iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jan Schakowsky Introduces Bill To Raise Taxes For Wealthiest Americans

Jan Schakowsky

First Posted: 03/16/11 09:37 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) announced legislation on Wednesday that would create new tax brackets for earners who make significantly more than the baseline for the current top income bracket.

Currently, the top marginal tax rate of 35 percent applies to income starting at $373,650, and the tax code fails to distinguish between earners making a few hundred thousand dollars a year and those making a few hundred million dollars a year. "LeBron James and LeBron James’s dentist: same difference," New Yorker financial columnist James Surowiecki quipped last year during early debate over the extension of the tax cuts enacted under former President George W. Bush.

Meanwhile, income inequality continues to soar, as Schakowsky, one of the 18 members of President Barack Obama’s debt commission, noted on Wednesday.

“In the United States today, the richest 1 percent owns 34 percent of our nation’s wealth -- that’s more than the entire bottom 90 percent, who own just 29 percent of the country’s wealth,” she said during her prepared remarks at a press conference. “And the top one-hundredth of 1 percent now makes an average of $27 million per household per year. The average income for the bottom 90 percent of Americans? $31,244."

Schakowsky's bill would create new tax brackets for earners making between $1 million and $1 billion annually, with tax rates starting at 45 percent with the millionth dollar and increasing on a sliding scale. The legislation would also tax capital gains and dividend income as ordinary income for those earning over $1 million in a given year. A full list of the new brackets appears below:

$1-10 million: 45%

$10-20 million: 46%

$20-100 million: 47%

$100 million to $1 billion: 48%

$1 billion and over: 49%

If enacted in 2011, Schakowsky's Fairness in Taxation Act would raise an estimated $78.9 billion in its first year, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, a liberal lobbying group. CTJ was unable to provide further projections, however.

Reps. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) and Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, partnered with Democratic Reps. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (Ill.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Bob Filner (Calif.), Jerry Nadler (N.Y.), Steve Cohen (Tenn.), John Yarmuth (Ky.) and Peter DeFazio (Ore.) to cosponsor the bill.

“The middle class is shrinking and deficits are rising because Republicans are giving a pass to special interests who aren’t paying their fair share," Ellison said at the press conference. "This bill is part of a plan to level the playing field.”

As the battle over the budget for the remainder of fiscal year 2011 continues to unfold on Capitol Hill, Schakowsky has been insisting that there are more progressive ways to reduce the country's $13.7 trillion debt. She said she hopes her bill can broaden the focus of the debate, and Yarmuth offered similar sentiments in remarks to reporters Wednesday.

"Yes, we have a spending problem," said Yarmuth, "but we also have a revenue problem. We're only asking that those of us who have done extremely well bear our fair share of the problem."

Yarmuth told reporters that a number of his Republican colleagues had told him in confidence that it would be difficult for them to vote against Schakowsky's bill were it to come to a vote. "It will just be very interesting if we can get it up to a vote," he said.

A recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that the most popular way to reduce the federal deficit was to place a surtax on federal income taxes for Americans making more than $1 million per year, with 81 percent of respondents agreeing with that statement.

Katharine Myers, a Pennsylvania millionaire who made her fortune off the royalties from the Myers-Briggs personality test created by her mother-in-law, told reporters at Wednesday's press conference that she believes the wealthy should pay substantially higher taxes -- all of them.

"Someone once said, 'Why don’t you donate money to the government?' Well that would be like putting a grain of sand in a beach," Myers said. "It needs to apply to everybody."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) announced legislation on Wednesday that would create new tax brackets for earners who make significantly more than the baseline for the current top income br...
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) announced legislation on Wednesday that would create new tax brackets for earners who make significantly more than the baseline for the current top income br...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,213
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (54 total)
10:12 PM on 04/19/2011
"You're Going to Wreck the Nation": Wrecking Economy a Planned Hit by Washington DC_Corporates: http://tinyurl.com/2btzjql
06:49 PM on 04/02/2011
Since the Supreme Court has decided that corporations are "people" I think it only fair that their incomes be taxed according to this scale as well with its extension on the same "pattern" be the standard.
06:42 PM on 03/26/2011
The republicans are letting the super rich hold back the almost two trillion dollars that they control that was thru our hard work and swett. They are trying to make "WE THE PEOPLE" have a very hard time surviving the ecomony. And they will throw any kind of blocking to make our President look bad.They will try to break "WE THE PEOPLE" down.
photo
Punzelda
Radically Progressive & Magically Delicious
03:02 PM on 03/23/2011
Fairness in Taxation Act is a grand plan! While we're reforming taxes, how about if we address the other gaping hole--corporate tax? Many American companies earn billions and pay little to no taxes. Worse yet, some get tax refunds and huge subsidies (like Bank of America and BP). Kill loopholes, do not allow CEO salaries and bonuses as expenses, and hunt down companies that pay taxes overseas instead of in America when they earn the money in America. American workers pay our taxes every time we buy something--how do corporations get away with selling us unregulated junk for free?
photo
democrats for life
republicans need not apply
04:17 AM on 03/23/2011
not quite high enough, raise it up to at least 75 percent
06:53 PM on 03/21/2011
The problem with Income Taxes is that they don't touch most of the Wealth.
A Wealth Tax, however, does: Switzerland, Norway, Holland, and France have one.

