More

TSA Releases Radiation Test Results To Gauge Health Risks Of Airport Scanners

Radiation Body Scanners

First Posted: 03/14/11 04:43 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

The Transportation Security Administration said on Friday it will start publishing radiation test results from airport passenger and luggage screening equipment in a bid to allay lingering fears about potential health risks.

TSA said it also uncovered anomalies in some reports, such as missing data or calculation errors unrelated to safety, and as an extra precaution has ordered retesting for all full-body scanners as well as other X-ray equipment used to screen baggage that had inaccurate reports.

Some travelers and airline crews have expressed concerns about being repeatedly exposed to radiation from the body scanners, which TSA has deployed to thwart plots such as a passenger hiding a bomb under his or her clothes.

"Independent third-party testing has confirmed that all TSA technology is safe," TSA Administrator John Pistole said in a statement. "TSA takes significant steps to ensure the safety and health of passengers and our workforce as we work to protect our nation from terrorist threats."

TSA has accelerated deploying full-body scanners and other machines to detect explosives after a Nigerian man tried but failed to detonate a bomb hidden in his underwear on a flight from Amsterdam as it approached Detroit on Christmas Day 2009.

The full-body scanners provoked a backlash among some travelers who were upset because they produced a revealing picture of themselves without clothes as well as the potential for increased radiation exposure.

TSA has said repeatedly the radiation emitted is minimal and not dangerous, citing experts from the Food and Drug Administration and other third-party scientists. The agency is also testing new software to address privacy concerns.

There are about 486 full-body scanners in 78 airports around the United States, of which 247 are so-called backscatter machines made by Rapiscan Systems, a unit of OSI Systems Inc, and expose a person to about 0.0025 millirem of radiation. The machines cannot produce more than 0.005 millirem per scan, according to TSA.

In comparison, a chest X-ray will expose someone to 10 millirem of radiation and the maximum recommended exposure to radiation from man-made sources is 100 millirem per year, according to TSA.

To address the problems with the test reports, TSA said it would boost oversight of the testing and procedures. It also ordered contractors to retrain personnel conducting the surveys and requested the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health to re-evaluate the TSA's safety program.

"The mistakes were the result of calculating and procedural errors that were identified by Rapiscan management and have been corrected," said Peter Kant, executive vice president of Rapiscan Systems.

He said the machines have fail-safe triggers to "shut down long before safety limitations could be reached." Rapiscan said it has already rechecked about 105 of its machines and found no problems.

The radiation test reports, conducted at least once a year on the machines, will be posted to the TSA website, www.tsa.gov.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

The Transportation Security Administration said on Friday it will start publishing radiation test results from airport passenger and luggage screening equipment in a bid to allay lingering fears a...
The Transportation Security Administration said on Friday it will start publishing radiation test results from airport passenger and luggage screening equipment in a bid to allay lingering fears a...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 428
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nevernot
I like paying taxes, they buy me civilization.
04:36 PM on 03/20/2011
"TSA has accelerated deploying full-body scanners and other machines to detect explosives after a Nigerian man tried but failed to detonate a bomb hidden in his underwear on a flight from Amsterdam as it approached Detroit on Christmas Day 2009."

This is after executives from the companies manufacturing the scanners and the TSA testified before congress that their scanners WOULD NOT pick up this type of explosive, or for that fact, any powdered explosives. Including the bomb the underwear bomber tried to use.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
euromarkusx
Political Party: Lobster
08:08 PM on 03/17/2011
So if you use their own numbers for people who fly round-trip once a week for their job - they get half of the acceptable 100/yr.

This doesn't even touch on flight crews.

