More

NPR Funding Targeted: House Votes To Defund National Public Radio

03/17/11 11:18 PM ET   AP

Npr Funding
The House has voted to cut NPR funding.

WASHINGTON — The House on Thursday voted to end federal funding to National Public Radio. Republican supporters said it made good fiscal sense, and Democratic opponents called it an ideological attack that would deprive local stations of access to programs such as "Car Talk" and "All Things Considered."

The bill, passed 228-192 along mainly partisan lines, would bar federal funding of NPR and prohibit local public stations from using federal money to pay NPR dues and buy its programs. The prospects of support in the Democratic-controlled Senate are slim. Seven Republicans broke ranks to vote against the bill.

NPR received almost $5 million in federal funding in fiscal year 2010. In that year its revenues also included $2.8 million in dues and $63 million in programming fees from local stations, its largest single source of revenue. Under the bill, stations would still be allowed to buy NPR programs using private funds and use federal funds to produce their own programs.

"It is time for American citizens to stop funding an organization that can stand on its own feet," said Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., the sponsor. He said it was not a question of content – which many conservatives say has a liberal bias – but whether taxpayer dollars should go to nonessential services. "As a country we no longer have this luxury."

Other Republicans also denied that the measure was a vendetta against NPR, although the organization left itself open to conservative attacks last week when an executive, talking to conservative activists posing as members of a fake Muslim group, was caught on camera deriding the tea party movement and saying the NPR would be better off without federal funding. Both the executive and the president of NPR resigned after the incident.

"Nobody's on a rampage," said Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., who also asked "why should we allow taxpayer dollars to be used to advocate one ideology?"

Democrats retorted that the legislation would do nothing to reduce the deficit and would be a blow to local public stations that rely on the national programs that include "Morning Edition" and "Wait, Wait... Don't Tell Me" to attract listeners. "This bill would pull the plug," said Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass. "It would snuff out stations from coast to coast, many in rural areas where the public radio station is the primary source of news and information."

Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., displayed a blow-up photo of the two brothers who host the car advice show "Car Talk" with the caption, referring to their nicknames, reading "Save Click and Clack."

The White House said it "strongly opposed" the bill and voiced similar objections, saying "undercutting funding for these radio stations, notably ones in rural areas where such outlets are already scarce, would result in communities losing valuable programming, and some stations could be forced to shut down altogether."

The move to curtail federal subsidies for NPR follows a House vote last month, as part of the GOP plan to cut federal spending for the remainder of this budget year, to take back some $86 million budgeted for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the parent organization of NPR. That proposal, which also faces opposition in the Senate, eliminates $430 million in planned future spending for CPB.

In a statement following the vote, CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison said Americans "overwhelmingly agree that public broadcasting is a service worthy of the federal government" and "rather than penalize public broadcasting, the debate should focus on strengthening and supporting this valuable national asset."

In fiscal years 2009 and 2010 the CPB distributed federal grant money to more than 600 public radio stations, which used that money to buy programs and pay dues to NPR.

NPR says that of its $145.5 million in budgeted revenues in the fiscal year ending last September, only 1. 9 percent came from station dues. The biggest chunk, $63 million or 43 percent, came from station program fees. Another $36 million, or 24.7 percent, was derived from corporate sponsorships. About 3 percent came from grants from federally funded agencies such as the CPB and the National Endowment for the Arts.

____

The bill is H.R. 1076.

Online:

Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,451
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (133 total)
  1 of 11  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
SilentSolidarity 01:45 AM on 03/18/2011
It's obvious why the Republican Party wants to get rid off NPR and PBS funding.
The media moguls that rule private news broadcasting are against taxes, thus tend to side with the right-wing policies of the GOP. If the GOP manages to completely privatize the news, most Americans will have no other choice than believe all the right-wing bias on NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN and of course FOX News.

