iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arkansas Earthquakes Decline After 'Fracking' Injection Well Closures

Arkansas Earthquakes 2011 Fracking

By SARAH EDDINGTON   03/14/11 05:58 PM ET   AP

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- The number and strength of earthquakes in central Arkansas have noticeably dropped since the shutdown of two injection wells in the area, although a state researcher says it's too early to draw any conclusions.

"We have definitely noticed a reduction in the number of earthquakes, especially the larger ones," said Scott Ausbrooks, geohazards supervisor for the Arkansas Geological Survey. "It's definitely worth noting."

The Center for Earthquake Research and Information recorded around 100 earthquakes in the seven days preceding the shutdown earlier this month, including the largest quake to hit the state in 35 years – a magnitude 4.7 on Feb. 27. A dozen of the quakes had magnitudes greater than 3.0. In the days since the shutdown, there have been around 60 recorded quakes, with only one higher than a magnitude 3.0. The majority were between magnitudes 1.2 and 2.8.

The two injection wells are used to dispose of wastewater from natural-gas production. One is owned by Chesapeake Energy, and the other by Clarita Operating. They agreed March 4 to temporarily cease injection operations at the request of the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission.

The commission said preliminary studies showed evidence potentially linking injection activities with nearly 1,000 quakes in the region over the past six months.

But Ausbrooks said it's too soon to tell if the decline in quakes is directly related to the injection well closures, adding that the drop could just be a normal low period of the swarm cycle.

"Either way, I wouldn't expect (the earthquakes) to quit immediately," he said. "If there is a relationship, the seismic activity could go on for weeks, months or even years."

Chesapeake Energy has said it does not believe there is a connection between the injection wells and the area's seismic activity.

A six-month moratorium on new injection wells in the area took effect in January to allow time to determine what relationship, if any, there is between the wells and the earthquakes.

The Fayetteville Shale, an organically-rich rock formation underlying the region, is a major source of natural gas in Arkansas. Drillers free up the gas by using hydraulic fracturing or "fracking," which requires injecting pressurized water to create fractures deep in the ground. The two injection wells at issue dispose of "frack" water when it can no longer be re-used by injecting it into the ground.

The state's Oil and Gas Commission will reconsider the issue at a meeting March 29 when both sides will get to testify.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- The number and strength of earthquakes in central Arkansas have noticeably dropped since the shutdown of two injection wells in the area, although a state researcher says it's too...
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- The number and strength of earthquakes in central Arkansas have noticeably dropped since the shutdown of two injection wells in the area, although a state researcher says it's too...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 698
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
12:57 PM on 04/26/2011
23 more on the 24th of April.

Boy, they must be injecting real hard!
04:14 PM on 04/08/2011
Fifteen and counting; 2 of 3.9 magnitude and all several miles from the offending well(s).

I guess the Arkansas Geologic Survey now has its answer.
allamericanboy
One of the original nattering nabobs.
09:29 AM on 04/25/2011
Don't make me drive down there to NW 63rd Street to tell you how many ways you're ignorant.
01:21 PM on 04/25/2011
You lost me on the address, but it is still rumbling at Greenbrier; 11 temblors yesterday. I suppose those bad oil companies are ignoring the state order to desist and injecting for all they are worth.

Sure am curious about the address. But ignoring the ignorant bit.
07:29 AM on 04/08/2011
OOPS

3.0 2011/04/08 10:12:53 35.252 -92.391 5.2 3 km N of Greenbrier,
2.9 2011/04/08 04:35:03 35.251 -92.391 5.3 2 km N of Greenbrier,
3.2 2011/04/08 03:27:58 35.188 -92.407 5.0 4 km ESE of Wooster,
2.9 2011/04/08 00:28:24 35.246 -92.368 2.2 3 km NE of Greenbrier,
3.9 2011/04/07 23:11:09 35.250 -92.373 6.1 3 km NNE of Greenbrier
2.5 2011/04/07 10:03:34 35.243 -92.359 3.2 3 km ENE of Greenbrier,
2.2 2011/04/07 09:48:00 35.247 -92.351 4.0 4 km ENE of Greenbrier,
2.4 2011/04/07 06:01:56 35.243 -92.349 4.6 4 km ENE of Greenbrier,
2.1 2011/04/07 05:56:21 35.240 -92.358 2.9 3 km ENE of Greenbrier,
2.2 2011/04/07 05:25:47 35.240 -92.365 5.7 2 km ENE of Greenbrier,
2.1 2011/04/07 04:28:51 35.238 -92.352 3.7 3 km ENE of Greenbrier,
3.4 2011/04/07 02:34:50 35.232 -92.367 6.3 2 km E of Greenbrier,
2.1 2011/04/06 03:05:17 35.227 -92.380 4.7 1 km ESE of Greenbrier,
09:20 AM on 04/07/2011
Somebody must be still injecting water!

