iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arab League Asks UN For Libya No-Fly Zone

Arab League Nofly Zone

DIAA HADID   03/12/11 04:11 PM ET   AP

CAIRO — The Arab League called Saturday for the U.N. Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Libya, a surprisingly rapid and aggressive move for a bloc known more for lengthy deliberations than action.

Analysts said the call reflected both a widespread dislike of Libyan autocrat Moammar Gadhafi and member nations' attention to the wave of pro-democracy protests sweeping the Middle East, which has toppled leaders in Tunisia and Egypt and threatens others.

The 22-member Arab bloc, which had already barred Libya's government from taking part in League meetings, said Gadhafi's government had "lost its sovereignty." It also said the bloc would establish contacts with the rebels' interim government, the National Libyan Council, and called on nations to provide it with "urgent help."

Western diplomats have said Arab and African approval was necessary before the Security Council could vote on a no-fly zone that would be imposed by NATO nations such as the U.S., France, Britain and Italy to protect civilians from air attack by Gadhafi's forces.

The U.S. and other countries have expressed deep reservations about any action that could draw them into the conflict. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has cautioned that establishing a no-fly zone would require an attack to take out Libya's anti-aircraft capabilities, but on Saturday he said setting up a restricted zone was possible.

In Saturday's statement, the Arab League asked the "United Nations to shoulder its responsibility ... to impose a no-fly zone over the movement of Libyan military planes and to create safe zones in the places vulnerable to airstrikes."

The Obama administration welcomed the decision, which White House spokesman Jay Carney said "strengthens the international pressure on Gadhafi and support for the Libyan people." He said the United States will prepare for all contingencies and coordinate with allies.

Amr el-Shobaki, an Egyptian political analyst, said the decision reflects the upheaval in the Arab world, which also includes serious unrest in Bahrain and Yemen as well as rumblings of anti-government dissent in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Iraq.

"It would be very difficult for the Arab League to ignore the Arab people as they have in the past," he said.

El-Shobaki also said Gadhafi has few real friends among Arab leaders – he has publicly clashed with and insulted many of them, including at Arab League summits.

"He brings to mind a figure such as Saddam," he said.

League Secretary-General Amr Moussa also acknowledged the region's rapidly shifting currents in a press conference after the meeting.

"There is a new direction that has been imposed by new changes on the Arab stage," he said.

Moussa said a no-fly zone would be humanitarian measure to protect Libyan civilians and foreigners in the country and not a military intervention.

That stance appeared to be part of an attempt to win over the deeply Arab nationalist government of Syria, which has smarted against foreign intervention into Arab affairs. Still, Syria voted against the no-fly zone, as did Libya's neighbor Algeria and Mauritania in West Africa.

The statement said the Arab League rejected "all kinds of foreign intervention" in Libya but warned that "not taking the necessary action to end the crisis will lead to intervention in Libya's foreign affairs."

The Arab League cannot impose a no-fly zone itself. But the approval of the key regional Arab body gives the U.S. and other Western powers crucial regional backing they say they need before doing so. Many were weary that Western powers would be seen as intervening in the affairs of an Arab country if they began a no-fly zone without Arab approval.

Still, the Obama administration has said a no-fly zone may have limited impact, and the international community is divided over the issue.

On Saturday, Gates told reporters accompanying him home from a trip to Bahrain that a no-fly zone was possible.

"We can do it," Gates said hours before the Arab League vote occurred. "The question is whether it's a wise thing to do. And that's the discussion that's going at a political level."

Moussa said the League would immediately inform the U.N. of its call.

Backing the rebel's political leadership, the League statement said it had faced "grievous violations and serious crimes by the Libyan authorities, which have lost their sovereignty."

It remained to be seen if any Arab forces would participate in air patrols in support of a no-fly zone.

Former and current diplomats assigned to the Arab League said they were not aware of another time when the regional bloc approved a measure that infringed on the sovereignty of a member state.

They noted that even when Arab nations supported the U.S. during the 1991 Gulf War to push Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, they did not have an Arab League mandate to do so.

The League's decision comes hours before the European Union's policy chief is set to arrive in Cairo to meet with the Arab bloc's leaders to discuss the situation in Libya.

Catherine Ashton said she hoped to discuss a "collaborative approach" with Arab League chief Moussa on Libya and the rest of the region.

Ashton said it was necessary to evaluate how effective economic sanctions imposed on Gadhafi's regime had been so far and that she was "keeping all options moving forward" regarding any additional measures.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle welcomed the EU's "very cautious" stance on possible military intervention.

"We do not want to be drawn into a war in north Africa – we should have learned from the events in and surrounding Iraq," Westerwelle said.

"It is very important that the impression doesn't arise that this is a conflict of the West against the Arab world or a Christian crusade against people of Muslim faith."