Comparing  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ProfessorDuh
09:54 AM on 03/21/2011
If anything defines what’s wrong with the supposed “left-wing media” it’s NPR: condescending yet mealy-mouthed, dedicated to stuffing the most startling of conservative usurpations through the deflavorizing machine, and when criticized, as resolute as a discarded straw wrapper in a hurricane.
— Keith Olbermann
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kiksadi50
01:52 PM on 03/21/2011
Yeah.The fault of the entire left Wing media (whatever that is ) is NPR.Sounds just like Palin & her mantra on the "lamestream" etc.Kind of a generalization.NPR is what it is.I like some of it,I don't like some of it.Sort of like Olbermann's old show or Air America.I like that it's there though.I think private funding will empower NPR to shape a more creative independent identity.Having worked for many non-profits dependent on funding & grants to exist,the pressure to renew that funding influences programming.No single source can represent left wing media.Look at NPR's history.They have played a very important role in the media for many,many yrs.I hope they continue to contribute.They got rid of juan williams didn't they?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ProfessorDuh
03:11 PM on 03/21/2011
NPR’s refusal to fight corruption and expose fasclst political corruption in the U.S. is what is going to kill them. Because the Republicans fully intend to kill them off. They want all voices silenced but their own, no matter how innocuous.
Olbermann, at least, is a fighter. NPR just cringes and takes its beatings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
08:28 PM on 03/20/2011
Can the 296,000,000 people who DON'T watch Faux News defund that network??
photo
morefreethings
fixed income analyst
03:24 PM on 03/21/2011
They dont get any public funding
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
07:58 PM on 03/21/2011
Well, that could be disputed, since it is the official news channel for the GOP. When I listen to NPR I hear people from ALL political persuasions. The Republican News Channel only brings on people from the left/center to set them up as straw men. NPR is the REAL fair and balanced news source, which of course is why the GOP wants to defund it.
07:08 PM on 03/20/2011
"The next important issue the House will address is to outlaw the principle invention of the printing press. Speaker of the House Boehner was overheard to say that this single invention has caused more suffering for the upper classes because it allows the unwashed masses to become educated... and if they are educated they will soon see what a bunch of crooks we all are."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trussia1
kids out of the pool, it's the adult swim
01:03 PM on 03/20/2011
Well, I quess if you're a bagger and want to destroy something that many people like you can hire a tailor made video from O'Keefe and company to do the dirty deed though their badly made and massively edited videos.They are more humerous than ground breaking news. My favorite was the pimp suit. If I'd been there I would of thought Okeefe was a runaway from the Shine Circus.Not exactly the type of response that you want if you're making a "serious" video. I'm sure he is snickering about the edited job he did on NPR now however sooner or later he's going to cross the wrong person and he will receive all that's coming to him and at that time I'll be snickering
10:28 AM on 03/20/2011
The Republicans were sent to Congress to create jobs and focus on the real problems that this country has. This is immature and ridiculous. All they have done so far is spend our taxpayer dollars on partisanship and attacking "liberal organizations". Where are the adults? Why do these politicians care more about attacking the other party than getting things done for the people?

Of all the things that they could use taxpayer money to call an "emergency session" of Congress? Defunding NPR is an "emergency"? We have crisis in the middle east, a banking crisis, a jobs crisis, an energy crisis and this is what they want to focus on? Give me a break. Republicans ... grow up and focus on real problems or go home.
09:39 AM on 03/20/2011
Shame on the GOP for acting like the left wing that NPR clearly is.
I love NPR eyes wide open listen to it because it is unique, and to the left.
Shame on the GOP we don’t need to lower ourselves to play book stifling free though.
That the left literally wrote. The GOP and what it represents is alive and well let NPR be NPR.
08:20 AM on 03/20/2011
So the party of limited federal govt is saying, no fedral funds to public radio, give it to the local stations to do as they see fit, unless they want to buy NPR programs, that they can't do.

Don't give funds to businesses that can stand on their own two feet? Hmmm. Wonder what he thinks of tax breaks for the oil and mining industries?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
03:50 PM on 03/20/2011
Defund Bachmans Family Farm . . . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logic63
03:32 AM on 03/20/2011
So a little punk who faked video caused acorn to go down and the same punk edited a video about npr and our esteemed elected officials go to this extreme? What a bunch of weak sisters and the people who elected them and the ones who sat on their hands in Nov should all be embarrassed.
photo
Vroomfondel
"It's a big club ......... and you ain't in it!"
11:52 PM on 03/19/2011
How did our public airwaves ever erode to the point that one of the most listened-to broadcasts in America is a der@nged former neer do well parsing prophesies from ancient holy books? Oh..that's right..deregulation. That's how. Oh, but it's NPR that is "poisoning the airwaves". I give up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgcarroll
One law for the lion and ox is oppression
09:49 PM on 03/19/2011
Yes, the Republicans are a brave and fair minded crowd, aren't they? They stand astride the mighty Congress, unafraid to stare down the evil truth-prod­ucing radio network. Heroes to the common working CEO, friends to the downtrodde­n arms manufactur­er, protectors of good conservative politicians everywhere­, they bravely push their agenda through the hollowed out halls of justice on behalf of truthiness­, money, and the American corporation.

