More

Obama Speaks On Libya, Says U.S. Ready To Enforce Sanctions


First Posted: 03/18/11 02:57 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama warned Libya's Muammar Gaddafi Friday to comply with U.N. demands for a cease-fire or face consequences that included military action.

Obama, laying out the rationale for deeper U.S. involvement in Libya's turmoil, said the United States would work with its partners to enforce U.N. demands on Libya but promised that no U.S. ground troops would be involved and that the United States would not use force beyond well-defined goals.

He said the international community's chief goal was to protect Libyan civilians and he called on Gaddafi to withdraw his forces in the eastern part of the country, where they threaten to overwhelm opposition strongholds such as Benghazi.

"All attacks against all civilians must stop," Obama said in his first public comments on the crisis since the U.N. Security Council voted on Thursday to authorize a "no-fly" zone and other steps to help rebels under attack by Gaddafi's forces.

"These terms are not subject to negotiation. If Gaddafi does not comply with the resolution, the international community will impose consequences," Obama said.

Obama, who faces deep misgivings among military planners and lawmakers over any Libyan engagement, said he was driven by deep concern that Gaddafi could commit atrocities if allowed to quash the rebellion, which could further destabilize the entire Middle East.partnership with key European allies as well as Arab countries.

"American leadership is essential, but that does not mean acting alone," Obama said.

"We will provide the unique capabilities that we can bring to bear to stop violence against civilians, including enabling our European allies and their partners to effectively enforce a
no-fly zone," Obama said.

Obama said he was sending Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Paris on Saturday to take part in an international meeting on the next steps.

Clinton said earlier that the immediate goal was stopping violence against civilians.

"We don't know what the final outcome will be. The first and overwhelmingly urgent action is to end the violence," Clinton told reporters.

Obama's comments came after a closed-door meeting with key lawmakers, some of whom have voiced concern the United States was lurching toward involvement in another open-ended conflict in a Muslim country amid a period of unprecedented turmoil across the Middle East.

The shift toward a tougher U.S. stance in favor of military action followed an extended internal debate within the Obama administration over how to stop Gaddafi from routing rebels fighting to end his four-decade rule.

Clinton said the United States remained convinced that any long-term solution in Libya must involve the removal of Gaddafi from power.

(Additional reporting by Steve Holland, Patricia Zengerle)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama warned Libya's Muammar Gaddafi Friday to comply with U.N. demands for a cease-fire or face consequences that included military action. Obama, layin...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama warned Libya's Muammar Gaddafi Friday to comply with U.N. demands for a cease-fire or face consequences that included military action. Obama, layin...
Filed by Cara Parks  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,945
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (77 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
Coinyer101 06:06 PM on 03/18/2011
A lot of Dems supported the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq....., I'm a flamin' liberal, but, I supported the no-fly zone over Iraq all them years, and Saddam was reduced to virtually nothing by the time we invaded.
 
It's when we stay and impose democracy on them that I have a problem with it. Democracy has to be self-determined. It has to be sacrificed for. If not, it ain't held in high  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spartacus1
01:05 AM on 03/22/2011
The faux president and nobel peace prize winner launches the U.S. into its third concurrent war.
02:12 PM on 03/19/2011
At what point do we say YES to drilling for own oil? You guys saw the oil rigs explode and no one could find the oil washing ashore like the media tried to strum up.
02:03 PM on 03/19/2011
And now CNN is reporting that that the_bombing against them is worsening. Heckuva job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:21 AM on 03/19/2011
From the text of the UNSC resolution:
". Authorises member states that have notified the secretary-general, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in co-operation with the secretary-general, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory,"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12782972
-----------------------

No occupation force.

We, including UK and France have used our military might to do a lot of bad things around the world.

This is one of those times when we have a chance to do some good.
We must do this. We must stand by and support human rights. We must show those brave Libyans fighting for human rights that they are not alone.

The least we can do is make it an even playing field by taking out Gaddafi's air force and all the military equipment he is using against demonstrators.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBaker
fictio cedit veritati
01:28 PM on 03/19/2011
I agree! Any attempts to equate Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya with Iraq & Afghanistan of "off base" in more ways than one. The rioting of the past two months was initiated by the people for greater democracy and relief from oppression. That was not the case with Iraq & Afghanistan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 PM on 03/19/2011
Well said.
02:02 PM on 03/19/2011
But when people are being slaughtered and tortured in Iraq, then it's - "Meh, no biggie. No WMD's, let them_die".

Yeah, you Baggies sure are compassionate alright.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 PM on 03/19/2011
I have always been against Iraq war. It was immoral, unnecessary, and we did horrible things in Iraq. That, however, does not men that we should do nothing to help Libyans demanding human rights.

