More

Obama Pushing Congress On Education Reform

Obama Education Reform

03/14/11 04:57 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Urging Congress to send him a new education law by fall, President Barack Obama focused Monday on the big concerns of parents and lawmakers alike: how student progress is measured and how schools that fall short are labeled.

Citing new estimates, Obama said four out of five schools may be tagged as failures this year under provisions of the Bush-era No Child Left Behind law.

"That's an astonishing number," he said. "We know that four out of five schools in this country aren't failing. So what we're doing to measure success and failure is out of line."

Obama's call for a rewrite of the education law appears unlikely, at least by his September deadline. The House education committee's Republican chairman acknowledged the need for improvement but called the president's time line "arbitrary."

While the law enacted in 2002 under George W. Bush has become an easy political target, Obama acknowledged that it set the "right goals": educating all children, having a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and highlighting the achievement gaps between rich and poor, white students and many minorities, and students with and without disabilities.

But he said improvements are needed in measuring student progress and labeling schools that fall short. He called for measuring creativity and critical thinking along with math and reading skills, and for rewarding good teachers while showing little leniency for bad ones.

"In the 21st century, it's not enough to leave no child behind," Obama said. "We need to help every child get ahead. We need to get every child on a path to academic excellence."

The Education Department estimated last week that the percentage of schools labeled as "failing" under the law could more than double this year, jumping from 37 percent to 82 percent as states boost standards to try to satisfy the law's mandates. The law set a goal of having all students proficient in math and reading by 2014, a standard now deemed unrealistic.

Schools that fail to meet yearly targets over time are labeled as needing improvement, a designation that upsets many parents who consider it an unfair stigma. Such schools often are described as failing, although the law itself does not use that term. Obama suggested it does, however, by repeatedly using the word "failing" to describe such schools during Monday's appearance at an Arlington, Va., middle school.

Obama said he wants a more flexible system focused on preparing graduating high school students for college and career, and assessing whether that goal is being met. Reading, math and science proficiency will continue to be emphasized, he said, but skills like critical thinking, creativity and collaboration should also be measured.

He also called for better efforts to prepare and support teachers that encourage their creativity yet holds them accountable for student progress and doesn't make excuses for the occasional bad teacher.

Obama has met several times this year with a bipartisan group of House and Senate lawmakers leading efforts to rewrite the law. Both Republicans and Democrats agree that an update is needed; they disagree on the federal government's role in education and on what's the best way to turn around schools with a history of poor performance.

The Senate committee handling education held 10 hearings on the issue last year and its chairman, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, has said he is working with Republicans to introduce a bill by Easter.

The situation is far different in the House. Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, who was chairman of the House education committee when the No Child Left Behind law was enacted, has not indicated whether he intends to make the rewrite of the law a priority.

Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., the current chairman of the House education panel, acknowledged the importance of overhauling the education law but suggested that Obama's September deadline had already fallen by the wayside. He said the committee was continuing to get input from school officials and state and local leaders.

"We need to take the time to get this right," Kline said. "We cannot allow an arbitrary timeline to undermine quality reforms that encourage innovation, flexibility and parental involvement."

Obama has been visiting schools around the country – in Miami, Boston and Arlington, Va., so far – to promote his education agenda, while fighting with lawmakers over how deeply to cut domestic spending to balance the budget and begin trimming the federal deficit.

Insisting he recognizes the need for fiscal discipline, Obama reiterated Monday that education spending is an area where he is unwilling to compromise. He said an educated and skilled work force will attract jobs and make the country more attractive to businesses.

"We cannot cut education. We can't cut the things that will make America more competitive," Obama said.

Education is one of Obama's better issues, according to recent AP-GfK polling that found nearly two-thirds of the public, or 64 percent, approve of his handling of the issue.

A majority of the public also views the education law unfavorably. An AP-Stanford poll last fall found that two-thirds of the public either thought the law has had "no real impact" or had made schools worse.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Urging Congress to send him a new education law by fall, President Barack Obama focused Monday on the big concerns of parents and lawmakers alike: how student progress is measured a...
WASHINGTON — Urging Congress to send him a new education law by fall, President Barack Obama focused Monday on the big concerns of parents and lawmakers alike: how student progress is measured a...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Salinitis
read 1984.
02:49 PM on 03/17/2011
Hey Barry- focus on the world events that can destroy the planet and not on issues that pertain to the states.
11:15 AM on 03/16/2011
Should the No Child Left Behind Act be reauthorized? Maybe, I guess its just a matter of opinion.

www.matterofopinion.com
researcher
researcher
04:23 AM on 03/16/2011
"He called for measuring creativity and critical thinking along with math and reading skills, and for rewarding good teachers while showing little leniency for bad ones".



ok teachers I will translate that bit of non wisdom for you.


see that reward word in obama's speech. that means pay for individual performance when 85 to 95% of the problems are systemic. that is like blaming the plant operators in japan for the earth quake. this is wall street tactics coming to education. will fail like no child left behind failed as I said it would.

