iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Methodists Shun The Bottle During Alcohol-Free Lent

First Posted: 03/24/2011 10:28 am EDT Updated: 05/25/2011 7:40 pm EDT

By Clayton McCleskey
Religion News Service

(RNS) The Rev. James Howell knew he had a problem on his hands when several teenagers arrived at a church dance drunk and had to be taken from the church by ambulance for treatment for alcohol poisoning.

Starting in 2009, he urged his flock at Myers Park United Methodist Church in Charlotte, N.C., to give up drinking for Lent and donate the money they would have spent on booze to a "spirit fund."

To date, Myers Park has raised more than $34,000 for local substance abuse programs, and seven parishioners have sought treatment for alcoholism.

"It isn't that alcohol in and of itself is bad; Jesus drank wine," he said. "We emphasize the role it plays in our lives."

Part of that discussion, Howell and others have found, involves acknowledging a fact that some Methodists prefer not to talk about: some Methodists drink -- even if many don't like to admit it.

From teetotaling Baptists to Episcopalians who uncork champagne in the parish hall, what to do with the bottle can be a tricky question for religious groups to answer -- especially during holy periods or holidays.

There are no rules on alcohol for Catholics during Lent, although Ash Wednesday and Good Friday are mandatory days of penance and abstinence. Muslims -- those who drink at all -- are called to abstain from alcohol during Ramadan. But to celebrate Purim, Jews are encouraged to actually get silly drunk, and what Christmas Eve would be complete without spiked eggnog?

Unlike prohibition-minded Mormons or Catholics who belly up to the bar on St. Patrick's Day, Methodists -- the nation's second-largest Protestant denomination -- have a more ambiguous stance. Now, the denomination's General Board of Church and Society is following Howell's lead and is pushing a churchwide Alcohol Free Lent campaign.

The 7.8 million-member UMC has long had a love/hate relationship with alcohol. For decades the church -- at least officially -- strongly supported temperance. The father and son who founded the Welch's grape juice company weren't only good Methodists, but also savvy businessmen who saw a huge market in pushing juice for Communion to temperance-minded churches.

In the years since, Methodists have trended toward a more liberal stance. While the UMC still encourages abstinence, in 2008 the church's Social Principles were revised to allow for "judicious use with deliberate and intentional restraint, with Scripture as a guide."

The result has been a somewhat uneasy relationship between Methodists and the bottle.

"We are very uncomfortable acknowledging that Methodists drink," said the Rev. Cynthia Abrams, who works on alcohol, addictions and health care issues for the Washington-based social policy agency.

"This is a campaign that opens the doors to conversation, a way to talk about alcohol, about drinking, its impact on young people, on our own perspectives and to dialogue about what that means for us as a church today."

Founded in 18th-century England by John Wesley, Methodism grew rapidly among working-class miners and factory workers who often drank heavily. In response, Methodism staked out a position of temperance early in its history, explained historian Ted Campbell of Southern
Methodist University's Perkins School of Theology.

"The General Rules of 1743 ruled out buying or drinking 'spirituous liquors' except in cases of extreme necessity, meaning medicinal use," Campbell said. "It was not total abstinence, but abstinence from the hard stuff, whiskey and gin in particular."

After the Civil War, as Methodism expanded in the United States, Methodists -- women especially -- began to steer the denomination toward a harder line as the temperance movement gained steam. And by the early 20th century, the church endorsed prohibition and required Methodist ministers to pledge abstinence from alcohol. It wasn't until the 1950s and '60s that the church began to soften its stance.

For some conservatives, the churchwide Alcohol Free Lent campaign is a welcome reminder of the Methodists' temperance heritage -- "a brief flicker of remembrance of those origins," said Mark Tooley, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy and author of Taking Back the United Methodist Church.

"For several decades the board has mostly neglected its call, so it's positive that at least during Lent they are upholding that," said Tooley, whose Washington-based institute is a frequent critic of the General Board of Church and Society.

The issue is still a rallying cry for conservatives, who recently lost a legal fight to make the Church and Society agency adhere to its charter and focus exclusively on alcohol and temperance issues.

But more than a simple say-no-to-booze campaign, Alcohol Free Lent is about reflection, said Abrams. "Somehow there is this perspective that because the church mentions abstinence we are saying people cannot drink," she explained.

That's not the case. Instead, the campaign seeks to encourage an open dialogue on a touchy subject.