In Norway, those making more than 700,000 a year pay a Wealth Tax of 1% of their Net Worth.

It doesn't take a PHD in Math to figure out that a 1% Wealth Tax in America would raise *Hundreds* of billions of dollars a year -- and who's going to go broke paying 1% more in taxes?
photo
Punzelda
Radically Progressive & Magically Delicious
03:11 PM on 03/23/2011
A wealth tax solves the problem more handily than an income tax and would be a great addition to this plan. Couldn't agree with you more.

I don't think the politicians in office can actually do the math (unless they're counting their bribe money); they think cutting $60 billion from social programs is going to do the trick.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:40 PM on 03/18/2011
THE KOCHS SHOULD PAY THEIRS SHARE, LIKE ALL OF US!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pakulio
What the hell is this?
12:05 PM on 03/18/2011
This sounds like a step in the right direction
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ma Lucille
a crack ~ that's how the Light gets in
11:17 PM on 03/17/2011
must be careful with all that money... remember the last time there was a surplus?
The Gop will see an opportunity to start wars all over the globe... or Wall Street will go on another gambling binge.

"We got plenty of money in Washington. What we need is more priority."
George W Bush - Washington, D.C., June 2, 2008
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:58 PM on 03/17/2011
TThis is how democracy works people. Get involved. Make the super rich pay their share!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
10:30 PM on 03/17/2011
You are quite right.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 PM on 03/17/2011
Contact your representative to support Schakowsky!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:27 PM on 03/17/2011
I wish they would do something like this in France.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
10:30 PM on 03/17/2011
What are the tax rates in France these days?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:01 PM on 03/17/2011
impôt sur le revenu (IR) or tax on income available to an individual varies - from 0% to someone with net income of less than €8,000 & increases gradually to about 30% to those with €20,000-€70,000 & over 40% for those beyond €70,000 roughly - .......can those with €25,000 really afford to pay the same 30% as those with €65,000?...
06:00 PM on 03/17/2011
tax them at 90% for over a billion and 85% for over a million.
First off it would force people to be better with their money, more frugal so to speak.

Why you say? its more than enough even if you are making 1 million a year, that is 150k a year to live on. Plenty.

It takes me back to a thought, 35% of $40k or 1.4% of a $1Million? Sounds fair to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
09:20 PM on 03/17/2011
Remember these are marginal tax rates. You wouldn't pay the 45% until you got to your second million.

I have a good friend with a successful family business that pulls down about 200-300K a year. I know their taxes are high, so I don't know what they net. But they live really, really well. They have a large home which they regularly "improve", two vacation homes, one rental home, a boat, and new cars every two years. In addition to their frequent weekends away to their vacation homes, they take several other vacations, to Europe or the Caribbean, every year, and they hit Vegas a few times a year as well.

Anybody who tells you that they are struggling on a gross income of 200- 300K a year is lying.. or somebody has serious health problems. People can live very large on 200K.
12:08 PM on 03/18/2011
If only your comments were correct MiddleMolly! Try living in a NYC suburban neighborhood with a good school district. Between the cost to purchase and maintain a home, the real estate taxes, the sales taxes, the income taxes (have to love that AMT), the bridge tolls (train ride would be 2 hours for me, each way), babysitting costs, and all the other expenses of raising a couple of kids there is not much left at the end of the day. And I'm at the upper end of your range! I have no second home, take one vacation a year and don't splurge on crazy items. It all depends on where you live.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
02:37 AM on 03/18/2011
Eliminate all deductions for 18 months!
 
Those refusing to pay their share are seditionists!
 
Set up a  Guillotine where that bull is on walstreet!
 
New meaning to street entertainment!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
05:38 PM on 03/17/2011
Finally the start of something more reasonable. I learned that there is around 90-100 million dollars a Year that Multi-National corp do not pay due to tax evasion and loopholes. One of those is Google. The founder got a taxpayer funded education at Stanford then got federal support to start the company. It is really obscene what they do all at the expense of every taxpayer and real small business here in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
09:22 PM on 03/17/2011
Did the Google guys really get government funded educations? And was Google funded with federal support? Is that really true? Do you have a link handy?