More

Arkansas 'Fracking' Site Closures Extended As Earthquake Link Studied

Arkansas Fracking Earthquakes

By SARAH EDDINGTON   03/17/11 09:36 PM ET  AP

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- Two natural gas exploration companies agreed Thursday to extend the shutdowns of two injection wells in Arkansas as researchers continue to study whether the operations are linked to a recent increase in earthquake activity, a state commission said.

Chesapeake Energy and Clarita Operating asked to postpone a hearing on the shutdowns before the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission until April 26, said Shane Khoury, deputy director and general counsel for the commission.

The companies had been expected to present testimony to the commission on March 29, after the panel ordered the temporary shutdowns of the wells on March 4. The two injection wells are used to dispose of waste fluid from natural gas production.

"We were going to request that the wells remained shut down (at the meeting on March 29)," Khoury said. "(Both companies) requested a continuance on the hearing until April, and we agreed on the condition that the wells remain closed until that time."

Khoury has said preliminary studies showed evidence potentially linking injection activities with more than 1,000 mostly minor quakes in the region during the past six months.

Clarita Operating has said it does not agree with the commission and it believes the area's seismic activity is a result of natural causes. Clarita has not changed its position, Mickey Thompson, one of the company's partners, said Thursday.

"We still very much believe that the science needs to be heard before any conclusions are drawn," he said.

Thompson said the company is hoping its alliance with Chesapeake Energy, a larger company, will help strengthen its case. Chesapeake also says the earthquakes are likely a natural occurrence.

"The science continues to point to naturally occurring seismicity, but to ensure that we provide the most complete expert analysis, we have agreed with the commission staff to keep our disposal well temporarily closed until the ... April hearing," Danny Games, Chesapeake's senior director of corporate development, said in a statement. "We will continue to work with all parties involved for a resolution, and we are appreciative of the cooperation and constructive exchange."

The area has experienced a noticeable decrease in seismic activity since the injection wells have been closed, said Scott Ausbrooks, geohazards supervisor for the Arkansas Geological Survey. However, he said it is too early to tell if the two events are directly related.

The Center for Earthquake Research and Information recorded around 100 earthquakes in the seven days preceding the shutdown earlier this month, including the largest quake to hit the state in 35 years – a magnitude 4.7 on Feb. 27. A dozen of the quakes had magnitudes greater than 3.0.

In the seven days following the shutdown, there were around 50 earthquakes. Since the wells were shut down, only two quakes have been magnitude 3.0 or greater. The majority were between magnitudes 1.2 and 2.8.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- Two natural gas exploration companies agreed Thursday to extend the shutdowns of two injection wells in Arkansas as researchers continue to study whether the operations are linked...
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- Two natural gas exploration companies agreed Thursday to extend the shutdowns of two injection wells in Arkansas as researchers continue to study whether the operations are linked...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 336
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
11:50 AM on 04/08/2011
Just wondering what's up with this now after the march 29th hearings began....since it is hmm..back at it with bigger quakes again...4.0 yesterday afternoon/evening & 4.2 a bout an hour ago...are they back at it? & to the last sane american...lol...yeah these tiny little quakes every day had slowed dramatically. From watching a few here & there in a day since the suspension compared to dozens upon dozens a day & it also takes more time for it to be able to even tell what's causing it...it cannot be determined in a month...that's not the way the earth works. The 4.7 was the biggest in 35 years in that area which is in the fault zone of the new madrid fault but not ON said fault line...no matter....add 2 more 4+ to that in 2 days now & I can't find any updates anywhere :-/
07:50 AM on 03/25/2011
For those of you hanging on every snippet of information on this riveting story, there have been 28 recorded quakes in the last three days, according to the USGS. They are all located around the town of Greenbrier, several miles distant from either suspended well, and at depths well below the injection level of those wells.

Just thought you would like to know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAGasDriller
11:43 AM on 03/23/2011
Can someone please tell me why HuffPo has been consistently rewording headlines to make it appear as if deep brine water injection wells are SIGNIFICANTLY different than gas wells?

There are 3 or 4 articles on here that all purport in the title that "fracking" is what is causing these earthquakes. All of the articles then go on to mention NOTHING about fracking and correctly identify the wells as injection wells.

Injections wells ARE NOT FRACKED. I repeat.... INJECTION WELLS ARE NOT FRACKED. They are a type of well drilled into an ultra deep salt water aquifer where water/C02 or a host of other liquid wastes are pumped slowly at low pressure into the aquifer.

