More

Further Analysis Finds Deceptive Editing In Sting Tape, As NPR Gains An Unlikely Defender

Npr

First Posted: 03/14/11 01:11 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

Last week, a Project Veritas "sting" operation directed at National Public Radio cost some NPR executives their jobs. Beginning with Senior Vice President for Fundraising Ron Schiller, who was depicted on tape disparaging the Tea Party movement and suggesting that NPR should move away from federal funding (a position with arguable merit, but probably very unpopular at NPR), the fallout eventually cost NPR CEO Vivian Schiller her job as well.

That's sort of the NPR way: when one of the humans under their employ gets in trouble for expressing their opinions, everyone starts panicking and people start getting fired. Further analysis of the original video, however, demonstrates the wisdom of the old maxim, "act in haste, repent in leisure."

Glenn Beck-branded website The Blaze may seem an unlikely defender of NPR, but when the site's editor, Scott Baker, and video production specialist, Pam Key, examined the raw footage, they found "questionable editing and tactics" and reported them all out. The observations they make in their analysis include the following:

-- The video "does not explain how the NPR executives would have a basis to believe they were meeting with a Muslim Brotherhood front group," and indeed "includes a longer section of description that seems to downplay connections of the MEAC group to the Muslim Brotherhood as popularly perceived."

-- The video is edited to make it appear that Ron Schiller "is aware and perhaps amused or approving of the MEAC['s]" advocacy for Sharia law, but Schiller's "Really? That's what they said?" remark is actually made in reference to "confusion" involving the "restaurant reservation."

-- Schiller is actually complimentary of Republicans, and prefaces his criticism of the Tea Party by indicating that it's his own opinion, not NPR's. (Plenty of conservatives and Tea Party activists have averred that NPR has treated them fairly.) Baker also finds footage in which Schiller and director of institutional giving Betsy Liley express a hesitancy to disparage the "education of conservatives" and defend "intellects of Fox News viewers."

NPR's Dave Folkenflik and Mark Memmott add their own reporting to this:

Al Tompkins, a senior faculty member for broadcasting and online at the Poynter Institute, says to David that he tells his children there are "two ways to lie. One is to tell me something that didn't happen. And the other is not to tell me something that did happen." After comparing O'Keefe's edited tape to the longer version, "I think that they employed both techniques in this," Tompkins says.

One "big warning flag" Tompkins saw in the shorter tape was the way it made it appear that Schiller had laughed and commented "really, that's what they said?" after being told that the fake Muslim group advocates for sharia law. In fact, the longer tape shows that Schiller made that comment during an "innocuous exchange" that had nothing to do with the supposed group's position on sharia law, David reports.

Tompkins also says that O'Keefe's edited tape ignores the fact that Schiller said "six times ... over and over and over again" that donors cannot buy the kind of coverage they want on NPR.

Per Memmott, Project Veritas' James O'Keefe continues to maintain that their video is "very honest." It's easy to see why: the effects of his "sting" operation manifested themselves in several public firings, so he can couch his claims -- however dubious they may be -- in the fact that NPR's response was a de facto acceptance of the video's premise.

Which is why organizations like NPR shouldn't freak right the hell out and start firing people until all the facts are known. Had NPR just waited, they'd have Ron Schiller and his perfectly protean opinions on the Tea Party headed to the Aspen Institute, and Vivian Schiller citing the Project Veritas video's content and NPR's own coverage as a demonstration of NPR's editorial integrity. But they decided to go in a different direction.

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

Last week, a Project Veritas "sting" operation directed at National Public Radio cost some NPR executives their jobs. Beginning with Senior Vice President for Fundraising Ron Schiller, who was depicte...
Last week, a Project Veritas "sting" operation directed at National Public Radio cost some NPR executives their jobs. Beginning with Senior Vice President for Fundraising Ron Schiller, who was depicte...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,615
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (80 total)
  1 of 9  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Artos 12:32 PM on 03/14/2011
NPR wants so badly to be seen as really Fair, and unbiased that they will go to extreme lengths to prove it. On it's face this seems a good position to take, but unfortunately they act in haste as was pointed out. It would be useful for them to take more than a day to fully investigate these issues and not take it on faith that the evidence is honest and factual as this case proves otherwise. I think if the  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
riverwester
Indignant Badger
04:20 PM on 04/05/2011
wow. i guess i have been so caught up with whats happening in wisco that i missed this story? or did it just not get reported anywhere else? its not a rhetorical question...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:39 AM on 03/24/2011
Obviously, O'Keefe was emboldened by his prosecutor­ial immunity in CA and went right out and pulled off a stunt that got him arrested and convicted. Now he is going farther, claiming he is doing a pubic service by secretly taping people and setting the resultant video to questions never asked...And he gets any coverage why?


Other than for being a liar who represents republican values perfectly.