MAG UTC DATE-TIME DEPTH LOCATION
2.4 2011/04/07 10:03:34 35.243 -92.361 3.0 3 km ( 2 mi) ENE of Greenbrier, AR
3.6 2011/04/07 02:34:50 35.239 -92.366 3.8 2 km ( 1 mi) ENE of Greenbrier, AR
11:58 AM on 04/02/2011
I'm of the opinion that the companies doing this fracking with "unknown" chemicals are headed by individuals bent on destroying the fabric of the USA.

What better way to destroy a country than by contaminating the water supply.
09:47 AM on 03/21/2011
1. The description of fracking as pumping "water" into a well is false.
Here's a list of 78 KNOWN toxins used in fracking fluid and believe me, we have no idea of all the toxic compounds they use.
http://tinyurl.com/26vgmfe

2. the connection between earthquakes and high pressure pumping of toxins into the ground is a problem on it's own, but what about all the places where there are nuclear power plants near the faults that are being affected? Much larger problem.

3. bush exempted oil and gas drillers from the Safe Drinking Water Act and the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act in 2004, so there is NO regulation at all.

4. Hydraulic fracturing is used in 90% of all oil and natural gas wells drilled in the U.S.

5. A minimum of 17 toxins are in wastewater these wells were pumping down to where we pump up drinking water and each well uses an average of 4.5 million gallons per well.
04:20 PM on 04/08/2011
1) you mentioned 78 of them
2) I think today put that story to bed
3) well none if you discount all the state regulations on oil and gas drilling and safe disposal of oil-field waste waters.
4) Not true. The percentage may be accurate for well drilled to Shale Resource Plays.
5) Oil-field waste water are injected into reservoirs thousands of feet deeper and separated from shallow aquifers by state mandate!

Apart from that-------------
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
banana republican
Next in line for crumbs from the King's Table
05:42 AM on 03/19/2011
Where I live, it rained for seven days straight after I had carpet installed. You can bet I'll keep this in mind next time I think about having getting carpet.
06:19 AM on 03/19/2011
Very well said. But I think the concept is a little too simple for this crowd (if you know what I mean).
07:19 PM on 03/19/2011
simple is right up your alley fo sho
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taymullah
Executive Order 11110
01:28 AM on 03/19/2011
When people inject heroin its pretty bad, injecting nasty stuff into the planet.. isn't it really just the same dang thing.

What are we ding here people?
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
12:13 PM on 03/18/2011
The title that states that earthquakes decline after fracking well closures is misleading and shows the ignorance of the author. These are not fracking wells in the usual sense of the word. As the article states, the wells are used to dispose of spent fluids which were used for fracking somewhere else. The editors should also be ashamed that they put such a misleading title to elicit a response by the public against fracking. The public can not make an informed decision regarding policy decisions with these misinformed and slanted articles out there. But then again, journalism and English majors tend to be uneducated about science and technology, and are some of the lowest paid people out there, so what can we really expect?
04:32 AM on 03/19/2011
I am sure no one had a problem with the title or the explanation in the article except for you. What I do have a problem with, however, is you saying we can't make an informed decision "with these misinforme­d and slanted articles out there," and then you give absolutely no explanation of what's missing from the article. Obviously you must envision another solution to getting rid of the wastewater than injecting it AS THE ARTICLE CLEARLY SAYS WAS THE PROBLEM THAT MAY BE RELATED TO THE QUAKES. So what is it? If you want to drink it, I'm sorry to say you're just going to have to spell that out very slowly for all of us poorly-paid journalism and English majors who tend to be uneducated about science and technology. Because otherwise we might assume you don't have a solution at all.
06:28 AM on 03/19/2011
"then you give absolutely no explanatio­n of what's missing from the article."