As an aside, by calling me a "Baggie", all you did is display your mental instability. As a result, I would just ignore anything you write in the future, unless you apologize and promise to not do it again. :-)
01:01 AM on 03/19/2011
THIS IS GOING TOO BE A BP FIGHT SO THE
UNITED KINGDOM WITH THE FRANCE WILL TAKE
DOWN GADDAFI .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:15 AM on 03/19/2011
BP already has a contract with Libya.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
If ur neibor wtchs Fox Nws wtch ur neibor
12:59 AM on 03/19/2011
Huh? He's just being an American criminal Republican, that's all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skibum49
12:48 AM on 03/19/2011
This is simply crazy on mutiple levels. Whether we like Gaddafi or not he is as close as it gets to being the 'legitimat­e' leader of a Sovereign country that is presently engaged in a "civil war". There may have been some legitimacy to the concept of enforcing a no fly zone in order to prevent the death of civilians but that ship has already sailed now that the Libyan army has advanced into the eastern part of the country. Under the present logistical conditions Gaddafi can simply keep his airplanes on the ground and finish off the rebels with artilery tanks and ground troops so a no fly zone would have to change to direct air support against Libyan ground forces to provide any benefit to the rebels. In order to have an effective no fly zone "we" would have to neutralize Libya's airforce radar and ground to air missile capability­. Thats going to end of killing people who are not always the bad guys. I can just see the press showing blown up women and children who are part of that Collateral Damage and guess who will get the blame for that in the Arab world? The only way I would support this operation is when I see Fighter bombers from Egypt and Saudi Arabia actively engaged in the operation.
12:39 AM on 03/19/2011
The U.S. needs to stop policing, there is plenty of issues at home so fix that. Libyans will take care of libya
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:16 AM on 03/19/2011
So, you are against helping people fighting for human rights.
02:04 PM on 03/19/2011
Sure. You are not for helping people in the exact same situation in Iraq?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuckles71
My micro-bio says O-Tay!
01:34 AM on 03/19/2011
The US fights for people who can't fight for themselves
12:39 AM on 03/19/2011
Be patience, people. The Average years for Rebels incursion or war in Africa is 10 years. some go even further than that.  The U.S would be there for a long, long time.
 
we will have to make cuts somewhere to pay for these fruitless adventure.
 
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:31 AM on 03/19/2011
Egypt is in Africa.
Just sayin'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBaker
fictio cedit veritati
01:33 PM on 03/19/2011
And Tunisia as well, which kicked off this widespread rebellion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CraiginPhoenix
12:36 AM on 03/19/2011
You know, I was against and think that it is bad idea but as I was driving home tonight and listening to NPR, I actually heard the rebels chanting USA USA USA (and NPR said that they incorrectly thought that it was just us) during a story about it, and I am hoping this works out well and we can help these people form a legitimate government as maybe a small penance for decades and decades of meddling in the region.
12:36 AM on 03/19/2011
Let's see...Wilson in WWI, FDR in WWII, JFK in Vietnam, Clinton in Bosnia, and soon to be Obama in Libya. Who are the war mongers? Wait...I think I'm a democrat now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lash LaRue
12:37 AM on 03/19/2011
You left both Bush's out but continue.
12:41 AM on 03/19/2011
I'm just pointing out the fact that the left's sh@t stinks too. Try not to be a hypocrite!
02:08 PM on 03/19/2011
Oh, OK.

Truman (D) dropped TWO atomic bombs on the Japanese killing hundreds of thousands of innocent men women and children. FDR imprisoning the Japanese here in America in torture camps.

Harry Truman (D) declared_war on 6/25/1950 - the Korean_War

Here's more of Clinton's war mongering - Serbia - 3/24/1999, Sudan & Afghanistan - 8/20/1998, Yugoslavia - 2/94 ~ 9/95, Somalia - 1992 ~ 1994, Haiti - 9/1994, Bosnia - 4/1993, Iraq - January 21, 1993, Iraq - April 9 and April 18 1993, Iraq - June 19 1993, Iraq - June 26 1993, Macedonia - July 9, 1993, Iraq - January 1995, Iraq - Dec. 19, 1998.

Anything else I can post for you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chuck prebys
12:41 AM on 03/19/2011
Are you getting the feeling there isn't a dime's worth of difference between the 2 parties?
Good.
You are learning grasshopper
photo
Never Again
It makes no difference which 1 of us u vote for...
12:33 AM on 03/19/2011
Do we support a NFZ in Bahrain? Without a consistent position on these uprisings, we will continue to support authoritarian governments when it is in our interest to do so.
12:33 AM on 03/19/2011
Where was the international community for operation c a s t l e a d and specially the US?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chuck prebys
12:42 AM on 03/19/2011
We don't talk about the "I" country here.......
It is sacred and off limits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CraiginPhoenix
12:32 AM on 03/19/2011
i am going to predict that Obama may have just sealed his reelection chances.

If bombs start falling and Conservatives are going after Obama instead of Gaddafi, watch out.

The same thing happened with the liberals and Bush during Afghanistan/Early Iraq before things got ugly and the bodies started piling up.

And as long as there are just bombings, there won't be a very high body count on our end.

There aren't enough pacificst hippies to have any sway in either political party, but if we start bombing sites in Libya and showing images of cheering rebels saying USA! USA! USA! - which I actually heard today, all th moderates and independents will pull out their Chinese-made flag and 'proud to be an American' will be blaring and Obama wins big.
photo
CashCrop101
Everything Burns
12:53 AM on 03/19/2011
Conservati­ve here

Going after Obama on Libya na.

Going after Obama on japan o yes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuckles71
My micro-bio says O-Tay!
01:39 AM on 03/19/2011
U.S. President Barack Obama warned Libya's Muammar Gaddafi Friday to comply with U.N. demands for a cease-fire or face consequences that included military action. And of course Obama means it this time. This entire Libya mess just makes Obama and the US look terrible.
Obama can make up his mind, "But let me be clear..." ugh.
12:28 AM on 03/19/2011
Hope & change, HAHAHAHA...You lib's are funny.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lash LaRue
12:29 AM on 03/19/2011
Obama Derangement Syndrome?
02:11 PM on 03/19/2011
Naw, Lash. Just looks like you guys are Branch Barackian cultists.