iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Germany Nuclear Power Plant Extension Suspended

Germany Nuclear Power

By JUERGEN BAETZ and GEIR MOULSON   03/14/11 12:43 PM ET   AP

BERLIN -- Germany's government on Monday temporarily halted plans to extend the life of its nuclear power plants, as two hydrogen explosions at a tsunami-stricken Japanese facility spread jitters about atomic energy safety in Europe.

Neighboring Switzerland suspended its plans to build and replace nuclear plants and Austria's environment minister called for atomic stress tests to make sure Europe's nuclear facilities are "earthquake-proof."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said a decision last year to extend the life of the country's 17 nuclear power stations would be suspended for three months.

"During the moratorium, we will examine how we can accelerate the road to the age of renewable energy," Merkel said.

Monday's decision also means that two older nuclear power plants will be taken off the grid shortly – at least for now – pending a full safety investigation in the wake of the explosions at a nuclear plant in Japan, Merkel told reporters.

The announcement, which came ahead of three German state elections in the next two weeks, fell short of opposition calls to scrap the extension of the plants' lifetimes altogether.

A previous government decided a decade ago to shut all 17 German nuclear plants by 2021 but Merkel's administration last year moved to extend their lives by an average 12 years.

Merkel says Germany needs to keep using nuclear power for now to keep energy affordable as it switches over to renewable power sources, and to ensure it isn't dependent on importing nuclear energy from other countries where safety standards might be lower than those in Germany.

However, the events in Japan "teach us that risks that were considered absolutely improbable are in fact not completely improbable," Merkel said.

Swiss Energy Minister Doris Leuthard said her country would suspend all "blanket authorization for nuclear replacement until safety standards have been carefully reviewed and if necessary adapted." Swiss regulatory authorities had given their stamp of approval to three sites for new nuclear power stations after the plans were submitted in 2008.

"Safety and well-being of the population have the highest priority," said Leuthard, who instructed the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate to analyze the exact cause of the accidents in Japan and draw up new or tougher safety standards "particularly in terms of seismic safety and cooling."

Leuthard said no new plants can be permitted until those experts report back. Their conclusions would apply not only to planned sites, but also existing plants. Switzerland now has four nuclear power plants that produce about 40 percent of the country's energy needs. It also has nuclear research reactors.

Alarmed by the crisis in Japan, the European Union called for a meeting on Tuesday of nuclear safety authorities and operators to assess Europe's preparedness in case of an emergency.

Austria's Environment Minister Nikolaus Berlakovich called for an EU-wide stress test to check whether nuclear power stations are "earthquake-proof," much like European banks have been tested for their ability to cope with financial shocks.

"With the banks it has shown its value," Berlakovich said. "Now, people are expecting personal security and that is why there has to be a stress test for nuclear power plants."

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said his government won't revise its ambitious program of building new nuclear reactors but will "draw conclusions from what's going on in Japan," according to Russian news agencies.

Nuclear power currently accounts for 16 percent of Russia's electricity generation, and the Kremlin has set a target to raise its share to one-quarter by 2030. Russia would have to build a total of 40 new reactors to fulfill the goal.

Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk also said the country would stick to its plans to build two nuclear power plants and have the first one running by 2022.

As of January, there were 195 nuclear power plants operating in Europe and 19 under construction – 11 in Russia, two each in Bulgaria, Slovakia and Ukraine, and one each in Finland and France, according to the Brussels-based European Nuclear Society.

German popular opinion continues to favor non-nuclear sources of energy. But elsewhere in Europe, people have become increasingly open to using nuclear power as memories fade of the accident 25 years ago at the Soviet-built reactor in Chernobyl, Ukraine. Eastern Europe sees it as a way of gaining a measure of independence from Russia's burgeoning gas and oil empire.