Let me assist. Mr. Ausbrooks, the geoscientist, falls into the same trap that the author of the article has. He, or by omission of the author, does not give any reason for his hesitance to make the connection that a large majority of non-scientists have. There is a coincidence there, but is it material?

I have posted above a geological reason for that skepticism, as my 43 years in the profession allows me.
04:31 AM on 03/18/2011
Maybe...wait for it...earthquakes cause fracking wells!!

Get the GOP to pass a bill to deny earthquakes ...problem solved.
08:29 AM on 03/19/2011
Oh, for god's sake. We had it all backwards and maybe we even need more earthquakes. And I have to tell you that since yesterday such a load has been lifted off my mind. If I had only realized that a simple committee vote denying global warming was all that was necessary to fix the planet, I would have been lobbying for it tooth-and-nail years ago.
11:43 AM on 03/17/2011
Liquids lubricate starta. It's happened again and again but each time it's a hand slap to the forehead and an exclamation of "wow, who'd have thought it?"
11:04 PM on 03/17/2011
O hell...in other words the injection wells were causing earthquakes!

thanks for the unreal info homie !!!
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
12:46 PM on 03/18/2011
Fracking fluids don't lubricate strata. You're making that up. It's not disconnected layers between different types of rocks. It's different types of rock layers fused together as one.
08:41 AM on 03/19/2011
Need a source saying that the entire state of Arkansas is metamorphic rock, or whatever type it is you're contending, and that there's a solid layer beneath all of these frakking sites without openings or fissures. Because you didn't exactly prove that fracking fluids don't lubricate strata, all you said was it's one big layer.

I'm basically expecting you prove to us there's a giant pancake in the shape of the state hanging down there. Oh, the injection wells can't permeate the pancake, another rule.

I'm just skeptical because there's a lot of frakking going on all over in Colorado, and our rock types vary enormously. I would be very interested and surprised to see a source saying that Arkansas is uniform, which of course would not prove your statement about fracking fluids not lubricating, but it would at least prove your last sentence.
10:16 AM on 03/17/2011
No earthquakes before no earthquakes after. Weird.
11:26 AM on 03/17/2011
not as weird as your post
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
senorlou
10:09 AM on 03/17/2011
Go frack yourself.  Sorry, had to do it.
Natural gas = not green energy.
Solar and wind = green energy
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:23 PM on 03/17/2011
Especially since shale gas deposits tend to drop off much quicker than regular natural gas deposits. This whole fracking fad won't last long as energy companies recognize that the discoveries were hyped. It won't change the fact the Peak NG in the US was several years ago. It's not a good idea to bet on something that's already in decline.
07:38 AM on 03/18/2011
Till natural gas prices rebound, and they will driven by economic demand. Reduction in coal-fired electricity and high oil prices will trigger a return. Unfortunately renewables will not grow fast enough.
08:43 AM on 03/19/2011
You're such a spoilsport. I would much rather the federal government throw millions of its very scarce r&d dollars into making fracking safe, and maybe we should also subsidize the unfortunate natural gas companies in the interim. NOT.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
senorlou
09:58 AM on 03/17/2011
Pouring acid deep underground is dumb.  We've probably caused the giant earthquake in Haiti with our deep water oil wells, and we're causing quakes in Arkansas (4.7) because we want to suck out the gas from underneath the Earth - and so let's pour acid into the aquifers, let's let the gas pumps leak gas.  I heard the Honda Civic GX (runs on natural gas) got the #1 green car award this year.  WHo cares if the gas used in it came from fracking and has a habit of seeping into our atmosphere?  So long as the energy companies brainwash us into thinking natural gas is clean energy, and is the future, they'll make bucks.
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
12:52 PM on 03/18/2011
You forgot to point out that we had a huge earthquake in Japan and shortly after the wells in AK were shut down, there weren't any more earthquakes of that size.