iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Army Training Slides Outline 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Implementation


First Posted: 03/16/11 06:51 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Army has released its marching orders to train soldiers on how military life will look after the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy banning openly gay service members.

In a 30-page PowerPoint presentation obtained by HuffPost, the Army will enumerate for its troops -- from the front lines in Afghanistan to those sitting behind a desk back home -- the basics of how repeal will work, while underscoring that its purpose is "NOT to change beliefs."

Each military branch is writing its own training slides, and the Army version resembles previously released materials prepared by the Navy
and the Air Force.

All of them hammer home on each page the mandate from Pentagon leaders that change will come with, "Leadership -- Professionalism -- Discipline -- Respect."

Last fall, the Pentagon outlined the basics of how it would implement President Barack Obama's promised repeal of DADT in a 95-page report that accompanied a much larger review of the issue.

In December, Congress repealed the 17-year-old policy, and the next month, the Pentagon outlined the steps it would take to comply with the new law.

The military services began training senior officers, chaplains, lawyers and counselors on the new policy last month. But the bulk of troops will be briefed on how openly gay service members will be integrated over the next few weeks.

The Army, the largest of the services, plans to train its 565,000 active-duty troops by mid-July and 567,000 members of the Guard and Reserve by mid-August.

That isn't fast enough for Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network.

"We believe training can be wrapped up by the end of next month," Sarvis said, noting that there will be an additional 60 days for training that may take place after the White House and Pentagon leaders certify the military is good to go on repeal.

Among the "guiding principles" laid out in the Army slides: "standards of conduct apply to everyone regardless of sexual orientation," soldiers should "treat each other with dignity and respect" and "there is no expectation to change religious or moral views."

The document also notes that the Defense of Marriage Act, which Democrats in Congress launched a campaign to overturn on Wednesday, will still bar soldiers in legally sanctioned same-sex marriages from receiving spousal medical, housing and other benefits taken for granted by straight service members.

Alex Nicholson, the executive director of the gay-rights group Servicemembers United, said the Army training presentation appeared to be in line with those prepared by the other branches.

"What needs further reinforcing, however, is the notion that other types of rule violations should not be used carelessly to try to trump up charges against gay and lesbian troops, as is being done in one prominent Navy case right now in South Carolina," Nicholson said. "All branches need a stronger emphasis on the fact that 'misconduct' does not have one definition for gay troops and another definition for straight troops."

And for troops who can't stand the new rules? Follow orders anyway. As one slide notes, there is, "No policy for early discharge based on: Opposition to repeal (or) Opposition to serving or living with gay, lesbian or bisexual Service members."


DADT Slideshow

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Army has released its marching orders to train soldiers on how military life will look after the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy banning openly gay service members. In ...
WASHINGTON -- The Army has released its marching orders to train soldiers on how military life will look after the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy banning openly gay service members. In ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chiefpayne
06:50 AM on 04/16/2011
Ok...now let's LOOK at this. There are no separate quarters, facilities, etc. And those who disagree are NOT going to be allowed to get out early. Sounds like a recipie for problems to me. Of course that will only be for about 6 years or so, at best. After that, those who disagree will not re-up and that will resolve the issue.

Of course, given the percentage that Gates gave Congress, you're looking at about 180,000 from the active military across the board and about 180,000 from the reserves and Guard. AND that was before the budget battle showing soldiers their pay could be stalled AND before DoD comtemplating putting women in ALL Military Occupational Skills (MOSs) to include combat arms. (As a side note - from the time there were a total of 13,650 soldiers discharged from the combined services from 1993 -2010 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_ask,_don't_tell).

So I DO wonder just how many soldiers we will ACTUALLY lose when all of this is said and done...not that anyone here will actually care...unless a DRAFT is required to maintain a manned military.

Still, it should be interesting to see how this plays out.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnotherTry
Tell me again why we can't be equal?
08:49 AM on 03/17/2011
So the gist is: gays will be treated like everyone else, but their spouses will not. And why is this taking so long to implement? The big change is basically 'stop discriminating.' That can happen tomorrow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
06:26 AM on 03/17/2011
Both DOMA and DADT sre unAmerican and should die. If you dont like it, if you dont like equal rights, move to France with Johnny Depp.
04:49 AM on 03/17/2011
This story reminds me of the Flintone's cartoon opening song...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
01:11 AM on 03/17/2011
> "Leadership -- Professionalism -- Discipline -- Respect."