How long until WikiLeaks exposes internal TSA docs?
01:13 PM on 03/16/2011
UPDATE march 16, 2011
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/03/tsa-radiation-test-bungling/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrMandible
No one on the corner has a swagger like us.
04:07 PM on 03/15/2011
This just in: Blasting organic matter with radiation has no harmful effects. In other news, running with scissors is a good idea.
03:22 PM on 03/15/2011
Isn't that what they said about DDT? Or CT scanners for that matter, until they found out that the amount of radiation could be adjusted by invididual clinics. I fly a lot, so I'll choose the pat-down, it's really not that bad, but wow, do those scanners ever slow down security lines. It's even worse than the people who don't seem to realize that large bottles of liquids will be confiscated, despite all the signs.
01:21 PM on 03/15/2011
No need to worry. Our government says they're safe. We can trust them right?
12:09 PM on 03/15/2011
I wonder how long it will be before we find out the TSA is lying about this too! Let's see, they swore there was "no physically possible way" to store the images of naked passengers, or send them, or download them en masse and remove them from the airport...but it happened. Now they tell us, in the wake of a radioactive crisis across the Pacific, when one of the leading killers in our society is CANCER (note how cancer didn't really exist too much before the Nuclear/Radioactive Age), that their body-scanners are totally safe. I'll take my Gate Rape, thankyouverymuch
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepimartinez
09:48 AM on 03/15/2011
I also heard that Ford is going to release information on why their cars are good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHMB
What's long and brown and sticky? A Stick.
12:40 PM on 03/15/2011
As a former Ford owner, your comment made me laugh especially hard. There is a reason I went back to imports.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
01:40 AM on 03/15/2011
What we really should be doing is reducing our consumption of oil & leaving the middle east. Energy independence is our is our only way.
01:59 AM on 03/15/2011
That is going to cause other problems such as collapse of US Dollar. We need to control the ME in order to retain the demand for our dollar.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Keep your greedy Mitt off our country!
11:02 AM on 03/15/2011
Yeah we've proven so good at controlling Muslim countries.
01:36 AM on 03/15/2011
This "study" is just a smoke screen since it does not accurately reflect the amount of radiation exposure a traveler suffers in the plane itself at high altitude, the number of dental and medical scans they have undergone, and other exposures. Worse, radiation damage is cumulative. ANYTHING that adds to the exposure is dangerous and may accelerate cancerous tissue. The entire scanning process is a scam, nothing more than theater to convince the public that they are actually safer. But the sheeple will accede to higher cancer rates, invasion of their person, and diminution of their rights, all in the name of fear. It is sickening....in more ways than one.
02:01 AM on 03/15/2011
It is also job creation.
photo
lotusgirl
Turned off the TV and stepped out of the Matrix
09:19 AM on 03/16/2011
You are so F&F. My sentiments exactly!
01:04 AM on 03/15/2011
Any conservative who supports these scanners should really be forced to turn in their credentials. It is time we all stand up and defend our civil liberties.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
09:42 PM on 03/15/2011
While you are tapping our phones.
09:45 PM on 03/15/2011
I sure as heck didn't support warrantless wire tapping when Bush did it and still don't support it now that Obama is doing it. Out of curiosity, do you support President Obama having the right to tap the phone lines with no warrant?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pflickner
Democratic Candidate for AZ State House
12:48 AM on 03/15/2011
Yes, and since the scanner cannot penetrate further than clothing, someone who is bent on self-destruction could easily insert a bomb into a body cavity. And even a pat-down won't find that since it goes well beyond what we will tolerate and the airlines would have a fit.
01:26 AM on 03/15/2011
The bottom line being these measures are useless and are no more than security theater.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
09:43 PM on 03/15/2011
But they make the manufacturer lots of money. Every wonder why we are not outraged when a company gouges Americans in the name of fighting terrorism?
12:37 AM on 03/15/2011
Cancer for the masses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Keep your greedy Mitt off our country!
10:56 AM on 03/15/2011
Cheaper than universal health care? NO.
12:19 AM on 03/15/2011
maybe they should release "be proud of your body" campaigns along with the test results... Besides, it's not like the TSA official checking the scans is writing down names of people they "like" Relax people, it's fine. If this bothers you then find another way to travel and leave the rest of us alone. I'd gladly go through the machine and wouldn't care at all what shows up.