“O'Keefe's Lawyers Seeking to Overturn CA Privacy Rights Law - Koch Money Helping Fund Effort


James O'Keefe has answered a lawsuit brought by Juan Carlos Vera, an ACORN worker fired due to O'Keefe's 'deceptive editing' and distortion­. O'Keefe is being represente­d by DC's priciest lawyers, but the tab is being picked up by a legal non-profit funneling donations by radically partisan billionair­es such as Koch Industries­, Richard Mellon Scaife and the like.
Oped news


.If the principle here is to get to the truth, a real journalist would report his findings, reporting .But of course the point was to defund ACORN, not journalism­, because ACORN registered a lot of Democrats.

O'Keefe's victims are relatively powerless and without wealth. And they work to make democracy stronger and more fair.Thats why Okeefe and his ilk are using lies ,propagand­a and deliberate setting up and editing video tapes to match his agenda not the truth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WryAwry
Hating haters since '55
10:52 AM on 03/20/2011
It's the weekly repugnant-can't roundup; gypsies, tramps and thieves --

the endless procession of repugnant-can'ts gypping America, tramping on Americans, stealing America's glory, and treasure, and blood.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Electrum 01
And the horse you rode in on.
01:17 PM on 03/16/2011
What does it take to discredit this publicity-hound? He's a proven liar and sociopath (Abbie Bourdreau affair), and yet when he comes up with these false "shlockumentaries" he gets covered in the media as though he were credible. He's disgusting, but the quality of American journalism is just pathetic.
photo
Lizzy28
Too bad he's got a mop instead of a wand.
12:59 PM on 03/16/2011
Shouldn't this story be as prominent as the original O'Keefe faux story??
11:47 AM on 03/16/2011
Hello Mr. Linkins.

Please understand that I REALLY admire your work, and find your analyses on current events very enlightening.

But in blaming NPR, I am ashamed for you.

The reason is that you, and ALL journalists on/offline (except MMFA), happily jumped the bandwagon to reify O’Keefes false narrative and push his story.

In your own analyses of the NPR scandal, can you honestly say that you highlighted the countless caveats about O’keefes dishonesty, depravity and (what I can only call) utter lunacy?

HuffPo even gave former-SugarDaddy Breitbart a big platform to spew his nonsense.

And NPR is to be blamed here?

Personally, I think that, by itself, attempted sexual blackmail SHOULD be enough to preclude credibility. I certainly would not favor/believe someone base enough to employ it.

What about the Boudreau case (let alone the several malicious anti-ACORN lies) did you and your journalistic colleagues (on and offline) NOT find off-putting?

All of you know O’Keefes history as much as anyone else; how much did that history figure into your own analysis of this story?

Please don’t take this the wrong way, because I really do just LOVE your work... even as I LOVE the work of Howard Kurtz or Jon Stewart.

But ALL of you gave O’Keefe a pass, and even promoted his lies. Why?

In any case, before blaming NPR for jumping the gun, ALL responsible people in Media (on and off-line) need to answer why they did so first.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Electrum 01
And the horse you rode in on.
01:06 PM on 03/16/2011
I agree. What does it take to raise a red flag? Why the heck are Glen Beck supporters delivering the truth? This has got to be the ultimate irony. Faved and fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
booker52
avid reader
05:59 AM on 03/16/2011
O'keefe is a liar
photo
SpookyTwo
Enhancing the lives of Liberals ....... every day.
05:49 AM on 03/16/2011
60 Minutes and the nightly news broadcasts do this all of the time.  It is what "journalists" do, unfortunately.  Regardless, NPR/The CFPB should not be getting public funding.

12:00 PM on 03/16/2011
Spooky, let me introduce you to some vocabulary that Breitbart, O'keefe, and anyone who follows them most certainly needs to learn.

The word today is "IRB."

Or, "Institutional Review Board" (look it up!)


The fact that O'Keefe and Breitbart DO NOT know what this is ought to preclude them from any association with REAL "research" or "journalism."


In any REAL investigation, you are legally required to complete an IRB in order to engage in ANY work that may violate an American Citizens right to privacy.

YOu need to prove that there is a definite NECESSITY to violate that right.

The producers at 60 Minutes can make that case.

BigGov.com and James O'Keefe cannot.

James O'Keefe is a fraud, a liar and a lunatic.

And what is it about the attempted sexual blackmail of Abbie Bourdreau that you people DONT find disturbing?

