iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Anti-American Extremists Among Libyan Rebels U.S. Has Vowed To Protect


First Posted: 03/19/11 12:58 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- In 2007, when American combat casualties were spiking in the bloodbath of the Iraq War, an 18-year-old laborer traveled from his home in eastern Libya through Egypt and Syria to join an al Qaeda terrorist cell in Iraq. He gave his name to al Qaeda operatives as Ashraf Ahmad Abu-Bakr al-Hasri. Occupation, he wrote: “Martyr.’’

Abu-Bakr was one of hundreds of foreign fighters who flocked into the killing zones of Iraq to wage war against the “infidels." They came from Saudi Arabia, Syria, Oman, Algeria and other Islamic states. But on a per capita basis, no country sent more young fighters into Iraq to kill Americans than Libya -- and almost all of them came from eastern Libya, the center of the anti-Gaddafi rebellion that the United States and others now have vowed to protect, according to internal al Qaeda documents uncovered by U.S. intelligence.

The informal alliance with violent Islamist extremist elements is a coming-home of sorts for the United States, which initially fought on the same side as the Libyan fighters in Afghanistan in the 1980s, battling the Soviet Union.

According to a cache of al Qaeda documents captured in 2007 by U.S. special operations commandos in Sinjar, Iraq, hundreds of foreign fighters, many of them untrained young Islamic volunteers, poured into Iraq in 2006 and 2007. The documents, called the Sinjar documents, were collected, translated and analyzed at the West Point Counter Terrorism Center. Almost one in five foreign fighters arriving in Iraq came from eastern Libya, many from the city of Darnah. Others came from Surt and Misurata to the west.

On a per capita basis, that’s more than twice as many than came from any other Arabic-speaking country, amounting to what the counter terrorism center called a Libyan “surge" of young men eager to kill Americans.

During 2006 and 2007, a total of 1,468 Americans were killed in combat and 12,524 were badly wounded, according to Pentagon records.

Today, there is little doubt that eastern Libya, like other parts of the Arab world, is experiencing a genuine burst of anti-totalitarian fervor, expressed in demands for political freedom and economic reforms. But there also is a dark history to eastern Libya, which is the home of the Islamic Libyan Fighting Group, an anti-Gaddafi organization officially designated by the State Department as a terrorist organization.

The group was founded by Libyan mujahideen returning in the mid-1990s from Afghanistan, where they had gone to fight the Soviets’ Red Army. Building on a radical Islamist credo, they organized to fight the secular corruption of the Gaddafi regime. In 1996 they nearly succeeded in assassinating Gaddafi by attacking his motorcade with either a bomb or a rocket-propelled grenade which missed its target. The attack led to a severe crackdown by the regime. Many were imprisoned or disappeared, but the CIA still regards the group as one of the many franchises of al Qaeda, including al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which operates in Yemen, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, which is active in Algeria and elsewhere in North Africa.

Eastern Libya has been described by U.S. diplomats as a breeding ground for Islamist extremism. In diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks, the region’s young men were said to have “nothing to lose" by resorting to violence. Sermons in the local mosques are “laced with phraseology urging worshippers to support jihad," one diplomat reported.

U.S. officials declined to discuss the make-up of the anti-Gaddafi forces in eastern Libya, and U.S. intelligence agencies declined to comment publicly. To be sure, extremist elements make up only a portion of the resistance to Gaddafi and have been present in every popular uprising in the region stretching from the Iranian revolution to the Egyptian people’s overthrow of Hosni Mubarak. But others caution that in the chaotic jockeying for power that will ensue, whether or not Gaddafi is forced from power, eastern Libya’s extremist groups will emerge.

“Lingering civil conflict in Libya (certain to happen if Gaddafi clings to power) would create ample ground for radicalization and extremist recruitment," Yasser al-Shimy, an Egyptian diplomat who defected during the last days of the Mubarak regime, wrote recently. Protracted civil conflict “usually induces radicalization and chaos. In other words, Libya might turn into a giant Somalia: a failed state on Egypt's borders with radical groups taking advantage of the mayhem," al-Shimy wrote in the blog, Best Defense. Or as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Friday about the immediate future of Libya: “We don’t know what the outcome will be."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON -- In 2007, when American combat casualties were spiking in the bloodbath of the Iraq War, an 18-year-old laborer traveled from his home in eastern Libya through Egypt and Syria to join an ...
WASHINGTON -- In 2007, when American combat casualties were spiking in the bloodbath of the Iraq War, an 18-year-old laborer traveled from his home in eastern Libya through Egypt and Syria to join an ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,677
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
01:54 PM on 05/03/2011
Imagine that, anti-american sentiment among Arab rebels. Didn't BinLaden get his start as a "freedom fighter" supported by the US?

Let's not make that kind of mistake again. Please?
12:46 AM on 04/26/2011
We need to stop fighting Libya and assisting the rebels. They may be focused on ridding the Gaddafi regime now, but once he's out of the way, the next target will be Americans in the name of Jihad.

When will we realize that a civil war should be fought out between the two parties without foreign intervention. John Stewart Mill was one of the first to say a group who cannot fight for freedom and liberty on their own won't be able to sustain themselves once the oppressor is finally gone.

True self-government, democracy and value of liberty won't be appreciated if there aren't lives lost and if the rebels don't think they are virtues that are worth dying for.

Resolution 2625: "No state or group of states has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other state."

Article 2 of the UN Charter: States that nothing in the charter authorizes intervention into "matters which are essentially within the jurisdiction of any state."