Somehow, though, I don't buy the story that the Republican party is cutting NPR funding in order to help balance the budget. Somehow their story of their own heroic actions on behalf of taxpayers doesn't sound so heroic to me.
photo
cheo
better a bleeding heart than none at all
06:18 PM on 03/19/2011
I know Harry Reid promised this will not survive the Senate, but the fact is KILLING NPR WILL NOT SAVE JOBS. The phrase "a way to end job-killing spending" or "job-killing" is being put before everything they propose including anti-abortion legislation.
As Steve Benen of The Washinton Monthly says: "This is the problem when congressional Republicans are told to incorporate the word "jobs" into everything they say and do, whether it makes sense or not.
It leads some of the less-skilled members of the GOP caucus to use ham-fisted rhetoric that makes them appear foolish.
Indeed, as Matt Finkelstein noted, 'Hensarling's logic is presumably that all governgovernment spending necessarily impedes job creation, a silly notion that nevertheless has become GOP doctrine."
Quite right. We've reached the point at which congressional Republicans believe
ALL federal investments, even those that directly create jobs, necessarily costs jobs. It's hopelessly backwards, but it's a notion that's come to dominate GOP thought.
For what it's worth, Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) had the good sense to explain that his own party's NPR bill wouldn't actually save taxpayers any money.
"The federal government does not subsidize NPR directly. Instead, the government funds the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a government entity, which has discretion to provide funding to whichever private radio producers it chooses."
06:06 PM on 03/19/2011
The Republicans, however, were not as easily dissuaded from folly. During the debate over Afghanistan, cost was no object. “War is expensive, and it should not be measured in the cost of money,” said Rep. Ted Poe (R-Tex.). But the 0.0001 percent of the budget going to NPR was a fiscal emergency.

It's hard not to cry with logic like that reigning in congress.

Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do.
Benjamin Franklin
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrMandible
No one on the corner has a swagger like us.
04:33 PM on 03/19/2011
They may as well have voted to turn dirt into gold. This legislation is dead on arrival in the Senate.
photo
morefreethings
fixed income analyst
09:02 PM on 03/21/2011
more so than likely, but you might be surprised to find it gets a few votes from the dems. There are many dem senators, including one in my state who are currently looking at doubtful hopes of reelection, who might jump sides to stay in office
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Davis 1
moderate with convictions, techie yet curmudgeon
02:11 PM on 03/19/2011
Many claim bias - challenge your friends to prove it. Like Wisconsin it is not about the budget, so prove the claim with actual facts not faked video.

I started a group If NPR is Biased, Prove it

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_196636283703797

Share it and allow those who believe NPR bias to prove it Listen to one news show for a week discuss any bias
Winedude
Always enjoying fun in the sun...
02:07 PM on 03/19/2011
I don't much listen to NPR and I'm not even sure that a function of government is to provide for public broadcasting. That being said, it's painfully obvious to me that this is a pure grandstand play for the house GOP. It does nothing to help decrease the deficit and therefore has to be purely political because of comments not too favorable to them. I thought that the idea of electing all these Tea-baggers was to put laws into effect that will give people jobs. My job was eliminated in March 2009 and I haven't found a full-time job since then. I'm about out of Unemployment Insurance and have no idea where money will come from in the immediate future.
photo
Brian Gilmer
Respect the bunny.
03:11 PM on 03/19/2011
The Republicans that voted against the measure were TEA Party backed. They correctly judged the bill as un-constitutional. The construct for public radio is that the airwaves are a public resource managed for the common good by the government. A portion of the airwaves are set aside for enrichment. Congress was not supposed to have influence on content. What this bill does it gets directly involved in content by barring a major content provider from selling content to public radio stations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrMandible
No one on the corner has a swagger like us.
04:40 PM on 03/19/2011
I'm sorry to hear about your job, friend. I hope things turn around.

As for NPR, I think it's important for a news source to function outside of capitalist markets. That's not because I hate capitalism, but there is an undeniable style of journalism that it produces (e.g. Fox News, MSNBC, CNN). I'm not even talking about bias so much as I mean shallow reporting and sensationalism.

NPR, for its many faults, can afford to ignore the glitzy celeb stories and sensationalism because it doesn't have to turn a profit. And, in my opinion, that's a good thing. There's a quality to democracy that almost requires an informed citizenry. That's not to say that one must listen to NPR to be informed, but it is certainly one viable way to become informed.

In a larger sense, the government exists to provide services. I believe one of those services ought to be public broadcasting which exist outside of markets.