iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Libya No-Fly Zone Approved By U.N. Security Council

Gaddafi Benghazi Libya News

EDITH M. LEDERER   03/17/11 10:55 PM ET   AP

UNITED NATIONS — Moving swiftly in response to a request by Arab nations, the U.N. Security Council on Thursday paved the way for international air strikes against Moammar Gadhafi's forces, voting to authorize military action to protect civilians and impose a no-fly zone over Libya.

The council acted five days after the Arab League urged the U.N.'s most powerful body to try to halt Gadhafi's advancing military and reverse the realities on the ground, where rebels and their civilian supporters are in danger of being crushed by pro-government forces using rockets, artillery, tanks and warplanes.

The vote was 10-0 with five countries abstaining including Russia and China, which have veto power in the council, along with India, Germany and Brazil. Russia and China expressed concern about the United Nations and other outside powers using force against Gadhafi, and Germany expressed fear that military action would lead to more casualties.

The United States – which in a dramatic reversal joined the resolution's initial supporters Britain, France and Lebanon – not only helped push for a quick vote but pressed for action beyond creation of a no-fly zone to protect civilians from air, land and sea attacks by Gadhafi's fighters.

"This council moved with remarkable speed in response to the great urgency of the situation on the ground," U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said. "This resolution should send a strong message to Colonel Gadhafi and his regime that the violence must stop, the killing must stop, and the people of Libya must be protected and have the opportunity to express themselves freely."

The resolution bans all flights in Libya's airspace to help protect civilians. It also authorizes U.N. member states to take "all necessary measures ... to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory."

U.S. officials said the resolution provides a strong legal base for enforcing the no-fly zone and for countries to carry out air and sea strikes against Gadhafi's forces.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters in Tunisia on Thursday that a U.N. no-fly zone over Libya would require action to protect the planes and pilots, "including bombing targets like the Libyan defense systems."

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the three criteria for taking action – a demonstrated need, clear legal basis and broad regional support – all have been fulfilled.

"This places a responsibility on members of the United Nations, and that is a responsibility to which the United Kingdom will now respond," he said.

Libya's Deputy U.N. Ambassador Ibrahim Dabbashi, whose support for the opposition spurred many Libyan diplomats around the world to demand Gadhafi's ouster, called on the world to respond "immediately."

"The lives of the civilians are in danger right now and I expect the international community to move quickly," he said.

Britain's U.N. Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant said with the "strong legal base," Britain and a number of other countries in NATO and a number of Arab League countries "will be looking to implement those measures." Diplomats said Arab countries likely to participate in possible strikes include Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan.

In Britain, a lawmaker with knowledge of defense matters confirmed that British forces were on standby for air strikes and could be mobilized as soon as Thursday night. The lawmaker declined to be named because the Defense Ministry has not issued official confirmation.

French Prime Minister Francois Fillon told France-2 Television that France would support military action against Gadhafi within a matter of hours after the resolution was approved.

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said the council had taken "an historic decision" to protect civilians from violence perpetrated by their own government. "Given the critical situation on the ground, I expect immediate action on the resolution's provisions," he said.

Immediately before the vote, France's Foreign Minister Alain Juppe urged adoption of the resolution saying sanctions imposed by the Security Council on Feb. 26 aren't enough and "violence against the civilian population has been redoubled."

"We have very little time left. It's a matter of days. It's perhaps a matter of hours. We should not arrive too late," he said.

In the opposition capital Benghazi, Al-Jazeera satellite TV channel showed a large crowd watching the vote on an outdoor TV projection burst into celebration when the resolution was approved as green and red fireworks exploded in the air.

The resolution came hours after Gadhafi went on Libyan television and vowed to crush the rebellion with a final assault on Benghazi.

In an interview broadcast just before the vote, Gadhafi said, "the U.N. Security Council has no mandate. We don't acknowledge their resolutions." He pledged to respond harshly to U.N.-sponsored attacks. "If the world is crazy, we will be crazy too," he told the Portuguese public Radiotelevisao Portuguesa.

But Libya's Dabbashi said the council's action will make "the people of Benghazi ... feel safe from this time on."

"It is a clear message to the Libyan people that they are not alone, that the international community is with them and is going to help them to protect themselves," he said. "It is also a clear message to Col. Gadhafi and those who are supporting him that there is no place for dictatorship, there is no place for killing the people."

The resolution also calls for stronger enforcement of the arms embargo, adds names of people, companies and other entities to the list of those subject to travel bans and asset freezes, and requires all countries to ban Libyan flights from landing, taking off or overflying their country.

It also demands that Libya ensure the "rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian assistance" and asks U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to establish an eight-member panel of experts to assist the Security Council committee in monitoring sanctions.

Russia and China had expressed doubts about the United Nations and other outside powers using force against Gadhafi, a view backed by India, Brazil and Germany who also abstained.

Germany's U.N. Ambassador Peter Wittig expressed fear that using military force could lead to "the likelihood of large-scale loss of life."