now see that word bad teachers. that will be over half as they will draw a line down the center of a bell curve and tell half the teachers they are below average. ie shape up or else. only the top ten per cent of teachers will be told they are ok and get a big raise. the rest will feel like losers.

teachers learn to teach to tests and suck up to the principal for the rest of that evaluation is creativity and that is subjective beyond anything you can imagine. translated principals pet teacher wins the creativity prize and raise.

american business school ignorance is coming to our educational insitutions. look how well that business school bit of skinnerism and taylorism of individualistic pay for performance has worked on wall street and banks and manufacturing, etc.

study deming to find out why it does not work. or not.
photo
GeorgieGirl9
Liberty, In God We Trust, and E Pluribus Unum
09:43 PM on 03/15/2011
Let's see, Japan is suffering like nothing we've seen in ages, Libya is a bloo d bath, the mid east is erupting in violence all over the place, we have $4 gas and 9% unemployment...and Obama is worried about dumbing down education further and the NCAA tourney. Loser.
10:43 PM on 03/15/2011
Do you really mean what you say? A President can't deal with more than one problem at a time? Or do you mean that President Obama really can't prioritize? Do you really think that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mburgh
Come Back Samuel Gompers
06:17 PM on 03/15/2011
How about scraping all the tests that clog up education? Standardized tests have done nothing to improve our education, and made everything worse. How about letting teachers teach for a decent salary? How about getting parents involved? How about returning to subjects that teach children how to think? How about we model our schools like Finland's excellent educational programs?
04:41 PM on 03/15/2011
but are they going to fund it this time?
12:33 PM on 03/15/2011
"So what we're doing to measure success and failure is out of line."

No kidding! But what do so many "school reformers" want to do? They want to double down and use those same "out of line" measures to determine how much teachers get paid and which teachers are laid off during troubled financial times. They want to publish these "out of line" measures to shame teachers, influence public policy and perception, and manipulate the weak-minded into assuming that teachers' unions are all about shielding incompetent teachers. It's the "out of line" tests and those who base their entire educational philosophy on them that deserve public scorn. The unions have been pointing this out for years, not because they were trying to protect educators, but because they have are always trying to protect education as a profession.
09:54 AM on 03/15/2011
I agree that reform of "No Child Left Behind" is important. Teaching to the tests is stifling for teachers and unproductive for students. And it leaves out some very important things. If we're going to prepare our students for future success in the workforce, we need to teach them the behaviors that will make them successful. It's not enough to just know the technical skills! Students need to learn the behaviors that research showed us are most important: getting Results; having Enthusiasm; a positive Attitude; Cooperation; and Honor. Let's reform education to make our students successful when they get out of school.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whatsthat1
08:20 AM on 03/15/2011
"Obama acknowledged that it set the "right goals": educating all children, ... and students with and without disabilities." But we are not there yet. So where is the problem? The US Dept of ED is a good place to start since all they do is produce charts and graphs but add no value to a student's education. Why else would a child be allowed to go 45 days without any education and the feds and state educators are doing nothing about it. http://www.ri-specialeducation.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:28 PM on 03/14/2011
I am getting a mixed message here, but perhaps a mixed message is better than an outright bad one:

I am hearing Obama say states need to support teachers and education and yet he stands by idle as Republican governors gut education and teacher rights. I am hearing Obama preach creativity and yet he promotes a high stakes environment that forces teachers to walk a fine line. I am hearing Obama promise that there will not be more testing, and yet testing still reigns supreme. I am hearing Obama wanting to reward teachers with support and funding and yet all he can produce is a toothless request of unsupportive governors to not cut education funding.

