More

China Suspends New Nuclear Power Plans

China Nuclear Power Suspended

By ANGELA CHARLTON   03/16/11 09:52 AM ET   AP

PARIS -- Japan's nuclear crisis reverberated in atomic power-friendly countries Wednesday, with China saying it would hold off on approving new nuclear plants and French lawmakers questioning top energy executives about the safety of their reactors.

Some governments have put their nuclear future on hold, at least for now, as concerns grow even among pro-nuclear governments about reactor safety around the world. Japanese emergency workers are desperately struggling to cool overheating reactors after a series of explosions and amid leaking radiation from a nuclear plant crippled after last week's earthquake and tsunami.

China's Cabinet said Wednesday the government will suspend approvals for nuclear power stations to allow for a revision in safety standards. The State Council said in a statement following a meeting Wednesday that it has ordered the relevant departments to conduct safety checks at existing plants and at those that are under construction.

The suspension and safety checks will allow China's communist leaders to allay any concerns among the public about the safety of nuclear power without derailing plans to double nuclear energy's share of national power generation to high single digits by 2020.

A top Chinese official said earlier this week that Japan's problems would not deter China from expanding nuclear power generation.

China has 13 nuclear power plants in use now and ambitiously plans to add potentially hundreds more. Beijing has been focusing on clean energy generation, including solar, hydropower, wind and nuclear, as one way to reduce the country's reliance on coal, a major pollutant.

In France, the heads of both houses of parliament ordered a legislative investigation into "the future of the French nuclear industry."

An emergency meeting scheduled Wednesday in the lower house of parliament was to include the chiefs of nuclear reactor builder Areva and Electricite de France, the world's biggest operator of nuclear plants.

France was among the few countries to continue developing nuclear power after Chernobyl. It is more dependent on nuclear energy than any other country and its companies market nuclear technology around the world, including to China, Japan and the United States.

European Union energy officials agreed Tuesday to apply stress tests on plants across the 27-nation bloc and Germany moved to switch off seven aging reactors.

In Spain, Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero told reporters Wednesday that studies have been commissioned to determine how vulnerable his country's six nuclear plants are to earthquakes or flooding.

____

Associated Press writers Gillian Wong in Beijing and Daniel Woolls in Madrid contributed to this report

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

PARIS -- Japan's nuclear crisis reverberated in atomic power-friendly countries Wednesday, with China saying it would hold off on approving new nuclear plants and French lawmakers questioning top ener...
PARIS -- Japan's nuclear crisis reverberated in atomic power-friendly countries Wednesday, with China saying it would hold off on approving new nuclear plants and French lawmakers questioning top ener...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 106
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
imtruthmonger
Mongering for the common good! Omit Mitt!
01:21 PM on 03/30/2011
The above picture suggests that in the current state of the structures construction it could easily be converted into a small arena with enough seating for a number of children.

A maypole in the center would look about right but I'm sure that others would have additional ideas.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:12 PM on 03/19/2011
China leads the world in roof solar panels, that is the way to go. China leads the world in recycling everything instead of dumping: That's the way to go. Chinas has plenty of room for offshore wind: that is also the way to go.
10:07 AM on 03/21/2011
Not really. China got 12,210 MW of installed photovoltaic capacity.
Germany got around 17,000 MW installed.
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
09:20 PM on 03/19/2011
So they will start opening 2 coal plants a week instead of the one a week they do now!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:12 PM on 03/19/2011
solar wind and waste. get real.
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
03:45 PM on 03/22/2011
The Chinese build that stuff to sell to us not for their use!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:25 AM on 03/18/2011
China makes over 55% of all the solar cells on the planet but exports 99% of them as late as 2007! Do you think they might consider installing some for their own use? I hear because of all the smog they have to be clean regularly and quickly lose efficiency.