With the right leadership, professionalism and discipline, respect would follow as a matter of course.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neighborhoodmole
no one really knows who anyone is here
12:24 AM on 03/17/2011
I wonder if this may hasten the repeal of DOMA when enough service members get outraged that some of their comrades are not getting treated equal with benefits. Once people are allowed to be open and talk about their personal lives and loves, the discrimination will become painfully obvious. The reason that the military gives support to spouses and families is it makes the service members more effective when they aren't separated more than necessary and they don't have to worry about their loved ones. If gay partners can't get that, everyone in the unit is going to know about it and feel bad, so it will end up hurting everyone's morale. It will become a national security issue to repeal DOMA. Want to bet the Republican's will then try to take credit for that and deny they ever opposed repeal?
12:13 AM on 03/17/2011
No change of living arrangements for for Gay Military personnel? It amazes me that the American public's opinion can change Military policy, but there is no consideration for the Military members feelings on how living with an openly gay person might make for an uncomfortably living arrangement.
12:28 AM on 03/17/2011
I've been in the military for 7 years, and rooming with someone of a different sexual orientation than me would rank pretty low on the list of "worst living arrangements" that has been forced on my by the military so far.

Trust me, if being forced to have a roommate you don't like is your biggest concern in the military, you've got it pretty good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chiefpayne
07:06 AM on 04/16/2011
Ok...just to play devil's advocate, since you've been in the Army for 7 years:

What is the difference between a heterosexual male rooming with a homosexual male and a female rooming with a heterosexual male?

Answer for me is, there IS no difference. And if you follow the logic of the Army which is "perception is reality" then you have to agree there is no difference as well.

SO...if homosexuals and heterosexuals are to be roomed together regardless of sexual orientation, WHY not room males and females regardless of sex? Seems logical to me.
02:50 AM on 03/17/2011
Visit a college campus. Dorms are filled with straight students who are sharing rooms with gay roomies. If college kids can handle the "living arrangements" for those that are openly gay...I'll just bet our military can work through this.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
11:48 PM on 03/16/2011
I think the narrative runs something like this: The military, for years, has been something of an 'old boys club', in which certain rules, norms, and standards are/were generally observed. And, once upon a time, it was a white man's army. Then, that changed. Then, they let women into the service. And, they've had gays in the service for years, but are now starting to be open about it. But, what's so evil, immoral, about having gays in the service? They go about their daily doings in real life in the civilian world without upset, are they now some hidden foreign threat, ready to subvert our Nation's military and drive down the colors at midnight? Well...no, they're people, people that probably feel like they made a mistake by joining a service that treats them with such disrespect. 

To be sure, military service is still generally equated with strength, power, and great virility, musclebound men ready to take on evildoers everywhere, but it takes all kinds to make a world, a country, and a military, and even if someone's gay, if they had the gumption to sign their name on the dotted line and hold up their hand and say "I do", well, if their conduct is not deemed unbecoming by either general or rank-and-file, then they should be permitted to continue to serve, or enlist in the service, if that is their choice. But, I think that for those persons in our military who've had enough of being harassed, hazed, and so forth, the door should also be open for them to leave under honorable conditions. 

Should gays be permitted to serve in the armed forces? I believe they should. If gays are not to be exempted from selective service, the foundation for the draft, then they should be permitted to enter the armed forces voluntarily as well. It's a free country, an all-volunteer military, and we should be proud of anyone and everyone that has given of their lives to be a part of our Nation's armed forces. Not everyone is 6 feet tall, 300 pounds, with a black book the size of the yellow pages, but all must play their part to contribute to the overall success of the military, and the country as well.
photo
Cory111
Life is truly good...
06:29 PM on 03/17/2011
The hilarious part about this is if they only knew the amount of gays they closely interact with on a daily bases.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chiefpayne
08:04 AM on 04/16/2011
Irrelevant. Since they DON'T know who is gay and who ISN'T, then they have no problem.

The whole point of this (as far as I can tell) is to allow gays to let everyone know they are gay with no repercussions. This makes no sense to me as no one is interested if they are gay or not...and are only uncomfortable showering or living with them if they know they ARE gay.

Now if I am mistaken and the point isn't to make it easy for soldiers to tell someone they are gay for whatever reason and it is just their business and no one else's, then what IS the point of doing away with DADT?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
breakingpoint
War is a Racket - Smedley Butler
11:33 PM on 03/16/2011
cut defense
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tootsie56
help fellow travelers along the way, it comes back
11:28 PM on 03/16/2011
My Dad served w/gay servicemen in Korea, and always sd, "I don't care what your private life is about, do your job and we'll get on fine." he was 17 yrs old when he joined, in his 30's when he left ('cause had a wife and Tootsie to take care of :-) ) but he joined the Reserves 10 yrs later
10:52 PM on 03/16/2011
Wow, this thread is really heavily moderated... scared much? Your repressing alot of posts that don't violate your rules...
10:31 PM on 03/16/2011
We could balance the US budget by selling tickets to watch Homophobes Shadow Box their Fears. Some of the post here tonight seem to be driven by fear and not the knowledge of Human Behavior. No mater how many times you repeat your lies, they won't become truth.
10:20 PM on 03/16/2011
Discrimination is Discrimination, regardless of the reason. People would jump up and down and scream at the top of their lungs if you said Christians couldn't join the military, or get married in the US any more. Or Jewish people, or black people, or white people. How about funny people, or 3rd born sons? Discrimination is evil and unfortunately many people ignore or openly participate in it. To many people are "ok" with discrimination as long as it doesn't target them.