More

Japan Earthquake 2011: Explosion At Nuclear Plant Tears Down Walls Of Building

By YURI KAGEYAMA and JAY ALABASTER   03/12/11 04:11 AM ET   AP

SENDAI, Japan -- An explosion at a nuclear power station tore down the walls of one building Saturday as smoke poured out and Japanese officials said they feared the reactor could melt down following the failure of its cooling system in a powerful earthquake and tsunami.

It was not clear if the damaged building housed the reactor. Tokyo Power Electric Co., the utility that runs the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, said four workers were injured but details were not immediately available.

Footage on Japanese TV showed that the walls of one building had crumbled, leaving only a skeletal metal frame standing. Puffs of smoke were spewing out of the plant.

"We are now trying to analyze what is behind the explosion," said government spokesman Yukio Edano, stressing that people should quickly evacuate a six-mile (10-kilometer) radius. "We ask everyone to take action to secure safety."

The trouble began at the plant's Unit 1 after Friday's massive 8.9-magnitude earthquake and the tsunami it spawned knocked out power there. The disaster has killed hundreds of people and devastated the country's northeastern coast, where rescuers began slowly arriving Saturday.

The toll of destruction was still not known more than 24 hours after the quake since washed-out roads and shut airports have hindered access to the area. An untold number of bodies were believed to be buried in the rubble and debris.

The official death toll stood at 413, while 784 people were missing and 1,128 injured. In addition, police said between 200 and 300 bodies were found along the coast in Sendai, the biggest city in the area near the quake's epicenter. Local media reports said at least 1,300 people may have been killed.

Adding to worries was the fate of nuclear power plants in the region. Japan has declared states of emergency for five nuclear reactors at two power plants after the units lost cooling ability.

The most troubled one is facing meltdown, officials have said.

Pressure has been building up in the reactor – it's now twice the normal level – and Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency told reporters Saturday that the plant was venting "radioactive vapors." Officials said they were measuring radiation levels in the area.

The reactor in trouble has already leaked some radiation: Operators have detected eight times the normal radiation levels outside the facility and 1,000 times normal inside Unit 1's control room.

Wind in the region is weak and headed northeast, out to sea, according to the Meteorological Agency.

Ryohei Shiomi, an official with Japan's nuclear safety commission, said that even if there was a meltdown, it wouldn't affect people outside a six-mile (10-kilometer) radius – an assertion that might need revising if the situation deteriorates. Most of the 51,000 residents living within the danger area had been evacuated, he said.

Meanwhile, the first wave of military rescuers began arriving by boats and helicopters.

Prime Minister Naoto Kan said 50,000 troops would join rescue and recovery efforts following the quake that unleashed one of the greatest disasters Japan has witnessed – a 23-foot (7-meter) tsunami that washed far inland over fields, smashing towns, airports and highways in its way.

"Most of houses along the coastline were washed away, and fire broke out there," said Kan after inspecting the quake area in a helicopter. "I realized the extremely serious damage the tsunami caused."

More than 215,000 people were living in 1,350 temporary shelters in five prefectures, or states, the national police agency said. Since the quake, more than 1 million households have not had water, mostly concentrated in northeast.

The transport ministry said all highways from Tokyo leading to quake-hit areas were closed, except for emergency vehicles. Mobile communications were spotty and calls to the devastated areas were going unanswered .

Local TV stations broadcast footage of people lining up for water and food such as rice balls. In Fukushima, city officials were handing out bottled beverages, snacks and blankets. But there were large areas that were surrounded by water and were unreachable.

One hospital in Miyagi prefecture was seen surrounded by water. The staff had painted an SOS on its rooftop and were waving white flags.

Prime Minister Kan said a total of 190 military aircraft and 25 ships have been sent to the area, which continued to be jolted by tremors, even 24 hours later.

More than 125 aftershocks have occurred, many of them above magnitude 6.0, which even alone would be considered strong.

Technologically advanced Japan is well prepared for quakes and its buildings can withstand strong jolts, even a temblor like Friday's, which was the strongest the country has experienced since official records started in the late 1800s. What was beyond human control was the killer tsunami that followed.

It swept inland about six miles (10 kilometers) in some areas, swallowing boats, homes, cars, trees and even small airplanes.

"The tsunami was unbelievably fast," said Koichi Takairin, a 34-year-old truck driver who was inside his sturdy four-ton rig when the wave hit the port town of Sendai.

"Smaller cars were being swept around me," he said. All I could do was sit in my truck."