Just asking.
photo
SpookyTwo
Enhancing the lives of Liberals ....... every day.
12:15 PM on 03/16/2011
Let me introduce you to the word "Regardless".  I'm not much of a fan of O'Keefe or "60 Minutes".  But, regardless of whether I am a fan or not, NPR/The CFPB should not be getting public funding.
photo
Lizzy28
Too bad he's got a mop instead of a wand.
12:58 PM on 03/16/2011
More important than the NPR funding issue is that this type of O'Keefe faux story is designed to discredit NPR as a reputable news source when, in fact, they are among the least biased of all the organizations today.
02:47 PM on 03/16/2011
They are the ONLY media organization which is even remotely non-biased. That reality, of course, is the reason why so many hate them; and why they are so strongly hated among the right-wingnuts whose very existence depends entirely upon the most biased media propaganda organizations in the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
O K Ali
Wash your hands, seriously.
01:29 AM on 03/16/2011
Who'd thunk it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mitchpeter
07:55 PM on 03/15/2011
Did anyone think we learned anything from the ACORN travesty of justice?
www.gaynycdad.com
05:07 PM on 03/15/2011
Unfortunately, public service groups have never adopted the Rove philosophy of sociopathy to not let shame or embarrassment cause you to defend your position; instead aggressively support it, even if if makes no sense. Check out Angel, Gingrich, Palin, Walker, Beck, Hannity, and numerous Republican congresspeople who pre-Rove, would have shamefully folded up their tents and moved on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris 1
04:54 PM on 03/15/2011
"60 Minutes" has been practicing "gotch" editing and tactics for 40 years, usually with a leftist spin.

This issue is small change on the funding issue for npr.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennishastings
Musician
05:36 PM on 03/15/2011
That's a bogus comment. Any news outlet that actively seeks the truth is a 'leftist' organization. 60 minutes is still one of the best news shows on TV, regardless of their faults. I assume that you must watch FOX in light of your 'leftist' accusations. And NPR should continue to receive funding.

Besides, 60 minutes is correct in trying to squeeze the truth out of many capitalist, war mongering right wingers. They are not going to give us the truth willingly.
photo
Sesame2009
Don't Probe Me, Bro!
06:01 PM on 03/15/2011
60 minutes doesn't deceptively edit video to change the truth.  They would be sued.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:50 PM on 03/15/2011
They have been, several times.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/60_Minutes

Scroll down till you hit the subsection "Controversies". Yes, it is wiki, not the best source, but from there you can google.
04:42 PM on 03/15/2011
Why isn't O'Keefe rotting in prison somewhere? And, yes, liberals seem to quake in terror whenever these diseased Republicans try to smear them with lies. They'll get away with it until we FIGHT BACK.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris 1
04:50 PM on 03/15/2011
It's good to adopt an avatar of che, a murderer and criminal. Really fits in at hp and adds support, next you can comment about right wing radio and violence, no??
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AngryBuddist
07:35 PM on 03/15/2011
Oh and torturers and war mongerers are your hero's? You are so far upside down you must think gravity is a communist plot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugi
01:17 AM on 03/16/2011
I disagree with her/his avatar too but the comment is valid, no?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisfrenzy
I am that one guy who says those things.
04:42 PM on 03/15/2011
Conservatives are fond of tossing around the notion of "corporate corruption" at NPR, as if it's a part of their culture the way it is at FOX News, Big Oil, Haliburton, etc. I have a slight insider's perspective into NPR. I work with liberal and conservative NPR employees on the local and even the national level. I've found the vast majority of them to be dedicated, hardworking, decent people who see the real meaning in their work as something much more than a paycheck or a chance to score points for a political agenda.

Make no mistake. The current attacks on National Public Radio are nothing less than combined and concerted efforts by more monied corporate news organizations to get rid of the one media outlet that actually endeavors — at times successfully — to get to the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris 1
04:52 PM on 03/15/2011
It's always scary to hear those bent with blind partisan hate talk about "truth".

Fox isn't subsidized by direct government funding, it's that simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisfrenzy
I am that one guy who says those things.
06:54 PM on 03/15/2011
No, it's subsidized by massive corporate funding and therefore influence. Far scarier to be bought and paid for by for-profit filthy-rich corporations than assisted by funds from a government of, by, and for the people.

Or don't you believe in our Constitution anymore?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric in Ayden
"Every waking moment I'm alive"
10:24 PM on 03/15/2011
Things subsidized by the government are almost always better than things subsidized by big oil and other huge corporations.

Big Corporations vs Middle Class
"You're either with us or against us"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael G Malloy
03:38 PM on 03/15/2011
This reminds me of what happened to Shirley Sherrod. What is it with Liberals that fire or force resignations before even holding an investigation first? This is quite perplexing. Afterall, Republicans always wait for an investigation and then typically they don't fire but just keep rolling with the punches.
photo
JLeroy54
55 year old freshman (out
12:22 AM on 04/06/2011
I agree with your observation MGM. The repubs were almost willing to back that guy that got caught in a stall in the men's room trying to get his groove on. No one came out and said that he had to go and they were trying to figure out how to save him, but then they realized this one couldn't be salvaged.