Kind of a catch 22!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:34 PM on 03/17/2011
They invented paper, gun powder, and bureaucratic, they ain''t stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blabberator
Who cut the cheese?
05:49 PM on 03/17/2011
China has been prudent in its proliferation of nukes and they are yards ahead of America in designing and using alternative power sources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:26 AM on 03/18/2011
exporting is not the same as using!
photo
BornOKtheFirstTime
pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo
11:56 AM on 03/17/2011
How little most of the posters seem to understand Chinese natural resource and energy policy strategy. This announcement was merely intended to further rattle the uranium and uranium mining markets so that the Chinese can buy up more at cheaper prices. China is going to go ahead full tilt with nuclear power as will the rest of the world--just not with antiquated plants with major design flaws situated on major fault lines. The antinuclear hysteria will die down once again.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:35 PM on 03/17/2011
Nonsense, China leads the world in solar power. Nuke power is dead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:27 AM on 03/18/2011
I'm buying uranium stock it's down now!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:13 PM on 03/19/2011
a fool and his money.....Nukes are dead: sell.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
go2goal
Business Consultant
11:44 AM on 03/17/2011
The US decides as our Corporations allow us.....too much could be lost in profits if we were to wake up like the rest of the world and freeze any plans to build new nukes. Whether it be Obama, Bush, or Mickey Mouse....corporations are running our government and our country.

But when the Tea baggers say take back out country....the last thing they're talking about is taking it back from corporations and blind eyed push to maximize profit and to heck with everything else. That is exactly why we need a strong government....for the people. Because the greed factor and the push to max. profit is the only thing that corporations know.
11:38 AM on 03/17/2011
Sounds like China is taking the visionary approach to energy while the US continues to lag behind. It's time to step up and do what's right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:59 PM on 03/17/2011
Or not. Peak Uranium is expected before 2040 so they will be screwed then, stuck with an obsolete technology and rising uranium prices.
Wind energy is cheaper than nuclear today and has better EROEI. If you have many wind turbines and a good grid between them, intermittent availability is evened out and a low risk than can be covered with quick start natural gas plants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:30 AM on 03/18/2011
I was looking at several different contracts for wind energy they average about over $0.20/kwh from Maryland to Maine.
10:55 AM on 03/17/2011
that is a scary thought. chinese quality and nuke power plants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:30 AM on 03/18/2011
We already get their smog in California!
08:51 AM on 03/17/2011
The United Corporations of America will be behind on this issue too.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
12:34 AM on 03/17/2011
Even if it ends up in only the #2 slot, it is clearly reason for concern – quite enough concern for all of the world to demand its leaders lead.

China's seems to gather get that. Our leaders, however, continue to be slobbering bulls led about by the industrial rings in their collective nose and the smell of dollars in their reelection trough.

That smell of fresh green fodder has taken over what little brain they have, and they would rather fodder down than raise their head to question the relicensing the industry is pursuing - - Dennis Kucinich, Barbara Boxer, and Ed Markey now being the most sensible voices in this blur of media noise and congressional timidity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:37 PM on 03/16/2011
It is difficult to get rid of a nuclear reactor once it is built and hooked up to the system, but after this latest nuclear disaster I suspect few new reactors will make it off of the drawing boards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:47 AM on 03/18/2011
I'm for nuclear energy just don't want the reactors on land. What percentage of the world's population lives within 200 miles of the coast? What percentage of Americans?

Build them on ships, safe from earthquakes, safe from tsunami's, safe from melt down!

Use them for electricity but also use them for desalination of water! Extract precious and rare earth metals and use them to make hydrogen for transportation using fuel cells!

Remember the hospital ship called HOPE? Imagine one of these water making power making ships showing up after a natural disaster! With power and water there is always HOPE!

At the end of their service life seal them and then sink them on a subducting tectonic plate over 10's of thousands of years it will make it's way to the trench and return the now very low level reactive waste back to the mantel. The ultimate recycling technology!
photo
Harvee Wallbanger
Republicans... I got no use for you.
04:59 AM on 03/19/2011
Ships are not totally immune to the effects of mother nature. They are subject to the whims of the weather. Unless you talking about something with the displacement and stability of an aircraft carrier. Bad weather can even impact their operation. I would hate to see a city relying on a ship in its port for electricity and then every time a bad storm blows in they lose their power source. Or possibly given a big enough tsunami wake up to find it beached on what was somebody's front lawn - lol.

But your idea is not totally without merit. There could be some commercial enterprise in it.
shylove2
warfare state is pathological
08:31 PM on 03/16/2011
Of course they should, the Japan Syndrome is nothing to scoff at!!!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]