This it not a result of fracking. At all. Please stop reporting it as such, Huffington Post!
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
10:34 AM on 03/21/2011
Another reader's reply to me below was 'fracking does not cause earthquakes'
May I respectfully ask....why does the headline & story read as such? Why is there so much opposition to the practice? Why have there been 800 quakes in Arkansas & have eased
to 100 more smaller ones since stopping?
Believe this responder...just playing games...This is a serious subject. Not to be taken lightly
07:55 AM on 03/22/2011
800 quakes in 180 days averages about 5 per day, !00 quakes in 20 days equals about 5 per day.

So your point is?

You should also know that at least 2 in the last 10 days were greater than 2.9 and several miles distant from the closed wells.
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
08:27 AM on 03/22/2011
Don't really understand what your opening line
Point was response to other stream of comments below with another(off subject comments)- ( person was just playing around)
Thanks for the info about the last ten days
09:54 AM on 03/21/2011
In PA we have fracking going on near the nuclear power plants. Some of our government officials say "we must do everything we can to encourage natural gas drilling. we don't want to tax them or over regulate them for fear they will leave and we will miss out on jobs and economic benefits." I have said it before and i will continue to say it. It is not only irresponsible to allow this Fracturing of the earth to take place in AK, but doing it in PA near nuclear power plants (out dated i might add) is putting the eastern US in jeopardy. There have been industry people say that hydro fracking is like exploding a massive bomb under ground. I don't know about you but i don't believe it takes a scientist to understand that this could cause major problems in all areas. The decline in earthquakes since the injection wells have closed is enough evidence. The process whether it be fracking, injection, dumping frack fluid, storing waste in frack ponds, the consumption of millions of gallons of water for each well. I can't understand how this is even considered a better energy source with such high risks in all areas. It needs to be stopped where ever it is being done before it's too late for all of us. It doesn't make sense and the industry will never take responsibility for the harm they are doing. It would cost too much money.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
Bianca Befana
...Teach your children well...
09:28 AM on 03/21/2011
What, they just figured out about earthquakes, dead birds & bad drinking water was all caused by fracking? Duh! How "fracking" long will it take for mankind to realize what we are doing? I guess when everything & everyone is practically extinct they will make the connection.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:06 PM on 03/20/2011
people against windfarms argue that they kill migrating birds. I'd rather have a few dead birds that will eventually learn to adjust their flight patterns and oppose to fracking caused earthquakes, exploding nuclear power plants and so called "clean" coal plants.
08:51 PM on 03/20/2011
it is my understanding the Arkansas is a "tsunami-free" zone. Or do you have new information?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:59 PM on 03/20/2011
I am speaking in general, not just Arkansas. Try to keep up
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
06:25 PM on 03/22/2011
It is far from the coast but still could be damaged by earthquakes. When wind farms or solar or geothermal plants are broken in earthquakes only machinery is damaged. When nuclear plants are damaged the effects are huge and can spread risk far away. An earthquake can break containment structures and allow leaks in fuel holding ponds, creating the same problems as in Japan. The used fuel stored in water is part of the problem, not just the reactor itself. When water levels expose the rods, hydrogen can be produced which as in Japan blows up and damages the containment structures. Any explosion spreads radioactivity into the air.
Boomerwoman
Momma said there'd be days like this
10:48 PM on 03/20/2011
Not to mention the quality of the aquafirs and drinking water.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:03 PM on 03/20/2011
this still does not address the issue of nearby residents being able to set their faucet water on fire due to natural gas leaching in to the water supply. Or the matter of waste fluids being pumped into the ground. How exactly is pumping waste fluids into the ground a safe thing to do.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
12:17 PM on 03/20/2011
NO MORE FRACKIN' FRACKING EVER.
THIS IS A REDICULOUS THING TO BE
SPECULATING ON AFTER ALL IT
HAS CAUSED. SO IGNORANT.
Boomerwoman
Momma said there'd be days like this
10:49 PM on 03/20/2011
I guess greed trumps common sense. Sigh.
10:06 AM on 03/21/2011
Unfortunately we can't seem to learn from our mistakes. And if we are waiting for the industry to admit mistakes....well that's where the greed becomes more obvious than i can comprehend. These people are willing to risk EVERYTHING for the profit of few. How and where will they spend all that money when there is nothing left of the world? They are destroying the earth everywhere they are operating. It's insane and yes ignorant.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Angie Cordeiro
We do all things with Grace which empowers us.
11:56 AM on 03/20/2011
November 15-17, 2010
Hilton Hotel
Luxembourg

