More

Desperately Seeking Their Own Rove: Democrats Try Catching GOP In Outside Money Chase

Democratic Fundraising

First Posted: 03/14/11 09:44 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

By Peter H. Stone
Center for Public Integrity

Democrats are in a defensive crouch. They have no Karl Rove. Instead, they have David Brock, Bill Burton and Craig Varoga, none of whom have Rove's marquee fundraising appeal to fill the coffers of outside groups trying to influence the election.

Fresh off his astonishing success helping two GOP-allied groups raise tens of millions in 2010, Rove has set his laser-like focus on the 2012 trifecta: capturing the White House and Senate while keeping the House.

Rove is already in motion. He schmoozed with rich Florida Republicans in North Palm Beach and Naples last week, and he pitched conservative moguls in New York earlier this year.

The Democrats are desperately seeking their own Rove. They were late to recognize the avalanche of unregulated money unleashed by the Supreme Court ruling in January 2010, letting Rove, former White House adviser Ed Gillespie and other Republican money men write the new script for a Wild West era of campaign finance.

All told, the mid-term elections rang up a campaign finance tally just shy of $4 billion, a number likely to be humbled by a 2012 spending spree fueled by a no-holds-barred race for the White House.

Democrats have little worry about the top of the ticket. President Obama has a decent shot at raising as much as $1 billion for his re-election race, having spent three-quarters of that amount to win in 2008. He'll try to rev up donors and fundraisers with a pep talk on Wednesday.

The field of Republican challengers tops a dozen, and about half of them will probably each raise $50 million in a primary slugfest to secure the nomination. GOP operatives project the nominee will need at least $500 million for the general election just to be competitive.

"Just as Olympic records are broken every four years, we can expect to see fundraising records shattered in 2012 by both outside groups and the main presidential candidates," said Larry Noble, former general counsel to the Federal Election Commission and now a private election law attorney.

The Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission gave the green light to corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums on ads and other campaign tools to directly advocate for a candidate's election. Curbs on campaign finance that had been in effect since the Watergate era were gutted.

Suddenly, six- and seven-figure checks were the weapon of choice in politics. Rove and other savvy political players channeled tens of millions to groups like the American Crossroads, which by law must disclose its donors, and its affiliate Crossroads GPS, which can keep donors' names secret.

"2010 was only Crossroads' opening act," Steven Law, the group's president, told the Center for Public Integrity. These two groups hope to rake in $120 million for 2012 compared to $71 million last year.

Republican efforts got a head start in 2010 from big donors including Houston home builder Robert Perry, who gave $7 million to American Crossroads. Multi-billionaires David and Charles Koch several years ago launched and helped finance Americans for Prosperity, which planned to spend $45 million last year.

Democrats initially stayed on the sidelines of the outside group money chase. But by fall, as the U.S. House began to slip away, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees jumped in with $91 million, which led spending by all groups. AFSCME president Gerald McEntee said unions, now at war in states like Wisconsin with newly elected Republican governors, are determined to do more.

"We have to build a broader coalition to counter Rove & Co.," McEntee said. "2010 provided a lesson and a beating. We have a lot of work to do."

Democrats also hope to lure millions from George Soros, the billionaire philanthropist and hedge fund titan who sat out 2010. For now, they have a commitment from several rich liberals, including Taco Bell heir Rob McKay, who is backing David Brock's new venture, American Bridge 21st Century . Brock, a former conservative journalist turned liberal activist, intends to do opposition research and run millions in television ads to influence the presidential and congressional elections.

Two former White House aides, Bill Burton and Sean Sweeney, are launching another group to focus on Obama's re-election.

"Democratic donors are in a fighting spirit. Rove and his allies were virtually unopposed," in the last elections, Brock told the Center. "We're not going to let that happen again."

But talk of millions and billions is deflating to voters who gave small amounts to their favorite candidates.

"There is no way I can go up against mighty corporations," said Laska Nygaard, 40, a stay-at-home mom in St. Paul, Minn., who gave Obama $75 in 2008. "It seems like a tsunami of money."

Campaign finance reform advocates are also upset about the burgeoning piles of secret donations. "History tells us that secret money leads to corruption and scandals," said Fred Wertheimer, who runs the nonpartisan Democracy 21. "In 2012 we may well face hundreds of millions in secret contributions flowing into the presidential and congressional elections."


Chart by Paul Compton

The Presidential Money Chase

Obama's re-election campaign and his GOP rivals are already courting the "bundlers," well-connected Wall Street and corporate executives who can rope in hundreds of thousands each. That's no mean feat: under federal law, individuals are limited to giving $2,500 per election to a candidate for president, or $5,000 for the primary and general elections combined.

In 2008, 324 bundlers raised at least $100,000 apiece for Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. For John McCain, 301 bundlers raised more than $100,000.

Historically, big bundlers often get special access in Washington. Some get sweet business deals and contracts; ambassadorial posts and other administration jobs; and invitations to exclusive social events at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

"Bundlers are the moneyed elites who can deliver their social and financial networks on behalf of the nominees," explained Sheila Krumholz, who runs the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