CS
photo
normk
Don't tread on me.
05:01 AM on 04/03/2011
I thought we were protecting civilians? Are armed rebels attacking a soveriegn nation, and it's internationally recognized leader, civilians?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CubnKira
12:21 AM on 04/01/2011
Erratum on my post in Iraq, not Iran.
04:21 AM on 03/30/2011
If USA didn't support JFK killing Israel, they wouldn't be anti-american
08:46 PM on 03/29/2011
Where in the Hades is Huff Post getting this information that Al Qaeda is among the Libyan rebels? Are they getting this information directly from Gaddafi? Are they getting this propaganda from the Fascists/ of America that love dictators, with few exceptions?

It is plain as the nose on your face that,Al Qaeda has little , if any, influence on the rebels..
Al Qaeda has some seasoned fighters and we certainly do no see that in the rag-tag rebels of Libya.

The rebels have the motivation, all they need is 24/7 air support for a few day or artillery that has a greater range than the Gaddafi artillery/rockets/mortars..
08:53 PM on 03/27/2011
we're there for israel and no other reason
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProletarianRenegade
www.socialismconference.org
10:01 PM on 03/24/2011
The Libyans could use the Iraqis' technical expertise and combat experience right about now. I wonder if any Iraqis are returning the favor.
10:44 PM on 03/26/2011
The foreign fighters in Iraq organized into Al Qaeda in Iraq, and although at first, they were allied with the Sunni and were operating out of Al Anbar province, through Iraqi awakening, were expelled by the local Iraqi tribes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jujubees
starch, gum and corn syrup, bees extra
12:42 PM on 03/22/2011
So tell me what exactly is our mission in Libya again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spkninglsh
'Poor' Fridge Owner
04:53 AM on 03/22/2011
I haven't read such an ignorant opinion in quite a while. Using per capita statistics is unecessary when Libya's population is small compared to other Arab nations (roughly 6 million). And like many others they saw the war as an illegal occupation, but I digress.

It's obvious you know nothing about the people of Libya. Ask someone who's been there, they'll tell you they're a great people, who love Westerners of all shapes and sizes. There will always be Anti-Americans everywhere, the American government not its people, but in the new Libya the extremists will have no place at all. Not after the crucial help the US has provided over the last few days, along with France and the UK.

The thousands who've died over the last month are peaceful protesters, all unarmed civilians. While you can call them rebels, that word carries another meaning with it, making them sound militant and unruly, but you must remember that a rebel can be anyone, with or without a gun.

You may think that Libya is split up right now. The rebels versus Gaddafi and his plethora of cronies, benefactors, hired goons and mercenaries, with the Libyan people caught in the middle. But they're not. They're on the rebels side; they are the rebels.

I wish people would open their eyes and see that just like Tunisia and Egypt, it is the unarmed people versus the oppressive state.
photo
subdolphin
I do not read replies...Ever!
03:30 PM on 03/26/2011
Sounds like a job for Team America - World Police !
Good work, keep an eye out for any other nice folks in the world that need rescue!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
polishlogician
51% confident in everything...
01:41 AM on 03/28/2011
you're correct, the Sinjar documents only mention 111 Libyans in Iraq; most ded/captured (59.4%), leaving 44 unaccounted for...

44 unaccounte­d.
http://ins­urgencyres­earchgroup­.wordpress­.com/2008/­08/02/bomb­ers-bank-a­ccounts-an­d-bleedout­-al-qaida%E2%80%99s­-road-in-a­nd-out-of-­iraq/

Then there's the "terrorist­" Islamic Libyan Fighting Group....i­n quotes because there is no record of any attack carried out beyond Libya for this group nor any civilian target.

In November 2007 an open letter to al Qaeda was published, according to The Times (London):

"In November last year Noman Benotman, ex-head of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group which is trying to overthrow the regime of Muammar Gadaffi, published a letter which asked Al-Qaeda to give up all its operations­...adding that ordinary westerners were blameless and should not be attacked."
http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/L­ibyan_Isla­mic_Fighti­ng_Group
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
contempt for the status quo
10:40 PM on 03/21/2011
Ok, Time to leave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
Vegan, not a Murderer
05:24 PM on 03/21/2011
David, its time to retire !
photo
saltysugar
Ecotopia, Ernest Callenbach
10:46 AM on 03/21/2011
This is rich.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JISantiago
02:26 AM on 03/21/2011
This article was posted in The Daily Beast days ago, in which David Wood had wrongly predicted that the UN Security Council will pass the No-Fly zone resolutiton! That was proven wrong and that part of his commentary has been conveniently removed from this posting!

The majority of those who commented on this article in The Daily Beast soundly and roundly shred to pieces David's case against the Libyan rebels.

I don't see the rationale of HP repeating this discredited article on its website.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JISantiago
02:42 AM on 03/21/2011
Correction:

The first para should read:
This article was posted in The Daily Beast days ago, in which David Wood had wrongly predicted that the UN Security Council will NOT pass the No-Fly zone resolutito­n!
10:11 AM on 03/21/2011
Ok, he makes a wrong prediction before (as if none of us has never made one) and all of the sudden we should distance ourselves from whatever he puts forward? The logic seem beyond my pay-grade.
03:06 PM on 03/21/2011
I have a thought--if you are calling someone a liar, wouldn't it be fair to provide proof?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JISantiago
06:13 PM on 03/21/2011
I called no one a liar. The point I was making is that Mr Wood is flawed in his judgement and that his whole analysis was based not on facts but on presupposition.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Proud2BIndy
Forget bipartisan, give us NON-partisan.
11:41 PM on 03/20/2011
So what? The tea b@ggers are chalk full of radical extremists hellbent on destroying America from within and without and yet they are still protected by our Constitution. In other words, America haters persist in every corner of the world. Does that mean we shouldn't protect the other 80-90% that aren't?