___

Sarah El Deeb contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

CAIRO — The Arab League called Saturday for the U.N. Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Libya, a surprisingly rapid and aggressive move for a bloc known more for lengthy deliberations...
CAIRO — The Arab League called Saturday for the U.N. Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Libya, a surprisingly rapid and aggressive move for a bloc known more for lengthy deliberations...
Filed by Carly Schwartz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 708
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JaneK13
01:03 PM on 03/19/2011
Talk is cheap. Why isn't the Arab League actively participating?
09:05 PM on 03/15/2011
The Arab League can with all their oil money fund and put together a UN force from their militias to do the job they want. US and the Brits should stay away altogether and have no direct involvement except through assisting the UN in materials.
08:46 PM on 03/15/2011
Fortunately for US Obama is not a BIG OIL man like Bush Cheney with self interest in taking US to war to advance their OILY cause. Obama has deliberately used wisdom to let the regional powers in north Africa to first come to achieve consensus on a concerted response to Gadafi. No he don't shoot from the hip and shoot his foot. He don't shoot off his mouth first to prove anything to nobody.
12:57 AM on 03/14/2011
It's good to see the Arab league back the No-Fly Zone, but we all know that imposing a no-fly zone without the potential of ground military intervention is futile. Question is : Is the Arab League ready to actually help in establishing and or at least maintaining the no-fly zone? Or do they expect the US to single-handedly go ahead with this operation? Once again, easier said than done Arab League!
08:52 PM on 03/15/2011
Obama ain't no cowboy like Bush. Obama will wisely use his POTUS leadership clout to engage all the nations in the region (stakeholders) to be involved in the solutions for Lybia into the future. He ain't risking any more lives of Americans or treasure unilaterally as Bush/Cheney/Wolfowitz did in Iraq.
06:49 PM on 03/13/2011
In a contest of international diplomacy versus Gadhafi’s military hardware is it possible to select a victor in Libya? This statement is especially salient after considering Russia’s military success in the Afghanistan Theater.

African and Middle Eastern death has proven to be consistent with Washington’s comfort level concerning domestic unemployment. Does lagging indicator sound familiar to anyone in America? Now African death in Libya is a lagging political football.

GENUINE INTELLECT RECOGNIZES BOUNDARIES. America opened a can of worms in the Middle East when America entered Iraq with military hardware based upon WMD. It is too late to question America’s political and military impact in the former Ottoman Empire.
08:57 PM on 03/15/2011
Obama is trying to change that default view of the Muslim/Arab nations with a good deal of difficulty; like turning the US economy around following the Bush/GOP 8 year fiasco in lives and trasure.
06:23 PM on 03/13/2011
Well the Arab League supports a no fly zone over Libya. I love the way they say the UN should enforce it. What they mean of course is the USA. What is the Arab league ready to put up to enforce the no fly zone? The Saudi’s, Kuwaitis, and the UAE probably have 500 modern combat aircraft that could enforce a no fly zone. Are they going to put a single one in the air? The Egyptians have 200 F-16s. Is egypt willing to risks their planes and pilots to protect the people of Libya? Are they willing to allow the US and NATO to use their bases? Or does the US have to put our aircraft carriers in the med to enforce the “UN” no fly zone. Who are the rebels in Libya? What is there ideology? The US helped the Taliban defeat the USSR in Afghanistan, and then put them in power. That worked out well, didn’t it?

I’ve got a great idea; let the Arabs clean up their own mess. I am not willing to risk a single American airman for “Operation Libyan Freedom” or “Operation Enduring Democracy” or whatever the mission is going to be called. Speaking of messes, the Ivory Coast is descending into civil war. Are we going to fix that problem too? We send a couple of aircraft carriers, and do some strategic bombing and voila, yet another opportunity for some US nation building. We are so good at it after all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Parthiban Yahambaram
06:50 AM on 03/14/2011
Your lack of understanding of international law is apalling. Only the United Nations has the authority to order a no-fly zone. The Arab League, or any other regional body, has no such authority. Any attempt to do so without UN authorisation would be illegal and an act of aggression.

Try to get an idea about what you are talking about before making silly accusations.
09:00 PM on 03/15/2011
What they mean is they DO NOT WANT US in there if they can help it. It's that obvious. WE ostracize Muslims here. It's hypocritical for US to be interested in helping them there; except if it's for the crude.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
11:54 AM on 03/13/2011
A no-fly zone may become necessary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KCate
they would travel on a boat with billowed sail
12:18 PM on 03/13/2011
Way, way too late. Gadhafi has much of the country back under control. This would be involvement in a civil war, and the Arab League will leave the US holding the bag. Compassionate maybe, but not smart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kazzim Zongo
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
12:24 PM on 03/13/2011
Couldn't agree more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
11:37 AM on 03/13/2011
All those planes we sold to the Saudis and the military aid we've given the Egyptians should come in handy for their applying the Arab League No-Fly Zone.
10:09 AM on 03/13/2011
In other news...their very next vote was that the USA should pay for the no-fly zone, not any of the countries in the Arab League.
10:07 AM on 03/13/2011
muslims have proved time and time again,,,

that they are quite capable of marking people they do not like for death,,,

and then murdering them,,,

they do not need the help of non-muslims,,,
01:24 PM on 03/13/2011
its not about us vs muslims. youre just making yourself sound racist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Parthiban Yahambaram
06:47 AM on 03/14/2011
Probably because he/she is
09:17 AM on 03/14/2011
ignorance breeds hatred...its sad
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
10:06 AM on 03/13/2011
It is now time for a joint no fly zone. Thank goodness the Arab League acted and I am glad the US did not jump as the so called hero's that would later be blamed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KCate
they would travel on a boat with billowed sail
11:11 AM on 03/13/2011
Thank goodness indeed. Now the US can move in. According to estimates, establishing and taking control of the skies over Libya would cost the Pentagon up to $300 million a week. We're running a deficit, but we can borrow the money from China.
10:04 AM on 03/13/2011
So, why don't the Arab nations impose the no-fly zone, and leave us out of it, as they always claim they want it.
Isn't this the argument we always hear, that Al Qaeda and others hate us for being on Arab/Muslim land?
photo
ponchoparadise
Why do wingnuts fear truth?
10:03 AM on 03/13/2011
This is starting to feel like when the Bush Administation gave us a
wink and a smile and said "the Iraq war will be paid for with Iraqi
oil" and I hope to God you all remember how that worked out
for us.
09:55 AM on 03/13/2011
ABOLISH the APARTHEID treatment of non-muslims,,,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
11:38 AM on 03/13/2011
Alluding to the treatment of Egyptian (and other) Christians?