
06:33 PM on 03/11/2011
1. One Individual is free.

2. The individual works.

3. The individual and other individuals assemble.

4. They unionize and form a union to collectively bargain.

5. The union negotiates with the employer about wage, benefits, etc.

All this whining about the relationship between unions and the Democrats have nothing, really nothing to do with the right of individuals to unionize and collectively bargain.

That is a a matter for campaign financing reform. D´oh!

Denying people the right to collectively bargain is illegal and a clear violation of the Constitution and the U.N. declaration of human rights.

Only if all people, including public sector workers, enjoy the same rights all people are equal.

It reminds me of the thing the GOP man used the other day when he spoke about students being young and thus not qualified to vote. Again, there are no two sets of laws for voters of different ages.

By definition the Constitution applies to all, not selected groups of your liking. Equal rights for all is the essence of constitutional democracy. Anyone arguing against that is against constitutional democracies.
05:37 PM on 03/11/2011
I believe that the Constitution protects our right to choose who want to represent us, whther it is a lawyer or a union or a lawyer acting through a union. Walker nor the GOP has the right to deny us representation. Can this law be un-Constitutional?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Private corps can't do it better!!!
07:01 PM on 03/11/2011
Interesting take. It bears research I think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Private corps can't do it better!!!
05:13 PM on 03/11/2011
Hoping one conservative will be enlightened.
It truly is a civil rights issue that has no color, religion or unless forced a political agenda.
Unions are one of the few remaining truly patriotic organizations who follow the Declaration of Independence and try to force corporations to follow it too.

"“ We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice (equal pay for equal work), ensure domestic Tranquility (try and resolve things through negotiation), provide for the common defense (defend the weakest members of our society because they too have value), promote the general Welfare (the REAL heart kernel of the constitution, to improve things for "ALL" the people), and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity(¬if we don't have the previous items how can we say we have liberty or are giving our children a better future), do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. ”"

These are truly what unions strive for everyday. When unions succeed, everything improves for everyone.

You'll notice that in that ground breaking sentence of the constitution there is NOT one mention of corporations or that any of these goals should be applied to them. Corporations should always be subservient. Sadly it's not the case and many American workers have paid with their lives both on the job and trying to gain rights to work in a safe environment so they too get to go home to their families.
11:19 AM on 03/12/2011
Mikeee, You're my hero. Thank you for this brilliant post. F& F
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dbos
Single payer universal health insurance agent
11:25 AM on 03/12/2011
Great post F&F
photo
LiveMind
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery
03:48 PM on 03/11/2011
So many, many trolls out today. So little time.
03:43 PM on 03/11/2011
I was saying this during the healthcare fight.

What King fought against later in his life was "Economic Segregation."

If they really wants to frame the debate further, use that term over and over again on the GOP saying that the GOP opposes "economic integration" and supports the "Jim Crow status quo of poor healthcare, lower wages, and negative job growth."

People understand those terms and goes straight to the emotions. It has the added benefit of being true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:31 PM on 03/11/2011
It isn't a "right".

It is a privelege.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Private corps can't do it better!!!
05:15 PM on 03/11/2011
Fail.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:50 PM on 03/11/2011
You offered nothing.

Just as well...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:30 PM on 03/11/2011
I wonder why the same argument wasn't raised when JimmyCarter eliminated collective bargaining for federal employees in 1978.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
03:49 PM on 03/11/2011
I have been waiting too long for someone to mention this on the HuffPost. Thanks for doing so. I am a liberal Democrat and a retired Federal employee, and it is amazing to me that no media outlet has dared mention President Carter's action. I strongly support collective bargaining for civil servants, and I am amazed and appalled that my Democratic party has spent the past two years being critical of teacher's unions and taking actions that were harmful to the labor union movement, and now is trying to once again ride the coattails of the movement they temporarily (at least) forgot. We need to remind the leadership of our party that these are issues that need support every single day -- not just on the days when they believe it can be turned to their own electoral advantage. They also need to be reminded that sometimes it is the Democrats who are on the wrong side of this issue, and you have done that. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
07:56 PM on 03/11/2011
There was another poster earlier that answered this post. Jimmy Carter STRENGTHENED rights for federal employees:

"The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 abolished the U.S. Civil Service Commission and distributes its functions primarily among three agencies: the newly established Office of Personnel Management, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and the Federal Labor Relations Authority.