And that, Abrams said, "is a very Methodist approach."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:28 AM on 04/16/2011
I was born and raised a Methodist. I never drink.
08:43 PM on 04/01/2011
I think this is great. Alcohol has caused such unimaginable suffering to mankind this seems a good exercise....While I don't advocate returning to prohibition, I am in my fifties and often have wondered how "The Church" (particularly the more conservative, evangelical types of which I am not a member) has over the years pretty much stopped talking about the dangers of alcohol abuse. I am also mystified about how in the past couple of decades the Christian Right has seemed to have become absolutely obsessed with homosexuals and stopped talking about booze entirely. Maybe they are all drinking now. But in my view when they used to focus the evils of the temptation of the bottle when I was younger, they were zeroing in a a topic that is more relevant to the betterment of society than their hate-mongering against gays. Addiction and abuse has harmed so many, including innocent children who are the "collateral damage" of substance abuse. I am a straight married woman, but I would love to see the Christian Right and other evangelicals get back to "basics" by talking about addiction and abuse of drugs/alcohol and get over their obsession with what consenting adults do behind closed doors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDMac
It's called sarcasm, Genius.
10:12 AM on 03/31/2011
I'm a life-long United Methodist. I don't get drunk, but I have more than the occasional drink. And I swear, too (but would use the F word 1000 times before I said GD or JC). And I have a sense of humor which can border on the raunchy in the best (or worst?) of times.

Just because we're Christians doesn't mean we have to check our personalities at the door. The UMC is where I hang my hat, but my faith and my life is between me and God.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
11:31 AM on 03/25/2011
in 2008 the church's Social Principles were revised to allow for "judicious use with deliberate and intentional restraint, with Scripture as a guide."

When I was a Methodist (before 1966) the rule was- Just Say No. The days of unfermented grape juice for communion may be gone but they are not forgotten.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:28 AM on 04/16/2011
We still use grape juice.
05:26 PM on 03/24/2011
I belong to a Methodist denominationwhich has repeatedly broken with mainline Methodist denominations over issues of "holiness", both in the theological and behavioral definitions. My mother is a United Methodist pastor, and after my conversion to a more Biblically-precise form of the Christian faith (while I was a clergy member of a universalist-leaning denomination), I couldn't accept her invitation to be received into the UMC. My issue was not alcohol, but such other doctrines as open communion, infant baptism, etc.

And yes, even the issue of women pastors. My denomination ordains women as evangelists, but not to the pastorate. Since my conversion to Biblically-defined Christianity, I have never preached to or taught a mixed audience in a church. (I serve as a nursing home chaplain, defined by my bishop as an evangelistic activity and not a pastorate.) I'm practicing full disclosure here, because every time I talk about my ministry here at HuffPo, the thread gets sidetracked on this issue. ;)

The mainline United Methodist Church would be unrecognizable not just to the Wesleys and the circuit riders, but to Methodists of a few decades ago. The UMC was once slightly to the right of, for instance, the Presbyterian Church USA and the Episcopal Church, but it's catching up quickly to the other liberal denominations.

Bad news for us evangelical Methodists, perhaps good news for most HuffPo readers. But I think that if Francis Asbury (among other Methodist pioneers) were here, he'd see it our way.
11:01 AM on 03/25/2011
I respectfully disagree with you. What isn't progressive about the Social Principals? John Wesley was largely into social justice, grace, and reading the Bible with the quadrilateral (bringing experience and reason is progressive). Open Communion is a beautiful thing because it meets everyone where they are at and brings them to the table. Infant baptisms are more traditional, but there is nothing better than coming together as a congregation and pledging to help that child grow in the way of God.
01:52 PM on 03/25/2011
My only concern with the Social Gospel is that in these modern times, it seems that the mainline churches choose to emphasize "social" more than "gospel".

It's important to bring a child into the congregation to be raised in the Christian faith; I'd just call it something different. Believer's baptism is the Biblical pattern, but I perform baby blessings/dedications with great enthusiasm because, working in a nursing home, I don't get to do them very often! (And I could never do them in a church building, because that's a role for the pastor, and I'm excluded for gender reasons.)

On the topic of Communion, I hold to a members-only position because in 1 Corinthians 11, Paul sets the order of service for Communion, including severe warnings about receiving the ordinance "unworthily", which in context excludes non-believers and those in a state of flagrant personal sin. As Paul states that taking Communion in these conditions leads to sickness and death, the safest pattern is members-only Communion in a church which practices Biblical church discipline.

However, I work with the sick, aged and dying. I'm looser on the "closed Communion" issue in practice than in theory. I believe in "viaticum" -- bread for the journey to the afterlife -- to make the process of dying more comfortable. But if I led a church, I'd adhere to the 1 Corinthians 11 standard.

But then again, I wouldn't ever pastor a church (being female), so that's a moot point. *wink*
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:32 AM on 04/16/2011
Religion and politics are frequently mutually opposed in terms of what is good for society. Conservative Methodists such as myself fight for social justice but oppose drinking.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SubgeniusMustHaveSlack
Snowboarder, vegetarian, organic gardener.
04:56 PM on 03/24/2011
mark tooley and the "Institute for Religion and Democracy" are non-Methodist, radical right wing and cynically political "think tank" financed majorly by the Scaife Family Trust. Their goal is to destroy the progressive Protestant denominations by using wedge issues to split up the denominations into schisms divided along political lines. Giving this repellent group any credibility by quoting them is incredibly irresponsible.

FYI- As the son of a liberal Methodist Minister, we never thought once of legitimizing alcohol consumption.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:14 PM on 04/06/2011
There is no doubt religion is under attack in this country by organized elements. Thank you for your confirmation of this.