___

John Heilprin in Geneva, Angela Charlton in Paris, and Raf Casert in Brussels contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BERLIN -- Germany's government on Monday temporarily halted plans to extend the life of its nuclear power plants, as two hydrogen explosions at a tsunami-stricken Japanese facility spread jitters abou...
BERLIN -- Germany's government on Monday temporarily halted plans to extend the life of its nuclear power plants, as two hydrogen explosions at a tsunami-stricken Japanese facility spread jitters abou...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 410
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:20 PM on 03/28/2011
Rahm and Exalerod lobbied for the nuclear power industry, are you kidding?> The USA sold nuclear power tech to Chile last week while the crisis was on the front pages. Chu's official DOE energy report uses 4 year old green energy costs, versus 2016 future fantasy nukes and clean fossil junk. The fix is int. Obama is DLC Reagan fiscal conservative conservadem. Wake up. Vote Kucinich and the Progressive Caucus in the Primaries. Vote for Ike conservatives if you can find them. Else suffer.
06:53 PM on 03/24/2011
This recent decision is a rational one considering the nuclear plant disaster in Japan, where radiation exposure is now a fast spreading fear across the nation. The effects felt in Germany from the Chernobyl disaster were undoubtedly significant factors in the decision to inspect the safety of present plants and work toward dissolving all dependence on nuclear energy. The Germans realize the great financial expense it will take investing in renewable resources and improving current nuclear plants, but the prospect in long-term benefits of alternate fuels and disaster prevention outweigh the cost. They hope to pave the way for the US to phase out our nuclear power plants, but I think it’s pretty unlikely that action will be taken any time soon. The technology for alternative resources exists and is available in the US, but isn’t implemented to a higher degree often because of its expense. As time goes by and our heavy dependency on non-renewable resources like oil and coal is in more peril because of low supplies, we become more accepting of the cost in renewable resources versus the loss of resources and fuel altogether. I think Germany’s decision is a good one, nuclear power plants are unstable and dangerous even in the safest of conditions. If the need for radioactive energy is virtually eliminated, horrific stories of exposures to radiation in the future hopefully can as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juna
Golden Rule is all we need.
10:26 AM on 03/17/2011
Yes, expand efforts to develop alternative energies! There's an idea! And it could put thousands of people to work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judson Wallace
01:55 AM on 03/17/2011
our two best alternatives : biofuel (carefully filtering reusing salt/ash) and the newer hyroelectric generators for low current tidal zones (they don't interfere with marine life, and they can generate electricity in almost any level of tidal movement)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:09 PM on 03/17/2011
Look at the EROEI of biofuel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judson Wallace
11:01 AM on 03/18/2011
Exactly what do you want me to look at? EROEI numbers are highly politicized either way... studies come out saying petroleum /biofuel number X is or isn't right.

If you are suggesting that biofuels would not work... maybe you should look at the Union of Concerned Scientists. They have a section on biofuels, and it can be done efficiently and in a sustainable fashion.

Also there are EPA studies showing its usefulness.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:16 PM on 03/28/2011
Look at the EROEI for bio char of dumped wastes. Get a clue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:11 AM on 03/16/2011
What is happening with the Japanese nuclear reactors has the whole world scared.

Playing with nuclear energy is like playing with fire....eventually you are going to get burned.
08:56 AM on 03/16/2011
What happened to the Japanese nuclear reactors has been hyped, esp. since almost all the deaths have been from debris, collapsing buildings, etc. But again, the earthquake is not changing most people's opinions 1 way or the other on nuclear. Sure what happened is bad publicity to the nuclear industry but it doesn't change the fact that when done right, nuclear energy benefits. President Obama has defended nuclear energy. Nuclear topic won't go away.
This will be repetitive but what BP did was negligence. BP got condemned for months after the oil spill, yet in the end, BP is still doing business. People are buying petrol from the BP pumps.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judson Wallace
01:56 AM on 03/17/2011
Its not the benefits people are worried about. Its the costs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:10 PM on 03/17/2011
And there was no negligence at TEPCO? Or at Chernobyl?
Do you say that there will never be any negligence at other sites?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
F Sz
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidenc
11:27 PM on 03/15/2011
Looks like the best we can have in USA is "talks". And only in the comments section of news. If you are lucky, someone even will read it, but that's it. Of course, we can do this until eternity, we can all read the news and make comments, but when the elections come, you will vote for the best Hollywood-styled dress men, with the best smile and the best looking personality. That's all you gonna get though...or get angry, and vote in the republicans, because you are angry about the democrats. Wait for the next cycle, rinse-repeat. 4 Years from now, you will still be here arguing about how everybody else outside USA is doing something and you aren't. IF you still have internet connection and roof above your head. Most won't even notice, how many others have just simply disappeared from these boards, probably due to poverty and loss of wealth, but you will continue keep talking and talking and you feel like you accomplished something by writing that post. You really did nothing though...Egyptians couldn't just talk themselves out from Mubarack if you havent' noticed. USA isn't different. None of the countries ever commented themselves out of troubles. The choice is in your hand, but you are all too afraid to use it, because you are weak and fear your own elected representatives. Obama is doing a great job keeping you in fear. You "may" end up like Manning, right?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:31 PM on 03/15/2011
Germany has created 340.000 jobs with renewable energy in the last years. They are world market leader in this segment.