SCOPE OF WORKSHOP
Induced seismicity deals with man-made ground
shaking due to direct human intervention inside the
Earth such as deep mining, water reservoirs etc.
Earthquakes induced by geothermal exploration
activities, sometimes called deep heat mining, stopped
the multi-million EURO investments in Basel

http://www.emsc-csem.org/Doc/Meetings/ECGS_FKPE_workshop_first_circular.pdf
09:56 AM on 03/20/2011
How long will it take to make our government assess the cost of any proposed source of energy, taking into consideration the cost of the loss of whole areas of the country due to the devastation of pollution?!?! Some time ago 60 Minutes did a segment on Fracking and the pollution of people's wells. This is not an infrequent thing, it seems to be almost universal.

It seems that with all these drilling endeavors the thinking of the company is "What could possibly go wrong?" Such as the deep water drilling that gave us the ruined Gulf waters...

With a variety of green energy sources: solar (getting more efficient all the time), wind (wasn't that the last best energy source T.Boone Pickens was touting?) wave power and several others that just need the govt. to get behind them, there is NO reason to continue to pollute the earth just to line some pockets.

This particular form of pollution is daunting. We can wash the shore birds and find SOME way to suck up all the dispersed oil on the bottom of the Gulf, somehow. But how do you clean the groundwater deep in rock?

This area is close to the New Madrid fault, which when it has a big one, the effects will be widespread. Last one rang the Liberty Bell. Would spread the pollution farther in the groundwater.
09:02 AM on 03/20/2011
P.S. The farmers who will be most affected don't vote Greens, because the Greens are "loonies".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
06:30 PM on 03/22/2011
People who create needless pollution and illness are smart---rrriggghhttt!
09:02 AM on 03/20/2011
This is going on in NSW and QLD in Australia as well. NSW Labor has just come out pre-election against, but they probably won't win. If they do then it may become what we call here a "non-core" promise.

The Greens are the only ones with the courage and integrity to stand against the mining companies.
08:45 AM on 03/20/2011
There is no disclosure in the chemicals used in fracking because they claim it is their intellectual property.

We voted against fracking in NY and will continue to keep up the pressure. The problem is that the supreme court decision to allow Business to give unlimited contributions to politicians.

The politicians hit the lotto and almost all of them now became bottom feeders not caring about America.
Boomerwoman
Momma said there'd be days like this
10:51 PM on 03/20/2011
Greed. Pigs at the trough. TERM LIMITS!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScapeGoat
Facts are stubborn things. Science Rocks!
09:35 AM on 03/21/2011
There are about 280 chemicals normally found in Fracking Fluid. Here are some:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/materials_minerals_pdf/ogdsgeischap5.pdf
CAS# Chemical Name
1330-20-7 Xylene
112-27-6 Triethylene Glycol
75-57-0 Tetramethyl ammonium chloride
68647-72-3 Terpene and terpenoids
68956-56-9 Terpene hydrocarbon byproducts
107-98-2 Propylene glycol monomethyl ether
9003-04-7 Sodium polyacrylate
1310-73-2 Sodium Hydroxide
590-29-4 Potassium formate
1310-58-3 Potassium Hydroxide
191-20-3 Naphthalene
350-00-0 Formaldehyde
64-18-6 Formic acid
25265-71-8 Dipropylene glycol
139-33-3 Disodium Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetate
5989-27-5 D-Limonene
8008-20-6 Kerosene
67647-01-0 Hydrochloric Acid / Hydrogen Chloride / muriatic acid
7722-84-1 Hydrogen Peroxide
95-63-6 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene
108-88-3 Toluene
71-43-2 Benzene
67-64-1 Acetone
79-06-1 Acrylamide
67-56-1 Methanol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
06:32 PM on 03/22/2011
I see one item that may be acceptable in drinking water in small amounts-hydrogen peroxide, the rest are all known toxins.
10:56 PM on 03/22/2011
Thank you for posting this list! I'm glad to see that these socially responsible, eco-friendly corporations have nothing but our best interests at heart. I was so wrong in my suspicions of their priorities. It is obvious they only have our best interests at heart. I mean who wouldn't care for a nice cool glass of formaldehyde laced water? Or how about a nip of kerosene to make that tea go down smoother. Oh, and Benzene! How did you know it's my favorite?