His rig ruined, he joined the steady flow of survivors who walked along the road away from the sea and back into the city on Saturday. Smoke from at least one large fire could be seen in the distance.

Smashed cars and small airplanes were jumbled up against buildings near the local airport, several miles (kilometers) from the shore. Felled trees and wooden debris lay everywhere as rescue workers coasted on boats through murky waters around flooded structures, nosing their way through a sea of debris.

Basic commodities were at a premium. Hundreds lined up outside of supermarkets, and gas stations were swamped with cars. The situation was similar in scores of other towns and cities along the 1,300-mile-long (2,100-kilometer-long) eastern coastline hit by the tsunami.

In Sendai, as in many areas of the northeast, cell phone service was down, making it difficult for people to communicate with loved ones.

"I'm waiting for my son to come here. But I cannot tell him he should come over here because mobile phones aren't working," a woman in her 70s told Japanese TV at a shelter in the town of Rikuzentakada, which appeared to be largely destroyed by the tsunami.

"My husband is missing," she said. "Tsunami water was rising to my knees, and I told him I would go first. He is not here yet."

President Barack Obama pledged U.S. assistance following what he called a potentially "catastrophic" disaster. He said one U.S. aircraft carrier was already in Japan and a second was on its way. A U.S. ship was also heading to the Marianas Islands to assist as needed, he said.

Most trains in Tokyo started running again Saturday after the city had been brought to a near standstill the day before. Tens of thousands of people had been stranded with the rail network down, jamming the streets with cars, buses and trucks trying to get out of the city.

Japan's worst previous quake was a magnitude 8.3 temblor in Kanto that killed 143,000 people in 1923, according to the USGS. A magnitude 7.2 quake in Kobe killed 6,400 people in 1995.

Japan lies on the "Ring of Fire" – an arc of earthquake and volcanic zones stretching around the Pacific where about 90 percent of the world's quakes occur, including the one that triggered the Dec. 26, 2004, Indian Ocean tsunami that killed an estimated 230,000 people in 12 countries. A magnitude-8.8 quake that shook central Chile in February 2010 also generated a tsunami and killed 524 people.

___

Associated Press writers Malcolm J. Foster, Mari Yamaguchi, Tomoko A. Hosaka and Shino Yuasa in Tokyo contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

SENDAI, Japan -- An explosion at a nuclear power station tore down the walls of one building Saturday as smoke poured out and Japanese officials said they feared the reactor could melt down following ...
SENDAI, Japan -- An explosion at a nuclear power station tore down the walls of one building Saturday as smoke poured out and Japanese officials said they feared the reactor could melt down following ...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 347
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CraiginPhoenix
11:58 PM on 03/14/2011
The Japanese Government should come out and tell the people of their country (and the world) the truth and admit they are in over their head. Maybe Tony Hayward can talk some sense into them before they twist themselves from a sympathetic victim in a giant tragedy to a villian who knowingly misled it's own people in an attempt to prevent panic and save face, which in the end may end up costing more lives.

All I know is the Iraqi information minister sounds more credible at this point.
06:11 PM on 03/13/2011
It's kind of hilarious to get on here and read all the environmental crazies predicting the end of the world, opining on the "safety" of nuclear power as if they are experts, and in general, calling for humanity to retreat energy methods that display DIS-economies of scale (look it up).

I have a B.S. and M.S. in nuclear engineering, and although I do not work in engineering, I understand the science behind what is going on. The bottom line is that a Chernobyl-style incident is not going to happen, as the Chernobyl had a positive void coefficient WAY in excess of what Japanese and American reactors have. Furthermore, Chernobyl did NOT have a functional containment building (meaning the reactor was not housed in a proper protective structure in the event something goes wrong). The Japanese reactors have containment buildings that house the reactors that have walls 4-5 ft thick of steel-lined concrete. These are designed to contain an exploding reactor. The problem they are trying to now avert is that of a core melt-down, which results in a complete loss of the facility.