Sounds like a good deal.
imonlyhereforthelaughs
Politicians...they ruin everything.
10:27 AM on 03/17/2011
Link?
09:24 AM on 03/15/2011
It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy.

Nuclear is just too dangerous. People and technology both do fail.

Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from waste, cellulose and algae are the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
10:38 AM on 03/15/2011
Ban the automobile. Too many deaths each year in those dang things.
03:08 PM on 03/15/2011
But the leftovers of my old car won't contaminate the environment for the next thousand years.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
03:24 PM on 03/15/2011
Heh, heh, heh.... if you are around to see the world in 20 years...... what do you think you will see? I really doubt that there will be much of a market for huge internal combustion engine driven vehicles to drive individuals around from point to point. I really doubt it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Overlie
06:16 PM on 03/15/2011
nuclear power works for the US Navy since 1955.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:14 AM on 03/16/2011
I seem to recall that there is at least one nuclear powered US sub laying on the bottom of the ocean.
FreeHat
Really?
07:05 AM on 03/15/2011
"temporarily halted plans..."

This is a political move motivated by elections coming up in a couple of weeks.
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
07:09 PM on 03/15/2011
Spot on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
01:20 AM on 03/15/2011
I just wish Dubya was still president so he could talk to us all about "nucular power pants."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
01:40 AM on 03/15/2011
...with or without the Foo Fighters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHU6aqt08dA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
10:39 AM on 03/15/2011
At least a "president" would be talking about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathaly Macomber
Philo is my son.
01:02 AM on 03/15/2011
BRAVO!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Onertwo19
12:58 AM on 03/15/2011
Goof for them. Germany is the leader in solar with a very moderate climate. We get TWICE as much sunshine...what's our excuse??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
10:39 AM on 03/15/2011
A solar panel on every car?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Onertwo19
12:35 PM on 03/15/2011
No, there should be a solar panel on every roof that will charge your car and your home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
02:29 PM on 03/15/2011
Our excuse is we are a stupid nation that cannot see beyond a 30 day profit statement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. crowsnest
06:38 PM on 03/14/2011
Because the output of power plants activated with coal, oil, gas, or nuclear fission can be accurately known before these are constructed one can fairly accurately predict the number of such plants that are needed to satisfy the energy demand today and in the near future.
I have long been an advocate for replacing much of the non-renewable with renewable energy production and am purchasing as much wind-produced energy as feasible in my state (because I live in hurricane territory solar on my roof is a greatly risky investment) but I often despair when I cannot get some quantitative answer on how many "windmills" and what area of solar panels of current technology are thought to be needed now and in the near future and what the real costs of installing, start-up, and maintenance are for our entire nation. If we want to win the "hearts and minds" of the overwhelming majority of our USAn public we must be able to place realistic numbers instead of well-meant wishes before them. I am not an expert hence I cannot derive these numbers but must rely on others to provide these. I am sure that there will be divergent answers but as the French are wont to say: "du choc des opinions jaillit la verite" or freely translated: "truth will emerge from throwing numbers around".
06:20 PM on 03/14/2011
Bravo. I hope the same happens in the United States. Unfortunately all of the Republican politicians here though have been bought by Big Business, so I doubt it.
10:09 PM on 03/14/2011
It's predictable that anti-nuclear groups (not a Republican) would say that the nuclear industry buys off politicians. Whether you like it or not nuclear power isn't going away. Sure the Japanese earthquake will cause nations to take another look @ their nuclear powerplants to make sure that they meet the worst case scenarios & that's fine. But in the long run, nuclear powerplants will continue. Ukraine has continued to build nuclear powerplants after Chernobyl. If anything, what happened in Japan proves how the nuclear industry got it right to react to the emergency situations. They evacuated the people from nuclear zones & they did the right thing. Most people were killed by other means in Japan during this earthquake. Yet does it mean that we shouldn't build high rise buildings or chemical plants because if a disaster happens such as an earthquake, many may get potentially killed?
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
06:44 AM on 03/15/2011
If we want to have an honest discussion about the risks and costs of nuclear power, please let's factor in things like the loss of large areas of land from contamination after a bad accident, millennia of having to manage nuclear waste, and stress on the local population from the knowns and unknowns.

Nuclear power kills fewer people than coal and petroleum each year, but coal plants don't shut down entire states or countries when they burp.

And if nuclear got us off of carbon sooner, that might save millions from the effects of global warming.

Supporting a huge human population covering the surface of a small planet is definitely problematic and requires more attention than it is getting from people with quarterly profit goals spurring them on to greater and greater stupidity.