To jump start the 2012 fundraising marathon, Obama will try to inspire some 300 elite fundraisers on the Democratic Party's national finance committee and national advisory board on Wednesday afternoon. If the Obama campaign is aiming for the magic $1 billion mark, bundlers are a crucial force.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
By Peter H. Stone Center for Public Integrity Democrats are in a defensive crouch. They have no Karl Rove. Instead, they have David Brock, Bill Burton and Craig Varoga, none of whom have Rove's marq...
By Peter H. Stone Center for Public Integrity Democrats are in a defensive crouch. They have no Karl Rove. Instead, they have David Brock, Bill Burton and Craig Varoga, none of whom have Rove's marq...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,006
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
  1 of 6  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
BeVeryAfraid 10:53 AM on 03/14/2011
How a young Republican lawyer became a central witness
In the final days of the 2004 presidential election, the Democratic National Committee files an injunction against the Republican National Committee in New Jersey federal court, alleging its involvement in using lists of returned mail to challenge 35,000 newly registered Ohio voters. This tactic, also known as voter caging, is historically  Read More...
Helloise
Healthy skeptic admires reason, trusts intuition
09:41 AM on 03/16/2011
The DNC is looking in the wrong places. They need to go to white collar prisons.
04:03 AM on 03/16/2011
The democrats do not have to worry about funding for the 2012 elections. Usurper Obama/Soetoro will accept ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS - from around the WORLD - just by simply removing the filtering mechanism - as what occurred for the 2008 presidential campaign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Harpe
Was young, now old.
01:29 AM on 03/16/2011
He who has the gold rules, and the SCOTUS is OK with that. The answer has to be that the people wake up enough that no amount of money can buy their vote. This appears to have happened in California, where Meg Whitman spent over $150 million (about $50 per vote) and still lost. Carly Fiorina also outspent Barbara Boxer by a huge amount, and lost. This was how it went over most of our state. This is how it should be across our whole country. Maybe we can't separate money and politics, but if enough people turn on their brain before they vote, it won't matter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy84
08:45 PM on 03/15/2011
One day I woke up and realized how much money was going into Washington on both sides. Besides the lobbyists, all the groups, move on, brave-new......., etc. (I only know about the liberal leaning ones) are all asking for money. It just occurred to me that politics has become an industry by itself and like Reaganomics, none of it is trickling down to the people. I am still torn because I care so much about the country but I do wonder sometimes if we all are being used and all those folks in Washington are in it together. Anyone else ever feel this way?
04:06 AM on 03/16/2011
Exactly.

The office of the presidency should not accept money from the public - for campaign contributions.

They should run on their records - not on how much money they raise.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
03:39 PM on 03/15/2011
An Ode to the TeaPublican Party M.O.   


Democracy, Patriotism­, Americana, Apple Pie 
All While they smile and the Cameras Roll
All they want is to get our vote at the Poll
So they can kiss Big Money and make us Cry
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
02:33 PM on 03/15/2011
Between Rove, Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thamas they started their fund raiseing the minute this President was Elected. FOX has been down on Obama from day one to break his community ties! I think what happened in Wisconsin has energized the Unions accross america, an the average Joe! We seen in Governor Walker/Brewer the dirty politics an the breaking of our middle class an our laws! If anything Politicians like Walker has done the Demacrate party a lot of good. If Republicans like Cantor keep makeing his wonderful mistakes an Cut Foreign aid/Weather Technology programs RIGHT at the time we have the biggest crisis on this whole planet, it will continue to show their true colors! We just need to keep empathizeing just how much they are hurting all of us for the next year 1/2. Thats were WE come in, an our continueing posting folks!
02:01 PM on 03/15/2011
Dems trying to be more and more like Republicans every day. We need a third party.
02:01 PM on 03/15/2011
Ooo-eee.

Articles like this can have a compound effect. Regular people can feel that their donation is meaningless in the face of these megabucks. That is not true.

Every dollar matters. Rove and the others have so much experience in not only raising a lot of money, but also in scaring people and telling tales about opponents. But a dollar is still a dollar, and every dollar to the President's cause is one more to continue the bbattle against the zany Republican assault upon our American Way of Life.

It also encourages the Administration and her supporters that other ordinary citizens are not going to sit by and let those meanies on the right and TeaBaggers to tunnel into that ditch they already rode us into.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy84
01:40 PM on 03/15/2011
What bothers me about this is that Rove got the GOP where they are by selling out "We the People" to the corporate interests. I'd rather see the Dems keep some integrity and get more of "We the People" behind them.........doing the people's work, not selling out any more than they have to corporate America which is not loyal to America at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
02:35 PM on 03/15/2011
Like those good folk down in wisconsin could generate a lot of donations for this President! They have had their Belly full of Republicans!
01:30 PM on 03/15/2011
In all new strategies these days, need to anticipate the lowest acts as a option the other side might in- corp- orate.
Sad
photo
JLeroy54
55 year old freshman (out
01:28 PM on 03/15/2011
There should be a law passed to demand disclosure of sources. I am in favor of getting more money out of politics, but at the very least we should have disclosure. The Chamber of Commerce issue brought up the notion that multinationals can contribute to their slush fund and no one can say for sure whether the money came from outside the country or not. That is bullshit.
photo
scorpioman
The Naked Truth
01:25 PM on 03/15/2011
Barbra Streisand could open up her purse strings.......
01:31 PM on 03/15/2011
You want to really go there? with Individuals and how long purse strings are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glojet
01:24 PM on 03/15/2011
dayum i wish Gates would just plop down a billion of the cause
01:23 PM on 03/15/2011
With the underbellies being exposed as it is these days, most of the money on the other side will come from on our Shores.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dnegri
01:08 PM on 03/15/2011
I'm not surprised that Dems were "surprised" by the rapidity and scope of what Rove did and continues to do.

Unfortunately it's not the first time the Dems seem to have been "surprised" by what the GOP does.
That said, it's still possible for the hundred of thousands, or millions, of grass roots Democrats to
help offset the effects of Citizens United.

And that means more than just sending comments to blog sites.
01:28 PM on 03/15/2011
Agreed! Open your wallet and put your money where your mouth is.
photo
ranchero42
Taunt him with the licence of ink...
06:48 PM on 03/15/2011
Five weeks no post? Can't turn your back on those bots for a double-fortnight these days...!