SOME people have an intrinsic problem with human manipulation of nature, e.g., nuclear reactions, bio-engineering, ... . THESE people need to grow up, educate themselves in mathematics and science, and then come back to the table to participate in intelligent discourse. Otherwise, I say we build a reserve, somewhere isolated, and place these people there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninthraphael
i have my god! He/she doesn't look like yours!
05:02 AM on 03/13/2011
Let us just pray for their safety! Much as I want to criticize nuclear energy and our wanton disregard of our environment, the people of Japan and us need to help each other in this crisis!
07:05 AM on 03/13/2011
well said
07:13 PM on 03/14/2011
Poorly said in my opinion. Those reactors just withstood one of the most powerful earthquakes in recorded history, plus the ensuing tsunami. They have been and remain relatively stable; Meanwhile local petrochemical plants were taken out by the initial earthquake, and in the process released a good deal of Uranium, Radon and Tritium (all radioactive) into the environment, while the radiation from the nuclear reactors remains below legal exposure levels. Why criticize nuclear energy when fossil fuels are responsible for FAR more incidences of cancer and detrimental health effects?

Of course those plants won't get any fancy headlines, the most I've seen was a passing comment on CNN about the petrochemical plants that were destroyedand on fire. Stop believing everything the media feeds you and do some real research.

Blot WJ, Brinton LA, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Stone BJ. Cancer mortality in U.S. counties with petroleum industries. Science. 1977 Oct 7;198(4312):51–53

Kaldor J, Harris JA, Glazer E, et al. Statistical association between cancer incidence and major-cause mortality, and estimated residential exposure to air emissions from petroleum and chemical plants. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1984;54:319–332

Belli S, Benedetti M, Comba P, et al. Case-control study on cancer risk associated to residence in the neighbourhood of a petrochemical plant. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;19(1):49–54.

J F Bithell,R A Stone,On statistical methods for analysing the geographical distribution of cancer cases near nuclear installations.J Epidemiol Community Health 1989;43:79-85 doi:10.1136/jech.43.1.79
01:09 AM on 03/13/2011
How Cool. Finally, the arrogance of believing that nuclear power is safe is exposed. But alas, who will connect the dots, even as nuclear debris is shared with all the world. Breathe deeply while you can, and write to Nuclear Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
02:36 PM on 03/12/2011
A safe alternative to conventional nuclear power is in production.

It is a Low Energy Nuclear Reactor demonstrated in Italy a few weeks ago.

See Cold Fusion at www.aesopinstitute.org

A 1 Megawatt heating plant is scheduled to open in Athens, Greece, in October.

Cost is stated as $2,600/kW. Power is expected to cost one penny per kilowatt hour.

This could mean the end of building new nuclear plants.
12:09 PM on 03/12/2011
"Sea water used for cooling down the reactor

The Tokyo Electric Power Company is using sea water as an emergency coolant in its quake-damaged reactor at Fukushima Number One Power Plant.

The massive earthquake on Friday caused a breakdown of cooling systems that could cause temperatures in the reactor to rise to uncontrollable levels.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano disclosed on Saturday that the company is pouring sea water into the containment vessel of the reactor. Sea water is readily available as the plant is close to the sea.

Edano said the company is mixing boric acid with the water to help absorb neutrons to slow nuclear fission.

Edano added that government's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency has endorsed the procedure."

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/13_01.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
03:13 PM on 03/12/2011
Yes, this is why nuclear power plants are located on the banks of bodies of water, like oceans, rivers, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
03:15 PM on 03/12/2011
It's of little value when the electricity that runs the pumps is down, as is this case due to the damage done by the earthquakes.  

What we're seeing is that the back-up to the fail-safe mechanisms (back-up generators) have failed (batteries) and they've been scrambling to get more in.  In the course of that, reports are that the core got exposed, which is what occurred at Chernobyl.

The reports are conflicting, but the little that we know that is accurate isn't good news and isn't license to license building new nuclear plants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kingofthenet
Where is Your GOD, Now?
11:48 AM on 03/12/2011
They keep saying everything is alright, but keep expanding the evac zone, something doesn't add up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcospinelli
an old liberal Democrat, a 'New Deal'-Democrat
03:27 PM on 03/12/2011
Cesium has been detected at the Fukushima plant which indicates a reactor meltdown is occurring.   At least a partial meltdown.

We tend to think of "them", government officials, as all-knowing and perfect automatons.  I think it's important to remember that "they" are people just like you, me, our friends and family.  They Iie, they obfuscate, not just to us but to themselves.  They've bought into an 'establishment'-group think, that there are grown-ups running the show who know what they're doing, omniscient beings in charge -- If it's not them, themselves, then the next rung up the ladder.  

If the powers-that-be have told them that nuclear reactors are safe, that all safeguards are fail-safe, that's good enough for them even if it's not their expertise.  They take the 'establishment elites' word for it, "because who would Iie about something so potentially devastating?".