http://supportpubliceducation.blogspot.com/2011/03/dont-show-me-money-show-me-respect.html
photo
Thordeer
Greed has won over principle.
02:06 AM on 03/15/2011
Fanned! I'd like to say he talks the talk and walks the walk, but that's not true, so I'd then like to say at least he talks a good game, but alas that isn't true either. Instead he parrots half-baked Republican ed reform ideas that will be nothing more than a distraction and will prove counterproductive.
05:03 PM on 03/15/2011
I also fanned you. Why did he renew NCLB if he knew it was ineffective? Why is he setting a deadline that lawmakers are calling unrealistic? Just more talk....trying to garner support, not really trying to make any changes....now off to read your blog...
10:12 PM on 03/14/2011
As a teacher who has just begun this year's 3 week process, I can tell you this the students do not care about these test other than they need to pass to graduate. I am in an affluent district and they only want a grade that will allow them to pass. They understand how the tests are used to evaluate the school's and student's progress but do not see it as necessary or beneficial to their daily learning. There is no incentive for them to perform exceptionally on these tests, so why would they. As the system is set up now the best my district can hope for is the students will want to try and challenge themselves. I could not imagine how students in lower social-economic schools deal with these test.
03:09 PM on 03/15/2011
There's no incentive for teachers to take the time to directly impact the life of a child. Why would the child care about academic achievement if the parent and the teachers have given up on them. Teachers should have to be held accountable to push their students to succeed, and if they fail to do so, they should loose thier jobs. In a corporation, if you make a product and that product is not marketable, the product declines in sales and production of that product is halted. That's how I see our educational system. Our children are the product, and if we do not put 100% of effort and creativity into that product, it will result in low achievement and therefore become unmarketable in the future. These are the ramifications of not being held accountable and sitting by idlely, instead of standing up to make changes in education!
03:37 PM on 03/15/2011
The good teachers are not afraid of being held accountable. My argument is there is no incentive for the students to achieve results on these tests because the tests do not directly tie into their educational success. I have highly intelligent students who because of their intelligence have realized what they need to do on these test is just to pass. They gain nothing from achieving the highest mark so like any normal person will not aggravate/worry themselves about these tests.
Now I know many people would say as an adult they will have to perform to their highest ability no matter what benefits might be for them. I agree most people do have to do things they do not want to do, but given the chance to most people would take the path of least resistance. That is human nature and the time when we learn to go against this idea is during our schooling. To teach students this is a complicated task which still many people do not learn.
Now to your point of students are products. This idea that students are simply a product does not take into account that students are humans. There is no assembly line to make a perfect student. You can not create a cookie cutter system to teach students. Each student is different and requires numerous types of instruction to help them achieve results.
10:46 PM on 03/15/2011
1. Product is not everything. Children are not just products.

2. The school system is not failing, much less "sitting by idlely":

http://www­­­­­­­.dis­s­e­n­t­m­­a­­ga­zi­n­e­.­o­r­g­­/­ar­t­ic­­l­e/­­?­ar­­­ticl­­­e­=37­­­8­1

"To justify their campaign, ed reformers repeat, mantra-lik­­­­­­­e, that U.S. students are trailing far behind their peers in other nations, that U.S. public schools are failing. The claims are specious. Two of the three major internatio­­­­­­­nal tests—the Progress in Internatio­­­­­­­nal Reading Literacy Study and the Trends in Internatio­­­­­­­nal Math and Science Study—brea­­­­­­­k down student scores according to the poverty rate in each school. The tests are given every five years. The most recent results (2006) showed the following: students in U.S. schools where the poverty rate was less than 10 percent ranked first in reading, first in science, and third in math. When the poverty rate was 10 percent to 25 percent, U.S. students still ranked first in reading and science. But as the poverty rate rose still higher, students ranked lower and lower. Twenty percent of all U.S. schools have poverty rates over 75 percent. The average ranking of American students reflects this. The problem is not public schools; it is poverty. And as dozens of studies have shown, the gap in cognitive, physical, and social developmen­­­­­­­t between children in poverty and middle-cla­­­­­­­ss children is set by age three."”

Also:
http://nas­­spblogs.o­r­g/princi­pa­ldiffer­enc­e/2010­/12/­pisa_­its_p­over­ty_not­_st­upid_1.­ht­ml”
06:00 PM on 03/14/2011
I just shake my head at Government - failed schools on a massive scale, failed energy policy, failed wars, failed healthcare - please someone restore my faith and tell me one thing the Gov has done that actually works?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:28 PM on 03/15/2011
What have corporations done that is right. GE just hurt Japan and BP just hurt the fishing industry in the gulf.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
05:58 PM on 03/14/2011
4000 teachers sitting in "rubber rooms" in NYC - getting paid and getting pensions and healthcare - how is that good spending of tax payer dollars.
10:03 PM on 03/14/2011
The rubber rooms were closed. They made a great talking point, but they're not there anymore. And some percentage (A minority? A majority? I'm not sure) of the teachers in them had done nothing wrong. That's why they were instituted in the first place.
02:57 PM on 03/15/2011
Umm No. According to the documentary, "Waiting for Superman" this is still happening in NY. Let me guess, they just lied to put the movie together to appeal to an audience. That's always the answer from liberals. This is the problem with public positions. In the private sector, if you do something wrong (or are accussed of doing something wronge) and the company feels you are not suited to do your positon, you are fired. You don't sit in a room, and collect pay and "benefits".
10:47 PM on 03/15/2011
This comment is a red herring. Please, if you wish to participate in the discussion about education, get serious.
05:57 PM on 03/14/2011
The same Congress that conjured up the AFFORADABLE Health Care Bill - I wouldn't hold my breath.
05:56 PM on 03/14/2011
Get rid of tenure and unions and then you will see real progress - no more money for schools, this just hasn't worked.
10:05 PM on 03/14/2011
...which is why the states with tenure and unions do a better job educating kids than the states without, right? Why do people persist in believing things that are directly opposed to the facts?
photo
Thordeer
Greed has won over principle.
02:09 AM on 03/15/2011
Fanned! They do it because they are ideologues and only interest themselves in facts that are on their side. (And although the right wing has the greatest share of this frame of mind, it's no monopoly.)
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]