___

Associated Press writers Anita Snow at the United Nations, Jamey Keaten in Paris and Paisley Dodds and Sylvia Hui in London contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

UNITED NATIONS — Moving swiftly in response to a request by Arab nations, the U.N. Security Council on Thursday paved the way for international air strikes against Moammar Gadhafi's forces, voti...
UNITED NATIONS — Moving swiftly in response to a request by Arab nations, the U.N. Security Council on Thursday paved the way for international air strikes against Moammar Gadhafi's forces, voti...
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,001
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (115 total)
12:37 PM on 03/19/2011
Yay another war, another war president, and another big heaping of 'Blowback' headed our way.
01:06 AM on 03/19/2011
Hugo Chavez is against any American or NATO action in Libya. Don't you libs worship him?
01:07 AM on 03/19/2011
Wait. I think that libs don't like him anymore because he's insulted Obama. When he only insulted Bush, that was okay.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:58 PM on 03/18/2011
Why Libya and not Bahrain? Is it really the Libyan people who want Gaddafi out or was this mess orchestrated by the west? And now a no-fly zone? Here comes the next round of U.S. (disguised as UN) ki___ngs.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
10:15 PM on 03/18/2011
Bahrain's on the "nice" list. Libya's on the "naughty" list. If you're on the "nice" list you get a free pass.
07:54 PM on 03/18/2011
Why hasn't the U.N. called for similar action in Darfur? Is it because they have no oil?
05:56 PM on 03/18/2011
To get the Nobel PEACE Prize, doesn't that mean you try to have PEACE?
05:59 PM on 03/18/2011
Using the military sure doesn't sound like PEACE to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
03:47 PM on 03/18/2011
Politicians like to say that military action will bring, freedom, stability and prosperity.

I say
How many schools have been built with bombs?
How have tanks contributed to women's rights movements?
How are checkpoints and raids by foreign soldiers contributing to freedom? 
How does war bring peace?


Double speak is the demon of society, a tool to manipulate the masses into thinking that doing the opposite is the solution. All they need is an international community that does not intervene, but stands behind the ones who struggle for freedom. Not with their weapons, but with their minds and hearts.

SilentSolidarity
12:04 PM on 03/18/2011
Finally - even my country has 6 fighter jets on the way to Libya! A No Fly Zone doesn't have to be an act of war - but women and children should never be put into this type of danger.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
11:20 AM on 03/18/2011
I am a believer in the power of non-violence, and so I think there may have been a non-violent way to address this crisis.

However, I am also a believer in protecting people, and this no fly zone (an act of war) is clearly warranted under the UN mandate. It is also supported by the majority of nations on the Security Council. Even China and Russia didn't vote against it (they abstained - which is huge and positive)

Additionally, as I understand it, even the Arab League endorsed a NFZ earlier this week.

There has been a huge international outcry to protect those demonstrators in Libya who have been calling for reform.

Also, it was doubtful that the Libyan opposition would have survived much longer.

Given the options, this is probably the best that could be done, and Britain, France (and the U.S., whoc pushed for this, but who is seeming to let others do the heavy lifting right now) should be commended.

The question for me remains, what about Saudi Arabia and other U.S. allies who are very repressive and brutal, and who are crushing demonstrators in their own nations? Will we come to the aid of those demonstrators?
01:44 PM on 03/18/2011
This is why Libya is so important..Dictators have a choice when the people come calling..They can abdicate power in a peaceful way or they can turn the machine of war on their own people.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
11:16 AM on 03/18/2011
So what are rebels who are no longer rebelling?
11:10 AM on 03/18/2011
they want freedom for themselves,,,

will they grant it to the non-muslims in their countries???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Coco Morgan
Retired. Living off-grid in Belize.
10:22 AM on 03/18/2011
You know, Ghadhafi could get a new chance at stardom. Hollywood and Bollywood are always looking for new villains, and he certainly looks the part.
10:12 AM on 03/18/2011
as IF,,, they will grant and enforce EQUAL RIGHTS for non-muslim­s,,,

do not send them help,,, send them to HELL,,,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
11:07 AM on 03/18/2011
That's incredibly ignorant and bigoted - and of course cruel and heartless. WWJD dude.
12:06 PM on 03/18/2011
Never mind Jesus!! What would a human being do?? What is wrong with you? Ignorance and arrogance - what an attitude.
02:36 PM on 03/18/2011
yes,,, these people denying equal rights to non-muslims are,,,

incredibly ignorant and bigoted - and of course cruel and heartless.

WWMD dudette,,,

oh yah,,, he rape plundered, pillaged and slaughtered all non-muslims,,,

but you knew that already,,,
04:53 PM on 03/22/2011
wow, such hate
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Aim high, allow for the wind, land on target.
10:04 AM on 03/18/2011
Did you notice how he waited before he invaded Benghazi giving the rebels time to Surrender.
Or was it he was waiting to see who would Veto the UN Vote.
If Ahmadinejad is complaining about the Troops in Bahrain . Things must be bad . I mean bad.
When they start shooting protesters on the street in broad daylight.
Is this good TV for the Rebels.
Big sacrifice. The world is watching.
Now a days revolution gets World attention.
Although a Dalli Lama Monk burned himself Yesterday it did not get much coverage like the happening in Tunisia.
09:45 AM on 03/18/2011
New sub-main
09:47 AM on 03/18/2011
Gaddafi the chi.cken man!
09:48 AM on 03/18/2011
What's that?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Coinyer101
King of Doobiestan
09:34 AM on 03/18/2011
I'm still a little stunned that the UN was able to agree to something with no vetoes.....,
 
Keydaffy must be feeling very isolated, right about now...,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneTop
Uh, is that a beer hall?
09:40 AM on 03/18/2011
He probably does, although he has been there before and knows full well how to turn it around in his favour.

Right or wrong, he has big money and that Oil thing of which is in high demand from his Western friends. Well, a month ago they were friends.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Coinyer101
King of Doobiestan
09:43 AM on 03/18/2011
They're already divvyin' up his stuff , man..., lol
09:42 AM on 03/18/2011
Maybe none of them wanted to be on record as vetoeing military action against a leader they have referred to the International Cri minal Court. Maybe they were worried they might end up in that court themselves, charged with not preventing gen0cide when they could have. You never know.
09:44 AM on 03/18/2011
I mean w ar crimes and crimes against humanity.