They look around at the others at their level who are doing the same thing, and it has the effect of reinforcement.  It's a circle-jerk (which is why I keep saying that the solutions to our problems aren't going to come from the people who created the problems).
photo
Nolana
I think: therefore, I'm dangerous.
10:18 AM on 03/12/2011
Slightly o/t, but apropos to the discussion: a couple of days ago, the NRC gave Vermont Yankee nuclear plant the go-ahead to be re-licensed for another 30 years of operation. It is 39 years old now, and due to be taken off-line next year. In recent years it has been plagued with many problems, including a partial collapse of a cooling tower, a fire in the control room, and most recently, persistent leaks of radioactive tritium-laced water from underground pipes that Entergy, the owners of the plant, said did not exist.

It is currently running at 120% of capacity. The Vermont legislature voted to close the plant at the end of its original license period, but Entergy is dead-set against it, and given the recent NRC ruling, may even sue the state to renew the license.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
09:37 AM on 03/12/2011
Len A:  This is a light water reactor, not a heavy water reactor like Chernobyl. The temperatur­es have risen, but the nuclear reaction in a light water reaction, reportedly­, also slows down and even stops.
 
-----
 
Okay, when they sold these "modern" reactor designs one of the selling points was that if you drained the coolant water out of the reactor core, they would stop producing energy without any need to shut them down with control rods.
 
And that is true as long as the core is in serviceable condition.
 
But if you warp or melt the fuel rods by allowing the core to overheat, all bets are off.  The rods are spaced mathematically to make the nuclear reaction work...  Warping or melting the rods changes the spacing, and if the rods collaspe or melt together then draining the water will no longer stop the reaction.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
10:00 AM on 03/12/2011
BTW, Chernobyl was a carbon block moderated reactor, not heavy water.  One of the biggest problems with the Chernobyl accident was the carbon blocks overheated and vaporized...  When hot carbon vapor is exposed to oxygen it explodes. That caused the big explosion that blew the roof open, and then the carbon blocks caught fire and started to burn.
 
Carbon burns at a very high temperature, and it vaporized the metal fuel rods sending the radioactive heavy metals up into the air with the heat plume.
 
Bottom line, regardless of the reactor design, there is no way to engineer a perfectly safe fission reactor. And this incident has all the appearances of a major nuclear accident... Not as bad as Chernobyl with it's burning carbon, but certainly worse than Three Mile Island.
photo
dayzee10
Get busy living or get busy dying! Damn right
09:33 AM on 03/12/2011
What a coincedence tonight @ 8PM Retro channel The China Syndrome
09:27 AM on 03/12/2011
I believe we are witnessing the slow but steady extinction of all life on earth... due entirely to the greed and stupidity of man. Good luck to all of us. Imagine the earth your kids and grandkids are going to inherit. I'm so sorry.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
10:10 AM on 03/12/2011
Conservatives love it!!!  They cut funding for tsunami and earthquake monitoring and are trying to abolish the EPA.
 
Dirty air, poisonous water, and warningless, reliefless, disasters for all!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Channa
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
10:19 AM on 03/13/2011
Mark Nov. 6 2012 on your calendar.
photo
dayzee10
Get busy living or get busy dying! Damn right
09:26 AM on 03/12/2011
If there was any negligence in the construction of the plant or in the response to the earthquake at least those responsible in Japan will be fired and prosecuted with a couple of hari-karis thrown in. If that happened in the US or Britain there would be golden parachutes given to the people who caused it and congratulations and champagne for everyone behind closed doors when they dump the responsibility of the clean up on the taxpayers. Sorta like the Gulf disaster
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thinklongterm
Conservatives are a disease....we are the cure.
09:22 AM on 03/12/2011
Somehow some way disaster capitalism will come into play. No matter how badly this looks for the pro nuke crowd in America they'll try to use this to their advantage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Channa
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
10:21 AM on 03/13/2011
Like "This is why we need to build the super safe NEW design everywhere" . Don't worry about the waste. We will figure something out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HekmagaJuximaxx
Shish Kebab, anyone?
09:19 AM on 03/12/2011
There's nothing that can be done to stop it. Japanese authorities should evacuate everyone it can from the surrounding area and destroy the reactor. The area will now be uninhabitable. You wanted nuclear power? There it is.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
09:39 AM on 03/12/2011
Just how do you destroy a nuclear reactor?  I'm curious here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddy joe
welcome to the machine
09:17 AM on 03/12/2011
6.4 aftershocks..8:04 cst.