Under the "rank-in-the-person" provision of the act, agency heads can move career senior executives into any position for which they are qualified. One provision of the act was the abolishment of the United States Civil Service Commission and the creation of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) and the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). OPM primarily provides management guidance to the various agencies of the executive branch and issues regulations that control federal human resources. FLRA oversees the rights of federal employees to form collective bargaining units (unions) and to engage in collective bargaining with agencies. MSPB conducts studies of the federal civil service and mainly hears the appeals of federal employees who are disciplined or otherwise separated from their positions. This act was an effort to replace incompetent officials."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Service_Reform_Act_of_1978
photo
LiveMind
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery
03:23 PM on 03/11/2011
It IS a civil rights issue. That's exactly what they need to point out. The sad part is, there are plenty of people (lots of Fox watchers) who will hear "civil rights" and assume that they are talking about selectively benefitting people of color, rather than protecting the rights of all. Ignorance runs so deep in this country these days, and the right knows how to play it. So maybe they ought to be talking simply about basic HUMAN rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kiksadi50
03:08 PM on 03/11/2011
Darn right his is a Civil Rights issue.Removing the right from workers to collectively bargain with bosses is disempowering exploitive & oppressive.Walker is trying to crush Unions by making their leaders look like thugs.They are advocates.Slowly the repub. party is trying to dismantle Unions all over the U.S.Walker is a snake in the grass.Shame on Wisco for voting him into office in the first place.Now,cheeseheads have to stand together until they can vote him & his stooges out of office.I grew up in the mid-west.where Unions are the backbone of the middle class.They protect workers from exploitation & abusive treatment by bosses.Is the pay scale amongst Union members always fairly distributed? no.Are there teachers who should be fired? yes.Are there supreme court justices who are appt.for life who should have mandatory retirement @ 85yr.o.YES! The tide is turning.Americans are beginning to understand & support the Health Care Reform Act. Demos are terrible @ reducing bills to easily understood,robotic, simplistic talking points like Repub.can.EX:palin & bachmann are chatty kathy's.Pull the string they repeat the same 6 talking pts.over & over until semi-illiterates & 3rd graders understand.Similar to intellectual & emotional waterboarding.Ex."tax cuts good,tax increases on wealthy bad","Obamma's not a citizen, he's Muslim",he has a "gangsta Gov".Even I have gone,hmmm,then I slap myself & come back to earth.A sm.majority of Americans now support health care reform.Workers can take back America,go cheeseheads!
maruski
Liberal Lutheran; lean left, save America!
03:47 PM on 03/11/2011
".Even I have gone,hmmm,then slap myself"

That is just it isn't it? They say it over and over and over and you start to think "am I missing something"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
03:03 PM on 03/11/2011
For those of us that think the battle between unions and the Fascist Republicans do not affect us because we are not union workers:

“First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me--
and there was no one left to speak out for me.”
Martin Niemoller

And in NH Republicans are trying to take the right to vote from college students.
"Several states looking to tighten voting rules for college students"
http://blogs.delawareonline.com/delawareed/2011/03/several-states-looking-to-tighten-voting-rules-for-college-students/



All for the corporations and their Oligarchial 2%ers. Let's not be as blinded as the Italians of Musolini's day:

Benito Mussolini is recognized as the father of fascism. When asked how he would describe his movement Mussolini responded, “Fascism should more appropriately be called “Corporatism” because it is a merger of state and corporate power”.
http://www.groundreport.com/Politics/Republican-Fascism/2936214
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Bryer
Can a Buddhist be conservative?
02:45 PM on 03/11/2011
Obfuscate!

Works every time.
02:55 PM on 03/11/2011
Anything they can do to try an gain sympathy.